Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
101083128 by NicoVargas @ 2021-03-16 03:11 | 1 | 2022-06-06 16:08 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,972 | why you changed this road and many others to track? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889964805/history |
2 | 2022-06-06 16:09 | erickdeoliveiraleal ♦1,972 | this is not a track road. | |
3 | 2022-06-06 17:06 | NicoVargas | Estimado @erickdeoliveiraleal. Las guías para mapear en Colombia desaconsejan el uso de la etiqueta highway=unclassified https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapearhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#V.C3.ADas_desconocid... | |
99844542 by NicoVargas @ 2021-02-23 17:22 | 1 | 2021-07-01 16:14 | Arma IRM-ED ♦196 | Hola NicoVargasEspero que lo estés pasando bienDescubrí que sus ediciones se cruzan entre sí (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/910086550 y https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/910086533). ¡Por favor échale un vistazo! ¿Te importaría a... |
2 | 2021-07-02 06:16 | NicoVargas | Se trataba de un sendero que atravesaba un cuerpo de agua. Se ha realizado el ajuste. Gracias por reportarlo. | |
93309939 by NicoVargas @ 2020-10-30 20:34 | 1 | 2020-12-12 20:18 | Betanyahoo ♦18 | Have you changed the town of Morelia https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5353807/history to landuse=industrial on purpose? |
2 | 2020-12-12 21:04 | NicoVargas | Hi Betanyahoo. It wasn't on purpose, I'm sorry. I'm going to revert it using JOSM as soon as possible. Thanks for let me know. Best regards | |
50873487 by NicoVargas @ 2017-08-06 01:14 | 1 | 2017-10-18 18:06 | jorge_o ♦9 | Hola Nico: ¿Cuál es la justificación para eliminar la relación "Zona de Restauración y Protección Ambiental del área de Recarga del Manantial de la Mintzita"? |
2 | 2017-10-18 18:12 | NicoVargas | Hola Jorge. Básicamente es que la información incoporada no es un área natural protegida aún, sino que fue un documento que se publicó el DOF como propuesta, pero no se llegó a aprobar por temas relacionados al parecer con consulta a los ejidatarios de la zo... | |
3 | 2017-10-19 00:57 | jorge_o ♦9 | Gracias Nico:ya veo el problemaAbrazo | |
47427987 by NicoVargas @ 2017-04-04 00:20 | 1 | 2017-04-04 17:18 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,could you explain the meaning of these tags?numero_pis=1numero_sot=0tipo_const=CONVENCIONALtipo_domin=PRIVADOAlso, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)Could... |
2 | 2017-04-04 23:15 | NicoVargas | Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using. numero_pis=1 (# of floors )numero_sot=0 (# of basement)tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)This issue maybe remai... | |
3 | 2017-04-05 17:07 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Hi,I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them? | |
4 | 2017-04-05 17:34 | NicoVargas | Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks | |
5 | 2017-04-05 18:48 | mueschel ♦6,560 | Ok, did in this changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023 |