| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165689243 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-05-01 18:27 | 1 | 2025-05-03 06:24 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Duplicated highway Way: 1382828809 removed. |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 06:11 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, I've removed several more duplicated sections of highways: Way: 1382828815, Way: 1382828798, part of Way: 608428939, Way: 1382828802, Way: 1382828807.Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-30 08:20 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | I've fixed a dodgy overlap at the north end of that which clearly didn't exist.I've assumed that the inland path to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/77964 as I presume that that is where that is signed and routed now (my GPS traces here are from 8 years ago and may not be accu... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-30 08:23 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | After editing any paths involved in a hiking route relation (e.g. all the coastal ones!) it makes sense to check http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=77964&noCache=true&_noCache=on (where 77964 is the relation) so that it matches what is signed on the ground. There are obvio... | |
| 166812655 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-05-27 08:17 | 1 | 2025-05-28 05:41 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, You somehow dragged the path Way: 453137260 out of position along with several other paths joined to it. I've reverted that part of this changeset to return the path to the original positions. May I comment that making changes to or adding 66 features over a fairly large area makes it very ... |
| 165626751 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-04-30 09:47 | 1 | 2025-05-03 06:29 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Duplicated sections of highways Way: 1382530552, Way: 1382530553, Way: 1382530554 are removed. |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 06:10 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | I've removed two more sections of highway: Way 1382530556 and Way 1382530560. Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. |