| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 152379670 by JAAS @ 2024-06-07 14:38 | 1 | 2024-06-20 03:16 | Info wiky ♦1 | El Mirador, Santa Cruz Barillas, Huehuetenango |
| 152590619 by JAAS @ 2024-06-12 14:39 | 1 | 2024-06-12 18:12 | MyoKyawKyaw ♦124 | Thanks for your contribution. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152590619 |
| 42984274 by JAAS @ 2016-10-18 13:39 | 1 | 2024-03-03 14:07 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,575 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14078285/history has access:hgv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well? |
| 142120005 by JAAS @ 2023-10-03 22:22 | 1 | 2023-10-03 23:09 | aliensuperstar ♦13 | "Heróico" is a misspelling that had already been corrected. |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 23:22 | JAAS | Thank you @fitojb. Are you referring to this segment?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73133868 - it was missing the accent mark, so I added it again.Regards, JAAS | |
| 3 | 2023-10-04 16:18 | aliensuperstar ♦13 | Yep, that is a Portuguese spelling, not a Spanish one :)I will report the error to INEGI through their "Cartografía Participativa" platform. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-05 02:11 | JAAS | OMG!I apologize for the misconception. I am a fluent Spanish speaking person, usually with good writing skills (very obviously not perfect!), but this time you have taught me a grammar lesson I will not forget.I even looked it up, and you are correct: “ Heroico, estoico: en estas palab... | |
| 141279094 by JAAS @ 2023-09-14 23:10 | 1 | 2023-09-20 15:39 | FS Patagonia ♦20 | Hola! Quisiera pedirte que en tus próximas ediciones tengas cuidado con las relaciones, porque aquí desconectaste (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16197991). |
| 141006274 by JAAS @ 2023-09-09 00:10 | 1 | 2023-09-10 06:35 | gscholz ♦2,778 | Hi JAAS,this changeset has creates errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting line:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.59026&lat=14.47740&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingl... |
| 2 | 2023-09-11 02:39 | JAAS | Hello Guido,Thank you for catching this mistake. I am currently unable to edit now, but will fix it tomorrow on my computer.Best regards,Jorge | |
| 45829232 by JAAS @ 2017-02-05 13:39 | 1 | 2023-02-01 12:23 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,972 | a user deleted many roads you added in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131862032/ |
| 123103914 by JAAS @ 2022-07-01 23:35 | 1 | 2023-01-22 19:18 | Trevor_1 ♦270 | Hola, por que cambiaste esto de "Motorway" a "Trunk"? |
| 2 | 2023-01-24 14:12 | JAAS | Hola.Respondiendo a tu pregunta: porque la descripción de un ‘motorway’ no coincide en nada con esta vía. Honestamente, no existe ningún camino en el país Guatemala que consideraría un ‘motorway’ tal cual. La misma VAS, recién... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-29 20:06 | Trevor_1 ♦270 | Muchas gracias! Saludos! | |
| 129061072 by JAAS @ 2022-11-17 21:47 | 1 | 2022-12-18 11:59 | Frans S ♦9,786 | Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. You mapped this a few month ago, But I noticed that you retagged a higway=unclassified (correct tagged) to 'track' Please update your knowledge when to tag traces as track.Best regards |
| 87405475 by JAAS @ 2020-07-01 14:18 | 1 | 2022-11-22 16:01 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,972 | this road really exists here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1223236991 |
| 2 | 2022-11-23 18:15 | JAAS | Gracias Erick! Siendo honesto, no parece que ese trazo sea el correcto! Pero, "en mi defensa" yo tan solo lo cambié de `residential` a `unclassified`, aunque admito que lo debí haberlo corregido en su momento, de haberme fijado y contado con las imágenes actualizadas. ... | |
| 94647665 by JAAS @ 2020-11-23 15:45 | 1 | 2022-03-31 02:20 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,972 | is this road private? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817641624 |
| 2 | 2022-03-31 15:20 | JAAS | Obrigado por perguntar...Yes it is, and a very unusual scenario: - This is considered a very exclusive residential zone, in which the residents won a long legal battle with the municipality over the rights to use this particular road - privately. Entering from the North side there is a lift-gate... | |
| 117257993 by JAAS @ 2022-02-10 18:46 | 1 | 2022-03-13 00:17 | AngocA ♦194 | Hola Jorge, Aquí veo que hiciste cambio de Yes a No al conditional de foot. Inclusive el validador de JOSM genera alerta con el no. |
| 2 | 2022-03-13 16:03 | JAAS | Gracias Andrés, te agradezco el comentario. Es cierto, en este caso la restricción condicional "a la inversa" [no @ (Mo-Sa;Su 00:00-07:00;14:00-24:00] lo había ingresado así "a propósito", justamente para hacer énfasis en que el paso ... | |
| 116127167 by JAAS @ 2022-01-13 22:28 | 1 | 2022-01-19 09:38 | mueschel ♦6,562 | Hi,please check the stairs you added - they got a strange ramy=gate tag. |
| 2 | 2022-01-20 16:22 | JAAS | Thank you for the heads-up mueschel! That was a pretty bad typo, I meant to write it in as `ramp=yes` but somehow did not. Already fixed! | |
| 114237119 by JAAS @ 2021-11-25 20:17 | 1 | 2021-11-26 15:26 | carfog81 ♦139 | Por favor, no dañen las relaciones multipolígono. Este es un daño muy frecuente del equipo de Kaart. |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 17:39 | JAAS | Gracias por hacérmelo ver carfog81. Admito el error. No me percaté del multipolígono en su momento, al dividir esta vía, que en realidad se encuentra dividida. Pasaré el dato al resto del equipo.Esperamos no causar más este tipo de inconvenientes... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-30 23:31 | carfog81 ♦139 | Hola. Si existe esa vía, es de 1 carril (lane=1) es paralela a la vía del MIO (Masivo Integrado de Occidente) y a la vía Primaria "Carrera 100". Es de acceso público, la diferencia con la vía "Carrera 100" es que está unos centímet... | |
| 107450154 by JAAS @ 2021-07-05 16:12 | 1 | 2021-07-19 04:34 | gscholz ♦2,778 | Hi JAS,this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Bandeirantes" and "Braúnas":http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-43.99844&lat=-19.85359&zoom=15https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107450154Can you please fix this?K... |
| 61698236 by JAAS @ 2018-08-15 21:55 | 1 | 2021-04-19 07:55 | willisturm ♦55 | Hi JAAS,please use highway=give_way instead of highway=yield. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way. Have a nice day. |
| 72707495 by JAAS @ 2019-07-27 02:50 | 1 | 2020-10-21 03:20 | reenas ♦6 | Hi JAAS,Trust you are doing great.While mapping in city Bangkok, I came across a highway way 156231356 modified as tertiary instead residential which makes a classification gap connecting to residential way 650912392.As the road is narrow the entire stretch has to be classified as residential... |
| 72708056 by JAAS @ 2019-07-27 04:12 | 1 | 2019-07-28 07:58 | user_5359 ♦19,346 | Hello! Please check the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160519020/history. You add unusally key with a blank inside (alt_<space>name ..). Could you mean old_name? |
| 2 | 2019-07-28 11:19 | JAAS | Thank you for catching that typo. I have already fixed it.The "alt_name" tag is used for a known alternate name, which are entered as seen on the road street name signs, while driving on the ground. | |
| 67032583 by JAAS @ 2019-02-08 18:06 | 1 | 2019-02-08 22:37 | rarad74 ♦274 | Hello!!! You damaged residential area. You do too unecessary changes without discus with romanian comunity... |
| 2 | 2019-02-09 00:52 | JAAS | Hello! I appreciate you making me see this. If you could please let me know a bit more specifically what you are referring to so I can check/fix it. I do want to do things properly within the community, as much as possible. Thanks! | |
| 66525560 by JAAS @ 2019-01-22 04:21 | 1 | 2019-01-22 18:18 | JAAS | Changeset comment 66525560 SHOULD HAVE READ: Added missing geometry and highway ref #'s. Updated road classifications in Escuintla, Guatemala, based local knowledge. |
| 66525029 by JAAS @ 2019-01-22 03:43 | 1 | 2019-01-22 18:15 | JAAS | Changeset comment 66525029 SHOULD HAVE READ: Added missing geometry, highway ref #'s and village name. Updated road classifications in Escuintla, Guatemala, based on OSC video and local knowledge. |
| 59613113 by JAAS @ 2018-06-06 19:35 | 1 | 2018-06-12 01:06 | chachafish ♦462 | Que tal. Ud. ha creado numeros "racetracks" cerca de La Reunion Golf Resort & Residences. Realmente son calles, no? Gracias. |
| 2 | 2018-06-12 02:43 | JAAS | Gracias por encontrar eso! No me había percatado que éstas habían sido ingresadas como "pista de carrera". Si son calles pero de uso exclusivo para carros eléctricos de golf, a pie o bicicleta. No se permite el acceso en vehículos motorizados grandes... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-13 02:13 | chachafish ♦462 | Muchas gracias por su invitación. Se lo agradezco mucho, pero por ahora no tengo tiempo para dedicarme a proyectos. A fin de cuentas hago ediciones normalmente en mi ciudad natal, Denver, Colorado. Por casualidad, voy a visitar la Ciudad de Guatemala después de aproximadamente 4-6 mese... | |
| 53931015 by JAAS @ 2017-11-19 19:11 | 1 | 2017-11-21 00:10 | AgusQui ♦578 | Please add the source in the changeset, not in each object that you add or modify. |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 18:25 | JAAS | Gracias por el comentario. No queremos causar inconveniencias y comprendo que agregar la fuente individualmente a cada POI puede ser considerado algo "obsoleto", pero de momento nos gustaría continuar haciéndolo pues es parte de nuestros procesos de control de calidad post-ed... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-24 14:04 | AgusQui ♦578 | Es muy molesto poner source a cada cosa, generan un innecesario incremento al peso de la base de datos, además lo agregan en una segunda edición lo que también aumenta innecesariamente el peso del historial. Si bien no está despreciado oficialmente, está en desuso ... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-01 19:39 | JAAS | Te comento que se tomó la decisión de cambiar nuestros procesos de post-edición internos a manera de evitar colocar el source a cada POI individualmente. Gracias por tus comentarios! | |
| 5 | 2017-12-01 20:27 | AgusQui ♦578 | Genial! Gracias a ustedes por escucharnos. | |
| 52306634 by JAAS @ 2017-09-23 15:19 | 1 | 2017-09-24 10:15 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello JAAS. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392536678 you have tagged `Alt_name` instead of `alt_name`, right? #typo |
| 36070489 by JAAS @ 2015-12-20 18:15 | 1 | 2017-09-07 14:18 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review typo lanes="RD QUE-13"on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376621156Looks like a ref. What about the highway=tertiary at both ends? |
| 49307141 by JAAS @ 2017-06-06 14:30 | 1 | 2017-06-06 14:40 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Røde Kors shops etc are best tagged https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcharity |
| 2 | 2017-06-06 15:00 | JAAS | Good call. I was not sure how to tag this, but did want it on the map! Thank you | |
| 3 | 2017-06-06 15:01 | Hjart ♦4,116 | They are quite popular in Denmark. That's why I know :-) | |
| 49272434 by JAAS @ 2017-06-05 14:19 | 1 | 2017-06-05 14:42 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Could you please add source=Kaart* to only those POI's which you originally created or changed considerably? I feel you are taking a bit too much credit when you add it to otherwise wellmaintained POI's like i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4283966598 |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 14:50 | JAAS | Agreed. This particular one slipped through the process... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-05 14:59 | JAAS | I do have a question for you: - I have noticed buildings in general are not well defined, neither in form nor are they separated from others. They are mostly drawn in where several buildings form only one building block. This is a problem when one edits features such as building:levels which i... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-05 16:20 | Hjart ♦4,116 | There are several reasons I guess. Not all mappers are very accurate (not even in Denmark) and some obviously just wanted to get buildings on the map very quickly. Also our first national imagery (Fugro), while being immensely helpful at the time, wasn't very well aligned everywhere and was of ... | |
| 49258478 by JAAS @ 2017-06-05 06:15 | 1 | 2017-06-05 11:27 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I have corrected a number of highway=crossing (i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org node/4896533578/history) and removed the traffic_calming=island next to them. I believe this is the better way to tag these. |
| 49250382 by JAAS @ 2017-06-04 19:49 | 1 | 2017-06-05 04:55 | MichaelVL ♦57 | Hi,You have added a shop called 'Smykkergaarden', which does not sound as proper danish. |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 05:11 | JAAS | This name I have confirmed and is entered correctly. It is actually a Jewlery shop located on Vestergade in Thisten. You may check it out at http://smykkegården.dk/Thank you for keeping an eye on the edits made. It is in the best interest of us all! | |
| 3 | 2017-06-05 05:27 | MichaelVL ♦57 | In that case I think you might want to check once more. Note the R in smykkeRgården in your naming vs no R in the link after 'smykke'. 'Smykkegården' sounds like correct danish. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-05 05:31 | JAAS | This is emmbarrasing and I stand corrected! You were right again... I already fixed this mistake as well.Once more, I appreciate your help | |
| 5 | 2017-06-05 08:16 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I have silently corrected a large number of spelling mistakes as well as shop categories (ALDI for example is a supermarket) in the wake of your teams work (JOSM & the Overpass API are very usefull for this). I think we can't expect foreigners to get danish spelling right every time, so no ... | |
| 49256674 by JAAS @ 2017-06-05 04:36 | 1 | 2017-06-05 04:54 | MichaelVL ♦57 | Hi,You have added a ommunity center named 'Thisted Kirkcenter', which does not sound as proper danish. Might this be 'Thisted Kirkecenter' instead? |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 05:11 | JAAS | Indeed you are right! My mistake, I appreciate you pointing it out. I have already corrected this. | |
| 49092812 by JAAS @ 2017-05-30 05:58 | 1 | 2017-05-30 08:35 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I have corrected some spelling mistakes here (as well as in a few other of your teams changesets). Please also note that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination only makes sense on oneway streets.Also note that we prefer that our national imagery (SDFE/Geodatastyrelsen) is used, as it&... |
| 48980644 by JAAS @ 2017-05-25 17:55 | 1 | 2017-05-25 19:51 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Please be carefull with our adressnodes. You accidentally moved Sallingvej 3 a few hundred meters. |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 19:56 | JAAS | Thank you, yes I saw that, but buy the time I noticed I was not certain where it was originally. I apologize for this and will certainly try to be more careful.I do congratulate your most efficient mapping. It is one of the best I have seen worldwide! | |
| 3 | 2017-05-25 20:10 | Hjart ♦4,116 | We are very blessed by having access to the national danish imagery, which for a few years has been refreshed every spring :-). We have also been very blessed with having access to the danish address register.Personally by now I also have quite considerable experience and have spent upwards of 15k... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-25 20:14 | JAAS | It shows! You are all so precise, it is a real treat and what I am doing is really just "fine tuning" little details. I will do my best to get everything the best I can, and not mess anything up.It was nice to "meet" you. | |
| 46276671 by JAAS @ 2017-02-21 14:29 | 1 | 2017-03-06 03:58 | AgusQui ♦578 | JAAS estás agregando muchas paradas de bus, ¿podrías agregar un note= con el número de línea de la cartelería así les agregamos las relaciones? Gracias. |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 00:13 | JAAS | Muchas gracias AgusQui. Te comento que estuve agregando en general sólo las paradas con techo con o sin banca, basado en los videos que tomamos en noviembre 2016, con la idea de que fueran actualizadas por algún colaborador localmente. En retrospectiva, creo que cometí el error ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-08 13:34 | AgusQui ♦578 | "Se me ocurre que podría hacerse basado en las mismas relaciones de las calles que indican las rutas, pero desconozco si todos los autobuses paran en todas las paradas indiferentemente."No, esto no es buena idea, no paran en todas siempre. Además aún no está... | |
| 45168677 by JAAS @ 2017-01-14 19:38 | 1 | 2017-01-14 22:52 | muralito ♦2,014 | Estimado JAAS, por favor no combines vias de forma incorrecta, porque que las relacionas de ruta de bus quedan mal. Unir Debenedetti dejo mal esta ruta http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3822018(El iD es un editor que no ayuda con las relaciones, mas bien lo contrario)Por favor revisa si ... |
| 44200682 by JAAS @ 2016-12-06 06:38 | 1 | 2016-12-07 15:26 | muralito ♦2,014 | surface=sett and not cobblestone is a better choice for this kind of surface. Most (if not all) surface=cobblestone in Montevideo are errors and should be put in a todo list to evaluate and correct them. Also, with sett there are several situations, in some strets the smothness is good and a... |
| 44072327 by JAAS @ 2016-11-30 23:09 | 1 | 2016-12-02 00:30 | muralito ♦2,014 | Burger King is not the small building.The small building is a light contruction, is part of the sidewalk.I don't understand why "KG 2016"'s contributors are deleting nodes and adding polygons. There is conceptually wrong, and we are losing the history of the data stored i... |
| 2 | 2016-12-06 05:25 | JAAS | The Burger King enclosed structure is physically on the sidewalk but, although it seems to be a light building, it does not seem to be a temporary structure. I have modified it to show building:material=semi_permanent, since this is what it appears to be.I have always opted for the "One fea... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-06 13:36 | muralito ♦2,014 | This is not a case of "one feature, one osm element", is about where the feature/element is located.The main activities of the restaurant are inside the main bulding, food is cooked, ordered, and served in the main building. The light building has only seatings for customers, just lik... | |
| 43988850 by JAAS @ 2016-11-27 18:02 | 1 | 2016-12-05 17:27 | muralito ♦2,014 | NO BORRAR LOS ATM CUANDO ESTAN SEPARADOS DEL BANCO. EL BANCO Y EL ATM TIENEN POR EJEMPLO, DISTINTOS HORARIOS. |
| 2 | 2016-12-06 05:29 | JAAS | Esto es cierto. En todo caso, habrá sido un error en esta ocasión... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-06 13:25 | muralito ♦2,014 | Jorge, puede ser, es que han sido decenas de usuarios y cientos de changesets, concentrados en poco tiempo, muchos cometiendo el mismo tipo de error, da trabajo corregirlos y si se corrige algo al poco tiempo vuelven a hacerlo mal (el mismo u otro colaborador del grupo) y eso me ha quitado la tranqu... | |
| 43954745 by JAAS @ 2016-11-25 22:40 | 1 | 2016-11-26 17:24 | muralito ♦2,014 | POR FAVOR NO UNIR CALLES QUE TIENEN RELACIONES DE LIMITES O RUTAS DE BUS!!!EJEMPLO DE COMO QUEDAN MAL!!!http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5639466#map=16/-34.9080/-56.1782 |
| 2 | 2016-11-28 12:53 | JAAS | Gracias por el aviso, aunque temo es posible que haya cometido el mismo error nuevamente el fin de semana, pues aun no había leído el mensaje. Yo ya he dado aviso acerca de esta situación para evitar que continuemos haciéndola.En cuánto a las ediciones que est... | |
| 3 | 2016-11-29 11:32 | muralito ♦2,014 | Te hago llegar las sugerencias por PM. | |
| 43740231 by JAAS @ 2016-11-17 19:05 | 1 | 2016-11-19 02:52 | muralito ♦2,014 | No duplicar. Ya estaba el culto http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4506885901 |
| 43769055 by JAAS @ 2016-11-18 15:11 | 1 | 2016-11-19 01:43 | muralito ♦2,014 | ¿Que criterio usaste para las 6 lanes en 18 de Julio? |
| 2 | 2016-11-19 01:49 | muralito ♦2,014 | Estoy encontrando varios errores en estos cambios. O el reconocimiento KG 2016 esta fallando o lo estan interpretando con un criterio distinto al convenido, por ejemplo la cantidad de "lanes" que etiquetan. | |
| 43200565 by JAAS @ 2016-10-26 19:22 | 1 | 2016-10-30 13:08 | mueschel ♦6,562 | Hi,could you check the tagging of this node?http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/251257271There are two restriction tags, one is misspelled. These restriction tags typically belong to a relation of type=restriction, but not on a node. Cheers, Jan |
| 42873347 by JAAS @ 2016-10-13 16:13 | 1 | 2016-10-14 10:24 | mueschel ♦6,562 | Hi,I don't understand the tagoneway:backward=yes @ (mo-fr 07:30-10:00)Is this whole way reversed during morning rush hour? This would be:oneway:conditional = -1 @ (mo-fr 07:30-10:00)Jan |
| 42480177 by JAAS @ 2016-09-27 20:57 | 1 | 2016-09-28 22:07 | jptolosa ♦205 | Hola, el rol identificador de la Autopista Vespucio Sur es ref=70, no ref=R-70. Saludos. |
| 2 | 2016-09-28 22:09 | jptolosa ♦205 | Y sólo debe colocarse en la vía principal, no en los motorway_link. |