| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 164143957 by PlaneMad @ 2025-03-27 01:42 | 1 | 2025-03-28 15:15 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371941079 (one of two objects). What is the mean of the tags AREA = 345 CATAGORYCO = 2 NAME = Anshi NP TYPE = NP? |
| 2 | 2025-03-28 19:12 | ChrissW-R1 ♦332 | This looks like parts of a national park. But this was already added to the database. See https://osm.org/relation/18900137 | |
| 3 | 2025-03-28 19:19 | ChrissW-R1 ♦332 | This https://osm.org/way/1371941078 is the other dubious way. | |
| 4 | 2025-03-28 19:27 | ChrissW-R1 ♦332 | Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/164223090 | |
| 73487212 by PlaneMad @ 2019-08-19 09:29 | 1 | 2025-01-10 14:34 | Tomas_J ♦283 | Hi, you forgot to tag this line which you created (see below). I should be probably an intermitent stream...? I am also not sure if it is correct to tie the line with the state border.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715330052#map=15/34.11585/73.92750 |
| 154041452 by PlaneMad @ 2024-07-17 06:17 | 1 | 2024-10-25 14:53 | dottir34 ♦3 | Hello!There are a few points/questions about the classification:1. If they're suburbs then of which town/city?2. E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candolim says its a "census town" which in Indian terms means a well-developed village with a population > 5000. It doesn�... |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 17:21 | PlaneMad | Calangute has a village government https://indianexpress.com/article/india/calangute-goa-plans-entry-tax-tourists-9376663/ and has significant agricultural land https://www.goa.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/DraftODPCalangute.pdfIt is planned as a suburb of Mapusa and Panjim in the regional p... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-25 18:59 | dottir34 ♦3 | Thanks for the clarification! | |
| 67057341 by PlaneMad @ 2019-02-09 19:30 | 1 | 2024-04-27 16:13 | snoozingnewt ♦82 | Hi, in this changeset you marked a city with a population of 400,000 as a village. What is the rationale behind this? |
| 2 | 2024-04-27 16:19 | snoozingnewt ♦82 | Just checked further and noticed that the wikidata was wrong - my bad (though it would be a lot less confusing if the tags were cleaned up fully) | |
| 3274241 by PlaneMad @ 2009-12-02 18:28 | 1 | 2023-06-19 05:44 | adiatmad ♦444 | Hello Arun, I was wondering if you have any idea whether this object still exists. I couldn't spot it in the satellite imagery on JOSM, so I'm a bit curious. Let me know if you have any insights. Thanks!(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/45441925) |
| 2 | 2024-03-25 04:39 | jaimemd ♦32 | I adapted this to bing image. The wetland seems to exist, but much smaller. The remaining area seems to be mostly farmland. | |
| 124655918 by PlaneMad @ 2022-08-08 19:58 | 1 | 2023-08-18 21:00 | keithonearth ♦314 | Today I just heard about the Zoji La tunnel project. Thanks for adding it to the map! |
| 2 | 2023-08-19 16:54 | PlaneMad | :) | |
| 139637234 by PlaneMad @ 2023-08-09 03:00 | 1 | 2023-08-09 03:55 | Vonter ♦71 | Hello. The location of the park seems to have been unintentionally moved in this changeset. I have restored the original location in a new changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139638061 |
| 138202936 by PlaneMad @ 2023-07-06 19:54 | 1 | 2023-07-25 12:44 | NaanAvanIllai ♦5 | @PlaneMad : Can you check if Way (348495914) has a Typo in its name and also update the addr:street tag as it doesn't match with any of the Street names nearby? |
| 2 | 2023-07-25 14:46 | PlaneMad | Not sure, I just copied the tags from an existing node by someone else. If you have locale knowledge, feel free to correct it. | |
| 9740004 by PlaneMad @ 2011-11-04 16:55 | 1 | 2023-07-03 23:50 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1829601the pipeline is in a tunnel ? or it's in the ground without tunnel location=underground ?type=lpg->utility=lpgRegards,Marc |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 06:10 | PlaneMad | Hi Marc, you are right it should be tagged as an underground LPG pipeline. Feel free to correct it. | |
| 134546754 by PlaneMad @ 2023-04-05 16:54 | 1 | 2023-04-06 07:02 | vikrambagade ♦3 | Hello, Is any specific reason to change the road classification as "Unclassified"for "Seawoods NRI Service Road" |
| 2 | 2023-04-06 07:39 | PlaneMad | The NRI road road is a first order collector road from just a couple of complexes. There's not enough traffic feeding into it to justify increasing classification to a tertiary road.Based on the traffic pattern I have observed here. | |
| 123863627 by PlaneMad @ 2022-07-20 18:58 | 1 | 2022-07-21 08:17 | adivik2000 ♦14 | Retagging submerged villages? They'd soon be covered in silt etc. |
| 118803682 by PlaneMad @ 2022-03-23 06:10 | 1 | 2022-04-11 19:56 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965141853. What is the meaning of highway=u? |
| 2 | 2022-04-12 04:05 | PlaneMad | Sorry looks like an error on my end. Please fix it to unclassified as I’m not able to edit at this time. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-12 05:35 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Done! I updated seven highways (six additional highways in Naga Bazar).You are welcome! | |
| 4 | 2022-04-12 19:07 | PlaneMad | Thank you | |
| 118488281 by PlaneMad @ 2022-03-14 22:21 | 1 | 2022-04-11 19:57 | user_5359 ♦19,340 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851977893. What ist the meaning of the tag highway=u? |
| 118419323 by PlaneMad @ 2022-03-13 06:39 | 1 | 2022-03-13 13:34 | krusefahrer ♦56 | Hi Arun,are sectors like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892781726/history well-defined to be kept as admin boundaries? |
| 117580627 by PlaneMad @ 2022-02-18 20:29 | 1 | 2022-02-19 09:23 | ivanbranco ♦2,693 | Hi PlaneMad,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6057703168/historywas this supposed to be =village? |
| 111156178 by PlaneMad @ 2021-09-13 17:01 | 1 | 2022-01-21 20:44 | jothishbabu ♦18 | 982884851 this way is draw over water delete it.. |
| 101219565 by PlaneMad @ 2021-03-18 01:55 | 1 | 2021-10-07 08:58 | woodpeck ♦2,417 | The DWG has had a complaint about this line, especially the "proposed" part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261185619, claiming that showing this proposed railway "has caused many economic impacts as the land value has reduced through which the route is shown and many people who hav... |
| 88648157 by PlaneMad @ 2020-07-29 03:36 | 1 | 2021-03-26 18:02 | Ludhiana ♦42 | Hi PlaneMad,IMHO Maxar doesn't show https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/787459530 well – the old stream alignment does exist and recently a debris flow happened. |
| 49724879 by PlaneMad @ 2017-06-21 16:18 | 1 | 2021-02-11 15:10 | मानचित्रकार ♦5 | Jagtap dairy chowk is marked as an individual disconnected point, and tagged as a junction.Won't it be better if the actual node (where the crossing roads intersect) is tagged as a junction with the appropriate name? |
| 95710952 by PlaneMad @ 2020-12-12 03:43 | 1 | 2020-12-22 21:22 | dalip123 ♦2 | Is it tracing bypass road? Curious to know more about bypass trace. I only see rectangle here. |
| 2 | 2020-12-23 02:44 | PlaneMad | Should be visible if you zoom in since its under construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/15.0740/77.6228 | |
| 78450608 by PlaneMad @ 2019-12-16 04:51 | 1 | 2020-11-20 09:51 | keithonearth ♦314 | Good call changing Zero Bridge to `highway=pedestrian`, it better corresponds with reality than `highway=footway`. |
| 78438209 by PlaneMad @ 2019-12-15 19:23 | 1 | 2020-07-30 16:46 | keithonearth ♦314 | Hi Arun, wanted to let you know that I have changed the tagging of a way you tagged as `highway=pedestrian`, back to `=service`. Based on your edit summary, I think you based the tag on the satellite imagery. I visited Srinagar in 2016, and came this way. At the time, some of the road was too narrow... |
| 2 | 2020-08-02 20:35 | PlaneMad | Have only walked on a short stretch in front of Suffering Moses back in 2012 and did not recall seeing vehicles on it. Will definitely trust your judgement and service definitely seems like a better option. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-02 20:39 | PlaneMad | Suffering Moses is west of Zero bridge, so looks like we both have been on different parts of the road :DUltimately would be great to have someone local update it (hopefully soon!) | |
| 4 | 2020-08-03 17:14 | keithonearth ♦314 | Small world! I"ll bet the right thing to do would be tag sections as pedestrian and parts as service. Although I've always been bothered by how the `highway=pedestrian` is used for such a wide variety of very different ways from something like The Mall in Shimla, to the galees in varan... | |
| 5 | 2020-08-04 03:58 | PlaneMad | My interpretation of a `pedestrian` street is one that has been restricted for vehicles to give pedestrians right of way and not "too narrow for vehicles to use".Reason for tagging it pedestrian was more of hunch that the whole route was closed off for entry to vehicles, but from your ... | |
| 6 | 2020-08-04 04:04 | PlaneMad | It was a handicraft shop, but i wouldn't be surprised if there was houseboat named that :P | |
| 85577405 by PlaneMad @ 2020-05-22 00:54 | 1 | 2020-07-04 12:36 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,574 | Hello - a quick question about http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=97671416 . I've recently undone an edit by a new mapper that broke the boundary of Nepal ( http://osm.org/browse/changeset/87486943 ) but noticed that the names on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97671416 were a bit odd. ... |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 01:42 | PlaneMad | Done. Sounds like the best approach considering https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule | |
| 3 | 2020-07-05 12:24 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Great - thanks. | |
| 85574373 by PlaneMad @ 2020-05-21 21:29 | 1 | 2020-05-28 00:10 | Kautilya3 ♦38 | Hi PlaneMad, you seem to have fixed a lot of the problems introduced in the previous edit. Thanks a lot. But Uttarakhand boundary is still not closed at Kalapani:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9987086#map=10/30.1672/81.0297 |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 01:18 | PlaneMad | Thanks for spotting, fixed. | |
| 72338458 by PlaneMad @ 2019-07-17 09:33 | 1 | 2020-04-15 09:37 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,abandoNNed:railway : one too many n :)Regards,Marc |
| 2 | 2020-04-16 00:16 | PlaneMad | Whoops, fixed! | |
| 41131386 by PlaneMad @ 2016-07-30 17:36 | 1 | 2019-11-05 20:39 | Heinz_V ♦296 | Please post in the Indian forum or the Telegram group whether you agree to delete the type=shanty tags in India. |
| 9703590 by PlaneMad @ 2011-10-31 13:37 | 1 | 2019-07-17 04:23 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | As per http://apenvis.nic.in/wetland.html there are no wetlands in Prakasam district. Hence this needs to be deleted. Actually, there exists villages and dry land used for farming. |
| 2 | 2019-07-17 12:18 | PlaneMad | You are right, this was traced long back with low resolution landsat imagery which looked like a wetland but are just very well irrigated farmlands. Updating it now, thanks. | |
| 3 | 2019-07-18 05:07 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | Thanks for your response, I will clean up if any left over in Prakasam district | |
| 4 | 2019-07-29 12:09 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | @planemad | |
| 5 | 2019-07-29 12:10 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | It has been 12 days. When will the change reflect in OSM standard maps? Is there anyway to speed it up? | |
| 6 | 2019-07-29 12:46 | PlaneMad | Check in a private tab? you might be ssing cached tiles. | |
| 7 | 2019-08-01 05:01 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | I tried in private tab, there is no difference. I tried to see in landuse focussed webmap provider. They also do not seem to be updating frequently. While the features are removed from database, we do not seem to have a way of getting the latest updated map for land use. | |
| 8 | 2019-08-01 05:54 | PlaneMad | Cann you share the map link of the location? i can see updated tiles on my end. | |
| 9 | 2019-08-01 07:04 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | Got to know about the /dirty suffix for url to refresh the tiles. Now it is working. Thanks | |
| 68028339 by PlaneMad @ 2019-03-11 16:10 | 1 | 2019-03-14 17:44 | Druzhba ♦13 | Hi Planemad. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45248331 wrong or why was it deleted? |
| 2 | 2019-03-15 02:41 | PlaneMad | These were farmlands in the river valley that was added incorrectly as a wetland by me 6 years ago using landsat imagery. | |
| 63157258 by PlaneMad @ 2018-10-03 11:57 | 1 | 2019-01-10 19:57 | Die immer lacht Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-01-11 06:00 | PlaneMad | Happy to unmerge, but i dont feel that the right solution to this is to not have multipolygons.All large water bodies face the same problem. | |
| 61501907 by PlaneMad @ 2018-08-09 13:32 | 1 | 2018-08-10 04:10 | chnav ♦1,073 | Please do not delete/re-draw anything but fix instead. Object history removed after your fix.Objects restored. |
| 2 | 2018-08-10 04:18 | chnav ♦1,073 | Well... you are part of Mapbox team... Very disappointed that you use such bad practice as work procedure. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-11 09:46 | PlaneMad | chnav, sorry for the trouble. Please fix the tags on the crossing so that they are footway=crossing across the junction. | |
| 33909783 by PlaneMad @ 2015-09-09 13:51 | 1 | 2015-09-09 22:05 | 5m4u9 ♦1,572 | thank you for edit and improve the map of Bolivia :) |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 18:27 | Lino Mario Cabrera ♦2 | Calle Hacia El Mar Oruro Bolivia | |
| 59341407 by PlaneMad @ 2018-05-28 13:50 | 1 | 2018-06-16 20:42 | keithonearth ♦314 | I've deleted the forest tags off these parks, as none of these parks were entirely forested, many already had the forested areas mapped more accurately, and adding the forest tag to the park hid the more accurate forest boundary. I know you are a very experienced mapper, but I think it is bette... |
| 2 | 2018-06-16 20:54 | PlaneMad | Agree. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-16 21:41 | keithonearth ♦314 | Thanks bhai. :-) | |
| 4 | 2018-06-17 00:32 | keithonearth ♦314 | I've realized that without the forest tag the parks stopped rendering at all. While I don't want to tag for the renderer, I do want these parks to render. I checked how national parks are tagged in Canada, and found that the `leisure=nature_reserve` tag was on all of them, in addition ... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-18 09:41 | PlaneMad | Looks good! Btw you should definitely be speaking at SOTM Asia http://bit.ly/sotmasia-cfp | |
| 6 | 2018-06-21 23:09 | keithonearth ♦314 | That's very flattering, I'm just a amateur though. Are you speaking at it? | |
| 55501959 by PlaneMad @ 2018-01-16 18:50 | 1 | 2018-01-17 14:05 | JaggedMind ♦5 | What's up with the three bus stop nodes in the UN building in San Francisco? |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 20:53 | cropmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-18 07:11 | PlaneMad | Yikes, not sure how they got uploaded from a different layer. Fixing it. | |
| 9789500 by PlaneMad @ 2011-11-10 15:17 | 1 | 2017-09-05 06:21 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505878No idea what this could be.Stumbled over it while looking at highway=ford onhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505867which probably should be highway=track + ford=yes, but the south-east end is now not connected to any oth... |
| 2 | 2017-09-05 12:35 | PlaneMad | It is indeed a ropeway https://www.telegraphindia.com/1091221/jsp/jharkhand/story_11890946.jsp | |
| 3 | 2017-09-05 12:38 | GerdP ♦2,751 | amazing. Maybe add this link as a note.Do you also know more about the ford? | |
| 4 | 2017-09-05 12:42 | PlaneMad | Added. Don't know about the ford except that its common for tractors on seasonal rivers in India | |
| 41337285 by PlaneMad @ 2016-08-09 04:40 | 1 | 2017-08-23 07:26 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review highway=L onhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215075949 |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 10:00 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Did you mean living_street? | |
| 40811202 by PlaneMad @ 2016-07-18 06:17 | 1 | 2017-08-22 15:39 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!please check highway=seton https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431603155Guess service was meant? |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 05:02 | PlaneMad | Whoops, fixed. Thank you! | |
| 50345606 by PlaneMad @ 2017-07-17 09:48 | 1 | 2017-07-27 07:07 | Oberaffe ♦45 | Dear Planemad,do you have any information about the rerouting of the NH27? I couldnt find anything in he media nor in actual videos!With best regards |
| 2 | 2017-07-27 12:34 | PlaneMad | Rerouted based on http://www.uppwd.gov.in/pdf/NHB.pdf which mentions it is a NH, but specifically NH230.Other NHs would also use this to bypass the city. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 13:24 | Oberaffe ♦45 | OK thanks for the link. :-) | |
| 47316252 by PlaneMad @ 2017-03-31 07:48 | 1 | 2017-04-01 06:24 | DaxServer ♦115 | Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177626343/ is a railway yard. The same one as http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/13.09815/80.27270 Probably landuse=railway suits better? |
| 2 | 2017-04-01 11:26 | PlaneMad | Done | |
| 3 | 2017-04-01 12:25 | DaxServer ♦115 | (Y) | |
| 47315906 by PlaneMad @ 2017-03-31 07:38 | 1 | 2017-03-31 09:11 | DaxServer ♦115 | Sweet :) Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-03-31 09:13 | PlaneMad | \\m/ | |
| 47199282 by PlaneMad @ 2017-03-27 11:44 | 1 | 2017-03-27 17:03 | DaxServer ♦115 | Awesome \\o/ |
| 6724008 by PlaneMad @ 2010-12-21 11:03 | 1 | 2017-03-21 12:06 | DaxServer ♦115 | Hey, you've been here in Vizag tracing all these nodes and ways? [Kudos!] This node doesn't seem to be a bus station, may be a local bus stop? Let me know. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1054294397 |
| 39019521 by PlaneMad @ 2016-05-01 15:53 | 1 | 2016-12-12 21:29 | indigomc ♦187 | Are there really 5 bus stops here next to each other? |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 03:11 | PlaneMad | Yup, there are 5 bus shelters | |
| 10447611 by PlaneMad @ 2012-01-20 15:42 | 1 | 2016-12-07 15:30 | DaxServer ♦115 | Hi, Arun! Node 1598973198 (Nellore city) is not called "Potti Sriramulu Jilla". Let me know, I'll remove it. I've added respective alt_names for the district Relation 2022291.Nellore node - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1598973198/historyDistrict relation - https://www... |
| 2 | 2016-12-07 15:57 | PlaneMad | Please change it :) It seems to have been added by a previous mapper. Awesome work on the relations! | |
| 3 | 2016-12-08 05:33 | DaxServer ♦115 | Thanks, Arun ;) | |
| 12923732 by PlaneMad @ 2012-08-30 21:16 | 1 | 2016-06-21 00:19 | utack ♦280 | Can https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178708307 be deleted? New aerial images don't match it at all |
| 2 | 2016-06-21 07:40 | PlaneMad | Removed, feel free to remove any other forests like this. Was mostly done on low zoom on not so clear imagery. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-21 07:45 | utack ♦280 | Ok | |
| 30460493 by PlaneMad @ 2015-04-24 18:50 | 1 | 2016-05-25 02:41 | Alan ♦134 | Hi PlaneMad, this boundary=claim tag is interesting, but I don't see it documented anywhere. Can you point me to any more information about this tag? |
| 2 | 2016-05-25 03:42 | PlaneMad | It was more of a trial without disturbing any existing tags for custom rendering I was doing with tilemill. Its not documented anywhere, but if you think it makes broader sense, I think I'll start a wiki proposal for this. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-25 03:51 | Alan ♦134 | I think it does make a lot of sense... but this is my first time trying to understand the complexity of disputed boundaries in OSM. It seems like boundary=claim is useful, and less complicated than some of the other options. | |
| 31521204 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-28 05:59 | 1 | 2016-05-11 19:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Are you trying to say here that the geographical location of the border is disputed, or referring to the dispute where Serbia still thinks that Kosovo is a province of Serbian?If just the latter, then according to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf an... |
| 2 | 2016-05-12 04:03 | PlaneMad | Wonder if the `disputed_by` tag would do the trick like what we have in Kashmir http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ga9 | |
| 33304948 by PlaneMad @ 2015-08-13 06:16 | 1 | 2016-02-24 23:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | For info the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032013 looks a bit iffy; I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/518603 so that hopefully it'll get a proper survey. |
| 2 | 2016-02-27 14:26 | PlaneMad | Thanks Andy. | |
| 35962680 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-15 09:34 | 1 | 2015-12-22 16:53 | ediyes ♦110 | Hi,Please fix the building.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385969308/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:51 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358841 | |
| 35960997 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-15 07:46 | 1 | 2015-12-22 16:53 | ediyes ♦110 | Hi,Please fix the building.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385955496/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:46 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358750 | |
| 35981499 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-16 07:12 | 1 | 2015-12-22 17:43 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Please realign this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386121817/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:43 | PlaneMad | Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358709 | |
| 35983428 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-16 09:03 | 1 | 2015-12-22 17:43 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Please realign this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386137395/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:23 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358252 | |
| 35960537 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-15 07:08 | 1 | 2015-12-22 16:53 | ediyes ♦110 | Hi,Please fix the building.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385955196/history |
| 15340040 by PlaneMad @ 2013-03-12 13:34 | 1 | 2015-10-30 10:50 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review way 209561034:the tag highway=median is rarely used,it seems to mean the same as highway=centreline, which is currently discussed as well, seehttp://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/when-should-highway-centreline-be-used-tp5857994.html |
| 2 | 2015-10-30 10:51 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please check also barrier=medianon way 209561046 | |
| 3 | 2015-12-21 10:58 | PlaneMad | Have made the changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36082674 | |
| 32386221 by PlaneMad @ 2015-07-03 12:08 | 1 | 2015-07-08 19:44 | calfarome ♦78 | Hi PlaneMad, there are many duplicate nodes in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3632810452/history#map=16/11.9218/79.8129 |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 10:48 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36082512 | |
| 32576192 by PlaneMad @ 2015-07-12 07:53 | 1 | 2015-12-09 02:59 | mikelmaron ♦34 | great detail with trees. but probably more appropriate to tag with species rather than name |
| 35799002 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-07 04:41 | 1 | 2015-12-08 18:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | B&M Bargains or B&M Homestore? They've got (at least) two brands in the UK. |
| 2 | 2015-12-08 20:29 | PlaneMad | The official listing of the address is a Homestore with Garden Centre. http://www.bmstores.co.uk/stores?location=Gordon's%20Lodge%2C%20Milton%20Keynes%2C%20UK&locationid=35839940-2839-11E2-B468A4BADB4726BE®ion=UK | |
| 15188347 by PlaneMad @ 2013-02-27 17:32 | 1 | 2015-10-31 09:55 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:the tag highway=divider is only used by you (7 times)Is it a barrier=line or maybe barrier=kerb?Sample: way 207489502 |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 19:11 | PlaneMad | Thanks, have retagged them to barrier=kerb | |
| 3 | 2015-11-04 19:14 | GerdP ♦2,751 | thanks for that and for the feedback | |
| 4 | 2015-11-05 15:08 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Do you think that this might also match here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15340040 | |
| 34861324 by PlaneMad @ 2015-10-25 15:16 | 1 | 2015-10-26 11:06 | Mediatinker ♦1 | Hey, you made Sushiya a lot bigger that it really is. :-) |
| 2 | 2015-10-26 11:13 | PlaneMad | Sorry about that, it was a case of lazy hands. Will be more careful from now on, thanks :) | |
| 33304615 by PlaneMad @ 2015-08-13 05:42 | 1 | 2015-08-17 14:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Hi Arun - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032015 is really an unclassified road? It doesn't particularly look like one from the imagery. What I suspect it is is a farm track with a "public right of way" over it (given that someone's named in "leeds c... |
| 2 | 2015-08-17 17:04 | PlaneMad | The section leads only to the Airport service road apart from the couple of properties and the footpath branching out. There are no ways that branch into farms to suggest this is primarily for agricultural use.Have been trying to understand UK roads better and would really appreciate to know why... | |
| 3 | 2015-08-17 18:08 | SK53 ♦864 | First dont rely on the wiki "tracks are for agricultural use". This may be applicable in Germany. In Britain I suspect we will use track or service for any non-public ways which vehicles can be seen to traverse. Most indeed will be for agricultural purposes (including things like Pheasant ... | |
| 4 | 2015-08-17 18:22 | PlaneMad | > For instance many railway lines will have access tracks used by maintenance crews.This should be an unpaved service road, no? | |
| 5 | 2015-08-17 21:40 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Personally, I'd map railway access tracks as "highway=track" as for example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30010081 , but obviously it depends on what they look like - some are more like service roads, and there are lots that are just footpaths. Here it's difficult to tell ... | |
| 6 | 2015-08-18 05:55 | PlaneMad | Ok this seems a little at odds with how i'm understanding highway tags, that they primarily define function of a way in the road network, otherwise most unpaved roads in developing countries would end up being tagged as tracks.If tracks in UK don't follow the wiki guidelines of being f... | |
| 7 | 2015-08-18 10:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | slightly related - a discussion on the Dutch forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32342&p=1 | |
| 32796912 by PlaneMad @ 2015-07-22 09:30 | 1 | 2015-07-22 11:16 | servergate ♦1 | like |
| 31520895 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-28 05:33 | 1 | 2015-07-18 17:21 | FTA ♦201 | H there. I was wondering about the motivation for "tunnel=building_passage" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349390889 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349390900 . From visiting, it looks like these walkways are inside (must walk through a door) and not surrounded by outer walls (li... |
| 2 | 2015-07-19 15:49 | PlaneMad | Hey FTA. Not sure what I was thinking at that time, but was likely a case of over enthusiastic mapping based on the building geometry and paths leading to it.Thanks for highlighting this, I'm going to revert the change.Cheers, | |
| 30846895 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-06 16:01 | 1 | 2015-05-09 13:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Thanks for fixing this!Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2015-05-09 16:18 | PlaneMad | No problem! Do you have any tool to find issues like this automatically? I'm worried more such cases go unnoticed. | |
| 3 | 2015-05-10 09:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | Like this, no - I just noticed the forum post about it. I did write https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/Changeset1 to look for certain sorts of issues locally by new users, but "nothing but deletes in the changeset" isn't currently one of them.There was a more general GSoC proposal... | |
| 4 | 2015-05-10 14:21 | PlaneMad | Thanks, that is really useful to dig into! |