7 Changesets created by NTTrailsNTH have been discussed with 2 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
175816137
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-12-11 18:51
~ 4 months ago
1 ~ 4 months agoBCNorwich
♦5,136
Hi, Your new highway Way: 1457860136 duplicates an existing highway; highway duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it.

The bridge Way: 1457860143 was also placed on top of an existing highway. I've removed this duplication.

It's likely you could not n...
2 ~ 4 months agoBCNorwich
♦5,136
I just noticed there was no layer tag on the bridge Way: 1457860143
3 ~ 4 months agoBCNorwich
♦5,136
Are there missing bridges at 54.4291356, -2.9263403 and Node: 2538444350
174149046
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-11-03 13:54
~ 5 months ago
1 ~ 5 months agogurglypipe
♦1,031
That’s grand, thanks for tidying this up :)

(Context is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029359 for anyone reading this in future)
174021746
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-10-31 13:39
~ 5 months ago
1 ~ 5 months agoSomeoneElse
♦13,741
Something has gone very wrong here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history had 677 members before you edited it and only 664 afterwards.
Did you get any warnings on screen? If not, I'd suggest that you log a bug with Vespucci to get the problem looked at.
2 ~ 5 months agoSomeoneElse
♦13,741
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737 basically the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19774128 ? If so, the shorter, partial one (the one I added earlier) can be deleted - but near Marsden I think the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737#map=19/53.604303/-1.9404...
3 ~ 5 months agoSomeoneElse
♦13,741
I've re-added the memberships so that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history is now 679.
173711037
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-10-24 10:38
~ 5 months ago
1 ~ 5 months agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,763
Hello!

Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029359 ?
170781834
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-08-21 14:05
~ 7 months ago
1 ~ 7 months agogurglypipe
♦1,031
Heya, thanks for these improvements!

I noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26486939 is part of the walking route, but it has a note (from before your changes) which says “closed to the public since 2007”, and its access tagging is private. Is it open again, and does the acc...
2 ~ 7 months agoNTTrailsNTH Hi!

Thanks for your comment - I'm a NT staff member and went out and walked the trail yesterday. I noted that there were signs on the path and also notes in OSM to say that there were closures to the footpath made in 2007. I'll make the local ranger team aware and suggest diverting the...
3 ~ 7 months agogurglypipe
♦1,031
Sounds good! I assume the ranger team have a way of feeding back path changes to you so the map continues to be updated over time?
4 ~ 7 months agoNTTrailsNTH Yep, we have a script which gives monthly alerts to property teams of any changes to data within the property areas. These changes are monitored by the respective property teams so that any issues will hopefully be picked up and can be verified by local rangers. Any disputes can be dealt with either...
5 ~ 7 months agogurglypipe
♦1,031
That sounds fantastic :D
168999145
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-07-16 07:47
~ 9 months ago
1 ~ 9 months agoSomeoneElse
♦13,741
Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414082973 was newly added here, and you've added it to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19341660 (the "Ancient Trees Walk"), but I've also added it to the Way of Roses and 688 cycle routes as there was an obvious gap in those too.\...
167264510
by NTTrailsNTH
@ 2025-06-06 12:27
~ 10 months ago
1 ~ 10 months agoSomeoneElse
♦13,741
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like a couple of gaps got introduced into the North Cheshire Way here (it's a bit tricky seeing what is a member of what relation in Vespucci (and sometimes the names don't appear properly there!). The gaps can be seen at https://overpass-turb...