| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 139195477 by LeifRasmussen @ 2023-07-30 05:10 | 1 | 2024-04-03 10:49 | Clara Hobbs ♦11 | I'm not sure the bicycle:lanes=...|no|... tagging is correct. Bikes are generally allowed to use the full width of the roadway in NC, so unless there's something specifically designating "no bikes", I believe they are allowed in every lane, whether it makes sense for cyclists to... |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 14:03 | LeifRasmussen | Excellent point. Not sure why I tagged it like that | |
| 130752419 by LeifRasmussen @ 2023-01-01 15:16 | 1 | 2023-01-03 07:18 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1126199752, http://www.osm.org/way/1126199753. what is the meaning of the tags (mostly „NULL“ values)City = UNKNOWNOBJECTID = 52385OwnerAddress = UNKNOWN ADDRESSOwnerName = UNIVERSITY OF N CPIN = 9777379943Shapearea = 460228... |
| 2 | 2023-01-03 14:56 | LeifRasmussen | I copied these shapes from a chapel hill open data kml file and thought I'd removed the gis tags from them all but clearly missed those two. Thanks for fixing them! | |
| 65977298 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-01-03 04:01 | 1 | 2021-01-02 03:46 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | Hi - any idea what this boundary represents? way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660075730 |
| 2 | 2021-01-02 13:38 | LeifRasmussen | It's a government owned parcel that isn't protected from development in the future. | |
| 71083877 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-06-10 00:55 | 1 | 2020-01-09 20:55 | Traaker_L ♦2 | Hello! I'm working on a JOSM-specific set of validator rules, and while doing some sanity checking, I came across this relation that refers to an optional connection to a 4th lane in its 'to' member. The 'to' member doesn't seem to have a 4th lane, so I wanted to check ... |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 23:05 | LeifRasmussen | Oh, no, that's definitely a mistake. I think it is supposed to be 4:(3) to indicate a merge. I'll fix this. Thanks for working on tools to find these sort of things! Also, thanks for letting me know about this case.Leif | |
| 71953043 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-07-06 07:46 | 1 | 2019-07-06 08:03 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I tilfælde hvor der er et tag over et stykke af en vej vil jeg ofte blot vælge at tagge taget building=roof+layer=1 fremfor at splitte vejen i unødigt små stumper. |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 20:16 | Lostmonkey ♦78 | Der er oprettet et græsområde ude i vandet i Aarhus havn. Er der en mening med det, eller er det blot en fejl? | |
| 3 | 2019-08-15 05:41 | LeifRasmussen | Det må har været en fejl. Kan du linke til græsområdet du har set? | |
| 4 | 2019-08-15 06:07 | Lostmonkey ♦78 | Det drejer sig om: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702037996 | |
| 5 | 2019-08-15 06:57 | LeifRasmussen | Det var et fejl. Jeg har slettede græsområdet nu. | |
| 72998188 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-08-04 20:17 | 1 | 2019-08-04 20:44 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Super du lige mindede mig om denne her. |
| 71738966 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-06-29 16:03 | 1 | 2019-06-29 16:25 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Bemærk at ifølge Tag:man_made=lighthouse bør navigationslysene mappes som en node (altså separat fra bygningen) |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 16:26 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Ups, det skulle have været https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=lighthouse | |
| 71380212 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-06-18 20:49 | 1 | 2019-06-18 21:00 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Vi havde ellers tagget den som privat (se link til note på den.) |
| 2 | 2019-06-18 21:18 | LeifRasmussen | Det har du faktisk ret i. Jeg prøver at "revert" den her changeset hvis jeg kan uden JOSM. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-18 21:23 | LeifRasmussen | Nu er stien tilbage | |
| 4 | 2019-06-18 21:43 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Jeg anede ikke der var et UI til scriptet. Tak for den (selv om scriptet nu er ret simpelt at bruge) | |
| 5 | 2019-06-19 08:39 | LeifRasmussen | Ja, men online scriptet kan ikke klare store changesets. Hvis der er tusindvis af ændringer, virker den ikke. | |
| 71380156 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-06-18 20:46 | 1 | 2019-06-18 20:58 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Undgå helst at røre vores importerede adresser |
| 70014091 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-05-08 08:27 | 1 | 2019-06-07 20:38 | archie ♦1,298 | Du har lagt stier på broerne. Name-taggen verkar överföras både till bron och till stien. Det hele ser lite märkligt ut. Är det inte lite överambitiöst med att lägga highway=footway på broen? Det ligger väl i sakens natur att man_made=pier &a... |
| 70861067 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-06-02 16:57 | 1 | 2019-06-02 21:27 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Jeg ville normalt skille banerne for enden af den fuldt optrukne midterlinje (som det var før din ændring). Er der et problem med det ? |
| 2 | 2019-06-02 23:04 | LeifRasmussen | Nej, men normalt skiller jeg kun veje hvor man ikke længere kan skifte mellem vejene hvor man kører (der er ikke noget physikelt mellem banerne).Mere accurate data kan tilføjes hvis man kun skiller veje hvor det er umuligt at køre fra en til den anden, som for eksempel t... | |
| 70618111 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-05-25 19:44 | 1 | 2019-05-25 23:23 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Den foregående editor formåede at forbinde cykelbroen til motorvejen under den. Rettet :-) |
| 2 | 2019-05-26 03:29 | LeifRasmussen | Tak! Det havde jeg vidst ikke lagt mærke til. | |
| 70042463 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-05-08 18:58 | 1 | 2019-05-09 05:10 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Undgå helst at røre danske importerede adressenoder. Vores bot (hvis den kommer igang igen) fungerer bedst hvis de lades alene. |
| 2 | 2019-05-09 05:17 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Bemærk også at når der redigeres i DK bør iD startes i DK, da den så automatisk vælger vores nationale SDFE luftfotos | |
| 3 | 2019-05-09 05:45 | LeifRasmussen | OK. Jeg vidste om botten, og at den kun virker vis adresserne er noder, så jeg har ikke gjort adresser om til områder. Tak for tippet om SDFE luftfotos! Jeg havde nogen problemer med at skifte til SDFE halvvejs igennem andresætet. For en aller anden grund blev laget helt sort n... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-09 05:55 | LeifRasmussen | Jeg har forresten en spørgsmål: jeg har skiftede nogen af vejene med tagget crossing=zebra om til crossing=marked, of har tilføjet nogen nye med crossing=marked + crossing:signals=yes I stedet for at bruge crossing=traffic_signals. Er det OK, eller skal jeg skifte dem til crossin... | |
| 5 | 2019-05-09 05:56 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Jeg har oplevet problemer med SDFE siden i aftes (de loader meget langsomt). Håber det snart løser sig igen.Jeg holder iøvrigt lige lidt med hvad du laver den første tid ;-), men ellers super du arbejder på området her. Langt hovedparten af de aktive i DK er ... | |
| 6 | 2019-05-09 06:10 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Jeg har ikke umiddelbart en holdning til tagning af fodgængerovergange. Jeg mapper f.eks. aldrig kerbs eller lignende små detaljer. Mit primære virkefelt er mere overordnet + at holde øje med begyndere + udlændinge, hvilket jeg stort set er ene om i DK. | |
| 69414362 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-04-21 01:03 | 1 | 2019-04-21 01:15 | LeifRasmussen | ^ Incorrect comment. Actual comment: Added landcover and fixed JOSM validator warnings. |
| 65323697 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-12-09 19:47 | 1 | 2019-04-10 18:12 | interdite Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-04-10 19:10 | LeifRasmussen | First off, this wasn't really a mechanical edit. I used the ToDo plugin for JOSM to allow me to paste the tags to each object individually, and I fixed a ton of inaccurate data in the process. The reason for using the ToDo plugin was that many of the areas (and occasionally non closed ways) w... | |
| 68210514 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-03-16 18:22 | 1 | 2019-03-17 15:32 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! What is the meaning of the key "]]]]]]" (see http://osm.org/way/106495551 and http://osm.org/way/673511547)? |
| 2 | 2019-03-17 15:35 | LeifRasmussen | Yikes, I thought that I had caught all of those. That key was accidentally created by me when using the Todo plugin in JOSM to scroll through each crossing. Using ] will go to the next crossing to add tags to. Unfortunately, I somehow added that character as a key to some crossings. I'll de... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-17 15:37 | LeifRasmussen | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68231317 | |
| 67852727 by LeifRasmussen @ 2019-03-06 17:33 | 1 | 2019-03-13 23:00 | dekallo ♦3 | Hi LeifRasmussen, just FYI I noticed this import created a few buildings which don't exist. Mostly demolished in the last year or so, or otherwise temporary structures which have since been removed. |
| 65923262 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-12-31 22:52 | 1 | 2019-01-02 18:29 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello!Will that be changed back at some point and will you take care of it?Usually the OSM live database is not the place to change data to "to avoid data processing issues" as this is not a testing environment. That should be done with local data on your computer.A short feedb... |
| 2 | 2019-01-02 19:05 | LeifRasmussen | Sure, I'll revert this later today. I originally thought that adding the name=* tag was a good idea, but later found that OsmAnd rendered the name of the area:highways, cluttering up the rendering. This changeset, though, is tagging for the renderer, as I now see. OsmAnd should change, not osm... | |
| 3 | 2019-01-03 08:08 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | OsmAnd is usually quite nice in using a lot of OSM features in their app, in this case it probably should be rendered optionally (haven't checked if there is a switch for that). Navigation across areas is still not really established anywhere, so most people stick to using the established ways ... | |
| 65488941 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-12-15 01:12 | 1 | 2018-12-15 01:14 | LeifRasmussen | Several, actually. |
| 65136895 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-12-03 19:30 | 1 | 2018-12-03 22:41 | Alan ♦134 | 👍 |
| 64824844 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-11-23 15:30 | 1 | 2018-11-23 21:29 | azakh-world ♦282 | Hi.When you deleted this line:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231445362the coastline ceased to be continuous and the ocean filled the continent on some maps. Please ensure that the coastline doesn't tear. |
| 64097671 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-11-02 01:22 | 1 | 2018-11-02 01:32 | LeifRasmussen | Whoops! Wrong comment. Correct comment:Imported addresses and buildings. #osmus-tasks-83 https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Miami-Dade_County_Address_Import |
| 62020302 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-08-27 03:03 | 1 | 2018-08-27 04:57 | Minh Nguyen ♦561 | I’m sure this change makes it a little easier to query for USPS boxes, for now at least, but as someone who consistently uses operator=United States Postal Service, I was really caught off-guard by this wide-ranging change. You gave the U.S. community about an hour and a half on a Sunday after... |
| 2 | 2018-08-29 02:11 | Peter Dobratz ♦113 | I prefer operator="United States Postal Serivce" as well instead of "USPS". Also, I delete name tags on post boxes when that information is wholly contained on the operator tag. Also, I only edit post boxes while after verifying their location. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-29 02:55 | LeifRasmussen | I contacted the talk-us mailing list about this to change the tags back to "United States Postal Service", as well as to add operator:wikidata to all post boxes. People have mixed opinions about expanding the operator or not, with generally more support for "United States Postal Serv... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-31 22:31 | Brian@Brea ♦45 | Would it be better to use the full tag for operator= and also use the tag alt_name=USPS so when it's searched for it will still pop up? | |
| 61700391 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-08-16 00:47 | 1 | 2018-08-16 04:47 | LeifRasmussen | I also merged addresses with buildings. The imagery used was NC Latest and Mapbox. |
| 58427668 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-04-26 02:25 | 1 | 2018-07-28 20:51 | jumbanho ♦146 | Any objections to removing the mtb:scale tags from the tracks here? Given that these are not even biking trails, I think that having these tags is superfluous and potentially confusing. |
| 2 | 2018-08-01 12:01 | LeifRasmussen | Yes, go ahead! Golf courses with no bicycle access should certainly not have mtb:scale tags. | |
| 60887599 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-07-20 02:42 | 1 | 2018-07-20 02:46 | LeifRasmussen | I will continue more cleanup of this area in the near future, hopefully replacing some of the very inaccurate wetlands I deleted with better wetland outlines. |
| 60780177 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-07-17 02:45 | 1 | 2018-07-17 02:46 | LeifRasmussen | misspelled, not mis-spelled. |
| 2 | 2018-07-18 17:54 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Miss-Pelled? ah, a long-forgotten childhood sweetheart... | |
| 60394703 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-07-04 02:08 | 1 | 2018-07-05 10:32 | Nakaner ♦3,142 | Hi LeifRasmussen,could you stop this mechanical editing? Removing created_by=* does not save disk space but waste some because a new version is stored. Data consumers receive an extra update without any benefit. The only advantage of this changeset is that all these nodes now have a new version ... |
| 60313876 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-07-01 03:52 | 1 | 2018-07-01 04:13 | LeifRasmussen | This should have been via "LeifRasmussen_import". |
| 59195334 by LeifRasmussen @ 2018-05-23 00:43 | 1 | 2018-05-23 00:43 | LeifRasmussen | (In Chapel Hill, not the entire world. That would be nice though...) |
| 54844640 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-12-22 16:12 | 1 | 2018-01-04 07:40 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! You add a long way without any tags (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33068150)? What is the meaning of this way? |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 14:44 | LeifRasmussen | Wow. I did not add this. All I can see, is that it was added by jumbanho about 8 years ago with the tagging "landuse=protected". I think it might be the outline of government owned property around Jordan Lake. Maybe we can email jumbanho and find out what this is all about. Thanks for ... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 14:48 | LeifRasmussen | Here is a link to the history of this way. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33068150#map=18/35.92173/-78.97717 | |
| 4 | 2018-01-04 19:08 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Sorry for the confusion! Okay the tags was deleted between version 14 and 15. I add a changeset comment (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42721487?way_page=2) | |
| 54889286 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-12-24 14:47 | 1 | 2017-12-25 06:08 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing (chapter How to map). |
| 2 | 2017-12-25 07:21 | 3vivekb ♦61 | Hi! Be sure to add a highway=crossing on the node that intersects the crossing and road. Also be careful asphalt is misspelled. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-25 15:38 | LeifRasmussen | Thanks! Must have accidentally made a typo. | |
| 54850617 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-12-22 21:19 | 1 | 2017-12-22 23:29 | LeifRasmussen | "bus stops", not "bus stoops". |
| 53862790 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-11-17 03:15 | 1 | 2017-11-19 18:03 | Nakaner ♦3,142 | Hi BjornRasmussen,you asked for a review of this changeset.First of all, I cannot find major issue, only a minor one. You added route=railway to the route relation which would be correct if the route is under operation. But service on this route will start in future, so route=railway is curr... |
| 53786106 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-11-14 23:05 | 1 | 2017-11-16 06:16 | Chetan_Gowda ♦214 | Hey, Your changes made to disappear the floating bridge. Can you pls be careful while you edit major tags like highway = motorway and other roads. I will add those back again. Thank you! |
| 2 | 2017-11-16 20:21 | LeifRasmussen | What exactly did I delete? I wanted to update the alignment of the Evergreen Point Floating Bridge, since it has had construction recently. I used the lifecycle prefix to make sure I didn't completely delete the old bridge. Thank you! | |
| 52459893 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-09-28 22:35 | 1 | 2017-09-29 12:33 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Please note that we have reverted your changes here |
| 52459874 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-09-28 22:34 | 1 | 2017-09-29 06:05 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Hvad var ideen i at slette venstresvingsbanerne her? |
| 2 | 2017-09-29 06:07 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Bemærk at der nu ikke længere er mulighed for at blive navigeret fra Ringvejen og til Vallensbækve/motorvejen | |
| 3 | 2017-09-29 10:51 | DK7080BE ♦74 | De to små vejstykker til og fra Vallensbækvej til "Link til primærvej" skal nok have fjernet ensretningerne, hvis navigationen skal virke. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-29 11:12 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Der er også stadig svingforbud (nogle af dem delvist ødelagte).Jeg bider mærke i at gutten normalt redigerer i USA (og har lavet nogle ret unikke ting, som f.ek.s http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BjornRasmussen/diary/42345)Man kan undre sig over at han pludselig redigerer her... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-29 12:04 | DK7080BE ♦74 | Mapningen i dette kryds bør rettes hurtigst muligt, for at undgå at der bliver fejl i oktober 2017-kortene til fx OSMAND og Mapfactor Navigator. | |
| 6 | 2017-09-29 12:08 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Jeg ruller tilbage så | |
| 52195374 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-09-19 23:17 | 1 | 2017-09-21 21:30 | Nakaner ♦3,142 | Hi BjornRassmussen,adding highway=service to an area a secondary roads runs through is tagging for the renderer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer In addition, applications which do other things based on OSM data than rendering maps, will treat the outline of this poly... |
| 51670396 by LeifRasmussen @ 2017-09-02 13:46 | 1 | 2017-09-21 21:21 | Nakaner ♦3,142 | This https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7546630/history#map=16/35.9261/-79.0311 footway crosses a road without a shared node. Could you please add the node? It is necessary to keep OSM data useable for navigation. |