2 changesets created by Polaris514 have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
85441278
by Polaris514
@ 2020-05-19 12:14
12020-05-29 15:49M!dgard
♦780
For your information: it appears that you changed https://osm.org/node/5685444341 from "freestanding" to "lattice", but this is not a lattice mast.
22020-05-29 20:34Polaris514 Hello,

You're absolutely right ! It's definitely a nonsense, since that this node is a BEMILCOM to<er, therefore it cannot be lattice (I should have added `material=concrete` also to be complete).

My apologies for this, I've been checking a bunch of sites and it seems that t...
32020-05-29 21:08M!dgard
♦780
No problem. I suspected it was a copy-paste glitch, these things happen. :)
42020-05-30 13:59M!dgard
♦780
It would appear that you pasted "lattice" on all masts in this changeset. Would you have the time to check them all 52 once again? You could look at previous versions and at aerial imagery.
52020-06-01 13:00Polaris514 All 52 nodes checked again. Original changeset included 31/52 nodes tagged "lattice" (60%). Second check revealed 3 errors (lattice -> freestanding) and 1 typo (guyed_latice -> guyed_lattice), see changeset 86047702. Hope that this time it's OK =)
62020-06-21 00:49M!dgard
♦780
Awesome!
85431124
by Polaris514
@ 2020-05-19 09:30
12020-06-07 17:00M!dgard
♦780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6497362560
J'aurais fait la même faute mais ce pylône porte des antennes d'ASTRID et non du réseau de téléphonie mobile. :D
22020-06-07 17:05M!dgard
♦780
(De plus, fait attention à l'angle des photos: la position du pylône n'est pas où elle semble terminer: il faut se rendre compte de l'élévation du toit.)
32020-06-08 19:05Polaris514 Bien vu ! Sur l'imagerie AIV les mats autoportants étaient peu visibles, mais si j'avais vérifié le document du permis j'aurais directement vu que les antennes GSM n'étaient pas sur le pylône... My bad. À l'avenir, j'évite...