| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100726513 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-03-09 17:57 | 1 | 2024-05-04 09:15 | ivanbranco ♦2,693 | Hi Jez,you added 6 trees with height=stump,would you agree to remove the height and change them to natural=tree_stump?thanks and good mapping :) |
| 2 | 2024-05-04 09:53 | Jez Nicholson | Thank you. Done. As you can probably tell, this is my local neighborhood and micro mapping playground | |
| 129272714 by Jez Nicholson @ 2022-11-23 09:38 | 1 | 2023-11-30 12:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Did you deliberately use some of the tagging for the lifeboat station here? Data consumers did use it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=lifeboat_station#projects . |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 12:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | s/use/remove/ | |
| 3 | 2023-11-30 12:49 | Jez Nicholson | Nope. Apologies if it affected your app. | |
| 4 | 2023-11-30 15:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Thanks - I'm guessing iD perhaps did it by accident? | |
| 136503994 by Jez Nicholson @ 2023-05-24 14:42 | 1 | 2023-05-24 18:54 | UtterClutter ♦17 | A slip of the finger surely? |
| 2 | 2023-05-24 18:58 | Jez Nicholson | It did make me laugh :) | |
| 127035544 by Jez Nicholson @ 2022-10-05 08:46 | 1 | 2022-10-06 00:16 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | Hi Jez, I've seen you have added some of the bike hangers in Brighton and tagged them as "amenity=bicycle_repair_station" due to lack of suitable other tags.bicycle_repair_station is not a good idea for the bicycle hangers as these are usually stands which have bicycle related too... |
| 2 | 2022-10-06 06:39 | Jez Nicholson | Yeah, it was lack of tags in Vespucci whilst I was on the spot, I was going to change them when I got home.....and then forgot. :( Will do it now | |
| 124835768 by Jez Nicholson @ 2022-08-12 22:13 | 1 | 2022-08-12 22:19 | redd ♦385 | Thank you! |
| 115067596 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-12-17 18:30 | 1 | 2021-12-17 20:10 | scintlark ♦9 | Great work - thank you for helping to map Scotland! :) |
| 114212788 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-11-25 09:21 | 1 | 2021-11-26 13:20 | danieldegroot2 ♦672 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683374953/historyRegarding this old way, are you sure it is a named alley? Is the footway next to it not an alley?Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 14:11 | Jez Nicholson | Hey Daniel,Good point. Springfield Mews is a new mini-development of 4 houses squeezed between the railway line and the Open House pub. The street sign appeared during the building stage and I mapped it before knowing that it would just be a path. Changed to a footway.....What I don't know is... | |
| 106102516 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-06-09 14:43 | 1 | 2021-06-13 12:54 | Brian de Ford ♦5 | "Blue plaque" is perfect.1) There is nothing in the wiki page for blue plaque deprecating the tag. It is a perfectly valid tag which I chose with all due deliberation.2) It IS a blue plaque in EVERY sense. It is a plaque. It is blue. It meets the criteria in the wikipedia artic... |
| 2 | 2021-06-13 14:35 | Jez Nicholson | Hi Brian, check out the Talk page of memorial=blue_plaque. Sure, we didn't get round to officially deprecating it...but I'm not really a fan of the tagging list 'officially' deprecating things. - Jez | |
| 3 | 2021-06-13 15:03 | Brian de Ford ♦5 | The talk page is inconclusive either way. As far as I'm concerned, if the actual page says it's valid then it's valid, irrespective of anything on the talk page.Both memorial=plaque and memorial=blue_plaque have the status "In use" so neither is more valid than the othe... | |
| 105831329 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-06-04 10:19 | 1 | 2021-06-04 18:18 | ndm ♦889 | It's 99% the wrong plaque/place -- it's nowhere near the "Chapel of the Three Kings" or "Foster's Almshouses" see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123978470 |
| 2 | 2021-06-05 11:29 | Jez Nicholson | Oh! Thanks for spotting Neil. I must have been having an off day. OpenPlaque 55158 is clearly over near Christmas Steps. This one is John Foster's former house, but not sure what the inscription says. - Jez | |
| 101514810 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-03-22 15:26 | 1 | 2021-03-23 11:29 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,would you mind checking these recycling tags? There are 11 that are not used in any other place. |
| 2 | 2021-03-23 11:44 | Jez Nicholson | Hi there, I'm working on a UK project to get accurate data on Household Waste Recycling Centres. This location has a particularly long list of what it will accept (taken the Council's web page https://beta.southglos.gov.uk/recycling-centres/) and some will be new to OSM. I will review t... | |
| 99684586 by Jez Nicholson @ 2021-02-21 15:13 | 1 | 2021-02-21 16:43 | spiregrain ♦195 | Oh dear - thanks for fixing these horrible typos. |
| 2 | 2021-02-21 17:25 | Jez Nicholson | No problem...couldn't resist it | |
| 93483344 by Jez Nicholson @ 2020-11-03 12:29 | 1 | 2020-12-14 10:57 | Robert Whittaker ♦271 | Did you mean to tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8077882100 with both amenity=recycling and shop=funeral_directors ? |
| 2 | 2020-12-14 16:55 | Jez Nicholson | ha! I claim the extenuating circumstances of it being a cold November dog walk, and me typing into Vespucci with cold, fat fingers whilst said dog pulls on the lead making the phone move. :D | |
| 89984122 by Jez Nicholson @ 2020-08-26 17:24 | 1 | 2020-08-27 18:19 | gnesss ♦15 | Looks like it's to the north of the area you mapped to me.. 52.42272/-1.21109 |
| 2 | 2020-08-28 07:12 | Jez Nicholson | oh yes, thank you, got it! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90063511 | |
| 84608030 by Jez Nicholson @ 2020-05-04 08:27 | 1 | 2020-06-25 13:29 | mcld ♦68 | Hi Jez - you edited the capacity of this one from 18 to 21.6 MW. The tag still says the source is REPD, but I presume you've a different source for that?I don't know the true value myself - I notice that both of the REPD entries are for 18 MW and both were approved (in different years)... |
| 2 | 2020-06-26 11:35 | Jez Nicholson | Can't quite remember, but I think I got the value by looking at the planning applications and confirming that this is indeed 2308 and 5315 merged. | |
| 81453544 by Jez Nicholson @ 2020-02-25 11:59 | 1 | 2020-02-25 18:06 | ndrw6 ♦76 | Hi, thank you for fixing what looks like my mistake. |
| 76265460 by Jez Nicholson @ 2019-10-27 13:01 | 1 | 2019-11-16 14:19 | mcld ♦68 | REPD says 3.1 MW for this one. Did you get 3.8 MW from another source? |
| 2 | 2019-11-17 18:15 | Jez Nicholson | Ah, looking at the history this feature already had 3.8MW on it. Repd has an estimate for power rating...it could be a figure from the builders | |
| 3 | 2019-11-17 19:27 | mcld ♦68 | Oops, I should have noticed that the number didn't come from you originally - thanks | |
| 70757918 by Jez Nicholson @ 2019-05-30 07:01 | 1 | 2019-05-30 14:15 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Jez,I think you've still got the restaurant tag active for Jamie's Italian. old_name=Jamie's Italian currently corresponds well with active mapping communities: Nottingham, York, Bristol, Edinburgh, Glasgow & Brighton :-).Jerry |
| 2 | 2019-05-30 15:35 | Jez Nicholson | Thanks Jerry,I've changed it to a shop=vacant but is that consistent? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/622204335Jez | |
| 3 | 2019-05-30 15:38 | SK53 ♦864 | I generally do that if the place is obviously retail premises. I didn't do that for the Nottingham one because it's located in an old town house, so what it becomes next I don't know. Paul Smith next door doesn't really look like a shop from outside (not much changed from this ph... | |
| 63064789 by Jez Nicholson @ 2018-09-30 14:05 | 1 | 2018-10-03 11:03 | eric_ ♦55 | Hi Jez, any particular reason to have tagged this POI with amenity=camera_obscura?ThanksEric |
| 2 | 2018-10-03 13:40 | Jez Nicholson | Hi eric_Following on from curiosity about the camera obscura near me in Hove i've found and tagged all the camera obscura's in the UK. Tag is not obvious as it is somewhat rare, but it is not always a tourist attraction, sometimes an artwork, but mostly an amenity like a telescope. I w... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-10 14:36 | eric_ ♦55 | Hi Jez,Thanks for your answer. As camera obscura POIs are probably a tricky case to map at a national level, it seems appropriate to leave it as it is right now. From my pov, another way to map them would be to use the description tag (e.g. description= Camera obscura) rather than the amenity one.... | |
| 61658726 by Jez Nicholson @ 2018-08-14 13:35 | 1 | 2018-08-14 14:56 | giggls ♦104 | Neither construction nor proposed would becorrect at the current stage of the structure IMO. Just prefix the highway key with disused: or abondoned:This said routing will not happen anyway as the access drives have been tagged acces=no. |
| 2 | 2018-08-14 16:25 | luschi ♦417 | Hello,please stop editing in this area!As I can see, you are not a regional mapper.If you will help, you can comment tagging in the node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1489296thanks | |
| 3 | 2018-08-14 16:41 | giggls ♦104 | I just commented to a changeset so why do you think I would be editing? I never do this without local knowledge.I still think, that highway=construction is not correct though. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-14 17:03 | luschi ♦417 | Hi giggls,war nicht an dich gerichtet.Lokale Mapper sind nur angepisst dass jeder glaubt es besser zu wissen aus den Nachrichten.Construction ist hier wohl nicht korrekt, da stimme ich dir zu.lg | |
| 47315956 by Jez Nicholson @ 2017-03-31 07:39 | 1 | 2017-03-31 11:37 | hadw ♦80 | addr:housename is not appropriate for a trading estate; addr:place may be right. Also the web site gives the information needed for addr:unit.In addition, if it is possible to deduce the boundary, with reasonable accuracy , it would be useful to map the name and extent of the trading estate (as... |
| 2 | 2017-03-31 12:04 | Jez Nicholson | thanks. I've amended the address. Am armchair mapping so will have to see about a site visit for the trading estate | |
| 42681272 by Jez Nicholson @ 2016-10-06 11:13 | 1 | 2016-10-06 19:03 | SK53 ♦864 | I'd put Premier as brand=Premier. It's a trading fascia owned by Booker Group (formerly a buying group IIRC). The shop is likely operated entirely by the folk behind the counter. |
| 2 | 2016-10-07 07:33 | Jez Nicholson | Thanks Jerry. Agreed. I've updated it. |