| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168184838 by M!dgard @ 2025-06-27 12:58 | 1 | 2025-06-27 12:58 | M!dgard | source=https://ebesluitvorming.gent.be/zittingen/24.0819.9048.9945/agendapunten/25.0204.5527.2070 |
| 167864623 by M!dgard @ 2025-06-20 11:06 | 1 | 2025-06-20 11:07 | M!dgard | Also update doctors in some offices |
| 167108063 by M!dgard @ 2025-06-02 20:12 | 1 | 2025-06-02 20:13 | M!dgard | Also put class:bicycle=-2 on the direction that's still allowed because it's also bad and you only cycle there if you really have to be there |
| 167025697 by M!dgard @ 2025-05-31 19:08 | 1 | 2025-05-31 19:09 | M!dgard | Also detail the driveways while at it |
| 166934235 by M!dgard @ 2025-05-29 17:13 | 1 | 2025-05-29 17:14 | M!dgard | This reverts part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146949033 |
| 112395468 by M!dgard @ 2021-10-12 00:25 | 1 | 2021-12-28 16:24 | philippec ♦742 | Blankenberge apotheek aed,dient dat cijferslot tot iets ?Ik zal morgen een mapillary van dichtbij opladen. |
| 2 | 2021-12-28 16:25 | philippec ♦742 | https://www.cardioservice.eu/product-categorie/wandkasten-aed/ | |
| 3 | 2021-12-28 17:06 | philippec ♦742 | https://www.defisign.nl/buitenkast-210/ Het is mij nog niet duidelijk. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-08 22:36 | M!dgard | Vandaag eens gevraagd aan de apotheker, het codeslot is niet actief: je kan de AED gewoon meenemen. Ze had de leverancier nog gevraagd naar een kast zonder codeslot, maar die had er zo geen. Door mijn vraag kreeg ze het idee om duidelijker te maken dat er geen code is. Ik stelde voor het cijferslot ... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-09 13:35 | M!dgard | Nog een weetje: ze vertelde ook dat de AED gebruikt was in de oudejaarsperiode. | |
| 162226230 by M!dgard @ 2025-02-06 23:15 | 1 | 2025-02-06 23:15 | M!dgard | This selectively reverts changeset https://osm.org/changeset/162198468 |
| 162207490 by M!dgard @ 2025-02-06 12:54 | 1 | 2025-02-06 12:55 | M!dgard | This is a selective revert of the following changesets:https://osm.org/changeset/162205669, https://osm.org/changeset/162205667, https://osm.org/changeset/162205665, https://osm.org/changeset/162205659, https://osm.org/changeset/162205658, https://osm.org/changeset/162205652, https://osm.org/chang... |
| 161542305 by M!dgard @ 2025-01-19 22:21 | 1 | 2025-01-20 10:53 | philippec ♦742 | Wissen van een AED is meer uitleg waard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-20 11:46 | M!dgard | De reddingsstations zijn volledig verdwenen, er kan dus ook geen AED meer in zitten. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-20 17:16 | philippec ♦742 | https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20200525_04970490Meer heb ik niet gevonden. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-20 20:30 | M!dgard | Ik heb mijn bron vermeld. Op de recente luchtfoto's zijn de volledige gebouwen verdwenen. In een gebouw dat er niet meer staat kan geen AED hangen. | |
| 161327729 by M!dgard @ 2025-01-13 22:57 | 1 | 2025-01-13 23:11 | M!dgard | Source character limit reached. Source for location of FCT:https://web.archive.org/web/20250113225819/https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/ocrd/262253.pdf#page=35 page 33 (PDF page 35) |
| 161327427 by M!dgard @ 2025-01-13 22:42 | 1 | 2025-01-13 22:57 | M!dgard | Source character limit reached. Source for location of the old company Zeebrugse Behandelmaatschappij: https://web.archive.org/web/20250113224535/https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/261498.pdf#page=40, page 38 (PDF page 40) |
| 160907285 by M!dgard @ 2025-01-02 13:35 | 1 | 2025-01-02 13:37 | M!dgard | This CS also removes a stray operator:wikipedia=Q524255 (Wikidata in Wikipedia tag) on Oud-Heverlee. |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 13:43 | M!dgard | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154014899 | |
| 160031711 by M!dgard @ 2024-12-07 15:52 | 1 | 2024-12-07 16:22 | M!dgard | https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2278 |
| 122639392 by M!dgard @ 2022-06-20 21:12 | 1 | 2024-10-08 17:50 | Mappers_Delight ♦2 | Is any information available on how and when the tag bicycle_parking=gent should be used (instead of for instance bicycle_parking=safe_loops, which is the type of this particular bicycle parking)? |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 17:54 | M!dgard | Hi, it was used for the type of bike parkings pioneered by Ghent but they should now be retagged to safe_loops if you ask me. | |
| 37774577 by M!dgard @ 2016-03-11 22:58 | 1 | 2024-09-18 00:27 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116051492/historyQue voulais-tu revérifier ?tant qu'à améliorer le fixme, pourais-tu convertir le cycleway=opposite |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 11:53 | M!dgard | Dat herinner ik me niet meer volledig. De fietsinfrastructuur, eenrichtingssituatie, of misschien zelfs of deze weg wel nog bestaat.Ik ben niet meer in de buurt, dus ik laat dit voor iemand anders. | |
| 72898241 by M!dgard @ 2019-08-01 13:09 | 1 | 2024-08-17 02:30 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Bonjour,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6670085123/historyque veux-dire voltage 17 sur un marqueur d'un pipeline gas ?en attendant de savoir j'ai retiré l'info vu que c'est surement pas le voltage :)Cordialement,Marc |
| 2 | 2024-08-17 14:02 | M!dgard | Bonjour, ça aurait dû être ref=017. Je l'ai changé maintenant. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-18 16:58 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Merci pour ton retour | |
| 154728407 by M!dgard @ 2024-08-02 10:09 | 1 | 2024-08-02 10:16 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Whoops. Thanks for the fix! |
| 135866853 by M!dgard @ 2023-05-08 19:31 | 1 | 2024-03-31 14:43 | HiddeWie ♦25 | Hello, are these signals the signals as documented on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Belgium), or different signals specifically for Stoomtrein Maldegem-Eeklo? I am working on visualizing Belgian railway signals, and would like to handle these properly as wel... |
| 2 | 2024-04-26 18:18 | M!dgard | Hi! Cool! Let me know when you're done, I'll definitely check that out.The signalling system is very much inspired by the Infrabel one, yes. I was told there are some minor differences (that I haven't been able to discern). I once made an Overpass visualisation:https://overpas... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-05 16:53 | HiddeWie ♦25 | Thanks!You can view the map at https://openrailwaymap.fly.dev/#view=17.21/51.204525/3.447955&style=signals. The current scope is Europe. I have taken some of your tagging and symbols into account.Specifically the signals currently tagged as `BE-SME:small_signal_triangle` might be better ... | |
| 150209690 by M!dgard @ 2024-04-19 08:04 | 1 | 2024-04-19 08:06 | M!dgard | .osc created with a custom script to allow modifications only to a given set of tags, uploaded with JOSM |
| 2 | 2024-04-19 08:08 | M!dgard | These nodes were created with the faulty editing software, have not been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:https://osm.org/node/11813722199https://osm.org/node/11813719303https://osm.org/node/11813732431https://osm.org/node/11813732156https://osm.org/... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-19 08:10 | M!dgard | These nodes have seen later modifications, after an edit with the faulty software, may not have been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:https://osm.org/node/3066426958https://osm.org/node/971993302https://osm.org/node/6611828862https://osm.org/node/6007415... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-19 08:59 | M!dgard | The script to generate these changes can be found here:https://git.sr.ht/~midgard/osm-selective-revert | |
| 5 | 2024-04-19 10:46 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Good job! Many thanks for this. | |
| 150212482 by M!dgard @ 2024-04-19 09:02 | 1 | 2024-04-19 09:04 | M!dgard | These nodes were created with the faulty editing software, have not been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:https://osm.org/node/11813663837https://osm.org/node/11813654137https://osm.org/node/11813659242https://osm.org/node/11813665612https://osm.org/node/118... |
| 2 | 2024-04-19 09:07 | M!dgard | ↑ All checked and corrected! | |
| 144705993 by M!dgard @ 2023-12-02 22:39 | 1 | 2023-12-03 02:04 | philippec ♦742 | access=yes in een school die niet altijd open is ? |
| 2 | 2023-12-03 11:49 | M!dgard | Tuurlijk, je kan er publiek aan tijdens de openingsuren, die ook aangegeven zijn. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-04 17:27 | philippec ♦742 | Dat is utopie.Wie zal de 2000 andere inbrengen en onderhouden ?Over access kan gepraat worden, het juridisch begrip is niet te gebruiken.Mijn systeem is het handigste en dekt de meeste gevallen. | |
| 142819572 by M!dgard @ 2023-10-19 14:39 | 1 | 2023-10-19 14:46 | M!dgard | This reverts all changes by vandal Crazy Craft (user ID 20050413) |
| 142190936 by M!dgard @ 2023-10-05 13:43 | 1 | 2023-10-05 13:44 | M!dgard | I contacted Maniak by email, they responded:> Notre tarif enfant (10 euros) s'applique aux enfants de moins de 12 ans. A partir de 12 ans, c'est le tarif étudiant (12 euros). |
| 142014218 by M!dgard @ 2023-10-02 00:36 | 1 | 2023-10-02 00:49 | M!dgard | I also made some more manual changes in JOSM, mainly to improve the comments entered in the On Wheels app, they were often describing POI type. |
| 2 | 2023-10-02 00:50 | M!dgard | These are the nodes that were flagged by my script because they have been modified after the event. My script did not modify anything on these nodes:https://osm.org/node/3066438241https://osm.org/node/5619008156https://osm.org/node/9749066892https://osm.org/node/10047215294 | |
| 3 | 2023-10-02 00:51 | M!dgard | The following were flagged because they were created during the event. (Also not modified by my script):https://osm.org/node/11212321789https://osm.org/node/11212323492https://osm.org/node/11212347803https://osm.org/node/11212390320https://osm.org/node/11212393875https://osm.... | |
| 4 | 2023-10-02 00:52 | M!dgard | These nodes will be fixed manually in subsequent changesets by the local community. | |
| 5 | 2023-10-02 11:49 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Well done! A possible improvement is to mechanically change the "comment" tag into "wheelchair:description". | |
| 6 | 2023-10-02 11:57 | M!dgard | The comment tag was mechanically changed into note:wheelchair. I'll retag since I didn't know about wheelchair:description. | |
| 7 | 2023-10-03 11:08 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Everything fixed now. | |
| 141532204 by M!dgard @ 2023-09-20 21:12 | 1 | 2023-09-20 21:22 | M!dgard | This reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140999255 . See discussion there for rationale. |
| 141516153 by M!dgard @ 2023-09-20 14:11 | 1 | 2023-09-20 14:12 | M!dgard | This reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141510663 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141513096 |
| 2 | 2023-09-20 14:12 | M!dgard | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141510663 for rationale | |
| 140710751 by M!dgard @ 2023-09-02 09:37 | 1 | 2023-09-02 09:38 | M!dgard | A helpful message was sent to the involved user accounts. |
| 138072226 by M!dgard @ 2023-07-03 16:35 | 1 | 2023-08-10 00:59 | philippec ♦742 | Meetkerke AEDU had hem op de straat gezet. |
| 2 | 2023-08-10 01:00 | philippec ♦742 | Ik bedoel op het voetpad | |
| 74229698 by M!dgard @ 2019-09-08 15:39 | 1 | 2023-05-25 21:15 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830312121https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630738531https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027717354what did you mean with bus:conditional=yes ?oneway:bus=no ?or motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Sa 13:00-18:00; Su[1] 13:00-18:00) ineed a yes @ bus or so... |
| 2 | 2023-05-25 21:46 | M!dgard | Hi, it's used to make bus=yes that overrides the motor_vehicle:conditional=*. I see that I must have missed the "Evaluation of conflicting restrictions" section at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions. It's not necessary to use a conditional, and I've... | |
| 136472124 by M!dgard @ 2023-05-23 20:32 | 1 | 2023-05-23 20:33 | M!dgard | Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3310647 |
| 69966076 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-07 08:59 | 1 | 2023-01-26 12:36 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Herinner je je toevallig nog waarom je de paden rond https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688336330 horse=no hebt gegeven? Volgens de verkeersbordendatabank staan daar borden die voet, fiets en paard toestaan |
| 2 | 2023-01-26 17:00 | M!dgard | Dat zal een fout geweest zijn.Op mijn archiefbeelden zie ik dat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55442493 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137262854 een F99a voet+fiets+ruiter hadden en dat er geen borden bij https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.20069&mlon=2.98017 stonden. | |
| 3 | 2023-02-01 08:53 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Ha, geweldig. OK, ik heb het aangepast. | |
| 4 | 2023-02-02 10:05 | M!dgard | Merci! | |
| 130989139 by M!dgard @ 2023-01-07 17:06 | 1 | 2023-01-07 17:07 | M!dgard | Bus stop still exists and has and entry for bus line 38 on its flag. |
| 96351839 by M!dgard @ 2020-12-24 01:16 | 1 | 2022-09-29 18:00 | philippec ♦742 | Blankenberge Delhaize De Wandelaar AED.Klopt de foto die ik toegevoegd heb ? Mapillary heeft de foto geweigerd.Het klopt niet met uw location "tegen de muur".Maar anderzijds is er bij Delhaize Jachthaven geen AED gemapt. |
| 124770841 by M!dgard @ 2022-08-11 11:05 | 1 | 2022-08-11 11:05 | M!dgard | This wrong tag was created by a wrong preset in the MapComplete editor, which has since been fixed. |
| 119715536 by M!dgard @ 2022-04-14 14:14 | 1 | 2022-04-15 06:27 | philippec ♦742 | Nieuwmunster AED,survey_date vind ik de beste extra tag. |
| 55749293 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-25 17:56 | 1 | 2021-11-07 08:03 | philippec ♦742 | Plopsaland EHBOIk volgde gisteren een bordje naar de EHBO. Dat spoor liep dood. Toen zette ik in osmand de POI Nooddiensten aan. Dat gaf niets. Dan heb ik maar de weg gevraagd aan een winkelier.Ik heb gevraagd aan de verpleger of er nog andere AEDs in het park zijn. Het antwoord was neen.... |
| 2 | 2021-11-07 10:09 | M!dgard | Dan moet je dat melden bij- Plopsaland om de AED beter aan te duiden- OsmAnd om EHBO-posten en spoedeisendehulpdiensten te renderen en te tonen wanneer je zoekt op Nooddiensten- de mapper die de AED mapte (maar hij is zelfs niet gemapt, zie ik, dus waarom zeg je dat zelfs?)- de taggi... | |
| 80414068 by M!dgard @ 2020-02-01 16:03 | 1 | 2021-10-09 19:15 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Hey Midgard,Je gaf hier aan de Groenestraat mee als etymologische verklaring de kleur 'Groen'. Ik vermoed echter dat de naam eerder verwijst naar het oude West-Vlaamse woord 'Groen' dat eerder de betekenis 'nieuw, jong, pril' had - net zoals de groenestraat in Brugg... |
| 2 | 2021-10-09 21:14 | M!dgard | Thanks, heb ik gedaan. | |
| 109353093 by M!dgard @ 2021-08-08 16:10 | 1 | 2021-09-18 22:10 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Hello,I suppose you are reflecting major infrastructure changes; I imagine this is a difficult edit here.This changeset created some issues with several route relations.IC-04 and IC-12, and possibly others, appear to be broken, and show up on different—unconnected—tracks with a gap... |
| 2 | 2021-09-19 13:54 | M!dgard | Hi, indeed, the switch bundle is being completely redone, I updated the map to the latest situation that is available on aerial imagery. I did a lot of effort to restore the relations, but apparently I still missed some.The thing is, these relations are so prone to breakage, and are not complete... | |
| 108960149 by M!dgard @ 2021-08-01 00:31 | 1 | 2021-08-20 08:37 | JanFi ♦49 | Wat bedoel je met "not routable due to incorrect tagging"? Een highway=path is toegankelijk voor fietsers en als een routeerder dat niet wil gebruiken is zijn zaak. Een onverhard pad is duidelijk niet echt gemaakt voor fietsverkeer: bicycle=designated is dus verkeerd. |
| 2 | 2021-08-20 10:59 | M!dgard | Dat over dit stukje:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849862611/historyDoordat fietsrouter rare ommetoeren maakte, merkte ik dat er vehicle=no op stond.Je grief gaat als ik het goed begrijp over https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955893494/historyDit stuk is inderdaad geen designated waard,... | |
| 108755525 by M!dgard @ 2021-07-28 11:46 | 1 | 2021-07-28 11:47 | M!dgard | Archived URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20191226194509/https://www.erfgoedforumbrugge.be/Waggelwater%20spoorwegbrug.html |
| 104333056 by M!dgard @ 2021-05-07 17:19 | 1 | 2021-06-21 10:32 | Lee Carré ♦665 | Awesome, thanks.This was on my personal to-do list, but didn't have the (OSM) experience or (know where to find) the data. |
| 102934745 by M!dgard @ 2021-04-14 13:52 | 1 | 2021-04-14 13:53 | M!dgard | Not "survey" but "AIV aerial imagery 2013-2015" |
| 27630720 by M!dgard @ 2014-12-22 14:08 | 1 | 2021-04-05 13:14 | philippec ♦742 | Veurne Dienst Toerisme.Hoe kan die aed indoor zijn en buiten gemapt zijn ? |
| 2 | 2021-04-05 17:40 | M!dgard | Iemand heeft de gebouwgeometrie veranderd en niet genoeg rekening gehouden met wat al gemapt was.Het is heel lang geleden dat ik hier nog geweest ben, maar de AED hangt aan de muur van de voorgevel, dus een verschuiving van een paar meter verklaart dit al. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-05 17:49 | philippec ♦742 | # Vespucci of misschien bestond GRB nog niet als grondlaag in OSM. Ik zet hem aan de binnenzijde van de voorgevel. | |
| 101818636 by M!dgard @ 2021-03-26 21:34 | 1 | 2021-03-26 21:35 | M!dgard | *letter boxes |
| 70960880 by M!dgard @ 2019-06-05 16:42 | 1 | 2019-06-11 18:06 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,the tag "packaging =avoids_waste" doesn't exist yet.There is a documented tag "bulk_purchase" for shops that make you bring your own packaging. There are some further tags in discussion in the German forums right now:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?i... |
| 2 | 2019-06-18 19:11 | M!dgard | I followed the different discussions a bit (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66456 and those linked from it).I had created a proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Low_waste_and_zero_waste before those threads were started, but "low_waste" seemed... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-15 09:14 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | By now, the definition of zero_waste on the wiki is "largely do without packaging material". I'd add that here as well / replace the current tag. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-15 12:55 | M!dgard | Done. | |
| 98471638 by M!dgard @ 2021-02-01 00:43 | 1 | 2021-02-04 00:50 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Mijn GPS-record + herinnering zetten "De Hazelaar"-tuin een stukje meer naar het Westen toe - ik pas het aan. |
| 96807109 by M!dgard @ 2021-01-02 13:18 | 1 | 2021-01-03 09:35 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,I found some tags like "bicycle:paving_stones:length" here.These are new and don't really seem correct to me: 'bicycle:XY' are access-tags but don't describe physical properties of roads.What has been used already are these:cycleway:paving_stones:lengthf... |
| 2 | 2021-01-04 12:33 | M!dgard | Both would make sense in some way. But now I see that it's also cycleway:surface and footway:surface, so I definitely prefer those prefixes now.I changed it to cycleway:* and footway:*, thanks! | |
| 96375557 by M!dgard @ 2020-12-24 10:00 | 1 | 2020-12-24 10:01 | M!dgard | *Improve hydrogen pipeline from landscape scars visible on old imagery |
| 90550917 by M!dgard @ 2020-09-07 23:27 | 1 | 2020-09-07 23:29 | M!dgard | There are now signs near the bridge saying it will be ready at the end of September, so opening_date is adjusted accordingly.I didn't visit the northeastern part of the bridge, paths will need an update there. |
| 80734540 by M!dgard @ 2020-02-08 21:07 | 1 | 2020-02-10 17:08 | philippec ♦742 | Lissewege jeugdbeweging aed.Als dat hek op de foto het enige is, zou ik opening hours 24/7 zetten. |
| 2 | 2020-02-29 19:12 | M!dgard | Niet in Lissewege.Dat hek is inderdaad het enige. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-14 09:10 | philippec ♦742 | Er stond volk in de weg zodat ik niet volledig kon fotograferen.Er is ook nog een "roof".Ik ben niet zeker of de AED juist staat. | |
| 77784317 by M!dgard @ 2019-12-01 15:24 | 1 | 2020-04-09 18:08 | AdVerburg ♦144 | Dag M!dgard,wellicht ingehaald door deze? (as build)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/789978858Ad |
| 2 | 2020-06-21 00:25 | M!dgard | Oei, ik begrijp eigenlijk niet wat je bedoelt. Vermoed je dat er een kabel die ik hier toevoeg buiten werking is? | |
| 3 | 2020-06-21 00:35 | M!dgard | Ah, ik denk dat ik het snap: https://osm.org/way/751310213 gaat over dezelfde kabel als https://osm.org/way/789978858 . Eén van beide mag dus inderdaad weg.Je zet "as build" in seamark:information, maar is dit relevante info voor schippers? Indien niet, OpenStreetMap heeft de ke... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-21 00:39 | M!dgard | Ik had ergens gehoord dat "underwater" voor objecten die op de zeebodem liggen is, en dat "underground" beter is als het ingegraven is. Ik kan de bron evenwel niet meteen terugvinden.Ik moet ergens gelezen hebben dat ze deze kabel gingen ingraven, want ik had location=undergr... | |
| 5 | 2020-06-21 08:00 | AdVerburg ♦144 | Dag M!dgard,Ik denk dat je dit bedoelt voor kabels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=cable?uselang=en#Location We hebben er eerder over gecorrespondeerd 16 August 2019 at 19:00 Met location: "underwater → A power cable located on the sea/river/lake floor, which can be see... | |
| 69190100 by M!dgard @ 2019-04-13 23:04 | 1 | 2020-05-23 23:09 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Hoe de **** heb je zelfs de locaties van de brandblussers kunnen toevoegen? Die kan ik toch niet zien op de luchtfoto's ;p |
| 2 | 2020-06-21 00:21 | M!dgard | Survey hé ;)En ook wat ervaring met die dingen spotten op luchtfoto's van verschillende jaren. | |
| 83002570 by M!dgard @ 2020-04-02 23:18 | 1 | 2020-04-11 14:55 | philippec ♦742 | Voor mij hoeft het niet als het ook niet op Mapillary mag. |
| 2 | 2020-06-20 23:23 | M!dgard | Krijg je geld van hen om hun platform zo hard te pushen misschien? Een foto is een foto. | |
| 86005187 by M!dgard @ 2020-05-31 11:00 | 1 | 2020-05-31 11:01 | M!dgard | source=survey |
| 84057299 by M!dgard @ 2020-04-24 11:11 | 1 | 2020-04-25 22:43 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | My bad, thanks for fixing this! |
| 77238504 by M!dgard @ 2019-11-18 16:36 | 1 | 2020-02-04 19:25 | s8evq ♦186 | Dag Midgard, is het correct dat deze mini_roundabout clockwise als direction heeft? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2542181100 |
| 2 | 2020-02-08 14:26 | M!dgard | Nog nooit erbij geweest maar op de beelden is een auto die CCW rijdt te zien, ik was waarschijnlijk gemist tussen CW en CCW. | |
| 70639884 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-26 19:19 | 1 | 2020-01-23 10:03 | smootheFiets ♦178 | Impressive work, thanks a lot!I have a question about the service road along the dike, though, way 692629522. You've tagged it as access=private. I biked there the other day (coming in through the open gate at the end of Robbenplaatweg), and I couldn't see any signs forbidding me from ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-08 11:49 | M!dgard | Thanks, and you're welcome! I mapped it from aerial imagery and could only assume access, based on the pre-existing access tags on the surrounding roads and the gates that I could see on the imagery. But please adjust if you were able to cycle! | |
| 3 | 2020-02-08 12:09 | smootheFiets ♦178 | Did that. Thanks for your reply! | |
| 79481507 by M!dgard @ 2020-01-12 17:01 | 1 | 2020-01-12 17:03 | M!dgard | Elia's 2018 investment plans mention "vervanging van de laagspanning in de onderstations Centrale Harelbeke, [...]" making it likely that this substation is near the former plant. |
| 79480800 by M!dgard @ 2020-01-12 16:37 | 1 | 2020-01-12 16:38 | M!dgard | I drew it to Aalter instead of Aalter Venecolaan because of https://www.elia.be/en/infrastructure-and-projects/infrastructure-projects/aalter |
| 79457944 by M!dgard @ 2020-01-11 18:47 | 1 | 2020-01-11 18:47 | M!dgard | source=survey,not aerial imagery |
| 79448748 by M!dgard @ 2020-01-11 11:18 | 1 | 2020-01-11 12:03 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts these changesets:https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/76957170https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/76918462https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/76916776https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/76916010https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/76822922https://openstreetmap.org/... |
| 79029255 by M!dgard @ 2019-12-30 20:07 | 1 | 2019-12-30 20:08 | M!dgard | Also: add a missing oneway, source=survey |
| 70257080 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-15 02:09 | 1 | 2019-12-01 19:52 | philippec ♦742 | Ik heb het vandaag gefotografeerd.De AED staat binnen de gevellijn.Ik pas het aan. |
| 77787901 by M!dgard @ 2019-12-01 18:06 | 1 | 2019-12-01 18:08 | M!dgard | The video shows the refs of two circuits (220-5 and 220-11). I assume the cables don't switch positions between the OSY and Stevin substations. From the markers I had surveyed earlier, I knew some on-shore points where the cables pass through. |
| 69864201 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-04 00:55 | 1 | 2019-09-21 19:41 | philippec ♦742 | Ik heb daar geen aed gevonden. Mapillary volgt. |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 16:59 | philippec ♦742 | Mapillary is er.Ik heb de aed gewist. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-01 13:31 | M!dgard | De aed hing er vroeger maar is inderdaad zeer recent weggehaald. Ik had je bericht hier niet gezien maar ben er onlangs ook nogmaals gepasseerd en ging hem wegdoen. | |
| 4 | 2019-12-01 13:35 | philippec ♦742 | Het heeft mij wel tijd en moeite gekost om zeker te zijn dat de aed er niet meer was. | |
| 77636565 by M!dgard @ 2019-11-27 14:01 | 1 | 2019-11-27 15:08 | JJJWegdam ♦137 | This revert was done without providing any possibility to discuss the original changeset. |
| 2 | 2019-11-27 15:22 | JJJWegdam ♦137 | Revert reverted 🤷♂️https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77641554Note to the author of 77636565:please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Revert_scripts#Act_responsibly.21and provide room for discussion before reverting a changeset | |
| 3 | 2019-11-27 15:36 | M!dgard | I did not use the revert scripts so that page cannot apply. | |
| 77201167 by M!dgard @ 2019-11-17 22:09 | 1 | 2019-11-17 22:10 | M!dgard | ICI Paris XL location found at https://theleaf.be/winkels/ |
| 76962538 by M!dgard @ 2019-11-12 13:21 | 1 | 2019-11-12 13:24 | M!dgard | [Markdown test](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthalen-Helchteren)- Markdown- test |
| 76127442 by M!dgard @ 2019-10-24 00:02 | 1 | 2019-10-24 00:03 | M!dgard | Comment should have been “Add distribution cables from Ham” |
| 74657635 by M!dgard @ 2019-09-19 07:47 | 1 | 2019-09-19 07:50 | M!dgard | Also, add addresses Weidestraat 100-104: from survey |
| 70568512 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-23 23:39 | 1 | 2019-09-02 14:14 | philippec ♦742 | ik heb de aed indoor yes gezet |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 13:57 | M!dgard | Dat klopt, was ik vergeten | |
| 70257008 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-15 02:03 | 1 | 2019-08-11 20:46 | philippec ♦742 | Ik zal het op indoor zetten. |
| 2 | 2019-08-21 09:41 | M!dgard | Ah ja, zeer goed. Ik was het vergeten. | |
| 73159074 by M!dgard @ 2019-08-08 14:43 | 1 | 2019-08-10 20:29 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | You're welcome! |
| 72785483 by M!dgard @ 2019-07-29 20:14 | 1 | 2019-07-29 20:17 | M!dgard | I only surveyed the noon regime from Brussel-Noord to Tour & Taxis (which goes via Rogier), for the other segments I assumed the most probable ones. |
| 51380168 by M!dgard @ 2017-08-23 16:05 | 1 | 2019-07-15 16:21 | philippec ♦742 | Is verplaatst, hoop ik. |
| 69052045 by M!dgard @ 2019-04-09 16:01 | 1 | 2019-06-04 14:17 | JanFi ♦49 | Ik zie net dat je in Melle een aantal fietspaden die correct waren ingetekend hebt overhoop gegooid. Wil je die zo snel mogelijk terug in orde zewtten? |
| 2 | 2019-06-22 13:49 | M!dgard | Dit is een fout van de wegbeheerder: gestreepte fietspaden kunnen eigenlijk niet opengesteld worden voor beide richtingen. Maar pragmatisch gezien is het inderdaad wel tweerichtingsverkeer op deze fietspaden. | |
| 70677520 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-28 00:23 | 1 | 2019-05-28 00:24 | M!dgard | The source of maxspeed=10 is survey. |
| 69820094 by M!dgard @ 2019-05-02 20:48 | 1 | 2019-05-02 20:48 | M!dgard | "survey" instead of "continue" |
| 67862460 by M!dgard @ 2019-03-06 23:14 | 1 | 2019-03-06 23:15 | M!dgard | *source=local_knowledge |
| 66934285 by M!dgard @ 2019-02-05 14:49 | 1 | 2019-02-05 18:47 | Erin76 ♦26 | Hey Midgard, the HV-line has been entirely removed. This means cables and supporting infrastructure was removed. I am not sure if the "unused" tag is the best way to describe this, as the line is currently back visible on the map |
| 2 | 2019-02-05 19:50 | M!dgard | I surveyed today near transition station Brugge Zuidervaart, the towers and conductors were still in place (though they were earthed). Where did you see them removed? If you say they are removed elsewhere, Elia will probably remove them here too. | |
| 66867251 by M!dgard @ 2019-02-02 23:34 | 1 | 2019-02-05 09:35 | manings ♦209 | Removed graffiti which was part of this edit via: changeset/66925970 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66867251 |
| 66908516 by M!dgard @ 2019-02-04 16:25 | 1 | 2019-02-04 16:25 | M!dgard | Forgot to mention: retag name=Apotheker as shop=pharmacy |
| 66369080 by M!dgard @ 2019-01-16 16:35 | 1 | 2019-01-16 20:05 | borishag ♦150 | Mag ik vragen waarom je bij 5 van onze Kruidvat vestigingen de woonplaats hebt weggehaald?B. HagemanEditor AS Watson storesb.hageman@nl.aswatson.com |
| 2 | 2019-01-17 10:29 | M!dgard | Die zijn verouderd sinds 1 januari 2019: op dat moment zijn een aantal gemeentes samengevoegd in België.Plaatsnamen opslaan is niet nodig aangezien onze gemeentegrenzen volledig ingegeven zijn. Daarom heb ik ze gewoon geschrapt in plaats van ze te updaten. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-17 12:41 | M!dgard | Het is voor jou misschien gemakkelijker om ze wel ook op het object te hebben, en het is niet fout, ik heb de (nieuwe) plaatsnamen toegevoegd. | |
| 4 | 2019-01-17 16:32 | borishag ♦150 | Omdat er nu in een gemeente meerdere kernen liggen is het m.i. wel onduidelijker geworden. Kan de naam van de kern er niet bij vermeld blijven? | |
| 66394546 by M!dgard @ 2019-01-17 12:41 | 1 | 2019-01-17 12:44 | M!dgard | Ref: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66369080 |
| 65701394 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-22 19:30 | 1 | 2018-12-23 21:34 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Valt dit onder een 'park'? |
| 2 | 2018-12-23 21:41 | M!dgard | Ik ben er nog nooit geweest, maar vanuit de lucht lijkt dit een hoog parkgehalte te hebben, ja. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-23 21:43 | M!dgard | Ah, het is niet als zodanig gemapt, vandaar dat je het vraagt. Ik denk wel dat het geoorloofd is dit te parkificeren in OSM. | |
| 4 | 2018-12-23 21:48 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | I'm on it | |
| 5 | 2018-12-24 07:06 | zors1843 ♦422 | De website van de stad beschouwt het in ieder geval als een park, maar situeert het op een verkeerde plaats :(https://www.brugge.be/heraanleg-edgard-desmedtplantsoen | |
| 6 | 2019-01-01 20:01 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Klopt. Het is effectief dat park dat je linkt, het is gewoon hun marker die fout staat. Ik stuurde ze een mail om ze erop te wijzen, hopelijks passen ze het aan. | |
| 65921426 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-31 20:43 | 1 | 2018-12-31 21:51 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | For more info about the preparations, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Municipality_Fusions |
| 2 | 2019-01-01 12:48 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | awesome! | |
| 65854274 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-28 22:24 | 1 | 2018-12-29 08:41 | Jakka ♦1,814 | het terug draaien van deze cs is ook niet ok Mo-Su 05:00-03:00 dat kan geen enkele app verwerken.... |
| 2 | 2018-12-29 23:18 | M!dgard | Toch wel hoor, probeer maar eens in OsmAnd :)Als het sluitingsuur vóór het openingsuur valt, loopt dat volgens de specificatie van opening_hours door tot in de volgende dag. Dingen zoals Sa-Su 20:00-03:00 werken dus gewoon op een intuïtieve manier. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-30 07:44 | zors1843 ♦422 | Maar moet dat niet 17:00 uur zijn ? | |
| 4 | 2018-12-30 16:31 | M!dgard | Ah, dat zou wel logischer zijn, ja … | |
| 5 | 2018-12-30 16:37 | M!dgard | Ik heb een note gemaakt: https://osm.org/note/1633880Over een paar weken zal ik zelf misschien wel eens in de buurt passeren en gaan kijken. | |
| 65669328 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-21 13:45 | 1 | 2018-12-21 17:01 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | Bedankt! Had ik gemist, ook al passeer ik er elke dag ... |
| 65424795 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-12 22:32 | 1 | 2018-12-12 22:33 | M!dgard | Shoutout to https://osm.org/user/JensTi for the local knowledge! |
| 65314328 by M!dgard @ 2018-12-09 13:02 | 1 | 2018-12-09 17:37 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | There is still a speed camera at this location, a few meters further, see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/d9QDpGeU1sbV4Mp97DT27gI've fixed this in changeset 65320844 |
| 2 | 2018-12-09 20:36 | M!dgard | Great, thanks! | |
| 60792343 by M!dgard @ 2018-07-17 09:41 | 1 | 2018-10-22 11:44 | Robert Whittaker ♦271 | This changeset added node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5765582580 as a Post Office, but there was already another Post Office node less than 100m away at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/431997222 . It's unlikely that there are two Post Offices this close together, so which one is corre... |
| 2 | 2018-10-22 11:57 | M!dgard | Hi, thanks for the notice. This weekend I'll see if I can find my photographs of this place. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-22 12:03 | M!dgard | Looking at some pictures on the web, I find versions of The Royal Oak pub with and without post office in front, so I think it was moved here and my new version is indeed correct. But I'll check this weekend. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-27 16:19 | M!dgard | This is one of my pictures and I'm certain the post office is now at the correct location:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Royal_Oak_Inn_and_post_office_in_Winsford_Somerset.jpgI didn't cover the location of the old one but I think it's safe to assume that there are... | |
| 63739607 by M!dgard @ 2018-10-21 22:36 | 1 | 2018-10-26 12:26 | Pistro ♦1 | It seems that this changeset caused way 165579200 to end up with one node, which is faulty. Unfortunately, I am unable to fix this through the online editor. Can you correct this? |
| 2 | 2018-10-26 13:16 | M!dgard | Woah, that's pretty bad. I've fixed this road with JOSM now but that's a bug in Vespucci. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-26 13:19 | Pistro ♦1 | Super, thanks for the quick fix! | |
| 62529119 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-12 18:22 | 1 | 2018-10-24 08:44 | AdVerburg ♦144 | landkabel (way 503629407) via ( way 612409605 ) met de zeekabel ( way 528770322) verbonden. Changeset: 63823096.De uiteinden van de kabels liggen 220.5 m uit elkaar, maar *ik* weet niet waar de verbinding gemaakt is. |
| 2 | 2018-10-24 09:50 | M!dgard | Je kan de putten van de strandwerken goed zien op de luchtbeelden van Informatie Vlaanderen van 2016: https://framapic.org/WbGKp7eP3bXE/0FlbGqQRxzrM.pngDie beelden kan je toevoegen in JOSM. Ze zijn deel van "WMS Orthofotomozaïek, middenschalig, winteropnamen" op https://overheid.v... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-24 14:16 | AdVerburg ♦144 | Aangepast. | |
| 62208923 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-02 00:07 | 1 | 2018-10-24 08:05 | AdVerburg ♦144 | The centre of this area should be ~2.1 nm in direction 338°. (51.4845, 2.832), out of fairway Vaargeul.The seamark:name is not really a name, but a description → seamark:information=…A non-documented tag could be seamark:military_area:category=detonating.Additional tags (make ... |
| 2 | 2018-10-24 09:33 | M!dgard | Hi AdVerburg, makes sense. I had interpreted the coordinates from the NtM (BaZ) as ° ' " but they're ° ' with decimals. Corrected in https://osm.org/changeset/63824768I added tags in https://osm.org/changeset/63825066> The seamark:name is not really a name, but... | |
| 63060778 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-30 11:21 | 1 | 2018-09-30 11:21 | M!dgard | source+=Mapillary |
| 62613792 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-15 14:45 | 1 | 2018-09-15 14:54 | M!dgard | This is a technically a reversion of https://osm.org/changeset/62612995, but I re-added the (in my view still pointless) tag "line=substation", so the net result now is only non controversial fixes to power infrastructure around the world. |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 01:11 | muralito ♦2,014 | You did not add them, but anyway, "161kV transmission line" is not a name. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-17 10:25 | M!dgard | Yes, that's very true :pSeems to have been introduced in https://osm.org/changeset/15177330 | |
| 62598739 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-15 00:22 | 1 | 2018-09-15 14:35 | Nehaj ♦25 | M!dgard stated publicly "i removed an undocumented, fairly low-usage, nonsensical tag to avoid it showing up in iD" -> that's not a valid reason to remove something by a mechanical edit, so I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62612995BTW there hav... |
| 2 | 2018-09-15 14:40 | M!dgard | And what does this tag mean? How can you claim to add meaningful information when you don't define what it should mean? I can understand if you're testing stuff and you're documenting when you played around a bit, I can also understand if tags are so obvious you don't bother with... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-15 14:51 | M!dgard | But thanks anyway for having the courtesy of notifying me, and not covertly adding shaming FIXME's in the database, like mrlanduse did. Much appreciated. | |
| 62421000 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-09 10:42 | 1 | 2018-09-09 12:08 | Polyglot ♦86 | good catch, thanks. So what do you think about the functionality to create those forks leadin to/from the roundabout? |
| 62309460 by M!dgard @ 2018-09-05 12:18 | 1 | 2018-09-05 12:20 | M!dgard | Seldom have I been so frustrated with OSM as I was when I saw what had happened here. |
| 58627935 by M!dgard @ 2018-05-02 20:54 | 1 | 2018-05-02 21:22 | M!dgard | source+=MapillaryUsed near the roundabout in the N439. |
| 58154053 by M!dgard @ 2018-04-17 00:33 | 1 | 2018-04-17 17:44 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | Probably a good idea to contact the original mapper and explain what you did. |
| 57700019 by M!dgard @ 2018-03-31 21:59 | 1 | 2018-04-11 11:02 | M!dgard | They placed new signs which do limit the speed to 90. Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57999091 . |
| 57890469 by M!dgard @ 2018-04-07 12:33 | 1 | 2018-04-07 18:37 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-04-08 12:01 | M!dgard | @L'imaginaireUrhm wut? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-08 15:45 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | Thanks for improving the map! Someone has to do the dirty work. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-08 15:45 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | ;-) | |
| 56545400 by M!dgard @ 2018-02-21 10:54 | 1 | 2018-02-21 10:54 | M!dgard | also removed repeated address information from nodes |
| 56004788 by M!dgard @ 2018-02-02 18:57 | 1 | 2018-02-20 01:47 | MacLondon ♦214 | Hi,I'm not sure why you removed status=proposed from the relation for Q6 cycle route. This is the recommended tag for cycle route relations - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations ("opencyclemap rendering shows these routes dotted").The proposed: prefix ... |
| 55724357 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-24 21:11 | 1 | 2018-01-24 21:13 | M!dgard | This CS also undeletes the bus service ways around the platforms. Those were erroneously removed in https://osm.org/changeset/19027072 . |
| 55532498 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-17 20:30 | 1 | 2018-01-18 07:39 | wegspotter ♦89 | Hello M!dgard,the application "Be Walking Be Brussels" uses virtual routing through squares, so could you please revert those changes! |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 07:42 | wegspotter ♦89 | Sorry Midgard, i was too quick. Thanks for restoring the actual omission. | |
| 55438807 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-14 18:08 | 1 | 2018-01-14 23:53 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | Je kan de facebook URL toch gewoon onder een "facebook"-tag plaatsen? |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 15:53 | M!dgard | Ha, dat kan. Ik wist niet dat die key gebruikt werd, en ik ben niet geïnteresseerd in Facebook dus dat was niet bij me opgekomen. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-15 19:58 | L'imaginaire ♦408 | Ok :-)Ik heb de URL teruggeplaatst onder de Facebook-tag | |
| 4 | 2018-01-16 10:23 | M!dgard | Perfect | |
| 55291935 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-09 12:43 | 1 | 2018-01-14 14:26 | JeroenHoek ♦644 | Volgens mij kunnen die vertalingen er ook allemaal af. Hun website meldt daar niets over (verzinsels van de mapper die de POI erin zette?). |
| 2 | 2018-01-14 21:58 | M!dgard | Gebeurd in https://osm.org/changeset/55444742 | |
| 55326388 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-10 16:05 | 1 | 2018-01-10 16:09 | William McBroom ♦1 | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55326388 |
| 55261237 by M!dgard @ 2018-01-08 11:00 | 1 | 2018-01-08 11:01 | M!dgard | Oh, source+=Mapillary, for the camera. |
| 43679702 by M!dgard @ 2016-11-15 19:49 | 1 | 2018-01-07 18:35 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Is motorway_link niet logischer voor way 313561411 ?(Osmand neemt nu heel de Loop ipv langs hier te routen, misschien ook omwille van verkeerslicht. Uiteraard vooral een Osmand-probleem natuurlijk) |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 22:51 | M!dgard | Technisch gezien is het al een deel van het normale wegennet, de bussen voegen er ook al op in. Het is inderdaad wel pragmatischer er motorway_link te taggen, voor het merendeel van de weggebruikers (enkel auto's zijn daar logisch)..Ik zou misschien gaan voor primary_link, zoals aan de ... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-08 06:42 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Dat klinkt als een goede oplossing. Ik heb het zo aangepast. | |
| 55003885 by M!dgard @ 2017-12-29 09:04 | 1 | 2017-12-31 12:09 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,the tag "for:addr:housenumber' is new. There is somebody in Russia who uses "post:housenumber": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4436294626You might want to use this tag as well?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-12-31 13:22 | M!dgard | Ha, good idea. I was on my phone so couldn't do a whole lot of research. amenity=letter_box and post:*=* are documented, but only in Russian. I think it'd be great to port this page to other languages! I don't understand Russian though. Do you?I'll change the tagging of these... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-31 13:33 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Maybe the author of that wiki page can help? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pavel47 | |
| 4 | 2017-12-31 14:09 | M!dgard | I requested a machine translation and cleaned it up: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box | |
| 55010671 by M!dgard @ 2017-12-29 14:04 | 1 | 2017-12-30 09:04 | Xaphar ♦1 | No the graffiti is placed by an artist, asked by the owner of the witte merel, i Shall add a photo on mappillary |
| 50350212 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-17 13:03 | 1 | 2017-11-24 01:15 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Hey Midgard,Je hebt hier een boel spoorwegen aangeduid die niet meer bestaan. Ze zijn echter gemarkeerd als 'razed'; moet dat niet 'abandonded' zijn? Vandaag de dag bestaan de spoorwegen alleszins niet meer; er zijn hooguit nog wat stukjes rail te zien in het wegdek. |
| 2 | 2017-11-29 15:53 | M!dgard | Dag PieterIk heb het schema van op https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway gevolgd: abandoned[1] indien de spoorweg nog zijn stempel drukt op het huidige landschap (het fietspad bijvoorbeeld), razed wanneer er niets meer getuigt van de vroegere spoorweg.[1]"abandoned" staat on... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-29 15:55 | M!dgard | Dit is een beetje subjectief. Sommige delen die ik als razed heb gemapt, zouden inderdaad even goed ook abandoned kunnen zijn. | |
| 4 | 2017-12-01 13:19 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦443 | Geen probleem hoor; ik wist niet van de wikipagina en de betekenis van Razed. Als ik 'razed railway' opzoek op duckduckgo, dan krijg ik om één of andere reden hangende spoorwegen of spoorwegbruggen... En die zijn er sowieso nooit geweest, vandaar mijn verwarring. | |
| 52982351 by M!dgard @ 2017-10-16 13:22 | 1 | 2017-10-16 13:23 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52951834, 52952741, 52953201, 52953572, 52953955, 52954624, 52955126, 52955353, 52955681, 52955827, 52955844, 52955976, 52962197, 52962898, 52962947, 52963004, 52963032. |
| 52454494 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-28 18:44 | 1 | 2017-09-28 18:44 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 49277269. |
| 52454096 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-28 18:27 | 1 | 2017-09-28 18:34 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47302256, 47302668, 49277278, 49277567. |
| 52453423 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-28 17:57 | 1 | 2017-09-28 18:02 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49274580, 49275624, 49638820, 49639316. |
| 52450499 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-28 16:28 | 1 | 2017-09-28 16:50 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47850390, 47984308, 47984483, 47985007, 49277567, 49277825, 49277839, 49278492, 49278584, 49278717, 49279141, 49279163, 49279225, 49279232, 49279426, 49279440, 49279483, 49279500, 49279860. |
| 52340283 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-24 21:56 | 1 | 2017-09-24 21:59 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 48438422. |
| 51802383 by M!dgard @ 2017-09-07 08:16 | 1 | 2017-09-07 08:18 | M!dgard | *too tight |
| 51492034 by M!dgard @ 2017-08-27 20:39 | 1 | 2017-08-27 20:39 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 51484870, 51487008. |
| 51485445 by M!dgard @ 2017-08-27 15:49 | 1 | 2017-08-27 15:49 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 51485122. |
| 50694347 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-30 13:52 | 1 | 2017-08-01 19:16 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,63 ways got the tag 'wip_remove_me' - was this a mistake?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 21:11 | M!dgard | Uh yes, I added that to be able to conveniently select the ways I had to change, and I forgot to remove them. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/50764793. Thanks for the heads-up! | |
| 50726350 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 15:59 | 1 | 2017-07-31 17:44 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49808707, 49809385, 49809452, 49809459, 49810030, 49810072, 49810077, 49810628, 49810728, 49810730, 49811412, 49811477, 49811483, 49812036, 49812117, 49812944, 49813005, 49813260, 49813309, 49813707, 49813739, 49813955, 49813972, 49814037, ... |
| 50728501 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 17:21 | 1 | 2017-07-31 17:44 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49808707, 49809385, 49809452, 49809459, 49810030, 49810072, 49810077, 49810628, 49810728, 49810730, 49811412, 49811477, 49811483, 49812036, 49812117, 49812944, 49813005, 49813260, 49813309, 49813707, 49813739, 49813955, 49813972, 49814037, ... |
| 50727561 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 16:46 | 1 | 2017-07-31 17:44 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49808707, 49809385, 49809452, 49809459, 49810030, 49810072, 49810077, 49810628, 49810728, 49810730, 49811412, 49811477, 49811483, 49812036, 49812117, 49812944, 49813005, 49813260, 49813309, 49813707, 49813739, 49813955, 49813972, 49814037, ... |
| 50722860 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 13:49 | 1 | 2017-07-31 14:40 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50265222, 50265980, 50266399, 50266460, 50266971, 50266991, 50267086, 50267149, 50267214, 50267730, 50267823, 50267838, 50268261, 50268321, 50268344, 50268632, 50268757, 50268777, 50268888, 50268940, 50269252, 50269279, 50269552, 50269581, ... |
| 50723915 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 14:27 | 1 | 2017-07-31 14:40 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50265222, 50265980, 50266399, 50266460, 50266971, 50266991, 50267086, 50267149, 50267214, 50267730, 50267823, 50267838, 50268261, 50268321, 50268344, 50268632, 50268757, 50268777, 50268888, 50268940, 50269252, 50269279, 50269552, 50269581, ... |
| 50721370 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 13:04 | 1 | 2017-07-31 13:35 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50285695, 50285884, 50285914, 50286127, 50286148, 50286681, 50286756, 50286945, 50286989, 50287811, 50287923, 50294481, 50294518, 50294601, 50294611, 50294618, 50294637, 50294750, 50294776, 50294855, 50294900, 50294907, 50294982, 50295005, ... |
| 50719857 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 12:21 | 1 | 2017-07-31 13:35 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50285695, 50285884, 50285914, 50286127, 50286148, 50286681, 50286756, 50286945, 50286989, 50287811, 50287923, 50294481, 50294518, 50294601, 50294611, 50294618, 50294637, 50294750, 50294776, 50294855, 50294900, 50294907, 50294982, 50295005, ... |
| 50718914 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 11:52 | 1 | 2017-07-31 11:58 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50296246, 50296254, 50296306, 50296313, 50296323, 50296350, 50296355, 50296359, 50296366, 50296371. |
| 50716986 by M!dgard @ 2017-07-31 10:44 | 1 | 2017-07-31 11:24 | M!dgard | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50322505, 50322534, 50323046, 50323099, 50323650, 50323724, 50324465, 50324640, 50324893, 50324949, 50325001, 50325006, 50325619, 50325671, 50326074, 50326131, 50326175, 50326545, 50326577, 50326621, 50326649, 50326676. |
| 49615072 by M!dgard @ 2017-06-17 13:42 | 1 | 2017-06-20 21:22 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-06-21 11:53 | M!dgard | Hi JanTags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase.I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-21 12:27 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once t... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-21 12:39 | M!dgard | (Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.) | |
| 5 | 2017-06-21 12:59 | M!dgard | > the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local communityThe problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-21 13:08 | M!dgard | Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds:Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 waysLowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 waysSo the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude. | |
| 49618796 by M!dgard @ 2017-06-17 16:59 | 1 | 2017-06-17 16:59 | M!dgard | I meant "non-oneway street" |
| 47342588 by M!dgard @ 2017-03-31 23:14 | 1 | 2017-06-03 10:16 | mentaken ♦29 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173720261cycleway = opposite but no oneway street. Can u fix this ? Thxhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite |
| 2 | 2017-06-17 16:59 | M!dgard | Fixed, thanks. | |
| 44966155 by M!dgard @ 2017-01-06 20:55 | 1 | 2017-03-06 23:05 | Eebie ♦118 | That trunk link was deleted because it was removed after the work were finished. The imagery isn't up to date. |
| 45023782 by M!dgard @ 2017-01-09 11:17 | 1 | 2017-01-09 11:17 | M!dgard | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810 |
| 45023459 by M!dgard @ 2017-01-09 11:05 | 1 | 2017-01-09 11:05 | M!dgard | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810 |
| 45023270 by M!dgard @ 2017-01-09 10:58 | 1 | 2017-01-09 10:59 | M!dgard | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810 |
| 44989943 by M!dgard @ 2017-01-07 22:18 | 1 | 2017-01-08 12:45 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | The link isn't "dead", it's just "resting"...You can see the story onhttp://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010There's no data from the last 45 days. If and when there is some data, it'll presumably appear at that link. Looking for &... |
| 37898791 by M!dgard @ 2016-03-17 14:48 | 1 | 2016-07-06 20:29 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Ha, die Panos is goed gemapped. Heb je tagging style maar overgenomen. Moet die strikt gezien ook niet nog een operator=Panos hebben? Of is dat een franchisenemer, en niet direct iets dat we opnemen? |
| 2 | 2016-07-13 13:56 | M!dgard | Ik weet niet of het zelfstandige winkels zijn of door Panos zelf worden uitgebaat, daarom heb ik geen operator toegevoegd.Ik denk trouwens dat ik die stijl misschien zelf wel van iemand anders heb overgenomen. De brand:wikidata is in elk geval Polyglot's invloed. :p | |
| 30781436 by M!dgard @ 2015-05-04 14:48 | 1 | 2015-05-05 19:21 | JoL ♦9 | Wat is dit nu weer : "superfluous nodes" ????? Paden lopen wel degelijk ongeveer zoals ik ze gezet had. Luchtfoto is helemaal niet up to date, dit is een nieuw ontwikkeld gebied !!!! "Bedankt" om mijn werk wéér eens te verknoeien. |
| 2 | 2015-05-05 19:26 | M!dgard | Ik heb een paar nodes verwijderd die niets bijdroegen aan de geometrie van de weg, aan henzelf heb ik niets gedaan. Het was helemaal niet zichtbaar op de renders. Als je werk verknoeid is, dan is dat door iemand anders gebeurd. | |
| 3 | 2015-05-05 19:31 | M!dgard | For your information: er is een nieuwe mapper die je paadjes waarschijnlijk heeft vertrappeld als ze nu niet meer juist staan: osm.org/user/hanscardoen/historyDrie dagen geleden heeft hij changesets aan het park gedaan. Ik patrouilleer een beetje over de nieuwe mappers in Blankenberge en Gent en v... | |
| 4 | 2015-05-05 19:41 | M!dgard | Zag het er zo uit? http://ruben.janmaes.com/files/parkbos.pngIk heb al hanscardoen's changesets daar eens ge-revert (maar nog niet geüpload). Als je zegt dat het er zo uitzag en dat dat klopt met de echte situatie, upload ik de terugdraaiing. | |
| 5 | 2015-05-06 11:25 | JoL ♦9 | Sorry dat ik jou valselijk beschuldigde... Jouw screenshot geeft niet de originele structuur weer, maar als ik nu op de map kijk ziet het er weer min of meer als vroeger uit. Let wel : perfect is het zeker niet, maar de paden die er nu op staan zijn wel degelijk aanwezig. | |
| 6 | 2015-05-06 11:33 | JoL ♦9 | Ik zou het ongeveer zo laten dus. Ik denk dat het sowieso beter is te wachten op nieuwe luchtfoto's. | |
| 28336984 by M!dgard @ 2015-01-22 21:06 | 1 | 2015-01-22 21:56 | M!dgard | *source=survey 2015-01-22; Bing:p |