| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 176800145 by Mxdanger @ 2026-01-03 22:20 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Udarian ♦691 | this is incorrect as definitionally footways do not exist within the area of a road as a road is a different mode of transportation then footways and thus the only footway that should exist within a road area is a crossing or a link, these are clearly not crossings and thus they are links, please do... |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Mxdanger | The idea of a footway changing within the area of a way is a flawed concept. For the same reason as driveways connecting to a main road aren’t connected via “link”.Not only that but you are hijacking the original intention of what link is used for. It has nothing to do with cro... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | Udarian ♦691 | Road way areas can be seen from aerial imagery. For vehicle transportation ways it doesn't matter as vehicles are large enough for it not to matter, for pedestrians on the other hand having to walk onto the road and exactly where that happens is extremely important and as such footways should n... | |
| 173699746 by Mxdanger @ 2025-10-24 04:58 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Mxdanger | Updated 19 existing PTv2 routes to match latest August service change. Modified several train/bus transportation centers. Modified dozens of bus stop positions. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Mxdanger | Project information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA | |
| 166906576 by Mxdanger @ 2025-05-29 07:45 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | DwarfNebula_ ♦45 | Hey, I love the proposal, but isn't it a bit quick to already change it on the map? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | silversurfer83 ♦3,950 | I second that. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166906576 | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | Mxdanger | Thanks for your concern DwarfNebula_ but I’m the one who spearheaded the “new” amenity=towing_service to begin with. Just a few weeks ago world wide usage of it was 1. I got it up to about 60 by hand. Now that the consensus is to drop “_service” I’ll just do that ... | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | DwarfNebula_ ♦45 | Ah okay, I haven't looked in it that deep. Thanks for clearing it up. | |
| 157854982 by Mxdanger @ 2024-10-13 23:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | user_21425661 ♦22 | You don't seem to have provided a source. Where did you get the opening hours? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | Hi, the opening hours for this POI can be found on the website. Hope this helps. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | user_21425661 ♦22 | Thanks, first party websites are indeed a valid source for OSM. The LWG have OKed it. To avoid this kind of confusion you can add a source on your changeset. iD walks you through this when you click "Save" | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | There is no confusion here. Thanks for asking though. | |
| 157446634 by Mxdanger @ 2024-10-04 06:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Kento Kei ♦22 | My man really did just do all of South Roxana, props to you! |
| 155001424 by Mxdanger @ 2024-08-09 00:49 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | Related note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2078732 |
| 152666397 by Mxdanger @ 2024-06-14 09:02 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | Project information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA |
| 152628105 by Mxdanger @ 2024-06-13 11:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | Project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA |
| 150817445 by Mxdanger @ 2024-05-03 02:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,088 | Instead of adding a node for Taco Bell with a note, you could just add it. lol |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Mxdanger | I don't like to add POIs in JOSM. Figured someone with local knowledge would add all the relevant information. Thanks' for the edit. | |
| 131979707 by Mxdanger @ 2023-02-01 21:40 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | jmarchon ♦439 | Thank you! I forgot about this :-) |
| 125923548 by Mxdanger @ 2022-09-08 03:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mxdanger | Correction in title: PTv2 |
| 118222985 by Mxdanger @ 2022-03-08 06:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Mxdanger | This is only one section of many, and with most of the U-turn sections being done incorrectly as a separate way instead of following standardized mapping practices with the use of turn lanes it may take a while to correct. |
| 116044540 by Mxdanger @ 2022-01-11 23:19 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Blasrohrkobold ♦2 | Hey Mxdanger,Ihre Änderungen hätten Sie gern lassen können!Der surface=asphalt auf der Zufahrtsstraße ist redundant, da es bereits auf dem Parkplatz selbst gesetzt ist.Das noexit=yes hätten Sie sich ebenfalls sparen können. Es handelt sich um keine richtige... |
| 97328774 by Mxdanger @ 2021-01-11 20:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Hedaja ♦137 | HiI saw that in this changeset you probably accidentally created a toilet in the middle of nowhere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313015082/historyIs that correct and we can delete that node? The parking area nearby already has it's toilet mapped as well.Best regards-Christian... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Mxdanger | Must have accidentally copied it over there or something I have no idea. Yeah it should be safe to remove. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Hedaja ♦137 | Done... Happy Mapping | |
| 102592189 by Mxdanger @ 2021-04-08 22:15 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦585 | Hey bro, you've done a good job!Because I was also confused by those minor payment, so I renamed some to common name today.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109075874https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109076211https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109076856Those 3 type mi... |
| 102435228 by Mxdanger @ 2021-04-06 22:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,026 | Hi,there are 22 "payment:linepay" tags which seem to point to the same payment scheme. Could you check that as well? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Mxdanger | Thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and updated those aliases.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102591366 | |
| 99705879 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-22 02:12 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mweper ♦453 | What is the reason for this massive change of labels?Before adding edits like this, please discuss with the community about it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductPersonally I prefer "contact:" to the old tags, but not everyone will agree and several app... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | Simply the reason for this change is to reduce tag fragmentation and improves data compatibility with applications that only use the far more common prefixed social media. Additionally, as no one else has seemed to tackle it yet, I may write up a proposal to formally deprecate the use of the non-pre... | |
| 99624340 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-20 03:46 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | G1asshouse ♦44 | Was the deprecation of <site>=* scheme for social media discussed some place? Could you provide a link to it as I haven't been able to locate where a discussion took place? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | The tags of the non-prefixed <site>=* has not yet been deprecated, however the very low tag usage and consensus with other members on the Discord, we decided to help with reducing the defragmentation by updating them to reflect the current documentation on the wiki. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,722 | For info, automated edits must follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . It's good that you had a chat with some other people on Discird about it, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans does say... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | mweper ♦453 | I have asked the same question in the South American changeset.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99705879 | |
| 98785625 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-05 18:36 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | MapSpot ♦98 | Nice work! These indoor maps really help the shopping center feel more complete!Out of curiosity, what made you stumble upon this mall-mapping project here in Staten Island? Noticed a lot of editing traffic lately and was wondering if there's been some recent promotion somewhere. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | I helped organize this indoor mapping project with some other fellow mappers. If you are in the OSM Discord you can see that message here. https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/641926452950073344/807089369848348704Someone posted something about this area, as it is highly detailed. Afte... | |
| 98144766 by Mxdanger @ 2021-01-25 21:15 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Brian@Brea ♦45 | Hello,There are some massive errors with edits on the Disneyland Resort made in this change set. I have already reverted the changes I deemed were made in error. The biggest fault was the change of the DL Central Bakery to the Grand Bakery which looking at the data you posted is located in Seattle... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | Thank you for making those fixes. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | However, could you explain what other things were considered massive errors other than that business? I would like to know so I wouldn’t do it again. | |
| 95903921 by Mxdanger @ 2020-12-15 22:58 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | tastrax ♦1,201 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updat... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | Thanks for the correction! | |
| 95581305 by Mxdanger @ 2020-12-10 01:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,479 | HiAs you let half of europe know about your amenity=picnic_table removal, you should be aware that the proper tag is leisure=picnic_table. JIC you'd like to put them back. Taginfo indicates it's been used 147,000 times.cheers.. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | Hi,I just want to let you know that I removed incorrect usage of amenity=picnic_table and when it applicable, it was changed it to leisure=picnic_table. Please look at the changeset history before making assumptions. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,479 | It's very hard to see when you make changes in big sets covering half of Europe. More helpful is to not just state in your change comment more than just 'Removed deprecated amenity=picnic_table tagging', so pardon my 'assuming'. "Write what you do and do what you write&... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | I will make sure to avoid confusion in the future with changesets such as this by using a more detailed changeset comment. | |
| 88948541 by Mxdanger @ 2020-08-04 21:10 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ACarlotti ♦158 | Have you read the OpenStreetMap guidance on mechanical edits (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits)? Also the guidance on good changeset comments is relevant (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).Aside from probably contravening the policy on mechanic... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Mxdanger | Thanks for your input, and I'll take it into consideration and avoid making large changesets like this. | |
| 66177065 by Mxdanger @ 2019-01-09 22:10 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | bye12 ♦34 | The source you included, on slide 16 says that construction does not begin until September 2019. If so why has the construction area already been mapped, which means it should exist currently on the Ground. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Mxdanger | Oh sorry my bad I was reading it wrong. | |
| 55200419 by Mxdanger @ 2018-01-05 23:25 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Mxdanger | never mind |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Mxdanger | ugh I need to find a way to accept this… |