| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 122806272 by NTCotehele @ 2022-06-24 14:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Is there any reason to use the new key "path name" instead of the known key "name"? (see http://www.osm.org/way/918449847 one of forty ways) |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | NTCotehele | HiWe are using OSM to input data for an ongoing National Trust project to nationally map all our paths.This also ties into a Cotehele ranger project to streamline our footpath/bridleway surveys to ensure the paths are safe and useable. To do this I am creating a map of all Cotehele estate paths ... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hi, if you use the key name you got the value on the standard OSM map. If this isn't the official name of the path you can use the key loc_name (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name). If no existing key fits, then the new key should at least not contain any spaces. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | NTCotehele | HiThanks for your advice, i'll change the tag to loc_name | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Casey_boy ♦86 | Hi,Thanks for contributing to OSM!Just a heads up: when mapping footpaths, a lot of access tagging is implied - i.e., you don't really need to add "vehicle=no" to the ways as it's a footpath. You'd only add "vehicle=yes" if there was some case where vehicle... |