Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
147346578 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-02-11 23:04 | 1 | 2025-07-07 00:01 | Kai Johnson ♦164 | I don't know if your bot can spot this, but Native American reservations in both OSM and Wikidata commonly conflate the concept of people (i.e., Cahuilla Band of Indians) with tribal lands (i.e., Cahuilla Reservation). The bot fixed the redirect, but not the conflation. Maybe check if the Wikid... |
2 | 2025-07-07 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | tribes linked as territory was so popular tagging and less blatantly wrong than many things listed in https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ that I think this kin of report is suppressed(and AFAIK wikidata was also wrong, in way much more subtle than what I am listing ... | |
166477455 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-05-19 13:38 | 1 | 2025-05-20 06:35 | goedegazelle ♦241 | I reset this automated change for the third time.I have to emphasise that you are not allowed to start an edit war, as you already have done.I would also like to mention that you can ignore people in the forum but not on the map. |
2 | 2025-05-20 15:01 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | what is your reason for retagging it to sidewalk=none ?it means the same and it just makes harder to process datageneral migration was approved and in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-none-to-no-proposed-automated-edit/128842/15 you claimed that both values mean the same and th... | |
3 | 2025-05-20 15:05 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I guess I can implement opt-out - can you post list of ways which you want to retag to sidewalk=none in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-none-to-no-proposed-automated-edit/128842/ thread?I guess that I can also exclude ways you last edited but in such case when someone else edits w... | |
166021088 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-05-09 10:23 | 1 | 2025-05-12 14:33 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hallo,ein paar Änderungen dieses Changesets machen doch nicht wirklich Sinn. Weswegen wird bei einem Feldweg, ein sidewalk=none zu einem sidewalk=no? Ist dies nicht ein komplett überflüssiger bot-Edit? Meines Erachtens nach macht eine automatisierte Änderung nur bei bes... |
2 | 2025-05-13 13:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | benefit from removing this tag in cases where it is pointless is small enough that editing each case by human is not really worth itbetter to spend human time on more useful things | |
3 | 2025-05-13 13:27 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | also, this edit IS limited to cetain highway valuesif someone created leisure=playground sidewalk=none where it is simply wrong this edit will not affect it | |
4 | 2025-05-16 06:55 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Several map changes appear unnecessary. As previously noted, altering a sidewalk=* value on a highway track is inappropriate, given that such tracks with a surface=grass typically do not accommodate sidewalks in this region. It would be beneficial to restrict such changes in your bot's activiti... | |
5 | 2025-05-16 14:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > altering a sidewalk=* value on a highway track is inappropriate, given that such tracks with a surface=grass typically do not accommodate sidewalks in this regionwhy inappropriate? this bot is NOT adding new values, it is only moving already tagged sidewalk=none to sidewalk=noalso, appa... | |
166019323 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-05-09 09:41 | 1 | 2025-05-09 10:25 | flohoff ♦2,363 | Hi,would you mind reducing the changeset size? This is basically impossible to review. Flo |
2 | 2025-05-09 15:48 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | in terms of geographic spread or number of objects in one package? | |
3 | 2025-05-09 15:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | BTW, http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=166019323 may be helpful | |
139678965 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-09 21:32 | 1 | 2023-08-18 12:11 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | I'd suggest that "note:opening_hours:covid19" on at least https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634146183/history should probably go too. Perhaps you'd like to check the rest of these individually? |
2 | 2023-08-18 12:51 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I will look manually through associated tags like https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=opening_hours%3Acovid19#keys | |
3 | 2023-09-07 18:38 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I looked through most, currently looking at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zWa | |
4 | 2025-04-25 09:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | full cleanup completed - as far I was able to do sothanks for spotting the problem | |
5 | 2025-04-25 10:00 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | and please, let me know if you spot anything like this | |
164796800 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-04-11 05:08 | 1 | 2025-04-14 16:26 | MosKartograf ♦53 | 👍 |
162241890 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-02-07 11:35 | 1 | 2025-02-07 13:52 | Dawid2849 ♦711 | został znacznik operator:type, choć operator zniknął |
2 | 2025-02-11 15:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | jeszcze jest kilka https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1YCXchyba zdejmę, bo jest raczej błędnawe choć PP to taki trochę urzędowy twór z ich monopolami | |
161608996 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-01-21 17:16 | 1 | 2025-01-22 00:52 | jmarchon ♦426 | Hi Mateusz, Isn't area=yes needed for highway=footway areas? |
2 | 2025-01-24 19:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | building= already implies area=yes, so explicit area=yes is not neededin this case tagging is suspect in general but it was not made worse by this edit, I think | |
3 | 2025-01-24 23:40 | jmarchon ♦426 | That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. | |
157874323 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-14 12:13 | 1 | 2024-10-16 21:07 | wildmaps ♦42 | Sorry I didn't knew that at that time! Thanks for the edit |
157875255 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-14 12:33 | 1 | 2024-10-14 16:06 | Xvtn ♦470 | Thanks for catching that! |
157674801 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-09 14:13 | 1 | 2024-10-09 15:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | sorry for a null edit not actually changing anythingit was another bug in retry code, now fixed |
157660082 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-09 08:07 | 1 | 2024-10-09 15:06 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | sorry for null edit say at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6397184/historyit was another bug in retry code |
157618068 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-08 09:55 | 1 | 2024-10-08 12:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | sorry, this repeated empty edits are result of bug in handling retries on failed network connectionprzepraszam, te puste edycje są wynikiem błędu w przetwarzaniu przerwania połączenia |
157618721 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-10-08 10:10 | 1 | 2024-10-08 12:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | sorry, this repeated empty edits are result of bug in handling retries on failed network connectionprzepraszam, te puste edycje są wynikiem błędu w przetwarzaniu przerwania połączenia |
136083420 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-14 12:32 | 1 | 2024-05-31 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5858588845/history has shop = textiles that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=textiles ? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=textiles, was used not shop=fabr... |
2 | 2024-06-04 10:08 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | heh, selfquestioning again | |
151914310 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-05-27 18:47 | 1 | 2024-05-28 06:55 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | bad description, sorry - it should be "address" not "gnis" |
150139071 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-04-17 16:40 | 1 | 2024-04-19 09:23 | pavvv ♦495 | proszę sprawdzić, czy zmiany są rzeczywiście poprawne |
2 | 2024-04-19 17:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | a są jakieś niepoprawne? | |
3 | 2024-04-19 17:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | To jest edycja automatyczna, która została uznana na tyle bezpieczną że może być wykonana bez sprawdzania poszczególnych obiektówpatrząc teraz na nią nadal nie widzę problemu - dostrzegasz jakiś? | |
4 | 2024-04-19 18:19 | pavvv ♦495 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327089207 - to wygląda mi na użycie cudzysłowiu w zamyśle lokalnej nazwy/opisu. Najlepsze byłoby loc_name/description, ale name z cudzysłowem pasuje bardziej niż bez.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9558306131 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/956592... | |
5 | 2024-04-19 18:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | jak ma jednie lokalną nazwę to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327089207 powinna ją mieć w tagu nameco do official_name to celowo nie chcę go ruszać, teoretycznie może być koszmarek że oficjalnie cudzysłów jest częścią nazwy | |
149024167 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 17:32 | 1 | 2024-03-23 11:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Please "engage brain" when making these changes.You've changed "craft=joinery" to "craft=joiner" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2659961527 but have left the tag "joinery=doors". This is exactly the sort of issue that I raised with you on https:/... |
2 | 2024-03-26 15:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I will investigate such orphaned cascading tags and fix them. And include automated steps to ensure it is entirely impossible for it to happen in this type of edit using this specific part of library. And will attempt to avoid it happening in other kind of edits.Sorry for not realising that ... | |
3 | 2024-04-17 13:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | "I will investigate such orphaned cascading tags and fix them."fixed, done it in general - not only with tags I edited If you see any missed - please let me know | |
148979715 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-21 18:43 | 1 | 2024-03-22 21:57 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Sigh. Would it really be _that_ difficult to contact consumers of tags that you're replacing, here https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=guns#projects ?No one's going to object that the replacement here is similar but without a message that a consumed tag is going to go away I hav... |
2 | 2024-03-23 18:31 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | In case you have not seen my response on Discord where you raised it: all of this projects support shop=gun and shop=guns with nothing indicating that they differentiate between them.Are you aware of any? If yes then I would need to look into what went wrong with my taginfo parsing. | |
3 | 2024-03-24 12:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | If a tag disappears and I'm not expecting it to I still need to see why it's gone. | |
4 | 2024-03-25 12:15 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I guess I can write to some of others listed as supporting specifically this value.(some, not all at start - as I am not sure would such message be actually welcome) | |
5 | 2024-03-26 14:45 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | First contact attempted in https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/pull/3375 | |
6 | 2024-03-27 00:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | I'm not sure what a pull request to nominatim has to do with anything? | |
7 | 2024-03-27 09:57 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | My comment in PR included> BTW - would it be useful to notify about retagging such as shop=guns to shop=gun before they happen (or after they happen?). It was suggested to me in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148979715 that doing it would be useful but I am not entirely sure about it... | |
8 | 2024-03-27 10:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | That PR was a format change only: https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/pull/3375/files - I'm not sure what that has to do with the suggestion that you, as the person changing OSM data, should look and see how tags are used before making changes.The actual software used to display "who... | |
9 | 2024-03-27 18:45 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I used description field of this PR also to ask Nominatim maintainer whether they would welcome such notifications (as quoted above)And they replied that they are not interested at all (as quoted above) | |
10 | 2024-03-27 19:05 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Perhaps there has been a misunderstanding.I was suggesting that _you_, as the person who is changing the tags, would as part of the processs where you ask yourself "is this a sensible change and should any other tags be changed" also ask yourself "which applications consume these ta... | |
11 | 2024-03-28 19:18 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | And I did it. As I described on Discord where you proposed it - I contacted one developer who had listing distinct for entry being removed compared to a new entry (it turned out their taginfo listing had a mistake).But if app lists shop=* catchall rather than using specific tag values then conta... | |
12 | 2024-03-28 19:48 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | > And I did it.Where was this? I don't remember seeing a message about this change here.> But if app lists shop=* catchall rather than using specific tag values then contacting them is very unlikely to be useful.Indeed - but I don't think that anyone is suggesting that?\... | |
13 | 2024-03-29 07:15 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | And it had "Shown as a generic shop" exactly like shop=gun.Though I guess in future it would make sense to contact project in case where they list older and newer that with the same description not indicating special handling? | |
14 | 2024-03-29 08:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Where was this? I don't remember seeing a message about this change here.https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/790139356903505951/1215014042406486098I contacted one developer at https://www.facebook.com/groups/historic.place/posts/2715780891914218/ as they were claiming t... | |
15 | 2024-03-29 08:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I guess that it means that next time I should consider contacting when they claim generic support for this specific value | |
16 | 2024-03-29 09:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | If a project offers explicit support (even if only generic rendering) it still makes sense to contact them as likely a code change is warranted if a combination is no longer in OSM.For example, if you search https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values for "funeral_director" you&... | |
17 | 2024-03-30 15:14 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I opened some issues:https://github.com/vmarc/knooppuntnet/issues/397https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23587 (this outright framed as bug report as it is a bug)https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/19427 (this outright framed as bug report as it is a bug)https://github.com/So... | |
18 | 2024-04-02 11:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Opened https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23594#ticket - and just fixed some presets in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/CampingForOverlanders?action=diff&version=11 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/OSMRookie?action=diff&version=9Opened https://github.com/BikeCi... | |
19 | 2024-04-03 16:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/MountainbikeTrails?action=diff&version=7 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23597 are final changes for nowI may make more report - if Osmand or some other place will process my reports, then I will reenable reports for them. Especially Osmand... | |
20 | 2024-04-17 13:44 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I marked it as resolved at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos#Discussion - let me know if you think that more should be done | |
140005241 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-17 10:18 | 1 | 2023-08-21 01:20 | DP24PH ♦418 | Follow-up removal of *:covid19=* in Dasmariñas City is in progress thru c140157406. Thank you very much for your effort in COVID-19 Emergency Termination procedure.DP24 |
2 | 2024-03-30 15:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Thanks :) | |
147346029 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-02-11 22:34 | 1 | 2024-02-11 22:41 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | This was an incorrect change. The wikidata was wrong and now the wikipedia tag is matching the wrong wikidata :) |
2 | 2024-02-12 01:09 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | Commented in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bot-edit-proposal-fixing-wikipedia-tags-pointing-at-redirects-in-usa-where-it-can-be-done-reliably/101417/3linked from this changeset | |
3 | 2024-03-30 15:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I replied in OSM discussion thread (I stopped this bot edit) | |
149026774 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 18:37 | 1 | 2024-03-27 17:49 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Well the spelling was correct before this and close to 200 others where tag-fiddled away, https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/display/analogueThe tagging language of OSM is British English, or standard English so we should not be changing a correct spelling to American English, or Simplified En... |
2 | 2024-03-27 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/display/analogue&***/display/analog - if display=analog is wrong and not preferable then it is still possible to discuss it and deprecate that tag with 13 000 uses | |
3 | 2024-03-27 18:51 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Also, if there is an actual support for keeping both versions I can roll back these edits | |
148995504 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 05:43 | 1 | 2024-03-23 11:15 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | The value here previously was "multi;q". That obviously means that the user meant "sport=multi" but also that they meant to square the rectangle. Did you manually square these rectangles? |
2 | 2024-03-23 18:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Did you manually square these rectangles? no, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos only tags replacements are doneI was looking into various reasons for this tags appearing but I have not realised h... | |
3 | 2024-03-26 14:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I added special handling to my typo detector to skip and ignore such cases (no immediate effects, has effect on future proposed edits or manual cleanup) | |
4 | 2024-03-26 15:08 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Also started reviewing potentially affected, looks like most or all are pitches.I have removed the from code of approved bot (this comment has not appeared at all previously in this discussion or any previous one if I remember right) and I started thinking about best way to detect and review aff... | |
5 | 2024-03-26 15:09 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Also, I reviewed proposed future edit where I asked about some of similar values in changeset comments. I removed such values from planned future bot edit.(PS if you prefer less info let me know, I can post less detailed updates) | |
149027417 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 18:57 | 1 | 2024-03-23 10:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Given that you're only replacing one value here It'd be much better if instead of just "fixing unusual departures_board values with a clear replacement" you actually said what you were changing.It saves people having to hunt through the actual previous values you changed.Fail... |
2 | 2024-03-26 14:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Would it be also useful to split edits where I would modify several values into separate edits, each for separate value?To me it seems that editing one key and clearly listing it is good enough (and better than typical description) but I can further split edits.But it seems to me of that is ... | |
149024023 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 17:28 | 1 | 2024-03-23 11:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | This is another example where it would have been nice to know that it was happening. I've commented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos in case that route works; many comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm... |
2 | 2024-03-23 19:31 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > many comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3199858 don't seem to be acknowledged; perhaps you're not reading mails from that account?I am processing this emails (that is how I found this comment).And actually it may make to sense to not start/... | |
3 | 2024-03-23 19:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | (for completeness - API calls iterating over all changesets ever made by bot would be really silly)hmm, how https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3199858 updates their data? Is there some stream of changeset comments? | |
4 | 2024-03-23 19:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > don't seem to be acknowledgedI bookmarked this page though I will not process all of them today. I will process them before running more bot edits. | |
5 | 2024-03-23 19:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | There is a feed of changeset comments (and other comments); ChangesetMD can read that.It might be easier just to process mails as they come in to though - assuming you can receive it on a machine you control? | |
146692074 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-25 23:31 | 1 | 2024-01-31 13:20 | wireguy ♦548 | Mateeusz, Bazetta wiki info updated, but relation is Mecca Township. fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146904350 |
2 | 2024-02-29 14:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | thanks for fixing! (AFAIK this edit has not made things worse at least) | |
146023450 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-08 10:39 | 1 | 2024-02-06 19:36 | mark2525 ♦15 | Mateusz Konieczny ten potok nazywa się Sowlinka, nawet w Wikipedii jest to napisane! Potok Starowiejski jak sama nazwa wskazuje znajduje się na terenie Starej Wsi i jest w zasadzie dopływem (dopływami) Sowlinki płynącym ze zbocza Cichonia. Ponieważ w Starej Wsi na zboczach Cichonia i Jeżowej... |
2 | 2024-02-07 07:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Mateusz Konieczny ten potok nazywa się Sowlinka, nawet w Wikipedii jest to napisane!Zauważ że nazwa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352044958 została zmieniona w innej edycji, patrz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352044958/historyta edycja, zgodnie z jej opisaem, dodała tag... | |
3 | 2024-02-07 07:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Zapytałem się w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145446576Jak wiesz która nazwa jest poprawna to ją możesz zmienić.Być może warto zobaczyć na inne edycje wykonane prez tamte konto | |
146625111 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-24 11:17 | 1 | 2024-01-24 11:18 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, this one was manually reviewedsorry, edit was made from wrong account and is not part of this bot edit |
146335823 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-16 19:15 | 1 | 2024-01-16 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, reverted as buggybug was found and fixed |
146335792 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-16 19:14 | 1 | 2024-01-16 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, reverted as buggybug was found and fixed |
139677537 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-09 20:40 | 1 | 2024-01-14 18:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/313156653 is open? It didn't look it. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4068353 . |
2 | 2024-01-14 18:57 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168771637 has also closed and reopened under a different name. | |
3 | 2024-01-14 18:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | You've also left "note:opening_hours:covid19" while deleting the tag that it refers to, which doesn't make a lot of sense. | |
4 | 2024-01-15 10:03 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/313156653 is open?No, and this edit has not verified/checked it - and it was not intended to verify this.Note also that this edit was configure to not remove opening_hours:covid19 tags declaring POI to be closed during Covid, exactly ... | |
5 | 2024-01-15 10:05 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Edit was also configured to not remove any opening_hours:covid19 that were not merely repeating opening_hours (some people run edit removing all of them, but i have not done this) | |
6 | 2024-01-15 10:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > You've also left "note:opening_hours:covid19" while deleting the tag that it refers to, which doesn't make a lot of sense.Fixed here and elsewhere, thanks for spotting! Left one that has potentially useful info.( though I have no idea what you meant as problematic... | |
146110183 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-01-10 16:14 | 1 | 2024-01-10 16:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | sorry, filter that was supposed to skip it failed(or more exactly, filter worked and was ignored)this is now fixed |
2 | 2024-01-10 16:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | edit reviewed manually, I would do the same manually (I could revert this and apply it manually but it would be pointless)sorry for a bug | |
144110321 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-11-16 19:44 | 1 | 2023-11-24 12:33 | David Dean ♦40 | I'm not sure how replacing tiled, which is a specific type of flooring surface with paved, which is generic can count as a 'clear replacement'. I've put this back as surface=tiles, which is in use at least 1000 times across the world: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/surfac... |
2 | 2023-11-25 07:52 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | It was done this way as also surface=paving_stones can be referred to as tiled, so surface=tiled is not so clearnote also that this replacement resulted in StreetComplete quest and creation of note with photo allowing conclusive tagging(though, I guess, it can be removed from list of replace... | |
3 | 2023-11-25 07:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | och, and to make it clear: surface=tiles is not being edited by a bot | |
144106389 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-11-16 17:51 | 1 | 2023-11-16 18:19 | Dawid2849 ♦711 | Tu miało być paving_stones. Poprawie, gdy będę mieć chwilę |
140794401 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-09-04 09:16 | 1 | 2023-10-23 22:30 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | This boundary is broken (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/119236)This was the last edit to touch it. I'm sure this bot edit wasn't the one that broke the boundary, but now it's hard to tell what the culprit was. It would be ideal if a bot edit working on boundaries might a... |
2 | 2023-10-24 11:32 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Thanks for fixing it!Sadly, boundary validity checking is more than a bit annoying and complex.Maybe it is possible to query Osmose is it checking errors for boundary? But it would require relying on extra service and distinguishing actual errors from useless warnings that Osmose likes to pr... | |
3 | 2023-10-25 03:42 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | The algorithm for boundary validity is not hard. I do it in Streetferret. You just gather up all the member ways and make sure each endpoint has a matching endpoint on the same or another way. Then you check that all the inner loops are outside an outer loop. In any case, there is definitely a QA si... | |
4 | 2023-10-25 07:21 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Then you check that all the inner loops are outside an outer loop.that is definitely not trivial in my python script that supports only tag changes (and parts of scripts is not yet supporting relations at all!) | |
5 | 2023-10-25 09:01 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | In this car case, a huge piece of the loop was missing, so even a trivial check would have caught it. | |
140125562 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-20 10:08 | 1 | 2023-10-09 15:59 | Minh Nguyen ♦567 | This changeset discarded a more precise Wikidata item in favor of a less precise one based on a Wikipedia article that covers multiple topics. The topics are covered in a single article because the individual topics are not considered notable enough by Wikipedia standards. To prevent this issue from... |
2 | 2023-10-10 07:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Thanks! | |
141053368 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-09-10 09:12 | 1 | 2023-09-10 09:39 | Snusmumriken ♦141 | You need to stop this edit war. I don't care one iota about the fate of that tag. But you have to come to some other resolution with your opponent, not just reverting back and forth |
2 | 2023-09-11 05:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Thanks for pointing this out! I am monitoring bot account bot not noticed this edit war.I asked now at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141087015 and will stop this bot edit for now. | |
3 | 2023-09-12 03:09 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I have received reply that they updated their bot. | |
4 | 2023-09-20 08:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10902156805/history problem seems to be fixed nowI will restart bot now(note, there was also some discussion on mailing list on this topic) | |
140014147 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-17 13:47 | 1 | 2023-09-09 10:07 | phd0 ♦54 | bonjour,toute la zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287309840 n'est pas le magasin en lui même. je propose plutot de mettre la zone en "zone commercial" et de détacher les tag du magasin pour les placer sur un point. Qu'en penses tu ?Philippe |
2 | 2023-09-09 10:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | looks like a good idea to me | |
139892669 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-08-14 23:55 | 1 | 2023-08-15 06:12 | tux67 ♦1,940 | Mateusz, I assume as an automated edit this has discussed somewhere? I do not see a reference to this announcement in the changeset.BRtux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139892669 |
2 | 2023-08-15 07:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139892669 ?Especially content of discussion_before_edits tag? | |
3 | 2023-08-15 07:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Or more specifically https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-July/088353.html | |
4 | 2023-08-15 08:04 | tux67 ♦1,940 | Thanks - my point was to refer to these communications together WITH the CS to avoid people have to search and ask. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Execute_with_caution | |
5 | 2023-08-15 08:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | But it is with changeset. It is tagged directly on the changeset itself, as seen at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139892669Maybe osmcha is not showing this tags, but it is problem of osmcha not supporting core and quite old OSM functionality (tags on changesets are not new) | |
6 | 2023-08-15 08:11 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | If you want, I can help you with finding place where osmcha is developed and where support for that can be requested (though I make no promises about this software, no idea is it even developed) | |
7 | 2023-08-15 08:16 | tux67 ♦1,940 | What about just populating the source field - at least to notify people about machine-readable information in a different place as expected:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Hashtags | |
8 | 2023-08-15 08:17 | tux67 ♦1,940 | For example, in the source field .. which aso JOSM and iD support | |
9 | 2023-08-15 08:19 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I guess I could put source=existing OpenStreetMap databut not sure how it would help with anything and would take some time to setupalso no idea which hashtags would be needed or useful (info that it is a bot edit already comes from user name) | |
10 | 2023-08-15 08:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > notify people about machine-readable information in a different place as expected:Which info is in different place than expected? | |
11 | 2023-08-15 08:29 | tux67 ♦1,940 | ok, I see - I have to look at the raw Changeset for things like this, as most likely 3rd party QS Tools would not all start showing additional information that I would expect to be in Changeset Comment and Source. Thanks anyway. BR tux67 | |
138715539 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-07-19 12:38 | 1 | 2023-07-22 16:34 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | `source` powinien może być wikidata;OSM aby wspierał parsery kilku wartości. Przecinek nie jest taki standardowy raczej. No i wtedy bez spacji. |
2 | 2023-07-23 06:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | zmieniłem | |
136080045 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-14 10:48 | 1 | 2023-05-16 16:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | You've replaced a few like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6590059464/history , but is the replacement here perhaps less precise? |
2 | 2023-06-19 16:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I do not think so. Either way I posted on tagging (wiki currently recommends replacing both with shop=weapons which seems like a clear detail loss to me though maybe shop=weapons weapons=guns would make sense?) | |
3 | 2023-06-19 16:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | (I have not mentioned this comment or bot edit, let me know if you think it should be mentioned) | |
136075427 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-14 08:15 | 1 | 2023-05-16 16:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2361007180/history is still a shop at all? What action did you take to verify it?If none, how does what you have done here improve the quality of OSM? |
2 | 2023-05-17 17:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > If none, how does what you have done here improve the quality of OSM?In the worst case (this shop is not existing) then benefits are basically nonexisting, but it is also not worse than before.This POI will be a bit more likely to be shown as requiring resurvey in some (not all) tools.\... | |
3 | 2023-05-17 17:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | > , but it is also not worse than before.untrue.A new "shop=yes" will just get lost in the other 180k "shop=yes". We know they won't get spotted because the other 180k of them have not been.Updating something that you do not even know exists with a "new&... | |
4 | 2023-05-17 17:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Note for the avoidance of doubt that the change here is NOT documented by osm_wiki_documentation_page \thttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits (there is no mention of fixme on that page) despite a changeset tag suggesting that it is. This is essentially an undiscussed mechanical edit.... | |
5 | 2023-05-17 17:50 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > A new "shop=yes" will just get lost in the other 180k "shop=yes". We know they won't get spotted because the other 180k of them have not been.Note that there are also some tools highlighting shop=yes as worth rechecking, as far as I know no widely used tool (or none... | |
6 | 2023-05-17 17:51 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Note for the avoidance of doubt that the change here is NOT documented by osm_wiki_documentation_page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits (there is no mention of fixme on that page) despite a changeset tag suggesting that it is. This is essentially an undiscussed mechanical edi... | |
7 | 2023-05-17 17:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > This is essentially an undiscussed mechanical edit. Also, shop=fixme was in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088185.html from thread linked on documentation page and in changeset comments here | |
8 | 2023-05-17 18:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Did you even read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088189.html ? | |
9 | 2023-05-17 18:11 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Did you even read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088189.html ?Yes, as indicated by replying it in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088196.html (and being at least on topic with replies, even if I would be 100% wrong) | |
10 | 2023-05-17 20:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | I didn't reply to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088196.html because it just made no sense - for example you said there "this batch is supposed to be listing 1:1 replacements" when you went on to change lots of individual values to "shop=yes". Tha... | |
11 | 2023-05-17 21:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > I didn't replyAnd I thought that I convinced you in this case.> because we had specifically discussed exactly that case previously AND in that example your had reverted your erroneous changesYou convinced me that shop=luxury to shop=yes causes some data loss (but I am still ... | |
12 | 2023-05-17 21:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | the tricky part is that only part should to be reverted (like shop=yes back to shop=true or shop=??? depending on how it was originally tagged) and avoid reverting shop=bed to shop=beds just to later edit it again | |
13 | 2023-06-10 07:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I have not forgotten about this one, this morning I nearly completed revert bot. | |
14 | 2023-06-14 11:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | I started revert process, first edits were made, see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4856808144/history | |
137324178 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-06-14 11:44 | 1 | 2023-06-14 11:57 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, actually performed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137324224 |
136080184 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-14 10:54 | 1 | 2023-05-19 01:28 | PierZen ♦262 | svp cessez de «laver blanc» en détruisant la carte pour imposer votre orthodoxie. Il serait plus utile de commenter pour aider les contributeurs à mieux cartographier. |
2 | 2023-05-19 02:16 | PierZen ♦262 | vs shop=yes | |
3 | 2023-05-19 08:38 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > vs shop=yesAre you complaining about change of shop=Retail to shop=yes or also about something else? | |
4 | 2023-05-19 12:47 | PierZen ♦262 | shop=yes n'améliore pas la carte. Quel est l'objectif de cette modification alors ? | |
5 | 2023-05-19 17:37 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | 1) changes to shop=yes done recently by this bot will be reverted (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136091078 for background)2) the intention was to make shops with no type specified at all to be easier to find for local mappers (as shop=yes has special support in multiple editors mak... | |
136091078 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-14 15:53 | 1 | 2023-05-16 16:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Clearly the change to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353944525 is causing information to be lost here (not much information, but still something).The correct tag here would be "shop=charity". |
2 | 2023-05-17 17:38 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > The correct tag here would be "shop=charity".Do you know this based on local knowledge or something else? I would be happy to replace it but I have no idea how this may be safely assumed here based on what I know.> is causing information to be lost here (not much informatio... | |
3 | 2023-05-17 17:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | As I have said on the mailing list already, local knowledge. Also, as I have also said on the mailing list, a quick overpass search finds lots of other similarly named shops tagged as "shop=charity" nearby.I could forgive a completely new OSM contributor with making this kind of basic... | |
4 | 2023-05-17 18:05 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Changing then to shop=charity> As I have said on the mailing list alreadyhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-May/088289.html ? Or also something else? I will respond to it - though not sure whether I will be able to do this today (but definitely before any bot edits)Bu... | |
5 | 2023-05-17 18:07 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > a quick overpass search finds lots of other similarly named shops tagged as "shop=charity" nearbyI am not fan of NSI style blind replacements based on name match and I am not planning to do them> this kind of basic errorWhat exactly is basic error here? If I would spot ... | |
6 | 2023-05-17 18:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | Your basic errors were:Performing an undocumented mechanical edit (the text at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_shop_tags does not cover this case).Thinking that changing "rare tag I do not understand" into "... | |
7 | 2023-05-17 19:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Why you think it is undocumented?Have you seen comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136075427 ?> Performing an undocumented mechanical edit (the text at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_shop_tags does not ... | |
8 | 2023-05-17 19:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | (just to be clear - here we are talking about anything to shop=yes, not just shop=fixme)If you've removed it from the wiki page, are you going to undo your changes? | |
9 | 2023-05-17 19:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Thinking that changing "rare tag I do not understand" into "common but meaningless tag" added any value.(1) I am definitely not changing all shop=* tags that I do not understand into shop=yes.In such cases I leave them alone (for example, from start of my list of exa... | |
10 | 2023-05-17 19:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > If you've removed it from the wiki page, are you going to undo your changes?I can do this, though I ask you to at least read what I posted and consider it. shop=yes usage going up does not mean that it is not being reviewed or that shop=yes objects are less likely to be reviewed than s... | |
11 | 2023-05-17 19:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | if you have read what I posted in this changeset comment/other changeset comments/talk mailing list and still think that it was bad edit then I can roll back shop=fixme changes and maybe also other if also problematic. | |
12 | 2023-05-17 19:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > (just to be clear - here we are talking about anything to shop=yes, not just shop=fixme)Are you asking also to undo say shop=*/shop=unknown to shop=yes changes discussed in February 2023? | |
13 | 2023-05-17 19:40 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Or are you asking to roll it back only in UK?If you are asking to roll back everything, everywhere - would you be fine with asking wider community whether they think that shop=* is preferable to shop=yes (and if not - is shop=yes preferable enough to change it) | |
14 | 2023-05-17 19:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Also, do you still think that it was an undocumented bot edit? That claim was a bit irritating as my bot edits are relatively rare case of actually following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct | |
15 | 2023-05-17 20:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | To be clear, what I'm suggesting is that if you _really_ care about having correct values in OSM then a tiny bit of research will often yield correct values. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1v53 is the set of your recent changes over a widish area. Many of the items that that finds can be easily... | |
16 | 2023-05-17 20:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | > Also, do you still think that it was an undocumented bot edit?Yes, in the sense that you wrote some documentation saying what you were going to do and then did something else instead. To be honest, I have re-read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_... | |
17 | 2023-05-17 20:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | > I am not fan of NSI style blind replacements based on name match and I am not planning to do themI'm glad to hear that, but unfortunately what you are doing is even worse! You aren't even thinking about what the correct value for an object is. What you are doing is akin to setting... | |
18 | 2023-05-17 21:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > I presume that "Please write at bot approval thread." means "please reply on the mailing list" to prevent part of this change from occurring" I did that and you ignored the request.Argghhh. Now I understand how it looked from your side and I agree that it was also r... | |
19 | 2023-05-17 21:19 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Many of the items that that finds can be easily found: rolled back for this objects, opened notes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3693714 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3693712Not convinced at all that shop=other or shop=store are more likely to result in fixes or that mov... | |
136024897 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-12 15:58 | 1 | 2023-05-16 16:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | A heads-up might have been nice here. Do the subtags need on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1178915529/history need to be changed or discussed anywhere? |
2 | 2023-05-17 10:59 | SK53 ♦864 | Why not consult the local community who are very active instead of just tag-fiddling! | |
3 | 2023-05-17 17:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > A heads-up might have been nice here> Why not consult the local communityDo you expect also posting on talk-gb in addition to posting on talk in case of bot edits affecting also GB? Or posting changeset comment in all edits that will be affected? Open notes in UK for all such cases i... | |
4 | 2023-05-17 17:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | > Do the subtags need on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1178915529/history need to be changed or discussed anywhere?Based on existing collector/collectables usage ( https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/collectables#overview indicates that it is sole usage worldwide) I have retagged thi... | |
136019418 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-12 13:36 | 1 | 2023-05-16 16:40 | SomeoneElse ♦13,389 | With https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6813245577/history it might make sense to talk to the original contributor. Clearly shop=yes is not a good replacement here. |
136024738 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-12 15:53 | 1 | 2023-05-12 21:30 | Joe-w ♦25 | good bot |
136020155 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-05-12 13:52 | 1 | 2023-05-12 14:05 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, replacement was also badfixed in code |
133557709 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-03-11 15:32 | 1 | 2023-03-31 19:50 | h551w ♦65 | (whoops!) |
134207782 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-03-28 07:59 | 1 | 2023-03-30 21:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | that was supposed to have edit description " move rock types to material from surface, as for example surface=granite may describe surface=unhewn_cobblestone and surface=sett and surface=paving_stones and raw rock surface " |
133467822 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-03-09 08:01 | 1 | 2023-03-09 08:10 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,955 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2349061814https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7473002534Pozd... |
2 | 2023-03-09 09:54 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | Przepraszam, po ostatniej aktualizacji bota wkradł się błąd. Ta wiadomość nie powinna zostać wysłana ponieważ ty nie jesteś autorem błędnych zmian. | |
133468654 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-03-09 08:29 | 1 | 2023-03-09 08:40 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,955 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy."Nyska/Dworcowa":https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8431787880"Partyzancka/Kukuczki":http... |
2 | 2023-03-09 09:54 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | Przepraszam, po ostatniej aktualizacji bota wkradł się błąd. Ta wiadomość nie powinna zostać wysłana ponieważ ty nie jesteś autorem błędnych zmian. | |
133469758 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2023-03-09 08:57 | 1 | 2023-03-09 09:00 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,955 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8925807687Pozdrawiam! 🦀 |
2 | 2023-03-09 09:46 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | A to jest dziwne że tutaj skomentował, będę musiał przeanalizować dlaczego tak się stało. | |
71486330 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-06-21 15:32 | 1 | 2023-03-04 13:02 | redd ♦390 | Hi Mateusz,it is not cool to change POIs without knowing them or checkin wether they are still up-to-date or even existing.Please do this kind of cleanups only for things you have a source like:- local knowledge- areal imagery- streetlevel imagery- OSM notesIn my eyes these automa... |
2 | 2023-03-07 19:41 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | This bot edit was discussed with OSM community.But can you be specific which specific object were harmed?Is there any negative to removing for example sustenance=restaurant from amenity=restaurant ? | |
128221082 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2022-10-29 17:39 | 1 | 2022-10-29 22:54 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
115875180 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2022-01-07 12:25 | 1 | 2022-01-10 01:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Discussed on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/add_highway%3Dbus_stop_tag_where_only_public_transport%3Dplatform_bus%3Dyes_is_present_in_Poland#amenity.3Dbus_station |
113499979 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-11-08 00:07 | 1 | 2021-11-08 00:08 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Sorry, for some reason according to OSM data this is in Poland.No idea why. |
111548387 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-09-22 15:08 | 1 | 2021-09-22 15:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops - widze buga w obsłudze błędu, bot zrobił pięć wersji tej liniprzepraszam |
105625050 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-05-31 12:45 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | to ręcznie wykonana edycja, pomyłem kontait is a manually made edit, I confused accounts |
105624760 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-05-31 12:40 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | to ręcznie wykonana edycja, pomyłem kontait is a manually made edit, I confused accounts |
105624938 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-05-31 12:43 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | to ręcznie wykonana edycja, pomyłem kontait is a manually made edit, I confused accounts |
105624599 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-05-31 12:37 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | to ręcznie wykonana edycja, pomyłem kontait is a manually made edit, I confused accounts |
105624555 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-05-31 12:36 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | to ręcznie wykonana edycja, pomyłem kontait is a manually made edit, I confused accounts |
100964052 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-13 18:07 | 1 | 2021-03-14 12:19 | km2bp ♦285 | Migracja błędnych linków - w wikipedia linkujemy hasło o danym obiekcie a nie najbardziej powiązaneAkurat to logiczne. Błędów nie popełnia tylko ten kto nic nie robi. Zmiana tagownia na operator:wikipedia w przypadku gdy link dotyczył parafii a nie budynku kościoła też ... |
2 | 2021-03-14 18:31 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | " i w zasadzie są bezużyteczne" - czemu? openstreetmap.org to nie jedyne miejsce gdzie te dane są wykorzystywane (choć nie wiem czy akurat tego tagu ktoś używa do czegokolwiek)https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2184https://github.com/openstreetmap/o... | |
3 | 2021-03-14 18:32 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Co do https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2184https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2812 - nie ma to dużego wpływu ale można swoje +1 zrobić (nie jako komentarza - jako łapkę w górę) | |
100936846 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-12 23:11 | 1 | 2021-03-12 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
2 | 2021-03-13 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... | |
100937939 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-13 00:10 | 1 | 2021-03-13 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
100937894 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-13 00:07 | 1 | 2021-03-13 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
100938148 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-13 00:23 | 1 | 2021-03-13 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
100936701 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-12 23:05 | 1 | 2021-03-12 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
2 | 2021-03-13 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... | |
100936442 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-12 22:56 | 1 | 2021-03-12 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
100935902 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2021-03-12 22:35 | 1 | 2021-03-12 23:32 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
85465731 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2020-05-19 22:14 | 1 | 2020-05-20 06:10 | gileri ♦1,003 | Thank your for this cleanup ! |
2 | 2020-05-20 09:57 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Happy to help, this one was an ideal work for bot (both finding offending objects and modifying them).BTW, are you potentially interested in reports about wikipedia/wikidata issues where human help is actually needed?Example reports are at https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-valid... | |
3 | 2020-05-22 08:26 | gileri ♦1,003 | Hi, nice tool !I already struggle to keep up with osmose [1] reports, but will check out regions I can understand the language such as California. Thank you for the offer anyway ! [1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ | |
4 | 2020-06-01 12:40 | trial ♦870 | nice bot! | |
5 | 2020-06-05 14:34 | Binnette ♦28 | Thank you Mateusz ^^ | |
63537317 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-15 11:20 | 1 | 2020-06-01 20:20 | matthiam ♦16 | Część ścieżki, której nie widać patrząc ze ścieżki, która krzyżuje się z nią, została usunięta. |
75676237 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-10-14 15:48 | 1 | 2019-10-14 22:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
75676417 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-10-14 15:52 | 1 | 2019-10-14 22:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
71090714 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-06-10 07:27 | 1 | 2019-06-14 16:29 | WinterB ♦4 | I reverted this change set and modernized the node information to preserve some history.The dam is no longer there (unsure what date) but documents seems to refer to the falls as Ledge Falls (hence the name of the dam being Ledge Falls Dam)The church, while I didn't verify if it's a hi... |
2 | 2019-06-14 20:50 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Thanks for a review and restoring useful part! | |
3 | 2019-06-14 20:52 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | And I amended the restored nodes - "(historical)" is not part of real old name, it is just how it was formatted in the database | |
71090948 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-06-10 07:37 | 1 | 2019-06-11 02:37 | JessAk71 ♦117 | Hello,Question about these automatic deletions: in cases like the node that is deleted here 358229380, the poi has already been tagged by a user as 'historic:amenity' thus it will not show up on the map. In some cases these pois are useful even if they no longer exist and they are correc... |
2 | 2019-06-11 05:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | For start: OSM is not a place to map historic, no longer existing objects.There are some cases where partially gone, but still present objects are mapped but it is not OK to map things like "all buildings that ever existed" or "all schools that ever existed".In some cases... | |
3 | 2019-06-11 08:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | And in case that you missed discussion - how else it can be advertised (except posting on talk-us and in #general on slack-us)?I am asking as it would help in case of a future bot edits, maybe I can reach wider community of mappers. | |
4 | 2019-06-11 16:26 | JessAk71 ♦117 | Hello,Thanks for the explanation, that sounds good. I was just curious due to that specific poi having been updated by a user, I agree, I now see it was in fact a mass edit, I didnt realize that. I did not intend to make a comment about general historic tags in anyway but yes totally agreed with w... | |
69859344 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:02 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859341 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:02 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859311 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:01 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859253 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 19:59 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859256 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 19:59 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859259 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 19:59 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859262 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 19:59 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859265 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:00 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859269 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:00 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859272 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:00 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859273 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:00 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
69859309 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-05-03 20:01 | 1 | 2019-05-03 20:35 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam za puste edycje. Problem został zdiagnozowany i jego źródło zlikwidowane. |
68503109 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2019-03-25 11:47 | 1 | 2019-03-25 11:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Note that large bounding box was caused by edit to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8197673 |
63681651 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-19 15:01 | 1 | 2018-10-19 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked |
63681645 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-19 15:01 | 1 | 2018-10-19 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked |
63681642 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-19 15:00 | 1 | 2018-10-19 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked |
63681639 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-19 15:00 | 1 | 2018-10-19 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked |
63681637 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-10-19 15:00 | 1 | 2018-10-19 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64038 was supposed to be linked |
59292617 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-05-26 12:02 | 1 | 2018-05-31 09:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | <test message to test notifications> |
59132879 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2018-05-20 20:38 | 1 | 2018-05-20 20:41 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | ops, wrong (outdated) version of bot made an editsorry |
52645635 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2017-10-05 07:12 | 1 | 2017-10-05 09:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,659 | Przepraszam, segmentacja edycji się wywaliła.Edycja pokryła całą polskę co jest wadliwe ale same wykonane edycje są OK. |
52397865 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2017-09-26 21:18 | 1 | 2017-09-26 21:34 | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account | Przepraszam - zapomniałem się przelogować po edycji profilu. |
52397904 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2017-09-26 21:20 | 1 | 2017-09-26 21:34 | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account | Przepraszam - zapomniałem się przelogować po edycji profilu. |
51848270 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2017-09-08 14:42 | 1 | 2017-09-08 14:48 | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account | ops, zapomniałem że na bota się zalogowałem |
51848260 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2017-09-08 14:42 | 1 | 2017-09-08 14:48 | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account | ops, zapomniałem że na bota się zalogowałem |