| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167153179 by Glassman @ 2025-06-03 21:23 | 1 | 2025-06-03 22:30 | Mazda05 ♦534 | Greatings. What is the reason for this reverting? What is the editing conflict? I don't observe a single comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166614563 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166616744. How is this consistent with the DWG resolution https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/W... |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 00:45 | Mazda05 ♦534 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/districts-in-crimea/130964. I ask you to cancel this rollback as soon as possible, as well as henceforth carefully deal with complaints sent to DWG. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 18:47 | Glassman | As the block on your account says, please follow the DWG guidelines for edits in Crimea. Looking at your tags, let me suggest that you add them to openhistoricalmap.org. If you are interested in OHM, I can connect you with one of the founders. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-05 03:39 | Mazda05 ♦534 | As the post says, boundary=historic have been retained as the new districts were formed based on the boundaries of the old ones, and the old boundaries have been changed since 2014 and need to be rechecked against the cadastre when it is opened. What does openhistoricalmap.org have to do with this? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-05 05:13 | Mazda05 ♦534 | All changes were made strictly in accordance with https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea. Which was communicated to you and detailed as much as possible in the topic. I have not received any specifics from you regarding this. If you have any remarks, pleas... | |
| 161880756 by Glassman @ 2025-01-29 03:27 | 1 | 2025-02-11 09:36 | paradx ♦1 | thanks for not following blindly with this stupidity |
| 161993352 by Glassman @ 2025-01-31 21:44 | 1 | 2025-02-04 08:01 | nickvet419 ♦91 | could be changed once the USGS national map is updated. https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ |
| 2 | 2025-02-04 14:42 | Glassman | nickvet419 please read the comments in the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 for a better understanding of how the community views this matter. | |
| 161585226 by Glassman @ 2025-01-21 03:48 | 1 | 2025-01-21 06:27 | Xanadu_Contractor ♦21 | https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-executive-order-gulf-mexico"(b) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior shall, consistent with 43 U.... |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 15:23 | iandees ♦723 | Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 | |
| 160804382 by Glassman @ 2024-12-30 18:46 | 1 | 2024-12-31 13:40 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,039 | Looks like some railway tags were left on an orchard relation line:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479388316 |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 17:23 | Glassman | Looks like AwFi removed those tags. I may have to revisit the revert perl script to see why it doesn't remove everything. Thanks for the heads up. | |
| 158016362 by Glassman @ 2024-10-17 16:17 | 1 | 2024-11-05 11:26 | Ropino ♦386 | Hi,please check/correct:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24525128"highway=West Valley View Trail" ? |
| 2 | 2024-11-05 15:37 | Glassman | The link you gave is in Sweden. What exactly needs correcting? | |
| 3 | 2024-11-05 15:55 | Ropino ♦386 | Sorry, there was a copy+paste-mistake:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245251285 | |
| 4 | 2024-11-05 16:45 | Glassman | Thanks for finding my mistake. Fixed | |
| 158190248 by Glassman @ 2024-10-21 23:03 | 1 | 2024-10-22 21:24 | Fen <3 ♦2 | Hi Glassman!I am new to this and I have a question! The address tag currently lists "119;315" should the 315 be removed? if not, what is its purpose? Thanks and have a wonderful day!happy mapping - Fen |
| 2 | 2024-10-22 22:02 | Glassman | Yep - 315 should be removed. My mistake. I copied the node over to the building and then merged the node with the building. Should have caught that.Fixed now. Thanks for finding it. | |
| 157817772 by Glassman @ 2024-10-13 02:01 | 1 | 2024-10-13 21:11 | Udarian ♦397 | same issue on this changeset as in changeset 157817730. |
| 2 | 2024-10-14 18:18 | Glassman | fixed | |
| 157817750 by Glassman @ 2024-10-13 01:59 | 1 | 2024-10-13 21:12 | Udarian ♦397 | same issue on this changeset as in changeset 157817730. |
| 2 | 2024-10-14 18:14 | Glassman | Fixed | |
| 157817730 by Glassman @ 2024-10-13 01:57 | 1 | 2024-10-13 06:46 | Udarian ♦397 | this added quite a few nodes that aren't connected to any way without any tags and I don't know if it's because of this commit but the multipolygon for lake mead (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1275469) has an unenclosed part. I understand this had to happen because of the van... |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 17:23 | Glassman | I fixed what appeared to be wrong. Not sure about where the water level should be with Lake Mead changing so much in the last few years. But it matches Bing imagery for now. | |
| 150730858 by Glassman @ 2024-05-01 00:19 | 1 | 2024-05-01 06:39 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,039 | Good catch. Make sure you report this golf vandal to DWG. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730858 |
| 147197831 by Glassman @ 2024-02-08 01:20 | 1 | 2024-02-08 06:09 | arasay756 ♦1 | Appreciated the notes, thank you! |
| 142414826 by Glassman @ 2023-10-11 00:30 | 1 | 2023-10-11 16:13 | Mark van Tinteren ♦1 | Fair bit on the house but the service road does match the imagery or will in the near future it's a bit of odd one there's two parallel easements one paved one as of yet unpaved imagery is not yet up to date (It's my driveway / easement) |
| 2 | 2023-10-11 19:58 | Glassman | Sorry about that. I used our imagery and also looked at it on the county's imagery. I moved the service road back to where you had originally placed it. Take a look now. Feel free to update it. | |
| 138311936 by Glassman @ 2023-07-09 21:11 | 1 | 2023-07-10 08:08 | stevea ♦304 | Cool! |
| 132699551 by Glassman @ 2023-02-18 00:35 | 1 | 2023-04-21 09:11 | citrula ♦840 | Hello, was marking this section of Eaglemont Drive as a barrier in error? |
| 2 | 2023-04-21 16:30 | Glassman | I remember there being a barrier system but this doesn't look right. I'm traveling right now but when I get back in early May I'll verify and correct it. Just to note - the road does end and because the nearby golf course is under new development this area is not used. | |
| 133606682 by Glassman @ 2023-03-13 02:25 | 1 | 2023-03-13 03:30 | TheOutpost ♦26 | Are you manually tracing imagery for this? PS - Good to see you! |
| 2 | 2023-03-13 05:27 | Glassman | On smaller glaciers I'm using the JOSM magic wand plugin. On larger glaciers, Like Borealis, I'm using a combination of the magic wand and manual edits to update. I was hoping to have Skagit County done by Tuesday evening for the PSQGIS monthly meeting. https://www.meetup.com/puget-sou... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-13 11:27 | TheOutpost ♦26 | I haven’t seen any articles.Magic wand tool looks very powerful. No wonder you were the top OSM contributor for the day. Very cool! | |
| 4 | 2023-03-13 16:40 | Glassman | I was probably on top because everyone else took the day off!Check out https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/01/us/washington-hinman-glacier-disappear-climate/index.html | |
| 131524609 by Glassman @ 2023-01-20 22:02 | 1 | 2023-01-23 11:05 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Please check this area, it doesn't have any valid tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133922351Here the geometry looks really weird:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15343111 |
| 2 | 2023-01-24 21:31 | Glassman | Thanks for catching the missing tags which is now corrected. The weird geometry is what the state has. I agree that it looks like a mistake but it is exactly what the state shows. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-24 21:33 | Glassman | I added the off trust lands because of the residential lands off of Rutsatz Road. There was no Whatcom county records of what it was nor did Bing Street Side show any signs. When I looked at the off trust lands that's where I discovered it was part of the Nooksack reservation | |
| 124132542 by Glassman @ 2022-07-27 10:07 | 1 | 2023-01-11 19:30 | Josef73 ♦272 | Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2023-01-11 20:06 | Glassman | fixed - The original opening hours were from an SEO. I got the current ones from their website | |
| 131126213 by Glassman @ 2023-01-11 01:10 | 1 | 2023-01-11 01:11 | Glassman | Thanks for the quick response. It's Done See -https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131126213#map |
| 129716314 by Glassman @ 2022-12-04 19:48 | 1 | 2022-12-05 00:23 | archpdx ♦542 | It looks like they removed it again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119452780 |
| 2 | 2022-12-05 01:26 | Glassman | Thanks - I've asked DWG to place a block on the user until they respond. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-05 01:44 | coopercovelo ♦4 | I will flag the private property on the path set. Also, the path is in an area that is being restored to a natural area as part of the la center bottoms. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-05 03:41 | Glassman | Thanks for getting back to me. I was concerned when I saw that Strava showed high activity on the trail plus it was visible in imagery - or at least parts of it was. Who is doing the restoration? Normally I see this with government held lands not private property. I agree that the trail should be re... | |
| 5 | 2022-12-05 18:02 | coopercovelo ♦4 | There are several things all happening in this area. The restoration is on county owned Legacy Lands, and is part of the McCormick Creek Restoration project (Link Below), and is being performed by Clark PUD as I understand it. from NW lacenter road, a path has formed, but crosses private property ... | |
| 122926907 by Glassman @ 2022-06-27 20:11 | 1 | 2022-07-03 12:40 | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,the relations 10704288, 10704289 and 10704290 are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created these useless relations despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not tel... |
| 2 | 2022-07-03 15:50 | Glassman | Sorry about that - I must have overlooked the validation message. The relations should be gone now.To fix in JOSM, just use the File->Download object to download the relation. Then delete the empty relation and upload. I'll try to be more vigilant in the future. | |
| 116167288 by Glassman @ 2022-01-14 23:07 | 1 | 2022-02-26 04:20 | markkerrigan ♦11 | did you intend to delete the Bay View State Park Campground multipolygon? |
| 2 | 2022-02-26 17:33 | Glassman | The campsite polygon is still there just not as an inner polygon to the park since it's part of the park. Tagging it as an inner polygon would indicate that it's excluded from Bay View State Park. I also removed the address from the polygon since the entire park uses the address. ... | |
| 12708677 by Glassman @ 2012-08-13 01:28 | 1 | 2022-01-01 17:23 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175820969/historyHi Glassman,Happy New Year!Why did you write all the keys with capslock on?See this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#How_to_name_new_tagsMarc. |
| 2 | 2022-01-01 20:23 | Glassman | It's what I love about OSM - any tag you like :-) All fixed now. | |
| 110631811 by Glassman @ 2021-09-02 17:09 | 1 | 2021-09-11 13:23 | Hedaja ♦134 | HiI just stumbled across this interesting piece of road in a video (https://youtu.be/at6pjzFKfzs?t=1320)I saw someone attempted to split the road into two seperate ones. I think it would make sense here because they are physically separated (pillars of the monorail)Don't you think this wo... |
| 2 | 2021-09-11 22:25 | Glassman | I tend to agree that it needs splitting into two ways. There were multiple problems with the new users attempt to split 5th avenue under the monorail so it made sense to revert. But as you can see from the video, the driver was able to change lanes from the right side of the monorail to the left... | |
| 3 | 2021-09-12 16:57 | Hedaja ♦134 | I'd suggest splitting up 5th Ave between Denny Way and Olive Way. That's from what I can see is where the pillars separate the lanes. Technically you only partially have a physical separation but combined with the being prohibited to cross the line, it should be sufficient to declare it tw... | |
| 107105026 by Glassman @ 2021-06-28 18:38 | 1 | 2021-06-29 17:14 | Hans Thompson ♦106 | Thanks Glassman. |
| 2 | 2021-06-29 18:30 | Glassman | I'd like to end the routes at wharfs but DOT says the routes end at city limits of Palmer and Talkeetna. I plan to work on the Aleutian Islands but there it's even more confusing, I think it ends in Unalaska but on the opposite side of the city from there the ferry docks. From imagery,... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-29 18:59 | Hans Thompson ♦106 | I wouldn't worry about it. The infrastructure mostly isn't there. Our reps will work hard to get the $$$$ for the ports now that the map has been made. :) It does look like the highway goes over land on Fire Island the island directly to the west of Anchorage in Cook Inlet. Could yo... | |
| 4 | 2021-06-29 19:26 | Glassman | Thanks for catching that big mistake. Fixed. | |
| 37129567 by Glassman @ 2016-02-10 17:10 | 1 | 2021-04-08 18:07 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,574 | I changed Cemetry to Cemetery as it seems a clear typo (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397127977/history )Hopefully that is not some mistake |
| 2 | 2021-04-09 02:00 | Glassman | I believe it was a typo. Thanks for fixing | |
| 99541188 by Glassman @ 2021-02-18 17:54 | 1 | 2021-02-20 09:50 | G1asshouse ♦44 | I disagree with this change. I believe the error is on Wikidata's side and not OSM's side.Yes, Q85812269 links to the Wikipedia article yet Q30253741 seems to hold more relevant information. I believe there are duplicate Wikidata entries and that the two entries need to be combined int... |
| 2 | 2021-02-20 15:27 | Glassman | Q30253741 is an education institute while Q85812269 is a building. Since the outline is of a building I chose it. Feel free to change the wikidata tag if you feel strongly about it. It you do, the wikipedia article also needs to be remove since the two don't match. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-20 22:01 | G1asshouse ♦44 | I see. Well, I will just be walking through the "I may be mistaken" door now. Thank you for taking the time to explain. | |
| 97617092 by Glassman @ 2021-01-16 19:27 | 1 | 2021-01-16 19:31 | WeChat ♦6 | Hi Glassman,may you please be so kind to use a dedicated account for your NHD imports?(and use a different changeset comment for this very changeset!) |
| 2 | 2021-01-16 19:59 | Glassman | Yes, I should have added in the farmland and meadow that I added. BTW - This isn't so much an import but a tracing of NHD background layer in an area I'm very familiar with.Let me know if you have concerns | |
| 93628727 by Glassman @ 2020-11-05 23:30 | 1 | 2020-11-06 07:33 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦722 | Hi GlassmanYou mean CS 93616781, right? |
| 2 | 2020-11-06 14:35 | Glassman | Yes - it should have been 93616781. Thanks for catching that. | |
| 91163182 by Glassman @ 2020-09-19 23:30 | 1 | 2020-09-20 23:38 | WrenchGremlin ♦1 | The street sign on West Lake Sammamish parkway at the North Rosemont entrance states that this is a "Private Road"https://www.google.com/maps/place/1220+West+Lake+Sammamish+Pkwy+NE,+Bellevue,+WA+98008/@47.6209021,-122.0935661,3a,44.5y,239.66h,85.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLjgx64bN2woRJ-FyV6... |
| 90493784 by Glassman @ 2020-09-06 21:23 | 1 | 2020-09-07 02:41 | stevea ♦304 | My friend in the great Pacific Northwest (Glassman), I see you have run in to Fluffy89502 edits like this, even local to me (a ways from you, that's fine). So far away that you correct it shows how egregious is this users mapping, in fact I an hour ago cleaned up more of the natural=heath mess... |
| 2 | 2020-09-07 06:23 | TheAdventurer64 ♦107 | I’ve had run ins with them before. They constantly retag trunks into motorways, and other things. I’ll report them to the Data Working Group to make sure that someone does something about this vandal. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-07 07:23 | stevea ♦304 | Thank you. You might want to mention DWG Ticket # 2020072410000029 in which I complained about him around the end of July. | |
| 86421458 by Glassman @ 2020-06-09 18:08 | 1 | 2020-06-09 20:38 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | Why? The precinct was, and still is, abandoned. I provided a source in the changeset comment. |
| 2 | 2020-06-09 21:02 | Glassman | It appears that it is tempy situation which isn't appropriate for mapping in OSM. As for the source, I saw similar news reports. Before reverting, I did consult with other mappers in the area and they agreed with reverting. | |
| 3 | 2020-06-09 21:04 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | I'm not a frequent editor, and you clearly are, so I'm not going to fight you on this one. But do you have a source on it being temporary? | |
| 4 | 2020-06-09 22:31 | Glassman | Take a look at https://spdblotter.seattle.gov/2020/06/08/spd-re-opening-streets-around-east-precinct/. While I agree it could be just propaganda, I suspect they plan to stay keep the location. If the city follows though on budget cuts, the last thing they need is to move to a new building. | |
| 5 | 2020-06-09 23:13 | Glassman | Looks like two more mappers have made the building abandoned again. I'm going to leave it for a few days. If and when the police move back in it can be corrected then. | |
| 6 | 2020-06-09 23:46 | phidauex ♦194 | "Abandoned" to me implies that no one holds a lease to the property, not just that someone isn't currently using it. I wouldn't say someone on vacation has abandoned their home, for instance.I'm supportive of the intent to map the "live" situation of the protes... | |
| 7 | 2020-06-10 00:10 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | I'm not well-versed in searching OSM, so I don't know how to check for the actual prevalence of temporary features/tags, but there is a good amount of guidance on the wiki about how to tag them, and no guidance that I can find that discourages doing so. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/in... | |
| 8 | 2020-06-10 01:03 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | Both phidauex and Glassman have pointed out <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features> in the comments of <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86421406>. I missed that -- most of the wiki search results for 'temporary... | |
| 86421406 by Glassman @ 2020-06-09 18:07 | 1 | 2020-06-09 23:17 | grnr ♦2 | Any reasoning for the revert? |
| 2 | 2020-06-09 23:29 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | Seconding that question. The discussion in <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86421458> (east precinct abandoned tag) may be relevant here. | |
| 3 | 2020-06-09 23:44 | Glassman | Those changesets added a landuse=military. Not appropriate or accurate. AFAIK, we have no tag to describe the area as it is now. Again, we don't tag temporary features. While this may last days or even a few weeks, it's still just temporary. As a contrast, look at DC where the 16th street ... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-09 23:52 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | How about removing the inappropriate landuse tag, then, rather than the entire feature? This is no less temporary than the east precinct being abandoned. | |
| 5 | 2020-06-09 23:57 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | Also, re: "we don't tag temporary features" -- can you please cite the wiki on this? I can't find any guideline to that effect. | |
| 6 | 2020-06-10 00:23 | phidauex ♦194 | It is in the Good Practice section: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_featuresThe main issue is that, while the OSM front page updates quite quickly, most major data consumers of OSM maps update on a weekly or even monthly basis, so if s... | |
| 7 | 2020-06-10 00:33 | Kevin Wallace ♦14 | Protestors are pretty clear that they expect to stay. "Every day" has been a consistent chant, both before and after the establishment of the autonomous zone. It's been almost 24 hours and neither SPD nor the city has indicated that they plan to intervene. The City is providing san... | |
| 8 | 2020-06-10 00:48 | Glassman | To Kevin's question about not mapping temporary feature. The wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features covers the question. | |
| 78698720 by Glassman @ 2019-12-20 20:45 | 1 | 2019-12-31 06:33 | Carnildo ♦905 | The Wikidata item you linked to is about the tribe, not the reservation. |
| 2 | 2020-01-01 00:52 | Glassman | Wikipedia doesn't have a article on the reservation. Both the one I picked or "Spokane People" refer to the reservation. I just picked one. Feel free to change it if you thing "Spokane People" is a better choice. I have reached out to a friend that works for a nearby tri... | |
| 73727672 by Glassman @ 2019-08-25 22:17 | 1 | 2019-08-27 07:52 | Carnildo ♦905 | Could you please do your cleanup in smaller pieces? It makes it easier to fix when you delete something (such as National Forest Development Road 2291) that you shouldn't have. |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 17:54 | Glassman | The USFS no longer has a road there. Plus the existing road was listed as residential. I don't want someone getting stranded there because we showed it suitable for the average sedan. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/737276... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 18:37 | Carnildo ♦905 | What's your source for the road not being there? I've driven or hiked on quite a few roads (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13920613 and the surrounding tracks) that the Forest Service shows as not being there.Judging from the surface quality shown in the Esri Clarity imager... | |
| 71079662 by Glassman @ 2019-06-09 19:43 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:44 | Carnildo ♦905 | Your aim seems to have been a bit off here. ARCpoint Labs is one building further south than where you placed it. |
| 71034818 by Glassman @ 2019-06-07 18:40 | 1 | 2019-06-07 22:38 | Carnildo ♦905 | The section of Conklin Road you added looks pretty "former" to me. If you switch over to Esri World Imagery (a few months older than DigitalGlobe Premium, but much sharper), you'll see a fallen log that looks like it's been there for a while, and a couple of trees that are proba... |
| 2 | 2019-06-07 23:20 | Glassman | ESRI helps a lot - I see the log but only a pixelated version of it in DG Premium. I removed the section. | |
| 70783559 by Glassman @ 2019-05-30 19:03 | 1 | 2019-05-31 05:29 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,388 | Thanks for correcting several issues of the following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70753557 |
| 68189906 by Glassman @ 2019-03-15 21:17 | 1 | 2019-03-16 07:28 | Carnildo ♦905 | You sure about that curve on Portola Court? The old, straight road looks like a better match to the Bing and Esri imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-03-16 15:10 | Glassman | Your right - fixed | |
| 33099933 by Glassman @ 2015-08-04 14:43 | 1 | 2019-01-29 13:25 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hi clifford,i found a lonely boundary inner as sole part of a multipolygon, that lost its outer in v2, when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38226181 below took on a life of its own for Beulah, it appears.can you verify that the inner still belongs together with the above outer and that i d... |
| 2 | 2019-01-29 20:53 | Glassman | My only involvement was adding level crossings to rail & road crossings. Apparently I added to the problem by adding a level crossing to where the rail, road and admin boundary were connected. I unconnect the admin boundary from the road. Your fix of the multipolygon looks good. | |
| 37033103 by Glassman @ 2016-02-05 23:35 | 1 | 2019-01-25 05:56 | JesseFTW ♦153 | How did you determine the park boundary? |
| 44826274 by Glassman @ 2017-01-01 16:58 | 1 | 2018-11-30 12:30 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | Hi again Clifford,I am working on adding the giant Alaska Maritime NWR and came across your work where yu added Unimak Island as part of the Izembek NWR. Indeed, the shapefile you gave me a while ago for Izemebek does include Unimak Island. However, my shapefile for the Alaska Maritime NWR include... |
| 2 | 2018-11-30 19:29 | Glassman | Dave - the name was there when I added the NWR. It looks like it should be named Umnak Island. I'm happy to fix - if you can confirm that is the name you have. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-01 01:26 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | It's not the name of the island I'm asking about. It's the name of the refuge.My shapefile for the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge is a perfect copy of your boundary for the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge on Unimak Island. Which is correct, Izembek or Alaska Maritime? | |
| 4 | 2018-12-01 02:59 | Glassman | My shapefile has Unimak Island shown as Izembek NWR Complex, org name Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge. The two areas NE of Unimak Island show an org name of Izembek National Wildlife Refuge. I think we could change Unimak Island to Alaska Maritime... Do you want me to make the change? And were you i... | |
| 5 | 2018-12-01 03:13 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | Thanks Cliff.I think Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge is the correct name. I can change it easily as I'm mapping in that area already. My town Homer, got some heavy shaking but no major damage. I didn't feel a thing because since I retired I've been living in Thailand duri... | |
| 63327889 by Glassman @ 2018-10-08 23:55 | 1 | 2018-10-09 00:13 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | Thanks! |
| 60590079 by Glassman @ 2018-07-10 21:31 | 1 | 2018-07-11 15:50 | Omnific ♦202 | Looks like the whole of Gala Way got accidentally tagged as one way. Went ahead and fixed it. |
| 2 | 2018-07-11 16:45 | Glassman | Thanks - I missed that adding the roundabout | |
| 59816842 by Glassman @ 2018-06-13 16:51 | 1 | 2018-06-13 21:14 | Omnific ♦202 | Hey, Sunwood Apartments are listed as a locksmith shop still. |
| 2 | 2018-06-13 21:45 | Glassman | thanks - I missed that tag | |
| 45608038 by Glassman @ 2017-01-29 00:45 | 1 | 2018-05-23 22:34 | Carnildo ♦905 | And here we see the hazards of using sans-serif fonts. That was a capital 'i' in the street name, not a lowercase 'L'. |
| 56506679 by Glassman @ 2018-02-20 00:18 | 1 | 2018-02-20 07:19 | Carnildo ♦905 | Mind being a little less eager with the chainsaw? One of the two logging roads you deleted here was highly visible in the Esri "Clarity" imagery. (The other looked like it was only traversible on foot, if that.) |
| 56231064 by Glassman @ 2018-02-10 00:38 | 1 | 2018-02-10 09:30 | Carnildo ♦905 | Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of logging roads and at least one driveway, rather than re-tagging them as tracks and service roads? |
| 55535559 by Glassman @ 2018-01-17 23:06 | 1 | 2018-02-09 21:48 | PursuitofMappiness ♦1 | Was the name deleted on purpose? |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 21:52 | Glassman | As far as I know, there was never a name on the island. History doesn't show one. If the island has a name it can easily be added. My purpose in adding the inner polygon was to correct the data. | |
| 55691311 by Glassman @ 2018-01-23 17:38 | 1 | 2018-01-24 15:39 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Hi Glassman,Thanks for reverting these SEO hotel deletions.I see here that there appears to be a retail outlet, Mattress (aagh, a Monty Python sketch) Superstore.Would this be a general retail/shared building so that the Best Western Plus name= I see here does not apply to the entire building?... |
| 2 | 2018-01-24 15:56 | Glassman | I have reached out to 1) Bestwestern and informed them of the vandalism and asked them to have their vendor stop and 2) am attempting to contact the SEO firm - yes I know who it is - to get them to follow our practices. While I've visited that area, I don't really know much about the ... | |
| 53719840 by Glassman @ 2017-11-12 18:05 | 1 | 2017-11-12 22:06 | Nakaner ♦3,142 | Hi Glassmann,please do not use your normal OSM account if you do imports. Create a dedicated import account instead. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesBest regardsMichael |
| 2 | 2017-11-12 23:47 | Glassman | Michael - thanks for the reminder. I know better. | |
| 53368400 by Glassman @ 2017-10-30 13:51 | 1 | 2017-10-30 19:13 | datamongers ♦55 | Old faithful has a variable interval, it tends to be either 65 or 91 minutes, depending on the duration of the previous eruption. This change isn't wrong, but it's also not strictly right. But i don't think we really have the tagging semantics for the correct value. |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 00:16 | Glassman | I changed the interval based on what I read in the visitors center. In reality, the interval does very so I was surprised that it was in OSM. In my younger days the timing varied only a few minutes, but now it's within a 20 minutes window. My guess is it will have more variation as time goes on... | |
| 41515679 by Glassman @ 2016-08-17 16:20 | 1 | 2017-08-23 07:39 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review typo highway="Mule Deer Lane":https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13910599 |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 14:36 | Glassman | I'm not seeing the typo. Can you point it out? Mule Deer Lane is what the county has in its records. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-23 14:41 | GerdP ♦2,751 | So I guess you meant name=* instead of highway=* | |
| 4 | 2017-08-23 16:22 | Glassman | Thanks - I missed that. Everything value looked right - its fixed now | |
| 49410335 by Glassman @ 2017-06-09 23:51 | 1 | 2017-06-09 23:52 | Glassman | The area around the playground is most likely a park. I made the change. |
| 46842635 by Glassman @ 2017-03-14 14:34 | 1 | 2017-03-14 14:37 | Glassman | I added office=it to your first edit. This will help search engines determine what type of business is at that node as well as have it rendered on the map. Although I don't thing we are currently rendering office=it. If I pick the wrong tag, feel free to correct. |
| 46181061 by Glassman @ 2017-02-17 23:19 | 1 | 2017-02-23 00:58 | Alan ♦134 | Did you buy any eggs at the Egg Shack? |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 04:13 | Glassman | I didn't, insteaded opted to let another person buy the last two dozen eggs. The egg shack also sells glass art by two bellingham glass art by Elena and Ed Schmidt. BTW they have something like 59 chickens on the property. They had 60 but a coyote got one the night before. | |
| 37137827 by Glassman @ 2016-02-11 01:14 | 1 | 2017-02-09 19:30 | jharpster ♦34 | Hi, I was looking at boundaries in Washington and this one keeps coming up. Are state park boundaries intended to be tagged as Admin_level=4? These are normally reserved for state boundaries. |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 00:07 | Glassman | No - it should be leisure=park. But If I change it I think it will render green over the water. Let me find some other island parks to see how they are tagged. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-10 00:17 | Glassman | Okay - let's see what I broke. The National Park boundary is gone and the the island now has a park polygon. Hope that fixes it. | |
| 22273653 by Glassman @ 2014-05-11 15:28 | 1 | 2016-04-13 23:45 | pnorman ♦317 | Is WA56 an IATA code? I thought they were all 3 letters maximum |
| 2 | 2016-04-16 16:11 | Glassman | Correct. I'll fix my error. | |
| 38032886 by Glassman @ 2016-03-24 04:13 | 1 | 2016-03-24 04:19 | Glassman | The donkey trail segment is wrong. I sent a message to the original mapper to fix. |
| 37172819 by Glassman @ 2016-02-12 17:12 | 1 | 2016-02-12 19:34 | Natfoot ♦56 | Where was it not a multipolygon? |
| 2 | 2016-02-12 22:54 | Glassman | Look just north of Bandera Airport. The park extends to the other side of I90. I could have shown I90 going through the park, but since the state didn't, I didn't either. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-12 22:55 | Glassman | BTW, I'm only part way done. I'm slowly heading east. Right now I'm working on the pass area. | |
| 37073253 by Glassman @ 2016-02-08 06:35 | 1 | 2016-02-10 16:09 | nickpeihl ♦2 | Can you please review this? The entire Lopez Island is now listed as a park. it shows up entirely green on basemaps. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2016-02-10 16:39 | Glassman | thanks for pointing out my error. Somehow I added the tag leisure=park to the shoreline boundary. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-10 16:57 | nickpeihl ♦2 | Thanks. | |
| 36750262 by Glassman @ 2016-01-22 23:20 | 1 | 2016-02-03 22:48 | sctrojan79 ♦22 | Nice work on the Arboretum, some really great details added! It looks like part of the creek was duplicated (way ids 155848138 and 392873123) though, and I'm not sure which one is the more accurate one. Would you mind taking another look at it? |
| 2 | 2016-02-04 00:19 | Glassman | Thanks for spotting that.I can see why JOSM didn't catch it. It looked to JOSM like two streams. I have more to add, but need help identifying trees. I haven't gotten back to it yet. | |
| 36919085 by Glassman @ 2016-01-31 15:41 | 1 | 2016-01-31 23:37 | sctrojan79 ♦22 | Hey, I was doing some island conflation around Puget Sound when I realized I'd just retagged the Sucia Marine State Park relation you added this morning – sorry! I put the tags back as they were. |
| 2 | 2016-02-01 02:54 | Glassman | I've been updating parks in the State. Surprised at how many "state parks" we have as nodes that don't actually exist. | |
| 25738801 by Glassman @ 2014-09-29 05:31 | 1 | 2015-12-23 17:10 | pnorman ♦317 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305503671 water? It looks covered |
| 2 | 2015-12-23 17:26 | Glassman | Could be alge over the pond. You can delete it if you want. |