| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 147477567 by Petr Fukátko @ 2024-02-15 07:24 | 1 | 2024-02-18 11:37 | ☆Finvenkulo ♦91 | Główna nazwa (klucz «name») powinna być w lokalnym języku. Lokalnym językiem kontynentu Europa jest np. język polski, niemiecki, ukraiński. Więc nazwa powinna być w tych językach. |
| 141291041 by Petr Fukátko @ 2023-09-15 08:27 | 1 | 2023-11-18 00:06 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Not sure why you added leisure=track - this tagging is not for motorsports, therefore I've removed it. |
| 112158087 by Petr Fukátko @ 2021-10-06 08:35 | 1 | 2021-10-09 18:17 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | This area corresponds to its description as a sandy area and is locally different from desert and other non-vegetated places, and also the tag natural=desert is not rendered in OSM Carto |
| 2 | 2021-10-11 06:21 | Petr Fukátko | Hi. OK. It is locally used like this and that is big argument. But I still miss information about desert in tags. So I'm thinking about adding new tag desert=erg. It is ok for you? | |
| 3 | 2021-10-11 08:27 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Yes, I think this describes the place better, as long as the tag "natural=sand" is present, because not all deserts are sandy best regards | |
| 4 | 2021-10-26 11:11 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | I am very sorry, after considering your change and inquiring from more than one person, I retract my words and I am very sorry, describing the place as natural=desert, and putting the tag surface=sand better describing the place as a sandy desert, and I did not notice that you put the tag surface=sa... | |
| 5 | 2021-10-26 17:10 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | I would probably reverse those changes I made in:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112990098 Since natural=desert is not currently displayed on openstreetmap-carto see:https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4488https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pu... | |
| 6 | 2021-10-26 17:15 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Do you support keeping these spaces as natural=desert regardless of the style and the way they appear in it? | |
| 7 | 2021-10-27 06:12 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | done:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113020196 | |
| 8 | 2021-10-27 08:31 | Petr Fukátko | Hi.For me is more important to have good data then good looking openstreetmap-carto style. Mapping for rendering is in my opinion not right. On the other hand "natural=sand" is widledly used and lot of people is using this style. I'm thinking that way around could be polygon wit... | |
| 9 | 2021-10-27 10:16 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | That's right, it's not correct to edit based on rendering style, also the solution you mentioned is very cool, it solves the problem completely except for the name issue (because one of the fonts will be a member of two relationships and we won't be able to put the name tag on it) | |
| 10 | 2021-10-27 10:33 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | because one of the ways*Sorry the translator changed ways to fonts | |
| 11 | 2021-10-27 11:58 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113034853 | |
| 12 | 2021-10-27 11:59 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Another problem I had during the implementation is that relations with inner members cannot be tagged with natural=sand | |
| 13 | 2021-10-27 12:28 | Petr Fukátko | I didn't know that relations with natural=sand cannot have inner members. It does not make sense for me. But current state is better for me then previous one. Thanks a lot. | |
| 14 | 2021-10-27 12:58 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | if there relation with natural=desert and have inner way members and we but natural=sand on outer way members the rendering style will fill all area (including inner members) and that is a problem, what if we have more then relation with same members and one of them is with natural=desert tag and th... | |
| 15 | 2021-11-15 10:27 | map per ♦1,296 | I don't think that using natural=desert is a good idea as this tag is not well defined. One can't exacly tell where a desert start an where ist ends. Thats why I would use natural=sand. | |
| 16 | 2021-11-15 13:34 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | yes natural=desert is poorly defined and not consistently used but the wiki recommends that | |
| 17 | 2021-11-15 14:31 | map per ♦1,296 | Anyone can write in the wiki and finding consens on what tags to use is a gradual process. The page for natural=desert includs a warning because of poor verifyability and was only edited by eight people so far (ten people on the proposed page). So I wouldn't rely to much on this wiki entry | |
| 18 | 2021-11-15 14:33 | map per ♦1,296 | Moreover desert proposual has the status abandoned | |
| 19 | 2021-11-15 16:56 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Thank you for the clarification, I will change the tags to natural=sand | |
| 20 | 2021-11-15 17:12 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113814683 | |
| 21 | 2021-11-15 20:22 | map per ♦1,296 | Thank you, have a nice day | |
| 112363395 by Petr Fukátko @ 2021-10-11 08:39 | 1 | 2021-10-11 09:34 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Thank you very much |
| 112363466 by Petr Fukátko @ 2021-10-11 08:40 | 1 | 2021-10-11 09:33 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦708 | Thank you very much |
| 109877179 by Petr Fukátko @ 2021-08-18 13:42 | 1 | 2021-08-19 17:05 | zstadler ♦1,055 | For the record, this changeset reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108776212 |
| 92716577 by Petr Fukátko @ 2020-10-19 14:56 | 1 | 2020-11-30 09:53 | glostis ♦2 | Hi,I see that in this changeset you have created a new relation for the Bretagne peninsula (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11771931) with an arbitrary new "border" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860713641) even though there already exists a relation for the Bretagne peninsula... |
| 2 | 2020-11-30 10:41 | Petr Fukátko | Hi.Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5687071 represents administrative region Brittany. New relation I've made https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11771931 represents geographical unit - peninsula. Those two entities are not identical. Significant part of administrative reg... | |
| 73824532 by Petr Fukátko @ 2019-08-28 07:04 | 1 | 2020-07-28 08:59 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello! On this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123811447/history why did you leave the specific access tags whereas your tagged it as is a private way? |
| 2 | 2020-07-28 09:17 | Petr Fukátko | Hello. Honestly, I don't remember anymore. At this point, it occurs to me that this tag is redundant. I'll delete it. | |
| 67098504 by Petr Fukátko @ 2019-02-11 12:23 | 1 | 2019-02-14 09:10 | geri-oc ♦497 | Sehr schade finde ich es das du den bestehende track gelöscht hast und neu eingetragen hast. Damit ist die Historie auch verlorengegangen. Änderungen sind sehr sinnvoll - sollten aber ursprüngliches erhalten.Gruß Gerd aus Sachsenhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669694669\... |
| 67091658 by Petr Fukátko @ 2019-02-11 08:09 | 1 | 2019-02-12 12:32 | Davide_sd ♦31 | Hello Peter, may I ask what is the source of your "correct" name? |
| 2 | 2019-02-12 12:54 | Petr Fukátko | Hello.I got suggestion for this change from mapy.cz user. I looked at google maps and https://www.viamichelin.com/web/Maps/Map-Italy. I checked also by searching for information on the Internet and found this article:https://www.tripmondo.com/italy/veneto/provincia-di-vicenza/perpiana/ | |
| 3 | 2019-02-12 13:09 | Davide_sd ♦31 | You should NOT use Google Maps to make changeset into OSM. Every link you provided is also based on results of Google Maps, which is WRONG in this case: I live in the area, and I know for a fact the Google Maps is wrong. You inserted an error!!!!!!!Before adding any new changeset, you should car... | |
| 4 | 2019-02-12 13:40 | Petr Fukátko | OK, it was mistake. I'll use note instead in future. Thank you. | |
| 63759008 by Petr Fukátko @ 2018-10-22 13:05 | 1 | 2018-10-23 12:17 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | You should tag fjords with natural=bay and bay=fjord. There was a cleanup earlier this year that removed all natural=fjord after discussions on the mailing lists |
| 2 | 2018-10-23 12:23 | Petr Fukátko | Thank you for notice. I've corrected the mistake. | |
| 54834656 by Petr Fukátko @ 2017-12-22 07:59 | 1 | 2017-12-22 11:37 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I've reverted this as the village was already named (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6533633) |
| 41707204 by Petr Fukátko @ 2016-08-26 06:19 | 1 | 2016-08-30 16:36 | MiroJanosik ♦139 | Pekny den, ak bol obchod zruseny tak by bolo vhodne zmazat tento bod uplne, alebo ho zmenit na disused:shop=yes |