| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173699746 by Mxdanger @ 2025-10-24 04:58 | 1 | 2025-10-24 05:04 | Mxdanger | Updated 19 existing PTv2 routes to match latest August service change. Modified several train/bus transportation centers. Modified dozens of bus stop positions. |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 05:04 | Mxdanger | Project information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA | |
| 166906576 by Mxdanger @ 2025-05-29 07:45 | 1 | 2025-05-29 12:16 | DwarfNebula_ ♦31 | Hey, I love the proposal, but isn't it a bit quick to already change it on the map? |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 15:47 | silversurfer83 ♦3,723 | I second that. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166906576 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-29 21:50 | Mxdanger | Thanks for your concern DwarfNebula_ but I’m the one who spearheaded the “new” amenity=towing_service to begin with. Just a few weeks ago world wide usage of it was 1. I got it up to about 60 by hand. Now that the consensus is to drop “_service” I’ll just do that ... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-30 20:29 | DwarfNebula_ ♦31 | Ah okay, I haven't looked in it that deep. Thanks for clearing it up. | |
| 157854982 by Mxdanger @ 2024-10-13 23:43 | 1 | 2024-10-16 08:01 | user_21425661 ♦22 | You don't seem to have provided a source. Where did you get the opening hours? |
| 2 | 2024-10-16 08:38 | Mxdanger | Hi, the opening hours for this POI can be found on the website. Hope this helps. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-16 10:40 | user_21425661 ♦22 | Thanks, first party websites are indeed a valid source for OSM. The LWG have OKed it. To avoid this kind of confusion you can add a source on your changeset. iD walks you through this when you click "Save" | |
| 4 | 2024-10-17 23:28 | Mxdanger | There is no confusion here. Thanks for asking though. | |
| 157446634 by Mxdanger @ 2024-10-04 06:57 | 1 | 2024-10-04 18:54 | Kento Kei ♦22 | My man really did just do all of South Roxana, props to you! |
| 155001424 by Mxdanger @ 2024-08-09 00:49 | 1 | 2024-08-09 00:49 | Mxdanger | Related note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2078732 |
| 152666397 by Mxdanger @ 2024-06-14 09:02 | 1 | 2024-06-14 09:06 | Mxdanger | Project information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA |
| 152628105 by Mxdanger @ 2024-06-13 11:06 | 1 | 2024-06-13 11:13 | Mxdanger | Project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA |
| 150817445 by Mxdanger @ 2024-05-03 02:57 | 1 | 2024-05-03 04:05 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,070 | Instead of adding a node for Taco Bell with a note, you could just add it. lol |
| 2 | 2024-05-03 05:13 | Mxdanger | I don't like to add POIs in JOSM. Figured someone with local knowledge would add all the relevant information. Thanks' for the edit. | |
| 131979707 by Mxdanger @ 2023-02-01 21:40 | 1 | 2023-02-08 06:15 | jmarchon ♦436 | Thank you! I forgot about this :-) |
| 125923548 by Mxdanger @ 2022-09-08 03:35 | 1 | 2022-09-08 03:56 | Mxdanger | Correction in title: PTv2 |
| 118222985 by Mxdanger @ 2022-03-08 06:51 | 1 | 2022-03-08 07:00 | Mxdanger | This is only one section of many, and with most of the U-turn sections being done incorrectly as a separate way instead of following standardized mapping practices with the use of turn lanes it may take a while to correct. |
| 116044540 by Mxdanger @ 2022-01-11 23:19 | 1 | 2022-01-12 22:58 | Blasrohrkobold ♦2 | Hey Mxdanger,Ihre Änderungen hätten Sie gern lassen können!Der surface=asphalt auf der Zufahrtsstraße ist redundant, da es bereits auf dem Parkplatz selbst gesetzt ist.Das noexit=yes hätten Sie sich ebenfalls sparen können. Es handelt sich um keine richtige... |
| 97328774 by Mxdanger @ 2021-01-11 20:28 | 1 | 2022-01-03 11:39 | Hedaja ♦137 | HiI saw that in this changeset you probably accidentally created a toilet in the middle of nowhere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313015082/historyIs that correct and we can delete that node? The parking area nearby already has it's toilet mapped as well.Best regards-Christian... |
| 2 | 2022-01-03 17:51 | Mxdanger | Must have accidentally copied it over there or something I have no idea. Yeah it should be safe to remove. | |
| 3 | 2022-01-03 17:54 | Hedaja ♦137 | Done... Happy Mapping | |
| 102592189 by Mxdanger @ 2021-04-08 22:15 | 1 | 2021-08-03 09:38 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦565 | Hey bro, you've done a good job!Because I was also confused by those minor payment, so I renamed some to common name today.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109075874https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109076211https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109076856Those 3 type mi... |
| 102435228 by Mxdanger @ 2021-04-06 22:52 | 1 | 2021-04-07 09:11 | mueschel ♦6,746 | Hi,there are 22 "payment:linepay" tags which seem to point to the same payment scheme. Could you check that as well? |
| 2 | 2021-04-08 21:46 | Mxdanger | Thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and updated those aliases.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102591366 | |
| 99705879 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-22 02:12 | 1 | 2021-02-22 13:18 | mweper ♦437 | What is the reason for this massive change of labels?Before adding edits like this, please discuss with the community about it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductPersonally I prefer "contact:" to the old tags, but not everyone will agree and several app... |
| 2 | 2021-02-24 17:50 | Mxdanger | Simply the reason for this change is to reduce tag fragmentation and improves data compatibility with applications that only use the far more common prefixed social media. Additionally, as no one else has seemed to tackle it yet, I may write up a proposal to formally deprecate the use of the non-pre... | |
| 99624340 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-20 03:46 | 1 | 2021-02-21 08:58 | G1asshouse ♦44 | Was the deprecation of <site>=* scheme for social media discussed some place? Could you provide a link to it as I haven't been able to locate where a discussion took place? |
| 2 | 2021-02-22 17:13 | Mxdanger | The tags of the non-prefixed <site>=* has not yet been deprecated, however the very low tag usage and consensus with other members on the Discord, we decided to help with reducing the defragmentation by updating them to reflect the current documentation on the wiki. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-22 19:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,569 | For info, automated edits must follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . It's good that you had a chat with some other people on Discird about it, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans does say... | |
| 4 | 2021-02-24 12:11 | mweper ♦437 | I have asked the same question in the South American changeset.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99705879 | |
| 98785625 by Mxdanger @ 2021-02-05 18:36 | 1 | 2021-02-07 02:23 | MapSpot ♦97 | Nice work! These indoor maps really help the shopping center feel more complete!Out of curiosity, what made you stumble upon this mall-mapping project here in Staten Island? Noticed a lot of editing traffic lately and was wondering if there's been some recent promotion somewhere. |
| 2 | 2021-02-07 23:28 | Mxdanger | I helped organize this indoor mapping project with some other fellow mappers. If you are in the OSM Discord you can see that message here. https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/641926452950073344/807089369848348704Someone posted something about this area, as it is highly detailed. Afte... | |
| 98144766 by Mxdanger @ 2021-01-25 21:15 | 1 | 2021-01-27 05:38 | Brian@Brea ♦45 | Hello,There are some massive errors with edits on the Disneyland Resort made in this change set. I have already reverted the changes I deemed were made in error. The biggest fault was the change of the DL Central Bakery to the Grand Bakery which looking at the data you posted is located in Seattle... |
| 2 | 2021-01-27 06:21 | Mxdanger | Thank you for making those fixes. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-27 06:43 | Mxdanger | However, could you explain what other things were considered massive errors other than that business? I would like to know so I wouldn’t do it again. | |
| 95903921 by Mxdanger @ 2020-12-15 22:58 | 1 | 2020-12-20 23:41 | tastrax ♦1,179 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updat... |
| 2 | 2020-12-21 08:09 | Mxdanger | Thanks for the correction! | |
| 95581305 by Mxdanger @ 2020-12-10 01:40 | 1 | 2020-12-10 08:27 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | HiAs you let half of europe know about your amenity=picnic_table removal, you should be aware that the proper tag is leisure=picnic_table. JIC you'd like to put them back. Taginfo indicates it's been used 147,000 times.cheers.. |
| 2 | 2020-12-10 18:27 | Mxdanger | Hi,I just want to let you know that I removed incorrect usage of amenity=picnic_table and when it applicable, it was changed it to leisure=picnic_table. Please look at the changeset history before making assumptions. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-10 18:49 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | It's very hard to see when you make changes in big sets covering half of Europe. More helpful is to not just state in your change comment more than just 'Removed deprecated amenity=picnic_table tagging', so pardon my 'assuming'. "Write what you do and do what you write&... | |
| 4 | 2020-12-10 18:51 | Mxdanger | I will make sure to avoid confusion in the future with changesets such as this by using a more detailed changeset comment. | |
| 88948541 by Mxdanger @ 2020-08-04 21:10 | 1 | 2020-08-05 22:22 | ACarlotti ♦158 | Have you read the OpenStreetMap guidance on mechanical edits (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits)? Also the guidance on good changeset comments is relevant (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).Aside from probably contravening the policy on mechanic... |
| 2 | 2020-08-19 18:18 | Mxdanger | Thanks for your input, and I'll take it into consideration and avoid making large changesets like this. | |
| 66177065 by Mxdanger @ 2019-01-09 22:10 | 1 | 2019-01-10 00:47 | bye12 ♦34 | The source you included, on slide 16 says that construction does not begin until September 2019. If so why has the construction area already been mapped, which means it should exist currently on the Ground. |
| 2 | 2019-01-15 22:01 | Mxdanger | Oh sorry my bad I was reading it wrong. | |
| 55200419 by Mxdanger @ 2018-01-05 23:25 | 1 | 2018-01-06 01:42 | Mxdanger | never mind |
| 2 | 2018-01-09 00:53 | Mxdanger | ugh I need to find a way to accept this… |