| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160802528 by Mark Martinec @ 2024-12-30 17:45 | 1 | 2025-01-18 19:48 | Kamion ♦8 | Why are you using tracktype=grade1 (PAVED)when the track is UNPAVED (surface=unpaved)? |
| 2 | 2025-01-19 23:44 | Mark Martinec | There is no requirement that a tracktype=grade1 must be paved. The wiki page says: "Solid. Usually a paved surface". It is very rare in Slovenia that a forestry or agricultural track is paved, but it can be wide and reasonably well maintained compacted surface (like in this case). I consid... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-20 10:34 | Kamion ♦8 | Have you been here? As a local I was here many times. The surface is far from compacted: it is just loose gravel.On OSM wiki you can clearly see that grade1 means that the surface is asphalt, concrete or paved:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype | |
| 4 | 2025-01-21 12:23 | Mark Martinec | Yes, I have been there on 2024-12-29, walked from Lokavec by the hiking path to Sv. Urban and back by the road. On that same wiki page that you cite, on grade1, it also clearly states "Usually a paved surface". "usually" is not "always" or "must be". At least... | |
| 126389525 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-09-19 17:41 | 1 | 2024-09-20 15:14 | ivanbranco ♦2,693 | Hi Mark!https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7633210/historywhat's the meaning of surface=0 in this relation?thanks and good mapping! |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 23:32 | Mark Martinec | Oops, fixed. Apparently I changed 'ascent' into 'surface' by mistake in changeset 126389525. Thanks for noticing! | |
| 85995165 by Mark Martinec @ 2020-05-30 23:02 | 1 | 2024-07-07 07:59 | soshial ♦26 | I wonder why you did put access=no for all these footpaths around here... Hmm.For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546836024 |
| 2 | 2024-07-07 11:01 | Mark Martinec | It wasn't me who put that tag on, it was Benđo Jušić about seven years ago (see history). I was just the lastone to touch these objects, keeping the access tag unchanged.That tag is most likely unwarranted or wrong. The original tagger seems to be inactive for the last six years.... | |
| 148518042 by Mark Martinec @ 2024-03-11 18:11 | 1 | 2024-03-12 18:40 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hi,It think that on https://www.osm.org/node/10973560597description="PAKETOMAT Podhod mesarski most"should be used instead of ref="PAKETOMAT Podhod mesarski most"(as I understand the wiki) |
| 2 | 2024-03-12 18:43 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | + I think that building:levels:underground should only be used on buildings and means "(total) number of levels that this building has underground". If the thing is inside a building, but is itself not a building, then level=-1 would be correct in my opinion. If it is not inside a building... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-12 23:40 | Mark Martinec | > think that building:levels:underground should only be used on buildingsI agree, removed. I have inherited this tag unintentionally when I merged my locker with a previous version of this locker at a wrong location.As far as ref vs. a description - I'm not sure. The current text in... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-13 18:34 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Ok.The wiki says that the "ref" key is used for numbers and codes. "PAKETOMAT Podhod mesarski most" doesn't really seem to be a number or code.I think that "PAKETOMAT Podhod mesarski most" could be the name in this case. The current name looks more like a d... | |
| 5 | 2024-03-18 18:15 | Mark Martinec | Ok, changed "ref" to "name", lowercased "paketomat". | |
| 118551744 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-03-16 13:15 | 1 | 2023-06-30 17:11 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hi,highway=steps + bicycle=designated appears a bit odd. Perhaps a tagging mistake?https://www.osm.org/way/940435513 |
| 2 | 2023-07-01 13:06 | Mark Martinec | It is odd indeed, but was intentional. The narrow road is steep, accessible by foot and bike but not by wider vehicles, and in that section there are a couple of long, inclined and not tall 'steps'. Didn't come up with better tagging than this. Feel free to change if you think of a mo... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-01 22:37 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Thanks for clarifying.How about bicycle=yes instead? (unless there is a bicycle sign) | |
| 4 | 2023-07-02 09:37 | Mark Martinec | Sure, changed. There is no sign, as far as I can remember. | |
| 5 | 2023-07-02 09:42 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Great! | |
| 66912141 by Mark Martinec @ 2019-02-04 18:43 | 1 | 2022-10-09 19:18 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hi,I don't understand the fixme on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668307651What is it that needs to be fixed? |
| 2 | 2022-10-11 09:16 | Mark Martinec | Admittedly my note needs clarification. The text in my 'fixme'is a direct copy of an info plate on the transition powertower https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1517026862 .It claims that the aerial double power line that comesto this tower transitions and continues underground to t... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-11 09:25 | Mark Martinec | Btw, even the power tower by the RTP Bežigrad https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3559320843 is now gone according to Lj aerial map, after the power line was moved underground. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-11 13:20 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Thanks for the clarification. I've move the cables near RTP Bežigrad underground | |
| 5 | 2022-10-11 13:21 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | ...and I've moved to fixme from the power line to the power masthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1517026862 | |
| 124651127 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-08-08 17:41 | 1 | 2022-08-29 07:49 | InanZen ♦1 | Veliko poti v tem gozdu je že čisto preraščenih - jih ni več. Nekaj sem jih izbrisal, nekatere pa spremenil v Path in dodal oznako obstacle:vegetation. |
| 41280036 by Mark Martinec @ 2016-08-05 23:54 | 1 | 2022-08-27 17:37 | mk2k22 ♦34 | Pozdravljeni, ali je morda tale križ (wayside cross) na Jeterbenku morda napaka? Vidim, da ste potem nekaj let kasneje dodali man_made=cross, kar mislim, da bi bilo bolj ustrezno? Ali pa je morda še kakšen drug križ kot tisti veliki na vrhu in sta dejansko dva? (Jaz se sicer spomnim ... |
| 2 | 2022-08-28 23:18 | Mark Martinec | Se ne spomnim več. Bi verjel, da je tam še eno malo znamenje malo proč, če sem ga dodal kot wayside_cross. Bo treba na izlet in preveriti. Na tejle sliki se morda da slutiti še en majhen križ v levem spodnjem kotu slike: https://www.casnik.si/narava-in-pokrajina-foto-jetrbenk/ Nim... | |
| 75576743 by Mark Martinec @ 2019-10-11 16:36 | 1 | 2022-08-17 12:26 | mk2k22 ♦34 | Pozdravljeni, mislite, da bi bil tukaj bolj smiseln 'tag' natural=rock kot pa locality? Lp |
| 2 | 2022-08-17 22:43 | Mark Martinec | Se strinjam, sem spremenil. Hvala za opaženje! | |
| 62772106 by Mark Martinec @ 2018-09-20 17:44 | 1 | 2022-08-06 17:15 | mk2k22 ♦34 | Pozdravljeni, zanima me glede poti skozi Grlo: ali ste to naložili svojo GPS sled? Izgleda mi precej zamaknjena v levo z dejanske poti po grapi... Lp |
| 2 | 2022-08-08 16:10 | Mark Martinec | Iz https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62772106 se vidi, da sem 2018-09-20 spreminjal je krajši odsek poti z vrha Grla proti zahodu, tisti del, kjer se je pot dalo razbrati iz LIDAR in GURS posnetkov. Glede sumljivega dela poti naprej dol proti Tamarju, tisto je ostalo nespremenjeno od ... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-11 17:23 | mk2k22 ♦34 | Pa res - nekako sem mislil, da je tudi tista sprememba spadala k vam. Hvala, da ste vseeno spremenili, izgleda precej bolje sedaj. (Morda bom poskušal kasneje še sam nekoliko bolj podrobno popraviti zgornji del skozi Grlo, vendar je iz satelitske slike težko razvidno, pa tudi pri OSM ... | |
| 115961825 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-01-10 00:26 | 1 | 2022-05-23 15:34 | ConnorWong ♦21 | Hi Mark,do you know the gauge of these tracks? |
| 2 | 2022-05-23 17:54 | Mark Martinec | According to aerial photography (GURS DOF025) the long railway tracks are 1.5 m wide, which would be a normal railway track size; the short tracks are about half that size, about 0.8 m, probably narrow-gauge. These are military artillery ranges - target guides. Haven't seen them in person. | |
| 120185778 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-04-25 22:21 | 1 | 2022-04-26 20:40 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hi,Thanks for adding the new roundabout. Just FYI you broke the bus relations of line 27 by doing so (you forgot to add them to the roundabout). I'll fix that, this is just to give you a heads up for future similar cases. |
| 2 | 2022-04-26 22:01 | Mark Martinec | Thanks for fixing! I was aware to be leaving job half-done, hoping for someone to pick it up :) Also the cycleway/footway to the East is now broken. The roundabout is actually a turbo-roundabout (spiraling roads outwards), so this needs further work. Likewise all the roundabouts to the West on Leta... | |
| 3 | 2022-04-27 20:06 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Yep, let's hope for the 2021 orthophoto to go online soon! | |
| 119732308 by Mark Martinec @ 2022-04-14 23:37 | 1 | 2022-04-14 23:37 | Emilius123 ♦393 | nice, bro |
| 111654668 by Mark Martinec @ 2021-09-24 15:57 | 1 | 2021-11-28 14:25 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hi! You've added this footway sidewalk to Tržaška https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180893454although a separated cycle and footway already exists:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652880804This seems to be redundant. If we argue that the little kerb between the cycle track and ... |
| 2 | 2021-11-28 14:29 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | ...and the sidewalk=right tag should be removed along sections like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933614459 | |
| 3 | 2022-01-14 22:27 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Cleanest solution seemed to be to remove it, sorry. (I didn't get any response, so I took the liberty to just do it) | |
| 4 | 2022-01-18 23:46 | Mark Martinec | Sorry, I missed your previous comment. Thanks for the update. But now there is a missing sidewalk (tag or way) along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150154689 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007054751 if I understand it correctly. | |
| 5 | 2022-01-19 11:45 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | True! I've added them.I understand your preferred style is to map sidewalks separately, while I prefer only doing if there is a cycle track involved. My reasoning is that for a cyclist it is a big pain to cross a raised kerb, while for pedestrians it's no effort at all, but I acknowled... | |
| 6 | 2022-01-20 00:10 | Mark Martinec | Thank you for noticing inconsistencies fixing errors! I'm fine with your choice regarding mapping sidewalks and cycle tracks style. I rarely touch these, leaving cycleways to cyclist mappers, as you may have noticed :) The reason why I chose to deal with these in this particular stretch of Tr... | |
| 111859762 by Mark Martinec @ 2021-09-29 10:48 | 1 | 2021-10-24 11:05 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Hello!You've deleted a whole lot of objects here: a parking lot, an access aisle, a vegetated area + a number of trees.One of the results is that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927801230 is now disconnected from other roads, but more importantly, I'm wondering why you deleted all ... |
| 2 | 2021-10-25 14:17 | Mark Martinec | That whole area of the MDB square has been recently fully reconstructed/rebuilt. There is no road there any more, it is essentially a pedestrian zone entirely. This includes removed vegetation and parking area. Some details will need to be filled-in when the reconstruction is finished. Have you seen... | |
| 3 | 2021-10-25 14:34 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Oh great! Thanks a lot for your edit!No, I have no recent on-ground information, so I wanted to make sure it wasn't an accident.Just a minor issue: The driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927801230 is now disconnected from other roads. Do you know whether the path https://www.ope... | |
| 4 | 2021-10-25 18:02 | Mark Martinec | I doubt that the path can be used for motor vehicles, as the "Ljubljana Ortophoto 2020" shows there is a bollard there. Need to check, will go there in one of the following days to see accessibility of the now-disconnected service road. | |
| 5 | 2021-10-25 18:52 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Very nice! Happy mapping! | |
| 6 | 2021-10-28 00:28 | Mark Martinec | Been there, done some mapping the old-fashioned way with a GPS, OSMtracker, and with josm back home. Filled-in lots of details according to the current situation on the ground. Regarding that service road: I talked to someone living there, who happened to be standing there. He explained that the bol... | |
| 7 | 2021-10-28 14:27 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Absolutely fantastic!That's what I call committed mapping! :-) | |
| 90310498 by Mark Martinec @ 2020-09-02 14:40 | 1 | 2020-09-02 21:16 | patata_28 ♦157 | Thanks for you adjustament! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90310498 |
| 81234738 by Mark Martinec @ 2020-02-19 18:13 | 1 | 2020-02-21 11:01 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,you added two ways with a strange tag, could you check this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774729827Thanks! |
| 2 | 2020-02-21 13:02 | Mark Martinec | Oops, fixed now on both ways. It is a row of trees. A cut&paste mistake, thanks for noticing! | |
| 52667492 by Mark Martinec @ 2017-10-05 21:44 | 1 | 2018-02-25 10:54 | StefanB ♦55 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services (množina!) je povsem legitimno za naša počivališča s črpalkami ipd samo za počivanje pa je https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=rest_area |
| 18970797 by Mark Martinec @ 2013-11-18 12:42 | 1 | 2017-12-27 14:50 | fredi_alf ♦154 | Deprecated tagTag landuse=pond is deprecated: natural=water+ water=pond |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 18:35 | Mark Martinec | Fixed. Thanks fredi_alf ! |