| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 147179207 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-02-07 14:25 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | julcnx ♦422 | Hi,I noticed that this changeset adds a large number of natural=peak nodes, including features that appear to be derived from DEM/SRTM local maxima (e.g. points along slopes or ridgelines without a distinct summit).I’ve started a discussion with proposed guidelines for mapping peaks in... |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | julcnx ♦422 | I removed unsupported natural=peak nodes (slope points, ridgeline clusters without distinct apex) based on the discussion above. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181078710 | |
| 173821684 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-10-27 06:04 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | GrabTH_Tanyaporn ♦1 | Hi Kri_ttt, I have found that you've reverted the tag for `motorcycle` tag. May I know the source of this tag? I have not found any traffic sign that is preventing motorcycle access for this bridge (https://organizations.kartaview.org/details/34044512/1943/track-info ). Please let me know if yo... |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Kri_ttt | Thank you for bringing this up. I initially misunderstood the layout and thought the lower road allowed straight-through access. After reviewing it again, I realize that was an error on my part, and I’ve now corrected the tag accordingly. I appreciate you pointing that out.Best regards, | |
| 169849190 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-08-02 07:34 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Glassman ♦5,936 | DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state? |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Kri_ttt | Thank you for your message. After reconsidering, I think it's best to revert the changes and restore the previous state of the border. I now understand the sensitivity of the area, and I want to make sure the map aligns with OSM's guidelines and neutrality. Appreciate your attention to thi... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | Glassman ♦5,936 | I have reverted the border change. Thanks for getting back to me. | |
| 141928593 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-09-29 20:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | ivanbranco ♦2,889 | Hi Kri_ttthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11227922108/this tree's circumference seems too big. Are they meant to be centimeters maybe? In such case should be edited with "0.80" or "80 cm" since the standard unit is the meterthanks and good mapping |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Kri_ttt | Ah, sorry about that, the number 80 was actually an unintentional typo; I meant to enter a value. Thanks for pointing it out! | |
| 164509049 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-04-04 13:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Glassman ♦5,936 | I'm having trouble translating the name:th-Latn you added. Neither Google or Deepl give a useful translations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164509049 |
| 163333482 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-03-07 16:08 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | olia_fix ♦11 | Thank you for comment! I'm sorry ) |
| 163367221 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-03-08 14:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | StarTrek2 ♦12 | "Sea Pine" is an English word and should therefore be the local name and not ซีไพน์. From the Thailand wiki "If the owner of the place (a business, for example) prefers another language than Thai (usually English), as indicated by signage, that language should be used inst... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | From what I can see on the official website, in Thai version the golf course is labeled as "สนามกอล์ฟสวนสนประดิพัทธ์" and in English as "Seapine Golf Course".Thai - https://www.seapine.co.th/th/golf-course-th/English - https... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | I thinking of a naming convention that looks like this :int_name=สนามกอล์ฟซีไพน์int_name:en=Sea Pine Golf Courseint_name:th=สนามกอล์ฟซีไพน์int_name:th-Ltn=Sanam Golf Sea Pineleisure=golf_coursename=สนามกอล์ฟส... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | StarTrek2 ♦12 | Here are a few pictures https://gofile.io/d/gYBJSDThere is no doubt that "Seapine Golf Course" should be used for the default English name. The Thai name according to the website is สนามกอล์ฟสวนสนประดิพัทธ์. So how about this:... | |
| 156270172 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-09-06 11:27 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck_repair ♦34,339 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251 |
| 156221777 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-09-05 09:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck_repair ♦34,339 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251 |
| 156271574 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-09-06 12:00 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck_repair ♦34,339 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251 |
| 156219687 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-09-05 08:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck_repair ♦34,339 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251 |
| 156219627 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-09-05 08:45 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vorpalblade ♦101 | It looks like this and 156219687 are from an import.Can you please document it on the wiki? Specifically on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue .If you didn't go through the import process (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ), please do so ASAP. ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | I send PM pointing to this changeset comment.I plan on reverting this edit due to unclear license and apparently lack of consultations with local community. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | HelloFirstly, I want to apologize for not giving more information and details about this dataset, and not consulted with the local community first. As I did not aware of such process and procedure before.I obtained the dataset from Thai Open Government Data website (https://data.go.th/en/datas... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | "open data common license" - which are exact conditions of this license?I made a relatively quick check and failed to find it. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | Please, can you give details of the license? Where one may find legal text of the license? | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | StarTrek2 ♦12 | The license for data.go.th is this onehttps://data.go.th/pages/dga-open-government-licenseThe license has been discussed before. It seems not really compatible with OSM.https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documentation-of-gistda-import/90597https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/looking-f... | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | @Kri_tttplease reply to questions about this importafter 6 months you failed to provide info on which license this data is which is mandatory to do BEFORE import | |
| 8 | ~ 1 year ago | woodpeck_repair ♦34,339 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251 | |
| 162998778 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-02-27 06:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/61846.pdf |
| 161855972 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-01-28 12:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | latenightdef ♦1 | Thank you for correcting and improving the grass ones! |
| 160592822 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-12-25 04:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | http://irrigation.rid.go.th/rid16/oe16/2016/design/images/conbook/9%20โครงการท่อระบายน้ำบ้านเกาะมุกต์.pdf |
| 134618826 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-04-07 14:22 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | dpolovinkin ♦391 | hi, just noticed - I'm 99% sure this living apartment isnt the whole building which you mapped here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160458054), right? it's like 5 different ones?.. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | From my last ground survey that time, I believe it's the whole building, from the signs both on the building and next to the building entrance. I’m curious to know your thoughts on this. Have there been any updates or changes to the building since then? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | dpolovinkin ♦391 | ah, if you saw it in person then maybe.. I just saw that from satellite it looks like several buildings instead of one, but on G map satellite it's kinda seems like one (while the roof is rly looking like it's several buildings heh)And also I'm not that familiar with a businesses ... | |
| 151350871 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-05-15 09:55 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283214149/history has shop = oxygen that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=oxygen ? Is it shop name put as its type? Is it some place actually selling oxygen gas? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | Yes, the shop does sell oxygen gas for industrial use. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | What you think about using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade ?And tagging it shop=trade trade=oxygen_for_industrial_use ?(I also have seen some shops selling bottles with "high-oxygen air" as miracle cures, this also makes possible to both classify it in detail i... | |
| 153423749 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-07-01 18:11 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Kri_ttt | พระราชกิจจาฯ อ้างอิงแนวเขตเพิ่มเติม :https://dl.parliament.go.th/bitstream/handle/20.500.13072/265105/SOP-DIP_P_1067683_0001.pdf?sequence=1https://download.asa.or.th/03media/04law/cba/bb/bb49.pdf |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Nithinat S ♦51 | สวัสดีครับผมคิดว่าแผนที่ในราชกิจจาอาจจะไม่ใช่ source ที่ถูกต้องที่สุดนะครับ (ในกรณีนี้และอีกหลายกรณี) ในกรณ... | |
| 146203769 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-01-13 06:14 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some narrow roads providing access to the main entrances of residences as 'service=alley'. One tip for future edits: we encourage to tag these as 'highway=residential' with additional tags like `lanes=1`, `width=... |
| 137594488 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-06-21 08:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give... |
| 147292753 by Kri_ttt @ 2024-02-10 13:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,884 | Hello!You usedtracktype=grade1won https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589045339/historyHave you maybe meanttracktype=grade1?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you use... |
| 140282557 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-08-23 15:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ppnplus ♦12 | เนื่องจากพบว่าชื่อถนนบางชื่อที่ท่านได้เพิ่มนั้นไม่มีการระบุบนป้ายชื่อถนนจริง จึงขอแนะนำให้ใช้ชื่อถนน... |
| 145313162 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-12-20 02:20 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | KoiAndBlueBird ♦32 | If the shop is gone, please delete the entire node. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145313162 |
| 139468332 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-08-05 07:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Nithinat S ♦51 | Footway with area=yes should not be used for linear footway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway#Areas for more details. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Kri_ttt | I mapped these area as to describe the area it covers, but anyway Tag:area=yes still needs to be tag, in order for the areas to be rendered and to comply with what was said in the wiki page. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Nithinat S ♦51 | If I understand correctly, first, it should be highway=pedestrian rather than highway=footway because it is wide enough for motor cars, as stated in Thailand Wiki. ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_(useful_in_most_cases)... | |
| 139286096 by Kri_ttt @ 2023-08-01 07:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Nithinat S ♦51 | The name tag should be the most commonly used and default name. This does not imply that everything in Thailand must be written in Thai script. For such reason, we already have name:th. (see discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-tags-for-brand-names-like-bigc-tesco-lotus-or-shell/... |
| 127503289 by Kri_ttt @ 2022-10-14 05:31 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Tantri IRM-ED ♦102 | Hi Kri_ttt, your edit looks awesomebut I noticed the relation (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/14694006) relation 14694006 natural scrub into two polygons in one relation is that one area with the same identity?Your description of the relationship is inaccurate because it raises ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Tantri IRM-ED ♦102 | Hi Kri_ttt, your edit looks awesomeI want to ask some questions regarding multipolygon in relation with ID 14694006 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/14694006). The natural scrub that you made with two polygons in one relation is that one area with the same identity? if its has the ... | |
| 129815106 by Kri_ttt @ 2022-12-07 10:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Anisa IRM-ED ♦83 | hi, Kri_ttt. Your edit looks awesome.I want to improve something from your data (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1014942113) I saw from Maxar Imagery the pond is little bit smaller than you mapped. I need to confirm because I want to improve footway around the pond. Should I put bridge on... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | Hi Kri_ttt. Thank to contributing OSM, you are mapping around Benchakitti Forest Park. I came across this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130630905#map=17/13.73031/100.55530 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129815106#map=17/13.72645/100.55457 you modified the waterbody a... | |
| 126034985 by Kri_ttt @ 2022-09-11 03:29 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Rizki IRM-ED ♦129 | Hi Kri_ttt. Your edit looks awesome, but there's an issue with footway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1093494644) due overlap with water body. Would you mind to recheck and fix the issue, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/... |
| 127231781 by Kri_ttt @ 2022-10-09 05:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mishari ♦57 | Hi KritttPlease kindly be more careful when mapping from satellite. The road below doesn't exist on the ground and the tagging scheme is incorrect.จะให้ผมอธิบายเป็นภาษาไทยไหมครับ? |
| 127469594 by Kri_ttt @ 2022-10-13 13:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | Hi Kri_ttt. thanks for your contributions. Do you mind adding a better description so it's easier to understand what you changed? thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 109753132 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-08-16 13:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | - surface=bricks is not a valid value, always refer to the official list- if you use access=private, then no need to tag private for bicycle/foot/horse/motor_vehicle... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109753132 |
| 109725141 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-08-16 05:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | Invalid landuse tag, I believe tourism=hotel should be sufficient, no?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725141 |
| 109725166 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-08-16 05:21 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | julcnx ♦422 | you should use a landuse tag for this area --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109725166 |
| 108535782 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-07-24 15:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Kri_ttt,Trust you are doing well. I have added building cover tag as the way 967423027 and way 967034888 overlapping with buildings.Thanks. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108535782 |
| 108542949 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-07-24 18:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Kri_ttt,Trust your are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 967065423 from unclassified to service as there is a classification gap.Thanks. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108542949 ... |
| 108194732 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-07-18 14:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Kri_ttt,Trust you are doing well. I have modified the connectivity of way 965381549, way 965381548 way 965381547, way 965381545, way 965381546 way 965381551, way 965381552, way 965381534and way 965381550 as these bridges are directly connected to the highways.Thanks. --- ... |
| 108022033 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-07-15 06:39 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Kri_ttt,Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 964497467 and changed road geometry, as there are some classification gaps and area seems like residential.Thanks --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... |
| 107298904 by Kri_ttt @ 2021-07-02 08:38 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vulasala ♦209 | Hi Kri_ttt,Trust you are doing well. I have modified classification of way 960685068 andway 960685067 to service as there is classification mistake.Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107298904 |