9 changesets created by RicoZ have been discussed with 10 replies of this contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
39651764
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-29 21:41
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agogormo
♦161
Hi, is there a discussion of your large-scale edits? Although your edits are probably not harmful, prior discussion is necessary (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ). Using JOSM and doing find/replace large scale is considered mechanical editing!
2 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ I am always trying to contact the individual authors whose data I am changing by private message and work in small chunks - however in this one case I have accidentaly uploaded too much at once. I am pretty sure that I have contacted most of the affected contributors though.
3 ~ 9 years agogormo
♦161
thanks for the clarification.
4 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ Thanks for having an eye on it, I am also making mistakes often enough.
5 ~ 8 years agoletihu
♦802
Diesen Wasserweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330130228/history
kann ich auf dem Luftbild nicht sehen. Er kreuzt auch Wege und Gebäude. Vielleicht fehlt "Tunnel" und "Layer -1"
6 ~ 8 years agoRicoZ Habe es geändert und vorsichtshalber den OC angeschrieben.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48558910
39644090
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-29 14:57
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 8 years agoletihu
♦802
Dieser Wasserweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44131874/history
geht vielleicht nicht direkt durch dieses
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44131874/history
Haus ;-) Vielleicht kennst Du den richtigen Verlauf.
Wenn Du schon dabei bist, die Straßenquerung mit dem Wasser
https://www.op...
2 ~ 8 years agoRicoZ Bin leider auch nicht von dort, habe es jetzt so verschoben wie es mit Bing aussieht aber im Zweifelsfall lasse ich lieber einen offensichtlichen Fehler drinstehen als einen gut versteckten.

Irgednwie passt auch die "Flussrichtung" vom Flutgraben und dem verbundenen ditch nicht gut zus...
39651087
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-29 20:55
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agogeodreieck4711
♦94
seems to be a senseless mass- or mechanical edit.....
2 ~ 9 years agoMKnight
♦911
should be revertet too...
39650507
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-29 20:24
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agogeodreieck4711
♦94
mechanical edit???
(layer= -1 removed)
2 ~ 9 years agoMKnight
♦911
should be reverted...
39668724
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-30 15:54
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agoPT-53
♦3,642
Nach Deiner Bearbeitung meldet keep right jetzt diesen Fehler:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=78555854
Würdest Du bitte das erledigen !
2 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ Aber gerne, weißt Du zufällig ob an der Stelle ein Culvert, eine Brücke oder ein Ford ist?

Übrigens bin ich nicht der "Verursacher" wie in Deinem dem Keepright Kommentar vermerkt und es ist auch nicht ein "Fehler" sondern eine Warnung.
3 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ war ausnahmsweise auf Bing unübersehbar eindeutig, keine Mühe machen.
39749704
by RicoZ
@ 2016-06-02 16:31
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.
39697460
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-31 20:23
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.
39686857
by RicoZ
@ 2016-05-31 11:41
~ 9 years ago
1 ~ 9 years agowoodpeck
♦2,537
I would appreciate it if you could use more precise changeset comments. I can see from the changeset that you edited a waterway but what exactly are you "fixing" (and, preferably, why - as you probably know, we do not usually start retagging everything just because the consensus on taggin...
2 ~ 9 years agoRicoZ In this changeset I tried to fix JOSM warnings where the river crosses the lake shore and dam.

Btw I do try to contact the main contributors when I am doing larger scale retagging.
33832681
by RicoZ
@ 2015-09-06 13:20
~ 10 years ago
1 ~ 10 years agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,513
Invalid data should not be kept as "example for wiki"

Just copy tags, list them and make screenshot.
2 ~ 10 years agoRicoZ there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?

Btw besides fixing this one bridge I have intended to contact the author of the unlucky mechanical edit causing this because there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy. It is s...
3 ~ 10 years agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,513
"there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?"

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Attic_data_.28.22date.22.29

In that case it would be http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bjc (note that map rendering is for cu...
4 ~ 10 years agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,513
or simply http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/37264089/history
5 ~ 10 years agoRicoZ thanks. I was also looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37264089/history but does not seem to have the possibility to link a specific version directly.

So the overpass query seems like the only way to get a stable pointer.
6 ~ 10 years agoMateusz Konieczny
♦9,513
Such feature may be (or already is) requested at https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues
7 ~ 10 years agoRicoZ Indeed, it has been requested already - https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/662