| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 157690119 by Kai Johnson @ 2024-10-09 21:09 | 1 | 2024-10-09 21:16 | Kai Johnson | I feel like this changeset needs a little more explanation than would have fit in the comment. The roads in Mesquite Valley have conflicting names in different sources. Where possible, I tried to reconcile BLM, San Bernardino County road centerline data, and San Bernardino County assessor maps. Unfo... |
| 155106353 by Kai Johnson @ 2024-08-11 14:44 | 1 | 2024-08-11 19:37 | 217541OSM ♦29 | Hi, did you use a 4x4 to get up Cerro Gordo or manage it with a civilian car? I'm wondering how bad that road is. |
| 2 | 2024-08-11 19:44 | Kai Johnson | Judging from the changeset, you're asking about Swansea Grade? If so, I wouldn't try that without a high-clearance 4WD vehicle. The Cerro Gordo Road from Keeler is more civilized. But it's been washed out and rebuilt a couple of times since I last saw it. Used to be a 2WD vehicle coul... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-11 19:55 | 217541OSM ♦29 | I see. It reminds me of White Mountain Road where it becomes unpaved - possible to drive with a 2WD, but it's terrible. Thank you for the info | |
| 153555670 by Kai Johnson @ 2024-07-04 16:34 | 1 | 2024-07-04 16:58 | Thoi trang nam cao cap Insidemen ♦1 | wow |
| 2 | 2024-07-04 17:48 | Kai Johnson | Hi! This update was a follow up to a project to add missing named summits in Alaska using GNIS data using automation to speed up manual review. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:B1tw153/recoGNISer. But GNIS data isn't always right. In this case, I was able to identify a more likely l... | |
| 130766068 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-01-01 22:51 | 1 | 2024-05-18 15:18 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Thanks for adding up the highway. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766068 |
| 144797667 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-12-05 16:04 | 1 | 2024-05-18 01:29 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for updating the map. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144797667 |
| 2 | 2024-05-18 04:04 | Kai Johnson | Thank you for your recent changeset reviews and for the kind comments! I really appreciate them! | |
| 130767351 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-01-02 00:03 | 1 | 2024-05-18 02:11 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for mapping and updating the fictitious information. Much appreciated. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767351 |
| 131428586 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-01-18 15:41 | 1 | 2024-05-14 08:05 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Your changeset comment is impressive. Keep up the good work. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131428586 ... |
| 144800037 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-12-05 17:09 | 1 | 2024-05-13 10:49 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144800037 |
| 130766107 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-01-01 22:54 | 1 | 2024-05-13 10:29 | Aarogya Pandey ♦266 | Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766107 |
| 131947439 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-02-01 05:37 | 1 | 2024-04-10 06:09 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,404 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10597985875/historysource=overpass_parserWhat does it mean in this context? |
| 2 | 2024-04-10 14:34 | Kai Johnson | This changeset was early in the development of the GNIS matching software: https://github.com/b1tw153/recogniser.The source and gnis:feature_class tags were manually added as we were debugging the software and can be safely removed. | |
| 144153446 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-11-17 20:18 | 1 | 2023-11-18 00:55 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | Merci Kai pour ton aide. Peux tu préciser pourquoi tu as ajouté une nouvelle relation plutôt que de prendre l'existante? Une des bonnes pratiques est bien de garder l'historique. Pourrais tu as ce moment là, ajouter tes nouveaux ilots dans l'ancienne relatio... |
| 2 | 2023-12-05 14:47 | Kai Johnson | Désolé, il a fallu si longtemps pour résoudre ce problème. J'ai ajouté la relation/16710916 avec la balise natural=reef pour représenter la zone du récif excluant les zones de la terre et du lagon. J'essayais d'empêcher le rendu d... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-05 14:56 | Kai Johnson | Je viens de regarder de plus près la relation/6082214. Dans sa configuration actuelle, la superficie de l'atoll ne comprend que le récif et exclut les îles et le lagon. Je pense qu'il serait peut-être préférable que la relation inclue soit uniquement... | |
| 4 | 2023-12-05 19:20 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | Pour les questions de rendu, je pense qu'une fois la manière de cartographier trouvée on pourra remonter aux différents rendus.. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-05 20:40 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | Pour la relation je suis en train de me dire que l'on est peut-être parti d'une mauvaise interprétation de la définition. Un atoll peut être défini comme sa limite extérieur (tout comme une île le serait avec la limite terre mer). Ainsi on se d... | |
| 6 | 2023-12-05 20:40 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | (pas eu de retour suite a l'annonce sur la liste de discussion il y a 15jours) | |
| 2 | 2023-07-13 21:22 | Kai Johnson | Hi,I'm glad we can have this discussion but let's continue it in direct messages since we're already in touch there. That will give us an opportunity to have a more detailed conversation.Thanks! | |
| 3 | 2023-07-13 18:23 | Kai Johnson | Thanks for adding the Wikidata ID and link to the English Wikipedia article!It may be that the Google translation isn't so good, but I found the English version to be a much better explanation of the feature.I noticed that the natural=cliff tagging might not be right, but figured that w... | |
| 4 | 2023-07-13 18:30 | Kai Johnson | It seems possible that way/157329997 and way/625187013 could be merged with the tags transferred.Since this is a geological feature, aerial imagery might not give us a good representation of the extent of the feature. (Some parts may not be apparent in the imagery, or might be obscured e.g. by s... | |
| 5 | 2023-07-13 18:34 | Kai Johnson | And of course, the tag for that "cliff" would need to end up in the right place after the merge.My inclination is to presume that whoever mapped it before got it right. | |
| 2 | 2023-07-13 16:41 | Kai Johnson | Hi Krako73. Thanks for getting in touch by direct message as well. Let's continue the conversation there where it's easier to have a more detailed discussion. | |
| 138165534 by Kai Johnson @ 2023-07-05 22:39 | 1 | 2023-07-06 21:40 | OddBunsen ♦15 | Please try to separate large changesets so they take up less space. |
| 2 | 2023-07-06 21:47 | Kai Johnson | Ah yes. It was that one extra node on the other continent. Sorry. | |
| 130620927 by Kai Johnson @ 2022-12-28 22:33 | 1 | 2022-12-29 20:50 | Kai Johnson | USFS has this road clearly named "Sheephead Mountain Road" to match the local "Sheephead Mountain" peak. The change to "Spearhead Mountain Road" was erroneous and I have reverted it. |
| 130621268 by Kai Johnson @ 2022-12-28 22:48 | 1 | 2022-12-29 20:48 | Kai Johnson | This section of road is either named "Thing Valley Road" (according to USFS and USGS) or "Desert View Road" (according to SanGIS). The USFS name is more likely to be correct as this road is managed by USFS. There is no evidence to support the fictitious name in the prior changese... |
| 130131307 by Kai Johnson @ 2022-12-15 21:10 | 1 | 2022-12-21 13:38 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hi there. I do a lot of mapping and hiking around here. I was actually just out there the other day and added some of the trails a few weeks ago. From what I can tell the area for the OHV Area is much to large and doesn't fit reality. At least not in my experience. Really I think it's most... |
| 2 | 2022-12-21 13:45 | Adamant1 ♦222 | BTW, what I mean by "it's mostly the trails" is that the OHV area is mainly or only the trails on the west side of the dam. There's a staging area right below the powerplant on the west side of the river and that's about it. No one can or does ride their off road vehicles so... | |
| 3 | 2022-12-21 15:13 | Kai Johnson | Hi Adamant1! The boundary data comes from the BLM GIS hub and specifically from this data set: https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/blm-ca-off-highway-vehicle-designations/explore?location=40.719376%2C-122.390878%2C10.99When you say "it's mostly the trails," that's co... | |
| 4 | 2022-12-21 15:37 | Adamant1 ♦222 | >OHV driving is permitted only on designated routes within this area. I haven't measured, but BLM says that more than 250 miles of roads and trails in the area are open to OHV use.I was looking looking at the https://webmaps.blm.gov/program_apps/BLM_Natl_Recreation_Opportunities/ a few... | |
| 5 | 2022-12-21 16:18 | Kai Johnson | I don't think that mapping the area as BLM has designated it gives the impression that the entire area is driveable. I do think it's helpful to identify the area for recreation, because that's clearly the land manager's intention. You've suggested deleting the area completel... | |
| 6 | 2022-12-21 17:41 | Adamant1 ♦222 | <I don't think that mapping the area as BLM has designated it gives the impression that the entire area is driveable.Cool. I didn't say anything about drivability. What I did say is that most of it isn't owned or operated by the BLM when that's how you mapped it. What part... | |
| 7 | 2022-12-21 17:54 | Adamant1 ♦222 | BTW, just to clarify something the Chappie Shasta Off-Highway Vehcile Guide shows what type of vehicles can drive on the roads. That's obviously different then who can access them. Just because a car can drive down a private asphalt road doesn't mean everyone with a car can drive down it, ... | |
| 8 | 2022-12-21 18:44 | Kai Johnson | It doesn't sound like we're going to come to an agreement about mapping the OHV area, since I think it should stay on the map as is.But I hope we're both in agreement that the roads and trails in the area should be mapped with appropriate access conditions. | |
| 9 | 2022-12-22 02:42 | Adamant1 ♦222 | >But I hope we're both in agreement that the roads and trails in the area should be mapped with appropriate access conditions.100%. like I said I was already in the process of mapping them based on the BLM map and ground surveying. If you look at you can see I added Escape Trail and the ... | |
| 10 | 2022-12-22 02:44 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I'll probably re-map it at some point after the roads are done being mapped, but as a small area that actually represents reality. | |
| 11 | 2022-12-22 02:48 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Not to beat a dead horse, but on the northern east end of the area there's a power plant slightly south of the dam. The road is inside the area you mapped. Although it's fenced and gated off INRL. Which can partly be seen on the map. The idea that people can drive their dirt bikes to the p... | |
| 12 | 2022-12-22 15:11 | Kai Johnson | I think you've misunderstood. The only access conditions that apply in this area are the ones tagged on the highways themselves.I'm optimistic that there will be a broader discussion among members of the OHV community about how to map areas like this, so we may have some broader commun... | |
| 13 | 2022-12-22 15:31 | Kai Johnson | Also, for what it's worth, I got a reply from Ranger Swartlander at the Redding BLM field office about the designated roads and trails on the OHV map that cross private land. BLM does indeed manage those roads and trails and they are open to public access. However, access to the private land of... | |
| 14 | 2022-12-22 15:45 | Adamant1 ♦222 | He or her can say that, but it's debatable and hasn't been my experience from actually hiking around there. Random government employees aren't authoritative anyway. Regardless though, even if that is the case the landuse=recreation_ground tag is for "An open space for general... | |
| 15 | 2022-12-22 15:47 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Compromise is a good a thing and it's rare people are even willing to do it on here. | |
| 16 | 2022-12-22 16:17 | Adamant1 ♦222 | https://www.coramranch.com/5 star $2,200 per night ranch houses that do corporate retreats and reunions. I bet they would just love a bunch of random drunk people driving 4 wheelers through their thousands of dollars corporate retreat. Sure dude. | |
| 17 | 2022-12-22 16:42 | Adamant1 ♦222 | https://cdn.hibuwebsites.com/e12eeabe2e114277b02a954912640c97/files/uploaded/coram-ranch-diagram-pdf.jpgTop left, "private drive." Sure, there's a "bike area" to north of the orchards which is along the road and I'm sure people could probably ride there dirt bikes t... | |
| 126521345 by Kai Johnson @ 2022-09-22 20:47 | 1 | 2022-09-28 01:48 | orthocircular ♦122 | Hey there thanks for this contribution however there was already a node for this feature when you added the line (10017047729), and it seems like a node (coordinates sourced from USGS) may be more appropriate than a line (topo maps suggest the basin is not linear, and doesn't really extend nort... |
| 2 | 2022-09-28 03:13 | Kai Johnson | Thanks for catching the duplicate node. Sorry I missed that. The line was an attempt to reflect the broader area of the basin, but a node is fine. | |
| 121250348 by Kai Johnson @ 2022-05-20 15:27 | 1 | 2022-05-22 13:28 | user_5359 ♦20,546 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369172293. What is the meaning of the tag mrds:id = W024802? Is this a reference value? Did you mean ref:mrdata? |
| 2 | 2022-05-22 14:34 | Kai Johnson | Hi! The original data for the node was apparently from USGS GNIS. When. I came across it, I updated it with data from USGS MRDS (Mineral Resources Data System), which is a more complete source for data on mines and quarries. There were some discrepancies between the GNIS and MRDS data, hence the sou... | |
| 3 | 2022-05-22 16:09 | user_5359 ♦20,546 | The prefix ref: clearly states that the value is a unique key from a source. Additionally, if this is only used in one country, then deep:<country code>: would be recommended. So here ref:US: would be the descriptive prefix. | |
| 4 | 2022-05-23 14:57 | Kai Johnson | That makes sense. Thanks! |