| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150644178 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-04-29 04:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | meongseolin ♦44 | 您好，这边界数据是从哪里来的？我想编辑下 |
| 175137330 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-11-26 04:53 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Kovoschiz ♦2,914 | Hi can you please discuss this? This is to be consistent with the Kowloon `=city` , and the HKI `admin_level=5` There's already `place=state` https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24330691Otherwise Kowloon should be changed to eg `=region` (if "twin city" is not literal) |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Kovoschiz ♦2,914 | Notice the `=city` is `admin_centre` , and `=state` the `label` | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | Rukkhadevata | Hong Kong is divided into three traditional areas which do not have administrative status: HKI, Kowloon, and the New Territories. However, locals in Hong Kong seem to think that "Hong Kong" refers only to Hong Kong Island, while "Kowloon" is a separate part. Given that Hong Kong&... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | 旧加卷 ♦67 | "place=city" does not necessarily have to be tied with the administration status? | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic ♦235 | I think that Hong Kong Island node can not be admin_center but label of Hong Kong, and node of the city should have admin_center role because it is always a place which have administrative body controlling the area | |
| 165465644 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-04-26 13:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 蕉饼电脑 ♦57 | 对于阁下的编辑，我有以下疑点：行政级别（admin_level）为6的平潭县关系仍作为行政级别由5降至7的平潭综合实验区的subarea？福州市关系的范围重新包括平潭，但平潭不作为福州的subarea？平潭应当独立绘制于福州市。平潭... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic ♦235 | Hi Rukkhadevata, can you answer to the 蕉饼电脑 comment since I have very similar question? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | Rukkhadevata | Hello. Simply put, "平潭综合实验区" is an exception: it does not belong to China’s legally defined administrative division system, even though it has a management body independent of Fuzhou City. There are many such special cases in China, and most of them we label as admin_... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | 蕉饼电脑 ♦57 | Functional areas with independent administration (e.g. Pingtan) -> still as a part of the original upper administrative region, and the only exception gives to Xiong'an because it's the "most important";functional areas whose administration has been transferred to another ad... | |
| 176029277 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-12-17 02:08 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | MetroBot ♦8 | 通常在一个route=subway中只包含一个方向，两个方向的route放在同一个type=route_master中参考https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping#Route_Relationshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Urban_Rail_Transit#%E7%AB%99%E7%82%B9%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%E5... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Rukkhadevata | 这个关系表示的是线路的物理设施，没有方向，跟列车的运行路线不同（尽管在地铁中两者经常重合） | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | MetroBot ♦8 | 我理解你的意思，但和现有的其他线路规范不同。下面是成都地铁30号线和成都地铁9号线（现有规范）的区别。成都地铁9号线（现有规范）https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13088859成都地铁30号线https://www.openstreetmap.org/relatio... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | MetroBot ♦8 | 另外这是地铁相关的检查工具。你可以参考https://maps.vk.com/osm/tools/subways/latest/china.html | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | Rukkhadevata | 已修复 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13367011/history/9 | |
| 173549983 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-10-20 17:55 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | 蕉饼电脑 ♦57 | 引用自https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Role:admin_centre 中文译文“代表行政中心（首府、县城等）的节点，通常是镇、市或村（取决于边界级别，参见place=*）。这一作用是针对首都（如首都城市），而不是国会大厦（如立法大楼... |
| 173359340 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-10-16 10:47 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | mueschel ♦7,168 | Hi,could you check this lake? It got a strange "wlw" tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1261455 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Rukkhadevata | Thanks for pointing out my mistake! It should be "ele" and I have fixed it in #173517027. | |
| 168768699 by Rukkhadevata @ 2025-07-11 04:13 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | honnip ♦9 | Hello. It has been agreed in the Korean community that the name should include the word '특별시' (and '광역시', '도', '시' etc)Please refer https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/85627 |
| 160308129 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-12-17 16:12 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Karma Howlin ♦4 | Thanks you. |
| 149786023 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-04-09 16:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | 理塘丁真 ♦56 | 茂县不是藏族县 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Taksine ♦164 | 你不写双语不舒服吗？？？？ | |
| 149680556 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-04-07 07:35 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | Source汉南区(武汉经开区)：https://www.whkfq.gov.cn/xxgk/fdzdgk/tzgg/202304/P020230422690973874003.pdf 蔡甸区：https://www.caidian.gov.cn/zwgk/zwdt/gsgg/202304/t20230422_2190017.shtml#:~:text=%E8%94%A1%E7%94%B8%E5%8C%BA%E5%9B%BD%E5%9C%9F%E7%A9%BA%E9%97%B4%E6%80%BB%E4%BD%93%E8%A7%84%E... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦588 | 武汉经开区挂着法定汉南区的牌子，但是占了蔡甸区的沿江部分和汉阳区的一部分,实际管辖范围比法定行政区大，按照OSM实控为准的原则修改 | |
| 148470770 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-03-10 16:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240310164232/https://www.fxqhm.gov.cn/content/2019/219020.html |
| 147320553 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-02-11 09:45 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ljc_jlyb ♦52 | ??请求来源 |
| 146467354 by Rukkhadevata @ 2024-01-20 07:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz ♦2,936 | Hi Rukkhadevata,this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=129.36650&lat=42.80281&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | ljc_jlyb ♦52 | 现有边界与国土空间规划有出入 http://www.longjing.gov.cn/hd/yjzj/202311/P020231122340228226446.pdf | |
| 140658836 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-09-01 02:26 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | pzs111111 ♦1 | what? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | According to the on the ground principle of OSM, this boundary is consistent with the actual situation (i.e. the actual jurisdiction area of the local authorities in the two provinces). | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Nazlyn ♦2 | The boundary line between Qinghai and Tibet is completely wrong, and there is no such thing as the two provinces actually controlling the line. | |
| 143818470 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-11-09 11:34 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | YPGGUUY ♦35 | If you are really unsatisfied with the unclosed border, you can temporarily move them out of relation. But you don't have to delete the whole relation, do you? |
| 136937815 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-06-04 15:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Vson ♦1 | Please check the real information on map.baidu.com or other products. Your data are years before |
| 138601060 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-07-17 03:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | λnko ♦23 | 你好，根据多方面观察，新光快速的性质应该算是高速，请悉知 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | 新光快速路是城市快速路，而城市快速路（没有高速公路编号）在交通法规中与高速公路并列，因此不能简单地将其标签改为高速公路。欢迎到相关社群与更多mapper交流～ | |
| 138630671 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-07-17 16:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | TaraV ♦43 | Hi, I've noticed you are creating new administrative boundaries in this region. Some of these (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101594, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101597 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101596) are not closed. Are you still working on these? ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | I have fixed them in the follow-up changesets & thanks for your pointing out. | |
| 138564250 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-07-16 03:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Rukkhadevata | Error correction: #138522282 |
| 135138331 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-04-20 08:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Kovoschiz ♦2,914 | Please check that the merge on HZMB already has `lanes=4`. Don't over-extend the `=motorway_link`. It is ugly and unrealistic. Follow the physical separation rule for best results. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Kovoschiz ♦2,914 | * `=service` As well as `placement=` | |
| 132392204 by Rukkhadevata @ 2023-02-11 07:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Supaplex ♦11,302 | name:zh 有繁中與簡中，應該是要並列處理的，要顧慮不同變體的話，請善用 name:zh-Hans 與 name:zh-Hant --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132392204 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | 电子烟假 ♦21 | 如果要并列处理，谁在前谁在后是不是也要争议一下？如果要讲并列，强行按照某种先后顺序去填充name:zh是不是也是一种钦点？ | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦588 | 后续： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132993934> revert changeset 132392204: name:zh should be filled with both traditional Chinese and simplified Chinese | |
| 130626117 by Rukkhadevata @ 2022-12-29 03:59 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | DavidKarlas ♦49 | Hi,looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15058963 is broken, could you try to close it?Thank you! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Rukkhadevata | I've done demarcating the border around here, thanks for the reminder! | |
| 123031630 by Rukkhadevata @ 2022-06-30 07:31 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,894 | Hi Surcrose,I saw you just edited this place name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3048801807/historybut the place has no specific value, just a generic "yes", since you changed its name I guess you know what kind of place it is so we can fix it with a proper place value? :) |