| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 175816137 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-12-11 18:51 | 1 | 2025-12-13 07:24 | BCNorwich ♦5,038 | Hi, Your new highway Way: 1457860136 duplicates an existing highway; highway duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it.The bridge Way: 1457860143 was also placed on top of an existing highway. I've removed this duplication.It's likely you could not n... |
| 2 | 2025-12-13 07:25 | BCNorwich ♦5,038 | I just noticed there was no layer tag on the bridge Way: 1457860143 | |
| 3 | 2025-12-13 07:29 | BCNorwich ♦5,038 | Are there missing bridges at 54.4291356, -2.9263403 and Node: 2538444350 | |
| 174149046 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-11-03 13:54 | 1 | 2025-11-03 14:07 | gurglypipe ♦961 | That’s grand, thanks for tidying this up :)(Context is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029359 for anyone reading this in future) |
| 174021746 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-10-31 13:39 | 1 | 2025-11-02 01:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,591 | Something has gone very wrong here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history had 677 members before you edited it and only 664 afterwards.Did you get any warnings on screen? If not, I'd suggest that you log a bug with Vespucci to get the problem looked at. |
| 2 | 2025-11-02 02:11 | SomeoneElse ♦13,591 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737 basically the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19774128 ? If so, the shorter, partial one (the one I added earlier) can be deleted - but near Marsden I think the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737#map=19/53.604303/-1.9404... | |
| 3 | 2025-11-02 02:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,591 | I've re-added the memberships so that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history is now 679. | |
| 173711037 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-10-24 10:38 | 1 | 2025-11-01 13:05 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,072 | Hello!Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5029359 ? |
| 170781834 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-08-21 14:05 | 1 | 2025-08-21 15:04 | gurglypipe ♦961 | Heya, thanks for these improvements!I noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26486939 is part of the walking route, but it has a note (from before your changes) which says “closed to the public since 2007”, and its access tagging is private. Is it open again, and does the acc... |
| 2 | 2025-08-22 11:37 | NTTrailsNTH | Hi! Thanks for your comment - I'm a NT staff member and went out and walked the trail yesterday. I noted that there were signs on the path and also notes in OSM to say that there were closures to the footpath made in 2007. I'll make the local ranger team aware and suggest diverting the... | |
| 3 | 2025-08-28 16:02 | gurglypipe ♦961 | Sounds good! I assume the ranger team have a way of feeding back path changes to you so the map continues to be updated over time? | |
| 4 | 2025-08-28 16:13 | NTTrailsNTH | Yep, we have a script which gives monthly alerts to property teams of any changes to data within the property areas. These changes are monitored by the respective property teams so that any issues will hopefully be picked up and can be verified by local rangers. Any disputes can be dealt with either... | |
| 5 | 2025-08-28 16:16 | gurglypipe ♦961 | That sounds fantastic :D | |
| 168999145 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-07-16 07:47 | 1 | 2025-07-17 07:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,591 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414082973 was newly added here, and you've added it to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19341660 (the "Ancient Trees Walk"), but I've also added it to the Way of Roses and 688 cycle routes as there was an obvious gap in those too.\... |
| 167264510 by NTTrailsNTH @ 2025-06-06 12:27 | 1 | 2025-06-08 10:21 | SomeoneElse ♦13,591 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!It looks like a couple of gaps got introduced into the North Cheshire Way here (it's a bit tricky seeing what is a member of what relation in Vespucci (and sometimes the names don't appear properly there!). The gaps can be seen at https://overpass-turb... |