79 Changesets created by Kookykooky have been discussed with 62 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
183825824
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-06-08 12:12
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 19 days agostreckenkundler
♦1,181
Was ist die echte, reale Grundlage? Bitte echte Quellen! Dann: bei solchen Dingen zwingend, nie und nimmermals Relationen schrotten! Die Nacharbeiten dann sind erheblich aufwändiger!
Ich hab das zurückgebaut...

verärgerte Grüße...
2 ~ 14 days agoKookykooky Hi,
all changes we make to OSM are based on current reports from our users who cannot or do not want to make changes directly to OSM.
#mapycom
165023612
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-04-16 11:09
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 22 days agokuhni74
♦461
this is not an alpine hut for tourism any more, only a museum
183875189
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-06-09 13:08
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoMaplev
♦17
"access=private"? Where did you get that info?
2 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the warning, it seems there was a mistake here, it doesn't look like a private road. I've adjusted the access.
183681938
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-06-05 08:22
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoYog Sot
♦507
you didnt give any source, i'm reverting this
2 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Hi, the signature #mapycom means that the recorded change is not a random one, but is based on a report from our user who has actual experience with the place, but is unable to record this change on OSM himself. The user wrote to us that the path is completely impassable, so I removed it.
So, this ...
3 ~ 1 month agoYog Sot
♦507
your user is wrong. You should quote that report along with a report date. So that i can survey yet again, which i did 2 weeks ago btw.
Impassable is actually a visibility value, but it should only be used if it's so.
The only prob with this path is that it's steep
4 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the clarification.
Have a nice day
183190197
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-05-26 06:52
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
Cześć, z tego co pamiętam, to te ciągi pieszo-rowerowe były poprawnie zmapowane i jeżeli znaki nie zostały wymienione, to ta edycja jest błędna. Nie wszędzie jest tam 'Droga dla pieszych i rowerów' - wg znaków są tam też chodniki z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym.
...
2 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Hi, according to our information, there is a widely used cycle path along the canal. We are not sure whether it is properly marked in the terrain. We found this arrangement suitable.
3 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
Hi, thank you for the explanation. I confirm that these roads are frequently used by cyclists. According to Polish law, we have various signage options for such roads, and the rights of cyclists on these paths depend on this signage. OpenStreetMap in Poland uses appropriate tagging based on these si...
4 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
I rolled back this edit - the roads were tagged correctly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183249879
5 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Thanks, sorry for the inconvenience. I'll be more careful next time.
Have a nice day
6 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
While reverting the changes, I verified the tagging and fixed some of it at the end. So this edit helped improve the map. Thanks! Have a nice day too!
183245608
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-05-27 09:23
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
If you try to correct your edits, you're making it even worse, blocking cyclists from accessing these roads. Perhaps it would be better to withdraw your edits in this area instead of correcting them with errors?
2 ~ 1 month agoMarek-M
♦1,080
I rolled back this edit - the roads were tagged correctly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183249879
182586724
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-05-13 07:37
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoNorthCrab_upload
♦8,771
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227636780

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
2 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky thanks, repaired #mapycom :)
182540269
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-05-12 06:58
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agoNorthCrab_upload
♦8,771
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604104822
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338232584

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
2 ~ 1 month agoKookykooky Thanks for the warning, I've removed the duplication.
#mapycom
182237146
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-05-05 08:08
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agomaro21
♦885
What is the source of this information?
2 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky Hi, the information is from a local user.
3 ~ 2 months agomaro21
♦885
Who exactly? Because a local user also added this ferry route.
4 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky We cannot share the user's contact information for data protection reasons. The user wrote this: "To nie jest przystań i prom działa nielegalnie. Nie ma umowy z PGW Wody Polskie. Prosze o wykreślenie."
5 ~ 2 months agomaro21
♦885
I see. Thanks
181571871
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-04-20 09:08
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agoNorthCrab_upload
♦8,771
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/20982...
2 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky Hi, fixed, thanks for the notice.
Have a nice day
Kookykooky
181625061
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-04-21 12:25
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agoTomas Straupis
♦2,095
Hello. Change reverted, you've actually destroyed a much more detailed data.
2 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky Hi, sorry, I didn't notice that. Thanks.
181447765
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-04-17 09:16
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agoNorthCrab_upload
♦8,771
Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2098208935

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
2 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the warning, I didn't realize that, fixed it. Hopefully it's ok now
Kookykooky#mapycom
181356300
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-04-15 09:02
~ 2 months ago
1 ~ 2 months agoMarek-M
♦1,080
You created a duplicate of enforcement relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12142771 and moved the speed camera to the wrong location. I'll fix your edit.
2 ~ 2 months agoKookykooky Hi, I apologize for the mistake, probably due to inattention. Thanks for the correction
181090432
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-04-09 10:48
~ 3 months ago
1 ~ 3 months agoYog Sot
♦507
i think you messed up a little bit landuse geometry around Głęboczek lake.
Also, what was this change about? Trojanka is not a river? ppl reported that?
2 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky Hi, I am not aware of any degradation, I just adjusted the drawing to more recent aerial photos. Since this "river" is a stream according to the description on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojanka_(river) and considering that it does not even look like a river on aerial photos,...
3 ~ 3 months agoYog Sot
♦507
yeah, you are right. It was hard to see at first.
An you're right about the relation.
I didnt add it, but did some landuse shifts
180613250
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-03-30 06:01
~ 3 months ago
1 ~ 3 months agosembelst134
♦44
Hello, can you please explain the reason for your change?
According to the wiki, attraction=summer_toboggan is a cart that rides freely down a long chute. (e.g. way/48537566)
The Othal Coaster (https://othal.de/winter/aktiv/othal-coaster/) is a cart fixed to tracks and therefore attraction=alpine_...
2 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky Hi,
ok, I looked at it, according to the OSM wiki it should be attraction=alpine_coaster https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dalpine_coaster . I edited it.
Thanks for the warning
Adéla #mapycom
3 ~ 3 months agosembelst134
♦44
Hi,
the wiki says:
- NODE or AREA with attraction=alpine_coaster: node/13575533993
- WAY with roller_coaster=track which means do not use oneway=yes (or bridge): way/1348737449
- leisure=track is wrong!

I've fixed it back to the correct version, so no need for you to edit it again.
165413172
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-04-25 09:06
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 3 months agosembelst134
♦44
Hello, you have 'closed' this way.
Do you remember why?
This way isn't traversing the geotechnical restriction area https://www.lmbv.de/bergbaufolgen/bergschaeden-sperrungen/sperrbereiche-lausitz/ and according to the Strava heatmap it's commonly used to cross from Sedlitz to t...
2 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky Hi, on 20.4.25 we received a message from a user about the closure of this route. It is possible that this closure is no longer in effect. Should I modify the access?
Thanks
Adéla #mapycom
3 ~ 3 months agosembelst134
♦44
Thanks for the reply.
Neither one of us can verify the closure. So if your mapycom report hasn't contained a picture clarifying the cause, it might be the best idea to revert your change.
4 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky ok, access modified
Adéla #mapycom
179989667
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-03-17 08:02
~ 3 months ago
1 ~ 3 months agogrzegorz75jan
♦669
Z jakiego powodu np. tą drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347816194 zamieniłeś z service na track ?
To ewidentnie droga prowadząca do zabudowań i jest co najmniej podjazdem czyli
highway=service
service=driveway
Zdjęcia lotnicze wskazują, że droga na tym odcinku jest użytkowana...
2 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky Hi,
I changed the road type to "service", but added information about the surface.
Have a nice day
3 ~ 3 months agogrzegorz75jan
♦669
Thx.
177843605
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-01-29 11:43
~ 5 months ago
1 ~ 3 months agoqstep
♦133
Hi. I think you misplaced this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472323759#map=19/47.861365/17.274706&layers=N

It should be at the intersection of Mosonyi Mihály utca and Aranyossziget utca: https://www.kisalfold.hu/helyi-kozelet/2024/12/korforgalom-mosonmagyarovar

Also...
2 ~ 3 months agoKookykooky Hi, I'm very sorry, you're right, I messed up, I fixed it. Hopefully it's fine now.
Thanks
175366074
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-12-01 16:17
~ 7 months ago
1 ~ 4 months agoOskarst_
♦91
Hi,

Looks like you replaced footway with track for Løvstien, setting access for motor vehicles to no. Løvstien is zoned as a hiking trail, and although it's both compact and wide enough for motorized vehicles, I'm not sure if the tag is appropriate seeing it's built f...
2 ~ 4 months agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the message, I found this marking more appropriate. But I believe that other people may see it differently. That is also the magic of OSM and the occasional eternal arguing :D
Have a nice day
3 ~ 4 months agoOskarst_
♦91
How did you find it more appropriate? The wiki states that the track tag is for minor land-access roads. Seeing that this is built by the municipality solely for recreational non motorized use, I don't really see how it fits. Furthermore, the footway tag has been used for twelve years without a...
4 ~ 4 months agoKookykooky Ok,
I have fixed it back to its original state, sorry for the inconvenience.
Have a nice day
176637010
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-12-30 16:31
~ 6 months ago
1 ~ 5 months agoPyknite
♦6
This changeset is WRONG, old chairlift had been replaced by a new gondola already active from 4/12/26, see official sources:

https://www.dolomitisuperski.com/it/live-info/impianti/arabba-marmolada

https://www.facebook.com/mydolomiti.italian/photos/-nuova-cabinovia-nuova-esperienzala-nuova-cabi...
2 ~ 5 months agoPyknite
♦6
https://www.facebook.com/mydolomiti.italian/photos/-nuova-cabinovia-nuova-esperienzala-nuova-cabinovia-lezuo-ha-sostituito-la-vecch/1292796882877167/ this is fixed second link, additionally you can check here that old chairlift had been removed https://www.skiresort.it/comprensorio-sciistico/arabba-...
3 ~ 5 months agoKookykooky Hi,
ok, sorry for the incorrect correction.
I'll be more careful next time.
Kookykooky
177019584
by Kookykooky
@ 2026-01-09 10:29
~ 6 months ago
1 ~ 6 months agoTomas Straupis
♦2,095
Čia supermarket Kardiolitos klinika?
2 ~ 6 months agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the warning, due to inattention I forgot to change the type.
Adéla
3 ~ 6 months agoTomas Straupis
♦2,095
Thank you :-)
173215547
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-10-13 08:59
~ 8 months ago
1 ~ 7 months agoburrscurr
♦96
Hi Kookykooky,

I came across this change and am a bit unsure in which way these allotments are in fact a amenity=community_center. From looking at their website, this place is described as having a toilet since 2012 and a specific plot that can be rented for parties (neither of which strikes me a...
2 ~ 7 months agoKookykooky Hi burrscurr,
I looked at it and I guess I didn't choose the right category. It really doesn't look like a community center. I removed the tag. I'll try to be more careful next time. Thanks
Have a nice day
Kookykooky
170482506
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-08-15 14:00
~ 10 months ago
1 ~ 8 months agognlpfth
♦85
Hi,

as you added aerialways to the map, that were torn down already, I had to revert this changeset. Maybe you should consider sticking to your area instead of editing all over Europe without any local knowledge at all.

Greets
2 ~ 8 months agoKookykooky Hi, thanks for the correction. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Adéla
150171200
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-04-18 11:44
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 9 months agoLuzandro
♦1,008
Hi,

did you actually read and understand the note that you have removed? The bridge that you have added is only temporary in the winter, while in the main season it's a ferry. Therefore for the important time of the year your change is incorrect and the information about the special situatio...
2 ~ 9 months agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the correction, sorry for the mistake, I must have overlooked it.
169603419
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-07-28 10:00
~ 11 months ago
1 ~ 11 months agoDodoGTA
♦53
Is there on-the-ground evidence that the address belongs to that building? The government's address data says the address actually belongs to the building south-west of this one (or west of the "Vakarų st." bus stops)
169397861
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-07-24 13:04
~ 11 months ago
1 ~ 11 months agoDawid2849
♦915
Thanks!
155508520
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-08-20 13:03
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoAndreas Binder
♦259
Hi, what was the reason to tag the Ramserer Alm as tourism=alpine_hut?
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, after a year, I'm not sure why I added this tag. After checking, I removed it, thanks for pointing out the inaccuracy. #mapycom
3 ~ 1 year agoAndreas Binder
♦259
Thank you
167566071
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-06-13 09:15
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoAldo Colombo
♦3
Circa un mese fa ho inserito il nodo 12909701394 con il nome q.2244, ma è stato cancellato.
Potete spiegarmi il motivo?
Grazie.
2 ~ 1 year agoAldo Colombo
♦3
Questa cima è presente sulla Carta dell'Istituto Geografico Militare Italiano e sulla Carta Nazionale Svizzera.
3 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, thanks for the warning, I had the wrong information, corrected
151598359
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-05-20 20:01
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 1 year agokuhni74
♦461
the track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062921897 is tagged with "access=permissive" and "toll=yes" - this would mean that motor_vehicles are admitted if they are paid for?
2 ~ 1 year agokuhni74
♦461
access with toll has been quit, only forestry vehicles are admitted now (I was there)
3 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky thanks for adding information
166873753
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-05-28 12:23
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoTomas Straupis
♦2,095
Hello, please do not remove actually useful tags without local knowledge. It is an actual place of worship. I will revert the change as it has damaged good data.
166289384
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-05-15 07:33
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoTatfahren
♦362
If roads are private (as driveways normally are) it should get "access=private" (if access is signed). But do not delete them if they exist.
163907451
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-03-21 13:54
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoAndersAndersson
♦648
What are the source for this campsite?
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky It's from our user, documented with a photo. #mapycz
162690118
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-02-19 08:21
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agowielandb
♦141
Hi!
Why did you add the name=-Tag to this guidepost?
162885950
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-02-24 10:38
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoflohoff
♦2,513
Moin,
ich habe hier gerade den changeset gesehen - der hat zu einer ROutingänderung geführt:

Rot - Alt - Grün Neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=661053,990870

Dann hab ich mir die tags angesehen.

Sollte das nicht zu highway=construction + construction=secondary werden?
...
162203143
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-02-06 10:58
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agobxl-forever
♦2,965
Hello.
Nice that you want to add buildings but… can you please avoid tracing buildings on aerial imagery.
We do not do this in Belgium. Every time someone does this, it takes ages to repair and slows down the effort to add missing buildings even more.
In this area of Belgium (Flanders), t...
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the warning, I'm very sorry for the mess I caused, I will repair the buildings according to the correct base, thanks.
Kookykooky
162160441
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-02-05 11:03
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoPiz Pachific
♦97
Reverted by #162163622. See: https://www.valsurses.ch/de/vom-ursprung-des-lai-barnagn or https://mein-ziel-savognin.ch/2021/05/30/lai-barnagn-savognin/
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, thanks for the info. I apologize for the mistake, I see you've already fixed it. Thanks
161338841
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-01-14 10:09
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
Hi! Is the guidepost really mounted on the house wall?
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, I deduced this information from the attached documentation https://data.vorarlberg.gv.at/raumplanung/wanderweg_standortblatt/76_Schoppernau/76.90W.pdf
3 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
Where can you find that information in the document?
On the first page, I can only read in the top left corner (translated): ‘Attachment at Hundsweg on the residential side’. And at the bottom of the diagram it says ‘new mounting (300/60)’, which stands for a post 300 cm hig...
4 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, since the signpost was originally displayed INSIDE the building, the solution of moving the signpost ON the building seemed more logical to me. Don't you think?
Have a nice day
5 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
Hi, presumably the original position was based on previous slope preparations (last winter aerial images are from 2015). These can change every year and so the signposts for the winter hiking trails are also repositioned in the snow every year again. The Vorarlberger ‘Wanderwegekonzept’ ...
6 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, ok thanks for the info, if the placement on the house is wrong and bothers you, it can be easily fixed. Should I do it or will you? Next time I will be careful with these winter signposts and not place them on the wall of the building. Next time please write to me, "hey that's wrong, i...
7 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
I didn't want to waste any time. I've fixed it. Let's move on!
8 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Nothing happened, thanks :)
161095796
by Kookykooky
@ 2025-01-07 13:35
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
Grüß dich! Danke für die Änderungen.
Meines Wissens nach dürfen nach wie vor Kunden des Restaurants Fischteich dort parkieren. Hat sich daran nachweislich etwas geändert?
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, thanks for the clarification, we received a message from a user who visited the place: "There is no parking here in the winter season. There is no public parking in the whole of Zug." Based on it, we adjusted the access, I fixed the access to the parking back.
Have a nice day
160678480
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-12-27 14:20
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoTatfahren
♦362
Hallo Kookykooky,
Kannst du bei der Bearbeitung vielleicht "source:name" beachten, und dies entfernen wenn du eine andere Quelle verwendest?

Momentan ist eine Quelle angegeben, die zum zuvor eingetragenen Namen gehört.

https://zoomviewer.toolforge.org/index.php?f=Meilenblatt_...
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi Tatfahren,
we received a message from our user requesting a correction of the name of the peak. When I turned on the edit mode and displayed the available map layer "Saxony topographic map" offered by the osm editor, I found this name there. Based on this, I edited the name of the peak...
3 ~ 1 year agoTatfahren
♦362
I don't know which of the names are correct, I just wanted that the source of the old name from the peak is removed or updated, because you changed the "name" without changing "source:name".

The "source" tag can be used as a key (for the whole object) or as a pr...
4 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the warning, it took a while, but now I understand. I updated the source:name tag. Hopefully it's fine now :)
Have a nice day
160420246
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-12-20 06:50
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agomcliquid
♦2,088
Hi, wayside_chapel is deprecated. I've changed it to wayside_shrine.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=wayside%20chapel?uselang=en

All the best
mcliquid
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for info :)
Kookykooky
158883519
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-11-08 07:15
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoRoad–Runner
♦221
Hi. I don't think it makes sene to add the gorge to the way. The gorge should represent the gorge, visible at the terrain model.
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, does it really bother you to put the natural=gorge tag on a path if the section of this path describes the course of the gorge? Or would it be better to put it on the stream section? thanks for the opinion
Adéla
3 ~ 1 year agoRoad–Runner
♦221
Thank you for the repsonse. I was wondering why the gorge was added to the way and is so short. But I saw some images online and it seems its really so narrow and small. So I think it is all right, sorry for any inconveniences.
4 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hello, nothing happened :)
Have a nice day
A.
158851649
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-11-07 11:22
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoRoad–Runner
♦221
Hello, this seems to be a descriptive name. I doubt it's called like this, is it?
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi, thanks for the message, do you really mind this name? If so, I'll remove it. This name is not really carved anywhere. I don't normally use artificial names, but I found it useful here.
Thanks
Adéla
157995159
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:37
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
Hello Kookykooky: in Spain there is an agreement for the treatment and labeling of EuroVelo routes.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rutas-eurovelo-en-espana/108020

Saludos.
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the information, but I still don't understand why Spain is special within the whole EV8 route and it is forbidden to have a "name" tag for this part, which is quite common for cycle routes. All the other parts of this route have a tag name and it seems pointless to me ...
3 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
Hello Kookykooky: the EuroVelo routes that have been recently reviewed have included those raised in the OpenStreetMap Forum. It is not considered necessary to carry the name=* tag. In case of disagreement, this is the place to raise it.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-creation-of-a-...
157994670
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:23
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157994861
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:28
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157994118
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:03
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157994384
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:13
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157994594
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:20
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157994952
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:31
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157995053
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-17 07:34
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoMarinoBM
♦164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
157908277
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-10-15 07:55
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agosilversurfer83
♦4,148
Howdy :)

just a little heads up: Good of you to use the lifecycle prefixes on empty shops. One little thing, though: please remove all unnessesary tags like opening_hours and phone and so on when a shop closes. I went ahead and did that here.

cheers
silversurfer83
---
...
157065384
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-09-25 06:15
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoHalfix
♦40
Have you been there personally? I was there a few weeks ago and took a break at this spot. There are picnic tables a few meters into the forest (not visible from aerial images).
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Thanks for the note, I wasn't there in person, I edited it based on the report of a user who was there in person. Unfortunately, he probably didn't notice these tables and reported to us that they weren't there. I fixed it, thank you
Have a nice day
153957973
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-07-15 07:13
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agoderloris
♦39
Hello Kookykooky! You changed same access information for paths in Hallstatt to "private" although the paths are still public. So probably some anonymous user had given you a wrong hint. The best way in such cases is to make a note, so that local OSM users can check if the given informatio...
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Thanks for the heads up, we got a message from the alleged owner who doesn't want the public to walk around. We'll see if the person calls again. We do not have the opportunity to personally explore this place and evaluate the situation personally.
Thank you
Have a nice day :)
155130940
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-08-12 06:18
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agosilversurfer83
♦4,148
https://www.hessenschau.de/panorama/kellerwaldturm-in-jesberg-wieder-offen-v1,kurz-turm-100.html

hello there. The information you added seems outdated. Are you sure?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155130940
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Thanks for the heads up, we got old information, I fixed it.
Adéla
153954453
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-07-15 05:02
~ 1 year ago
1 ~ 1 year agosilversurfer83
♦4,148
Hi :)

when you're closing a highway to motorized traffic like that it would be nice to leave a note or a fixme with the OSM-objects so people can easily discover the reason. The way you did it people need to dig through the edit history and I know that not many mappers do that.

cheers
si...
2 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky Thanks for the advice, I didn't think of that, I'll do better next time :)
3 ~ 1 year agoKookykooky fixed, hopefully ok :)
4 ~ 1 year agosilversurfer83
♦4,148
That was quick :)

thank you and happy mapping
148557497
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-03-12 16:24
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agotrapicki
♦42
The imagery cannot produce any information for that specific tourist attraction.
Can you please provide any other source or reference for this feature?
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Hello,
the tourist attraction was inserted based on a report by a Mapy.cz user, it was documented by photos, more information including photos can be found here https://www.reisen-magazin.at/wandern/2014/05/erlebnisweg_moorwaldinbadleonfeldenooe.html
Adéla
147141601
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-02-06 16:05
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoProtoxenus
♦333
Hi,
If you are going to change something here, then please do it properly. A GmbH is a company, an association of persons. A terrain as it is mapped in OSM cannot be a GmbH. The GmbH is the operator, not the name. Telephone numbers in DE never have a zero after the +49. Zero is used in DE without t...
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Hi,
thanks for the message, I made the changes based on the documents - the website, which I also attached to the farm, see http://www.gut-dummerstorf.de/, here the farm is marked "Gut Dummerstorf GmbH"
Thank you for the warning and the phone number, I didn't know that, I'll ge...
3 ~ 2 years agoProtoxenus
♦333
Hi,
GmbH is the same as LTD. in english or in czech language: Společnost s ručením omezeným.
It is only the company which runs the farm, not the farm itsself.
Regards Protoxenus
4 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Hi,
if you have a problem with it, you can edit it and report it to Google, where they have it anyway :)
151633842
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-05-21 15:11
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoBienson
♦610
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151644199 - you should know better with 3700 edits.
150496102
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-04-25 13:08
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoibanez
♦90
Hi Kookykooky,
on the basis of which knowledge base were the changes made? Please provide details.
BR Jens
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Hi, the change was made based on a Mapy.cz user who reported it based on personal knowledge. I also checked the paved bike path using streetview on google maps.
3 ~ 2 years agoibanez
♦90
Hi,
you changes a lot of highway=path, highway=construction and even razed:highway into cycleways/footways. Parts of the path you changed are razed and completely new build (which is not applied on outdated street imagery) cycleways have a traffic sign DE:237 and footways have a traffic sign DE:23...
150538227
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-04-26 13:03
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agopitfire
♦736
Hi Kookykooky,
Please provide telephone number in international format (ITU-T E.164).
148921992
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-03-20 16:11
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoRobhubi
♦132
The key:name should only contain the proper name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names). "e-laden Tirol Charging Station” is not a proper name, but a generic name. Please note that charging stations in Austria do not usually have a proper name.
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Ok, thanks for your comment, I'll be more careful. :)
149555747
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-04-04 07:14
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
Hello, the street here is definitely not called "Melisau", there is no street sign for it. The official and official name here is "Bregenzerwaldstraße". The addr:-tags should therefore remain in place.
2 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
*official and legal name
3 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
See our a screenshot from our official GIS: https://ibb.co/ZJjGbNC
4 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky I looked at https://www.geoland.at/webgisviewer/geoland/map/Geoland_Viewer/Geoland and there is the street name Melisau, if you don't agree you can change it back. ... But I know that the official addresses here have the name "Melisau xxx, Egg" not "Bregenzerwaldstraße xxx,...
5 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
The entire Bregenzerwald is made up of hundreds of small hamlets, which are gradually being grouped together into village associations. The hamlet of Melisau was grouped into the municipality of Egg. In order to be able to correctly read the GIS in Austria, it is necessary to become familiar with th...
6 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky ok, thanks for the explanation
148950036
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-03-21 09:06
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
Was it wrong?
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky I looked again at the report from the user and according to the photo I found that he reported the wrong location, which, however, I do not recognize from the photo, so I deleted the guidepost. I have to be more careful.
148947648
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-03-21 08:05
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agomcliquid
♦2,088
What kind of guidepost is there? one for hiking or biking? or a general one for businesses?
148799245
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-03-18 05:48
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agosilversurfer83
♦4,148
Hi there :)

When POIs change (e.g. "close") I believe it to be better to use the lifecycle prefixes as described here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
silversurfer83
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c...
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky I also use the tag disused, sometimes, maybe this tag will be better here.
Thank you for your note :)
146328252
by Kookykooky
@ 2024-01-16 15:27
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoxephos1one
♦32
Hi,
according to the tagging guidelines your reclassification of this road seems to be wrong.
The carriageways are separated physically and there are two exits without any intersections along this section.
Therefore this section qualifies completely for being tagged as trunk.
2 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky The lanes of this road are separated for most of its length. I only corrected the qualification of a part of the road that was different from the rest, even though it looks exactly the same. It looks like I really requalified it wrong, but that means the rest of the road I didn't fix was wrong....
3 ~ 2 years agoxephos1one
♦32
I reverted your change (you also seem to have moved a catenary pole by mistake).
Tagging the road as trunk "along the entire mentioned length" would be wrong as there are intersections.
To be tagged as trunk the Wiki says the following (translated as good as Google and I can):
The decis...
4 ~ 2 years agoKookykooky Thanks for the heads up, I'll be more careful next time. At Mapycz we follow the official classification of roads and do not study what each road looks like, at OSM it is obviously different.
Thanks for your help and have a nice day :)
62723779
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-09-19 09:46
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Ako obycajne bez zdroja.
62725909
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-09-19 11:02
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Ze 'update'. Nezmyselna zmena, ktora odstranila znacenie o skole a len upresnila budovu (ktovie ako dobre, kedze o ziadnu 'college' sa nejedna).
81872015
by Kookykooky
@ 2020-03-06 14:06
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Slovenske nazvy poprosim.
81464326
by Kookykooky
@ 2020-02-25 16:39
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Zdravim, nejaky zdroj pre taky nazov rozhladne?
60596835
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-07-11 05:50
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Tak pridat genericky nazov name=Fontana je fakt uzitocne...
85720653
by Kookykooky
@ 2020-05-25 14:08
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Takze cela budova je zaroven bazenom? To vyzera divne. Pozor na to.
81592770
by Kookykooky
@ 2020-02-28 13:35
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Zdravim, som zvedavy kedy skonci tato hrr-akcia vykradania mapy.cz a naplnania OSM duplicitami a evidentnymi chybami. Netvrdim, ze vsetky Vase zmeny su zle, ale ocakaval by som vacsiu koordinovanost a kvalitu.
60596859
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-07-11 05:51
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Prosim nevymyslat si nazvy, ani do znacky "name" nezadavat opisy objektov.
82117712
by Kookykooky
@ 2020-03-12 14:38
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agocamelCaseNick
♦174
Hey,
doesn't "doplněna wikidata" mean you wanted to add a wikidata tag? You removed one, you had added a minute earlier.
And wikidata=Q1468337 doesn't look so bad.
Was this an accident, that you removed it or that you had added it?
CamelCaseNick
2 ~ 6 years agoKookykooky Hello,
thanks for the warning, yes, it was only an accident, I added a wikidata tag ones more :)
Kookykooky
62574929
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-09-14 08:09
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Zdravim, skolka sa znaci amenity=kindergarten na areali skolky, nie building=kindergarten na budove. Opravim. Prosim pouzivajte wiki.openstreetmap.org.
64693273
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-11-20 11:46
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoyzal
♦57
Zdravím, túto materskú škôlku ste práve presunuli do telocvične. Správne je pri tom vchode ako aj bola. http://www.msstvorlistok.estranky.sk/clanky/kde-nas-najdete.html
2 ~ 7 years ago*Martin*
♦661
Tiez prosim davajte zmysluplnejsie popisy zmien lebo "update" nie je velavravne. Dakujem.
58224750
by Kookykooky
@ 2018-04-19 07:35
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoaceman444
♦2,960
Zdravim, prosim nevymyslajte si nazvy zastavok. Ta zastavka pred byvalou stanicou sa vola "Autobusova stanica", pozrite apy DPB. Urcite nie "Mlýnské nivy" este aj s preklepom. Taktiez nova stanica sa u Slovak Lines vola "Bratislava,,AS", ziadne "Nivy&...
53638085
by Kookykooky
@ 2017-11-09 12:31
~ 8 years ago
1 ~ 8 years agozimba
♦212
Regarding this and other changesets by you: The landuse=winter_sports tag (and other landuse= tags) is not meant to be put over whole areas and villages. The correct way would be to tag individual pistes and use the operator= tag.