| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 144529900 by Matija Nalis @ 2023-11-28 03:01 | 1 | 2023-12-22 20:01 | APneunzehn74 ♦155 | Hello Matija Nalis, the four works of art in Baska at 44.97089, 14.7486 and 44.97016, 14.74895 are correct. I can't see any of this in street photos.Greetings Andreas |
| 2 | 2024-09-21 18:06 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,328 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227263754/history - what you meant by building=maybe ? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-21 18:40 | APneunzehn74 ♦155 | https://osm.org/go/xd1~sa4vf?node=11380674092It's about these works of art, I'm not sure if they actually exist. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-21 18:42 | APneunzehn74 ♦155 | https://osm.org/go/xd1~sa4vf?node=11380674093 | |
| 5 | 2024-09-29 03:13 | Matija Nalis | @Mateusz, "building=maybe" meant that it is unclear from aerial view whether that is a building or ruins or something else (parking?...)When DGU Croatia 2024 aerials get published, perhaps we'd see better. (or if someone on the ground surveys) | |
| 6 | 2024-10-03 16:14 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,328 | I would say that building=yes with fixme (or just fixme or just note) would be likely better... But maybe it is too far going purism. | |
| 154584176 by Matija Nalis @ 2024-07-30 00:00 | 1 | 2024-08-03 17:07 | aceman444 ♦2,709 | Hi, the buildings at Marina Project Zadar are almost done so it does not make much sense to change them to construction now. Also, if you removed mu source=ESRI, you could replace it with the source that you used. It is useful for chcecking. There is no dgu.hr 2022 imagery in JOSM editor yet, so whe... |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 03:00 | Matija Nalis | Hi, thanks for the notice, and sorry for a delay! If you know opening_date (when it will be fully finished), it would be good to add that tag, so it can be checked semi-automatically when finished (e.g. via https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date#Practical_useand either online survey or... | |
| 142636956 by Matija Nalis @ 2023-10-15 21:47 | 1 | 2023-10-16 06:03 | Negreheb ♦298 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3819089 i'm sorry, i miswrote. Neuroth ist there instead of Gligora, not additionally. The shop between Ikic and Neuroth(Gligora) empty. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11265527858 |
| 2 | 2024-05-18 22:11 | aceman444 ♦2,709 | Hi, you peron (platform) numbers are to be put into local_ref or ref tags, not in the name. I will fix it. | |
| 132507008 by Matija Nalis @ 2023-02-13 20:01 | 1 | 2023-02-20 20:56 | rjaksic ♦8 | overpass-turbo kaze da je ovo prvih 6 “highway=demanding_trail” na svijetu, pa je nekako prikladno da to bude bas na Prvicu ;)Salu na stranu, mozda bi ipak bilo bolje kad bi highway ostao neki "standardni" path/track, a ovaj "demand" nekako bio ukomponiran u sac_sca... |
| 2 | 2023-02-20 23:07 | Matija Nalis | Da, ideja je iz https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/feature-proposal-voting-highway-scramble/5228 - Problem je što zapravo taj dio nije prohodan na bilo koji normalan način za regularnog pješaka, pa nije dobro da ih routeri šalju tamo. sac_scale je nažalost također neadekva... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-24 22:26 | rjaksic ♦8 | Kad kazes da "taj dio nije prohodan na bilo koji normalan nacin" pitanje je da li ti "putevi" uopce spadaju pod highway...? Ako se oznace kao highway po definiciji su (bar u nekom ogranicenom obliku) dio rutabilne mreze, a koliko razumijem u ovom slucaju to zapravo nije pozel... | |
| 4 | 2023-03-07 00:32 | Matija Nalis | bilo je u toj diskusiji za sub-tag demanding_trail=* koji bi specificirao zasto tocno... No, nema veze, stavio sam abandoned:highway=path za sada; ako stave proposal budemo vidjeli onda... | |
| 92978629 by Matija Nalis @ 2020-10-24 05:20 | 1 | 2020-10-24 05:22 | Matija Nalis | highway=cycleway je za biciklisticke staze (odvojene od ceste), a highway=secondary+cycleway:left=lane je za biciklisticke trake (na cesti). v. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle |
| 85319315 by Matija Nalis @ 2020-05-16 23:07 | 1 | 2020-06-05 11:38 | simulator1 ♦26 | Pozdrav,vidim da si posmaknuo južnu papagajku na krivu poziciju, tj. na mjesto gdje se nalazi vrh krova po DGU. Staru poziciju sam pokušao što preciznije staviti na dno zgrade koristeći više perspektiva, pa bi te zamolio da to ispraviš. Changesetovi: 85983949 i 853193... |
| 2 | 2020-06-08 16:19 | Matija Nalis | Pozdrav, nisam u mogucnosti sad detaljnjije pogledati do srpnja nazalost :( Dogovor na talk-hr je bio da se (procijenjena) baza zgrade iz DGU DOF koristi kao autorativna. Moguce da sam fulao, iako pokusavam koristiti i DGU DOF i DGU buildings (ZIPP) layer. Sto si ti tocno koristio? Bilo bi dobro d... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-03 14:57 | Matija Nalis | rasprava o tome je krenula u threadu na https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-hr/2020-August/002783.html - slobodno se priključi | |
| 29440377 by Matija Nalis @ 2015-03-13 03:22 | 1 | 2015-05-08 14:54 | Janjko ♦87 | U ovom changesetu si ucrtao jedan spomenik, historic=monument. Stavio si ga usred šume.http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3396312094Jesi li možda mislio na ovu skulpturu:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505135731 |
| 2 | 2015-05-20 23:50 | Matija Nalis | Mozda, tesko mi je za reci, imas sliku ili nesto? IIRC radilo se o nekoj skulpturi vjerojatno iz partizanskog doba, a vidjelo se iz vlaka kroz drvece. obzirom je pucano iz vlaka u gibanju, definitivno je aproksimativna lokacija... | |
| 3 | 2015-05-21 09:59 | Janjko ♦87 | Ako je iz vlaka onda je to vjerojatno taj. Budem izbrisao svoj i dodao tagove na tvoj da ostane povijest. | |
| 25771108 by Matija Nalis @ 2014-09-30 15:55 | 1 | 2015-01-12 15:31 | Janjko ♦87 | Ali što ako negdje imamo jednu tablu sa jednim imenom, i drugu sa drugim? Toga ima okolo. Mislim da bi se trebali odlučiti za jedan tip označavanja, i onda se toga držati. |