| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140959831 by InfosReseaux @ 2023-09-07 21:55 | 1 | 2025-07-25 12:25 | Hb- ♦295 | The tunnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205984966 is drawn here from the three tunnel junction point (elevation >1255 m) to an inlet Grande Eau river at Pont de la Tine (elevation ~820 m). But this misses out either the Sepey inlet at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021876218 and the p... |
| 2 | 2025-07-25 14:35 | InfosReseaux | HelloThank you for noticing it and the tunnel between La Tine and Hongrin tunnel was erroneous. I've deleted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169458378I surely had mistaken offocial map.This confirms there is no such tunnel: https://www.fmhl.ch/fileadmin/_processed_/d/5/csm... | |
| 116116014 by InfosReseaux @ 2022-01-13 17:24 | 1 | 2025-06-21 09:17 | zstadler ♦1,059 | Hello InfosReseauxThank you for your contributions to OSM.This edit changed the "usage" tag of way 544376704https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/544376704It was changed from "usage=headrace" to "usage=transmission".If I understand the other tags correctly... |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 10:50 | InfosReseaux | HelloThat's right usage=headrace covers waterways intended for power generation. It is used on waterway sections between intake and penstocks ending to turbines.Here there is no turbine. This underground waterway was dug to move water between two valleys and ends in a river downstream.\... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-21 11:46 | zstadler ♦1,059 | Thank you for the clarification. Interesting! | |
| 127259496 by InfosReseaux @ 2022-10-09 17:09 | 1 | 2025-05-07 21:58 | josmougn ♦233 | Bonjour, vous avez dans ce changeset et le 127259463 une quarantaine de points avec seulement 2 tags : " operator = Enedis operator:wikidata = Q3587594 "Est-ce que vous pouvez les compléter ?Merci. |
| 2 | 2025-05-07 22:38 | InfosReseaux | BonsoirEn effet ça a du passer les filtres des traitements de maintenance.C'est corrigé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165959866 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-07 23:09 | josmougn ♦233 | c'est vite fait ! | |
| 161362370 by InfosReseaux @ 2025-01-14 23:22 | 1 | 2025-01-15 15:01 | divaddivag ♦117 | Salut Francois, est-ce que tu me donnes le feu vert pour nommer les éoliennes et rajouter le name:etymology:wikidata (c'est un peu mon TOC). Il n'y pas urgence évidemment. David |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 15:11 | InfosReseaux | Bonjour DavidEffectivement je me suis posé la question hier soir.J'imagine que tu penses à ces noms là ?https://www.parc-eolien-en-mer-du-calvados.fr/territoire-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/devoir-de-memoire-parc-eolien-en-mer-calvados/Bonne après-midi | |
| 81067348 by InfosReseaux @ 2020-02-16 10:47 | 1 | 2024-09-11 06:41 | frosm ♦1,131 | Bonjour,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/288587887qui a le droit de passer ?comment fait-on pour rejoindre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25032239 ? cette rue est-elle de facto motor_vehicle=private ? |
| 2 | 2024-09-11 06:56 | InfosReseaux | BonjourJe ne sais pas répondre à ces questions. Il faut aller sur place et demander aux riverainsBonne journée | |
| 140462650 by InfosReseaux @ 2023-08-27 17:51 | 1 | 2023-08-28 12:45 | Binnette ♦29 | Hi InfosReseaux, thank you for this edit. You were quicker than me :) |
| 2 | 2023-08-28 12:59 | InfosReseaux | You're welcomeI may have fogotten some cliffs around the scree area, but hard to draw as arial pictures are very dark | |
| 127747781 by InfosReseaux @ 2022-10-18 21:01 | 1 | 2023-07-05 14:53 | Piagno ♦93 | BonjourTu est sure ce sont 380kV entre Bassecourt est la france? Parce que à la france il y a 400kV depuis 9 ans...Merci pour repondez |
| 2 | 2023-07-05 21:17 | InfosReseaux | BonsoirEn réalité, les tensions varient entre 350 et 440 kV en permanence. 380 kV et 400 kV sont des normes choisies par chaque pays. La France parle de 400 kV alors que Suisse et Allemagne parlent de 380 kV mais ce sont les mêmes tensions, il n'y a pas de transformation e... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-06 14:54 | Piagno ♦93 | Ah, merci beaucoup :) | |
| 128573507 by InfosReseaux @ 2022-11-06 23:16 | 1 | 2023-05-23 11:43 | phd0 ♦54 | hello, j'ai un doute sur cet ligne HTAhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714092979 qui ne semble pas apparaître sur Volta, Y'a beaucoup d’enterré dans le coin, mais rien en aérien. Qu'en penses tu ? |
| 2 | 2023-05-23 11:56 | InfosReseaux | Bonjour PhilippeIl y a probablement eu une campagne d'enfouissement récente dans le coin, c'est courant.Volta a été mis à jour il y a 15 jours et des choses ont pu changer.On peut supprimer les sections qui ont été démontées a... | |
| 126911315 by InfosReseaux @ 2022-10-02 22:17 | 1 | 2022-10-10 19:40 | Antonin Del Fabbro ♦310 | Salut !Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7679714383, ça ne serait pas transformer=distribution ?Désolé & merci ! :) |
| 2 | 2022-10-10 19:49 | InfosReseaux | Bonsoir !Hé non : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Proposed_features/Substation_nodes_extensionCa a changé récemmentBonne soirée | |
| 67145426 by InfosReseaux @ 2019-02-12 22:10 | 1 | 2021-04-11 09:56 | pyrog ♦343 | Nom descriptif pour ce NRO 😉https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443074328/history |
| 71941855 by InfosReseaux @ 2019-07-05 18:19 | 1 | 2021-02-22 17:21 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6591917286Un généraleur de type turbine à vapeur connecté à un pipeline vapeur ne devrait-il pas avoir en entrée steam au lieu de heat ? oui c'est délicat en fonction de la pression :) |
| 2 | 2021-02-23 18:50 | InfosReseaux | Tu as raison, mais ces clé generator: sont à reprendre.Elles ont été définies dans un contexte où il n'y avait pas grand chose, et désormais on aurait des outils différents pour décrire des systèmes aussi complexes.Les po... | |
| 93953226 by InfosReseaux @ 2020-11-11 21:49 | 1 | 2020-11-13 10:14 | mueschel ♦6,582 | Hi,could you check tags here?'flow' is not really common, 'flow_rate' is used and documented more often.There are several spelling mistakes 'mechnical_driver'.Btw, is there nothing like pump:power or similar for this feature? |
| 2 | 2020-11-13 22:38 | InfosReseaux | Hi MueschelThis changeset was partly designed to test proposed tagging in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumping_proposalThank you to bring flow_rate back to my attention. I'll have to consider move proposal to it since it is pretty used now.That's right ... | |
| 61664430 by InfosReseaux @ 2018-08-14 17:10 | 1 | 2020-02-14 14:33 | SK53 ♦864 | This power line seems to have been removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166408008, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2071675#map=17/50.54706/2.82357 |
| 2 | 2020-02-15 10:19 | InfosReseaux | Indeed, and it has been removed form osm recently.Thanks to anyone took time to update quicker than I read your commentAll the best | |
| 71616526 by InfosReseaux @ 2019-06-25 22:40 | 1 | 2019-06-26 15:17 | mueschel ♦6,582 | Hi,do you want to add tags about the style of cable holding as a new scheme in OSM? I would suggest to use a tag like "power:attachment" or similar - using the power namespace makes it clear that the tag belongs the power infrastructure and nothing else. It also avoids conflicts with ot... |
| 2 | 2019-06-26 16:42 | InfosReseaux | HiThank you for noticing thisThis is a proposed key on the wiki. Have a look : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_attachmentsline_attachment isn't restricted to power lines, so I didn't want to include it in power namespace.All the best | |
| 60288778 by InfosReseaux @ 2018-06-29 20:16 | 1 | 2018-07-03 13:16 | mueschel ♦6,582 | Hi,you used the tag "lins = bay" on several power lines - could you check that?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-04 21:27 | InfosReseaux | Thank you to have noticed this !It was an unfortunate typo.A further changeset will move all those bogus ways to line=bay | |
| 60131345 by InfosReseaux @ 2018-06-24 22:43 | 1 | 2018-06-25 14:04 | warangal ♦5 | Hi InfosReseaux,your changeset seems to be an mechanical edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_editsHave you announced this retagging in before? |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 16:44 | InfosReseaux | This was discussed for days on local chapter mailing list talk-fr.This is not so mechanical since I check each place prior to retag it (Mapillary, aerial photos, personal pictures and knowledge).power=station has been deprecated for years, it's time to get rid of it | |
| 56534961 by InfosReseaux @ 2018-02-20 23:19 | 1 | 2018-02-21 12:49 | BAK365 ♦123 | Hallo, deine Quellenangabe überrascht mich etwas. IGN BdOrtho? Im Glarnerland?Beste Grüsse, BAK365 |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 13:10 | InfosReseaux | Hello,Oups, this was a mistake. IGM BdOrtho is a French national database I use to use there. I didn't updated the source field in JOSM last night.Source is local knowledge and ESRI imagery in JOSM.I'm no sure I can update the changesetAll the Best ! | |
| 3 | 2018-02-21 16:36 | BAK365 ♦123 | Thank you for your reply. I know IGN, thus my surprise to see it as a source for edits in Linthal/Glarus. I am also surprised how detailled your edits are, especially the underground parts like pipelines, valves, generators etc. (examples https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5425649966#map=19/46.87639... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-21 17:06 | InfosReseaux | Yes I'm really keen on power plant mapping and manage to find precise public documentation.For the cavern of Lint-Limmern and Linthal 2015, there is plenty of documentation available on the web/youtube/whateverhttps://www.swisslinkpersonal.ch/images/gal/G40215915302.jpghttp://c.tutti.ch/i... | |
| 5 | 2018-02-21 17:09 | InfosReseaux | This is precise mapping but not exact mapping. All nodes are added by hand on JOSM according to charts and explanatory texts. For example, I know the Linthal 2015 cavern is 150m long x 54m height then I just draw a rectangle at the approximative location but without any certitude. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-21 18:23 | BAK365 ♦123 | Hmmm, I'm not sure I'm glad I asked.... I trust you are aware that information publicly available on the internet might not be usable in OSM due to its copyright situation. I leave it to you to check the copyright status of the sources you used (youtube, swisslinkpersonal.ch, tutti.ch).... | |
| 7 | 2018-02-21 22:25 | InfosReseaux | I agree the docs I linked may be compyrighted, but information on them certainly not.To build such infrastructure, public institutions have to give an agreement based on projet files which are freely available and displayed to citizens. As Switzerland is a very welcoming country, open days are oft... | |
| 53929022 by InfosReseaux @ 2017-11-19 17:42 | 1 | 2018-01-14 20:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,785 | Is it intentional to use power=line rather than power=minor_line for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429960823/history ? |
| 2 | 2018-01-14 22:22 | InfosReseaux | Yes, there is no consensus nor unique definition for what makes a line minorIs this voltage? Supports? Operator? Very difficult to know in which way this will be understood. That's why i just want to say "it's power line" | |
| 34094034 by InfosReseaux @ 2015-09-17 23:35 | 1 | 2017-11-18 11:39 | Hb- ♦295 | typo corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53897792 |
| 2 | 2017-11-18 12:47 | InfosReseaux | Thank you Hb :) | |
| 17507740 by InfosReseaux @ 2013-08-25 21:29 | 1 | 2017-10-06 15:23 | frosm ♦1,131 | Bonjour Francois,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2431554730te souviens-tu de ce téléphérique ?car ce poteau se trouve après l'arrivée, ce qui me semble peu probable |
| 2 | 2017-10-06 17:45 | InfosReseaux | Bonjour Frosm,La plateforme d'arrivée n'est pas visible sur les vues de l'IGN.Mais je crois bien que le poteau est bien placé et qu'il s'agit d'un quai se situant sous la trajectoire de la nacelle. Il faudrait y aller faire des photos car je n'y s... | |
| 40881823 by InfosReseaux @ 2016-07-19 21:38 | 1 | 2016-09-03 01:10 | Olyon ♦127 | Pourquoi utiliser une relation site et non multipolygon pour la Centra |
| 2 | 2016-09-03 01:13 | Olyon ♦127 | (Desolé, c'est parti trop vite)Centrale Solaire? Toute la centrale est compris dans les 2 polygones barrier=fence. | |
| 3 | 2016-09-04 18:45 | InfosReseaux | Oui tout à fait.Mais les relations power=plant sont de type site parce qu'il y a pas toujours des polygones fermés à rassembler (cas des barrages) | |
| 4 | 2016-09-04 23:09 | Olyon ♦127 | les relations power=plant ne sont pas toutes de type site. pour une centrale éolienne c'est plus approprié vu que c'est plusieurs éoliennes sur un terrain servant a autre chose, pour les barrage ça se discute mais pour cette centrale solaire toute la centrale es... | |
| 5 | 2016-09-06 18:01 | InfosReseaux | Apres consultation du wiki, il est vrai que les multipolygones sont préférés quand les éléments de la centrale sont contenus dans des périmètres fermés.Je ne voyais pas les choses sous cet angle, mais je vais le corriger, qui plus est quand c... |