| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 122241563 by SK53 @ 2022-06-11 09:35 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:28 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068742206/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 95174786 by SK53 @ 2020-12-02 19:45 | 1 | 2025-05-09 23:34 | Milhouse ♦25 | Hi! Thanks for your awesome work tagging so many solar panels - I've been trying to add more myself to keep the count up to date.On this changeset I noticed a module count that looks several times too big. I'm not sure:1) Whether to cut them down to a single node with a more accurate m... |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 09:32 | SK53 | Hi,No these look OK. Each group of modules is arranged as 4 rows of 10, so module count of 40 is correct. The idea of mapping each group separately is that it makes it much easier if one wants to convert them to areas.At present a useful way of checking module counts is to draw lines along e... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-12 07:59 | Milhouse ♦25 | Ah, brilliant, thanks for the tip about measuring the dimensions of the panels. I didn't know any of that. I'll have to revisit the ones I added in the last week or two to check I haven't undercounted lots!I didn't hear about loss of high resolution imagery, that would be a sha... | |
| 19485961 by SK53 @ 2013-12-16 17:58 | 1 | 2025-04-16 00:20 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | Any idea what "building=s" is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252175919#map=19/53.269303/-3.914435 ? |
| 42071262 by SK53 @ 2016-09-11 05:41 | 1 | 2025-01-28 06:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4395654557/history has shop = pet_supplies that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=pet_supplies ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ? If yes, what... |
| 159519604 by SK53 @ 2024-11-24 02:50 | 1 | 2024-11-24 02:53 | SK53 | Nottingham Post article on The Waterfront closure https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-news/future-prime-nottingham-pub-suddenly-9720103 |
| 17998142 by SK53 @ 2013-09-23 20:03 | 1 | 2024-09-05 15:24 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hellohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239128864does coniferous=spruce_woodland mean genus=Picea ?Regards,Marc |
| 150108648 by SK53 @ 2024-04-17 03:55 | 1 | 2024-04-17 07:32 | gurglypipe ♦869 | Heya, I’m not sure it’s right to call Ribblehead a hamlet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/513869708). I’ve always known it as referring to the area of moorland. One pub, one station and a handful of spread-out farms don’t make a hamlet. |
| 2 | 2024-04-18 16:35 | SK53 | Yeah, I'd agree it's a marginal call, but it appears to be in the address for the Station Master's House which is unlikely for a locality. I moved the node closer to where OSGB have it (I.e. near the pub & station). I'd have thought 100 years or so there would have been a... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-18 21:35 | gurglypipe ♦869 | Unlikely but not impossible? Ribblehead might just be a special case of addressing.The new location for the node looks fine to me. I agree that 100 years ago it would definitely have been considered a hamlet (probably with a population in the hundreds for a time, if you also count those who live... | |
| 52409183 by SK53 @ 2017-09-27 09:52 | 1 | 2024-03-07 15:36 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | Hello!You usedcycleway=aslbon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132750414/historyHave you maybe meantcycleway=asl?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used this... |
| 7973092 by SK53 @ 2011-04-26 10:18 | 1 | 2024-02-05 17:37 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40426231/history has access:psv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well? |
| 2 | 2024-02-06 11:00 | SK53 | That was probably some variant tagging on use at the time. I suspect it means motor_vehicle=no as well. I will need to check ifbI have a photo | |
| 3 | 2024-02-06 13:27 | SK53 | Yes, No entry except buses sign. Have updated. | |
| 146562468 by SK53 @ 2024-01-22 17:10 | 1 | 2024-01-27 15:27 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you check the trees for uncommon tags? ncc_tree_code = 158320 site_tree_no = 15.00-> reference numbers should use the "ref:XYZ" syntax. sitename = Middleton Boulevard -> seems to be a likely unnecessary object:addr or location tree_type-> shoul... |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 18:55 | SK53 | Yes, well caught : site_tree_no, sitename & tree_type should not be there. The ncc_tree_code is not necessarily a "ref" in OSM terms (it is not the same as the markers on the trees) and is there to allow checks for new trees etc. | |
| 77587998 by SK53 @ 2019-11-26 16:59 | 1 | 2024-01-25 11:46 | kapazao ♦909 | Hi, could you explain what is location=heliostat?Is there any other better location tag to use here?Regards |
| 130563259 by SK53 @ 2022-12-27 15:48 | 1 | 2024-01-02 20:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | My recollection is that this is artificial turf, yes. |
| 2 | 2024-01-03 14:11 | SK53 | Most of them are & have been for many years at least at a decent club standard. | |
| 141074870 by SK53 @ 2023-09-10 17:49 | 1 | 2024-01-01 03:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I'm guessing perhaps residential not reservoir :) |
| 2 | 2024-01-01 03:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206690291 | |
| 141419311 by SK53 @ 2023-09-18 11:14 | 1 | 2023-09-18 13:38 | Carlos Brys ♦272 | Thank you very much.I apologize for my mistake. |
| 36920361 by SK53 @ 2016-01-31 16:47 | 1 | 2023-08-07 19:52 | VictorIE ♦906 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3980022261field_4=55.181928field_5=-6.720907field_6=1field_4 and field_5 seem to be location. Any idea what field 6 is? |
| 136385221 by SK53 @ 2023-05-21 19:42 | 1 | 2023-05-22 13:10 | SK53 | Source image for VR royal_cypher: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=175971688130124 |
| 65530876 by SK53 @ 2018-12-16 20:15 | 1 | 2023-04-22 20:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,I'm guessing that "disused:admin_level=Ulex europeaus" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655452132 presumably isn't what was intended?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2023-04-24 07:05 | SK53 | Fixed now. | |
| 62462217 by SK53 @ 2018-09-10 17:41 | 1 | 2023-04-22 07:31 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,594 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624458106/historysurface=linoWould surface=linoleum would fit ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dlinoleum |
| 134562771 by SK53 @ 2023-04-06 06:33 | 1 | 2023-04-06 12:35 | SK53 | Reviewed and removed/reverted. |
| 133557059 by SK53 @ 2023-03-11 15:12 | 1 | 2023-03-11 18:58 | jmarchon ♦426 | Hello,It looks like the Wikidata code you added here is for the brand, not for this specific bank location. I've improved the tagging to reflect this.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2023-03-13 14:26 | SK53 | This is actually the head office so it would have been appropriate, but my intention was in creating the wiki data item was to support use as brand. | |
| 115177046 by SK53 @ 2021-12-20 18:18 | 1 | 2021-12-20 19:36 | SK53 | Link to paper on installation of solar panels here. |
| 2 | 2023-01-13 13:38 | SK53 | Forgot link https://www.sd-commission.org.uk/data/files/publications/Bronllys%20Hospital%20Solar%20Energy%20Project.pdf | |
| 115225228 by SK53 @ 2021-12-21 20:37 | 1 | 2022-12-29 23:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | No idea what the "man_made=standing_stone" such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9356645968/history are like here - are they like any of the first four stones at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/-25.00734/135.17517 ? If so, I can detect them as one category or anothe... |
| 2 | 2022-12-30 09:58 | SK53 | They are components of modern stone circles (built in 2000 IIRC), but Wales has a lot in the form of Gorsedd stones. A picture here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3311833. Usually such things fall under historic=archaelogical_site, but these are neither. They aren't unique in that quite... | |
| 20049050 by SK53 @ 2014-01-17 11:29 | 1 | 2022-12-10 14:42 | Hungerburg ♦408 | Dear SK, the avalanche_protection features are still in place. Would you mind, if I change those to snow_bridge with underscore (as on the wiki :) and fence for barrier? |
| 2 | 2022-12-10 16:57 | SK53 | I suppose this is the consensus, I don't think they are fences though, even though they are distinctly barriers. There are all sorts of odd tags with avalanche protection (passive) and (active) which I think can lead to confusion : e.g., showing CatEx as aerialways. There is a distinct prob... | |
| 3 | 2022-12-10 18:56 | Hungerburg ♦408 | Hmm, snow bridges are barriers, I found a lot, that were mapped fence, nothing else. What would you call this, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684105108 - those are like fins, the mountain sides concrete/stone/walls, the valley side a steep slope. Are those "berms"? | |
| 4 | 2022-12-10 19:11 | SK53 | Yes I think I would call them berms. The one's I've mapped closest to this are in the Val St Antonien (and are very characteristic of Walser houses in that valley), and I did use berm (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Avalanche_protection#House_defenses_in_St_Antonien,_Graubunde... | |
| 5 | 2022-12-10 19:33 | SK53 | I'm a little puzzled by these, because although they will disrupt an avalanche flow, they don't seem to be protecting anything on immediately downhill of the obstruction. Retaining wall is clearly wrong as one would expect a retaining wall to have the wall part to be on the lower side. | |
| 6 | 2022-12-10 20:02 | SK53 | They are described as concrete wedges in this document: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/10851_avalancheprotection.pdf.Long ago one of my Praktikants at UBS in Zurich was the son of the director of the Swiss Avalanche Institute, would be a useful contact now. | |
| 7 | 2022-12-10 20:22 | Hungerburg ♦408 | In New Zealand, "avalanche diversion berms" are built, but no image, but diversion sounds right to me.The Arzler Alm Lawine 2019 destroyed most of protection that was there, so these are just rebuilds, they cost 600.000 Euro; https://www.ibkinfo.at/abschluss-sanierung-lawinenbauwerke -... | |
| 8 | 2022-12-10 20:30 | Hungerburg ♦408 | If you put the tiris DGM (lidar) in background, you will see the structures continuing further down and the big dam there too. | |
| 9 | 2022-12-10 21:36 | SK53 | Ah, very interesting. The paper I linked earlier talks about "bumps" which are energy dissipation devices rather than straight protection (they have a high angled face which forces the flow into the air with some loss of energy). The discussion in the paper seems to always associate them w... | |
| 10 | 2022-12-10 22:16 | Hungerburg ♦408 | The paper mentions Arzler Alm! The french site on same page here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8278528709 ? | |
| 11 | 2022-12-11 10:13 | SK53 | Definitely time to start a thread on community.osm. I'll see if I can find some of the Icelandic & Norwegian examples, in the meantime there are also these above Pontresina https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981577482/history#map=17/46.49516/9.90856 | |
| 129198505 by SK53 @ 2022-11-21 13:56 | 1 | 2022-11-23 00:23 | Milhouse ♦25 | Hi - I noticed that you changed The Prince of Wales to "outdoor_seating"="no". Do the picnic tables in front of the pub not count?Steven |
| 2 | 2022-11-23 10:41 | SK53 | Not my intention, so I'll put it back to yes. Jerry | |
| 3 | 2022-11-23 10:43 | SK53 | Done. | |
| 4 | 2022-11-23 10:46 | Milhouse ♦25 | I thought you might be making a subjective judgement about whether anyone would want to sit outside at a busy road junction! ;-)I think this might usefully be the distinction between "outdoor seating" and "beer garden"...Thanks for putting the key back.Steven | |
| 5 | 2022-11-23 14:00 | SK53 | Hi Steven,No, not in a position to make such judgements. Years since I used to frequent the area. I just happened to see something about the Dodo micropub & was intrigued if it had been mapped & saw the opportunity to add some "fhrs:id" values.I totally agree about "ou... | |
| 119459067 by SK53 @ 2022-04-08 08:35 | 1 | 2022-11-11 11:32 | Dave Venables ♦164 | I've added a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3434277 as I think this changeset may have accidently dragged a Castle Wharf footpath node across the Nottingham Canal and joined it to Wilford Street. Changeset does have warning:cross_waysI don't seem to be able to disconnect the nod... |
| 124895031 by SK53 @ 2022-08-14 16:36 | 1 | 2022-08-15 10:38 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9953006571. What is the meaning of the tag ENE = WSW? |
| 116083331 by SK53 @ 2022-01-12 21:29 | 1 | 2022-08-12 08:36 | redd ♦386 | Hi SK53,thanks for you very active contributions to OpenStreetMap. It seems like you did an typo on building=semidetached_houseqaa on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807477682.Can you have a look again on that one?Thanks,redd |
| 2 | 2022-08-12 22:15 | Jez Nicholson ♦70 | nil desperandum Jerry, I've fixed it. - Jez | |
| 3 | 2022-08-12 22:19 | redd ♦386 | Thank you! | |
| 4 | 2022-08-13 09:14 | SK53 | Jez - thanksredd - I think you can fix things which are obvious typos without needing to contact people. In this case I clearly was trying to square the building whilst focus was in the tag field (and possibly then added a couple of Josm shortcut keys as well!) | |
| 5 | 2022-08-14 21:02 | redd ♦386 | Hi SK53,thanks for that feedback. I did clean up some typos by myself in the past, but it was kind of desperating work. Also feels like very lonely work without any human interaction. Therefore I prefer now to get in touch with the other poeple worrking on OpenStreetMap when I find any errors or s... | |
| 124604213 by SK53 @ 2022-08-07 16:21 | 1 | 2022-08-11 06:07 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/880100255/history. Is there any reason to add a character x to the key power? |
| 2 | 2022-08-11 08:10 | SK53 | Thanks for picking it up. I add the "x" which then allows me to divide a way in iD without it creating a relation. I should of course remove the "x" now, which I did do on the other half. As the building & the panel dont coincide it needs editing anyway. | |
| 123772876 by SK53 @ 2022-07-18 17:14 | 1 | 2022-07-18 20:09 | MelancholicSlav ♦21 | Hi, I can agree that Barnstable is better classed as a town than a city, but I am moving the Barnstable town and Hyannis nodes back to where I previously put them. I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be allowed to move city/town nodes to a more central location if I see fit. Hyannis is ... |
| 2 | 2022-07-19 11:20 | SK53 | You are confusing the administrative division of Barnstable with the place within it. There are already admin relations for the "Town of Barnstable" with city type goverment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2387624) and the actual Barnstable which is on Highway 6A (https://www.opens... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-20 14:02 | MelancholicSlav ♦21 | The Barnstable village node is now admin_centre of the Barnstable village administrative boundary. Apologies for the confusion. | |
| 72600587 by SK53 @ 2019-07-24 12:40 | 1 | 2022-06-25 20:26 | lyctkel ♦332 | Hi SK53 ,currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706967288 which uses building=toilet_block.This tag is only used twice.From my point of view building=toilets would fit better.Regards,lyctkel |
| 2 | 2022-06-30 18:35 | SK53 | Toilet block, Shower block, Washroom block are pretty standard descriptions for distinct buildings for these purposes (e.g., in campsites, schools, military barracks etc) and I think other forms will always have "block" as part of the name. I must have tagged it this way because that is h... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-07 10:00 | lyctkel ♦332 | Hi Jerry,Thanks for the details. I added a description.Regards,lyctkel | |
| 51876993 by SK53 @ 2017-09-09 11:34 | 1 | 2022-06-18 05:47 | lyctkel ♦332 | Hi SK53,currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258091038 which uses building=youth_hostel.This tag is only used here.From my point of view building=hostel would fit better. That tag is used 176 times worldwid... |
| 2 | 2022-06-18 08:56 | SK53 | Hi,Yes, I think that would be fine, although it may lose a bit of nuance (hostels in UK English may be for other purposes than tourism: students, nurses, workers etc). I wanted to capture that this was purpose built by the YHA and consequently rather unusual.Jerry | |
| 3 | 2022-06-18 11:38 | lyctkel ♦332 | Hi Jerry,I understand your motivation and for the moment no better idea how to map it as is was. I don't care so much if this tag is changed. It is only important for me to understand it and to enable other mappers to understand it as well.It looks to me as if this building is used as a hos... | |
| 50336092 by SK53 @ 2017-07-16 22:00 | 1 | 2022-03-23 14:46 | DaveF ♦1,562 | Hihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508028510If accessible by motor vehicle, shouldn't this be track rather than footway? |
| 2 | 2022-03-23 21:55 | SK53 | Interesting question. In practice Hilbre is not accessible by car for anyone other than people with very specific permission (the Land Rover when I visited belonged to a bird ringing group). The owners, Wirral Council are quite clear that it can be visited by foot only https://www.wirral.gov.uk... | |
| 118038368 by SK53 @ 2022-03-03 00:59 | 1 | 2022-03-03 02:48 | SK53 | Damn, iDs autocomplete! Thus was adding tags to existingbtooftop solar |
| 114612706 by SK53 @ 2021-12-06 10:28 | 1 | 2022-01-05 16:31 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! What is the meaning of the key SK53:solar? Can I assume that this is "only" a private work tag in a production database and thus this tag will disappear again at some point? |
| 2 | 2022-01-10 22:34 | SK53 | Yes, exactly that. Enables buildings mapped initially as nodes can be quickly found in a separate pass for conversion to area (the extra precision afforded by the cadastral parcels means offsets need to be done for each building, which interferes with solar mapping workflow).Subsequently I now h... | |
| 115534852 by SK53 @ 2021-12-29 19:28 | 1 | 2021-12-29 19:29 | SK53 | Of course I meant Stanley Common |
| 115492084 by SK53 @ 2021-12-28 23:06 | 1 | 2021-12-28 23:07 | SK53 | This was a general tweaking of roads to match imagery realigned to the LR land parcels; not sure why an old changeset comment appeared (autocomplete I expect) |
| 115141823 by SK53 @ 2021-12-19 22:54 | 1 | 2021-12-20 19:35 | SK53 | Sorry unintentially did two separate changes in this changeset (adding cutlines in Owston, Leics, and adding an outdoor centre & archery butts near Llanwrtyd Wells |
| 50311895 by SK53 @ 2017-07-15 19:00 | 1 | 2021-12-19 22:22 | PeterPan99 ♦43 | In this changeset, you have left 2 ways (507835856 and 507835860) as line features tagged with “natural=wood”, which is normally reserved for area features. Can you resolve this, please? |
| 2 | 2021-12-19 22:56 | SK53 | Took me a while to work out what I intended, but I was using Potlatch where one can copy the last used tags onto a new way & obviously accidentally had touched the wood not the cutline to the N of these too. Now corrected.Thanks for asking: dont think it would be easy for anyone else to work... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-20 07:57 | PeterPan99 ♦43 | Thanks for sorting this out. | |
| 58832630 by SK53 @ 2018-05-09 21:08 | 1 | 2021-12-19 22:00 | PeterPan99 ♦43 | I notice (as part of a MapRoulette Challenge) that in this edit you have left Way 587036831 as a line, but tagged as "leisure=nature reserve", which is normally an area. I am reluctant to delete it from my armchair; can you resolve, please? |
| 2 | 2021-12-19 22:13 | SK53 | It can go, must have just got left accidentally when I had to chop up the original nature reserve polygon & reassemble on it's much smaller new boundaries. | |
| 3 | 2021-12-20 07:48 | PeterPan99 ♦43 | Many thanks. I will delete it. | |
| 115063200 by SK53 @ 2021-12-17 16:27 | 1 | 2021-12-18 09:52 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please check http://www.om.org/way/255119152. Is there an difference between the use key cadw_ref and ref:cadw ? |
| 2 | 2021-12-19 19:36 | SK53 | Thanks, indeed it is. I fancy I've been using cadw_ref for odd things and someone is silently changing them without pointing it out. A bit annoying that the key is formed in a different way to the equivalent key across the border in England.I had been meaning to check what was used, but as ... | |
| 114394070 by SK53 @ 2021-11-30 09:23 | 1 | 2021-11-30 12:19 | Panthro83 ♦2 | I've resolved some conflicts as I pushed further updates after your tweaks - (on waie inn building multi polygon - clearly we both had the same idea in improving this building!) |
| 114116518 by SK53 @ 2021-11-22 22:22 | 1 | 2021-11-23 01:57 | Bexhill-OSM ♦94 | Nice. I do love a bit of sneaky solar :) |
| 112156887 by SK53 @ 2021-10-06 08:07 | 1 | 2021-11-21 08:29 | ivanbranco ♦2,694 | Hi SK53,what's the meaning of folly=yes? |
| 2 | 2021-11-21 12:54 | SK53 | See https://e.n.wikipedia.org/wiki/FollyThere are various books on follies in Britain (this is a good overview http://follies.org.uk/index.php/books/), and it would be nice to be able to identify them. My favourite is the Pineapple at Dunmore https://www.nts.org.uk/visit/places/the-pineapple. Ma... | |
| 19017633 by SK53 @ 2013-11-20 16:33 | 1 | 2021-11-11 18:07 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | This was a while ago, but an odd tag "addr:vector=opposite" appears to be been added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43303737/history in this changeset. There's only one other instance of this key worldwide, so I was wondering what it's purpose is, and if the information wou... |
| 2 | 2021-11-11 19:05 | SK53 | Experimental. The vector represents which way housenumbers go w.r.t to the street way, so opposite means that house numbers rise in the opposite direction to the direction of the way. The idea is that one can start to infer predicted housenumbers based on the vector direction. I stopped thinking abo... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-11 19:06 | SK53 | I guess in principle it is equivalent to addr:interpolation ways on either side of the road. | |
| 20580267 by SK53 @ 2014-02-15 16:36 | 1 | 2021-11-11 18:06 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | This was a while ago, but an odd tag "addr:vector=backward" appears to be been added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59551258/history in this changeset. There's only one other instance of this tag worldwide, so I was wondering what it's purpose is, and if the information wou... |
| 112896990 by SK53 @ 2021-10-24 08:49 | 1 | 2021-10-26 13:49 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,you added a couple of 'gene' tags here, could you check that? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197050224 |
| 2 | 2021-10-29 15:51 | SK53 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113130575Thanks | |
| 111924506 by SK53 @ 2021-09-30 16:00 | 1 | 2021-09-30 16:28 | SK53 | agggh, accidentally started on St Michaels near St Fagans (not completely used again to PL3's changeset cf iD) |
| 109166100 by SK53 @ 2021-08-04 22:05 | 1 | 2021-08-04 22:13 | SK53 | Accidentally used, old changeset description. This was adding the house Afallon on S side of river. It was the former minister's house (on older maps called Blaen-Dyffryn), but Afallon on the post-WWII 1:10560, which is it's current name & the name when my mother lived there 1941-4 (is... |
| 76064484 by SK53 @ 2019-10-22 18:33 | 1 | 2021-08-03 08:17 | Dave Venables ♦164 | I've changed this back to the Blue Bell https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/870029/The-Blue-Bell-Inn-Nottingham as I think Route One is in the Cornerhouse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8976390965 |
| 2 | 2021-08-03 08:49 | Dave Venables ♦164 | My mistake regarding the cornerhouse. Have moved the recently created Route One node back here. Food Standards have both the Blue Bell Upper Parliament Street and Route One Forman Street which is confusing. Expect they will deactivate the Blue Bell one. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-03 11:32 | SK53 | Yeah, I actually surveyed this one! I think the Blue Bell always had two addresses. Certainly it had doors at both ends the only time I drank there, seemed a pleasant boozer back then.Some FHRS Ids do tend to be zombies. | |
| 66433766 by SK53 @ 2019-01-18 17:01 | 1 | 2021-04-18 21:05 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello SK53 :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240132957it's a amenity=clubhouse ?Regards,Marc |
| 2 | 2021-04-19 13:35 | SK53 | Hi Marc Marc,I'm not sure the tag existed when I did this. Golf clubs in UK can be a bit complicated as some function as private members bars (amenity=social_club), but I think in this case clubhouse is appropriate, as I think the latter case is mainly true in Scotland. But if the club hous... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-21 23:19 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello Jerry,thanks for the feedback.feel free to improve the objet, your have the local knownledge I didn't have :)if you don't want it, I can of course take care of itRegards,Marc | |
| 34443555 by SK53 @ 2015-10-05 09:06 | 1 | 2021-04-14 10:06 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,I've been looking at tagging, local to me, an arboretum. And I came across this as one of the earlier ones. Looks like it still is, combined with the cemetery. You have it tagged as a nature reserve... would arboretum not be more specific and appropriate? |
| 2 | 2021-04-14 20:35 | SK53 | Abney Park may have been an arboretum around 200 years ago, but certainly not now. Since the cemetery company ran out of cash (1970s IIRC) the place became quite wild with trees self-seeding and growing anywhere. It's full of strange things, which are growing wild: Service Tree of Fontainebleau... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-15 08:24 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Ok ... I'll put it into OMH then. Could be a cool place to visit in hot weather. | |
| 21416257 by SK53 @ 2014-03-31 09:55 | 1 | 2021-04-04 13:53 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello SK :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390341214Is it deliberate to put the tags on a node of the building?and is this a sailing club or the harbour or both in the same building ?Regards,Marc |
| 102012164 by SK53 @ 2021-03-30 22:47 | 1 | 2021-03-30 22:51 | SK53 | Havent really untangled the two minor power lines heading NNE from substation outside Blaenporth |
| 99833825 by SK53 @ 2021-02-23 14:11 | 1 | 2021-02-28 02:37 | ConsEbt ♦27 | Awesome that you spotted it.Did you intentionally not add any capacity numbers?There are sources around?http://www.t2energy.com.au/projects/rugbyrun.htmlhttps://duckduckgo.com/?t=canonical&q=Rugby+Run+solar+farm&ia=web |
| 2 | 2021-02-28 10:48 | SK53 | Mainly because I'm not familiar with what are usable sources in Oz. We're lucky in the UK because the govt publishes details of all solar farms with power. | |
| 95833243 by SK53 @ 2020-12-14 21:03 | 1 | 2021-02-11 14:24 | Peter Newman ♦33 | Hi @SK53, I wonder if a lot of these were done by StreetComplete. I don't know the logic behind it, but you could try raising an issue and you might be able to get the value added automatically if it's normal UK tagging:https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/ |
| 2 | 2021-02-12 13:24 | SK53 | Sounds like it, @trigpoint pointed out a few others elsewhere. Thanks for the hint. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-12 18:22 | Peter Newman ♦33 | Good luck, happy to give some input if it helps when you've opened the issue. | |
| 97299397 by SK53 @ 2021-01-11 10:44 | 1 | 2021-01-14 10:20 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,you added the new tag 'dedicatee' here, shouldn't that be 'subject'? |
| 95324282 by SK53 @ 2020-12-05 06:49 | 1 | 2020-12-09 01:58 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi SK53,Our team recently came across the edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881203327/history while going through this changeset. This particular way created by you was not matching with any of the satellite imageries available. Also since this road is not connected to any parent road segment... |
| 2 | 2020-12-09 10:47 | SK53 | Hi,There was an error in my mapping, but your edits compounded it. In fact the highway=residential should have been landuse=residential. A good clue was that as a road it did not correspond to any aerial imagery. I've now corrected it & removed the road added to fix the non-existent isl... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-09 11:09 | jguthula ♦65 | Thanks for your quick response and fixing the error Jerry. I thought the same, but considering your local knowledge, was doubtful to make the changes before contacting you. Happy that error got resolved.Happy mapping!Jothirnadh | |
| 94758506 by SK53 @ 2020-11-25 08:40 | 1 | 2020-11-25 20:50 | SK53 | Not Brockenhurst, but New Milton |
| 94524402 by SK53 @ 2020-11-20 21:19 | 1 | 2020-11-21 12:49 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Please watch out for typos:generator:sola4r:modulesgenerator:solar:m4odulesgenerator:solar:modu2lesgenerator:solar:modules4 |
| 2 | 2020-11-21 14:31 | SK53 | See how these happened, for some reason the key field got focus not the tag field when overwriting in advanced editor. The numbers should have replaced the number in the tag field. Now fixed. | |
| 92621524 by SK53 @ 2020-10-17 09:54 | 1 | 2020-10-30 11:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks for deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859897146/history . Do the other edits by this user (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zxk ) look OK? |
| 2 | 2020-11-01 13:13 | SK53 | Not really enough local knowledge (I did wander down past the school/leisure centre complex back in Jan to Machins Lane. Kevjs1982 is more likely to be aware of current status. | |
| 90137025 by SK53 @ 2020-08-30 07:05 | 1 | 2020-09-29 15:38 | mcld ♦68 | 7 GW? Are you sure?! I might have to come and visit this :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90137025 |
| 2 | 2020-09-29 15:39 | mcld ♦68 | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7858088791 | |
| 3 | 2020-09-30 12:49 | SK53 | For some reason this appears as a preset in Vespucci and can therefore be accidentally set. Fixed | |
| 4 | 2020-09-30 13:26 | mcld ♦68 | Thanks. I've raised it as an issue here: https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset/issues/209 | |
| 90865655 by SK53 @ 2020-09-14 12:11 | 1 | 2020-09-14 13:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks!This should resolve the issue raised with the DWG that was mentioned at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2020-September/thread.html#2651 . |
| 89467113 by SK53 @ 2020-08-16 09:51 | 1 | 2020-08-16 09:52 | SK53 | Correction Teignmouth not Kingsteignton |
| 89202433 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:33 | 1 | 2020-08-10 13:56 | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 89202973 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:47 | 1 | 2020-08-10 13:55 | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 89203221 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:53 | 1 | 2020-08-10 13:55 | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 88790625 by SK53 @ 2020-07-31 16:03 | 1 | 2020-07-31 16:25 | SK53 | Another search for solar using UPRN nodes, but this time I clustered the nodes in QGIS using DBSCAN with distance of 0.0005 degrees and took centroids of clusters. This reduced targets from ~1500 to ~110, although road UPRNs mean the centroids not necessarily located near buildings. With 100 nodes a... |
| 2 | 2020-07-31 16:27 | SK53 | One further note the FIT number of installations in East Devon 009B LSOA is 83, but I mapped 100. A couple of installations were several discrete panels on farm buildings which upped the count. | |
| 88504004 by SK53 @ 2020-07-25 19:08 | 1 | 2020-07-26 02:00 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | On the Eastern approach to the railway you have moved the traffic lights to node 7747294016, while before it was on one ~20 metres to the East.I cycled through this 4 days ago and it has not moved back to its pre-2018 position |
| 2 | 2020-07-26 14:09 | SK53 | Ah, sorry the position looked very odd & so I checked against Mapillary traces. As the railway line was missing bridges and pedestrian crossings I just thought it was misplaced and dinnt check if it had recently been updated. I'll change it back.The bridge looks to be a low bridge, but ... | |
| 3 | 2020-07-26 15:50 | SK53 | Ah, I've reviewed this again and the traffic light position as it was originally was too far East, roughly in line with first house to the S, or around 50 m (has been at that location for a very long time, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/212763059/history), and for some reason thought I ... | |
| 4 | 2020-07-27 12:43 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | So at the moment the road is closed between March and August (maybe later) due to construction works for the A15 Lincoln Bypass. Beyond the last house the road is closed, however there is still access for pedestrians, cyclists and maybe horses too, however here they share the main road as the paveme... | |
| 5 | 2020-07-27 19:20 | SK53 | Thanks, I'll add the maxheight, and see if I can check any bridges further S (often a railway was built to same tolerances so its a good way to track other missing height restrictions).I'd noticed the street lights but hadn't added them as lit=yes. Sounds like you're tracking... | |
| 88353192 by SK53 @ 2020-07-22 13:51 | 1 | 2020-07-26 04:57 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please check the node http://www.osm.org/node/7737136295 again. |
| 2 | 2020-07-26 14:11 | SK53 | Thanks for the note, someone already edited & I have now restored the correct value. (When copying items in iD, sometimes the focus goes to the tag editor rather than the map and a different paste buffer goes into the key or tag field, but its easy to miss when mapping a single object). | |
| 87711381 by SK53 @ 2020-07-08 12:33 | 1 | 2020-07-08 13:20 | gurglypipe ♦869 | Nice work on South Lakes solar recently :) |
| 2 | 2020-07-09 09:39 | SK53 | New imagery makes a fantastic difference! | |
| 87540220 by SK53 @ 2020-07-04 20:05 | 1 | 2020-07-06 13:56 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please check the modification of www.osm.org/node/7683585818/history and www.osm.org/node/7683585814/history |
| 86319535 by SK53 @ 2020-06-07 20:50 | 1 | 2020-06-07 21:26 | Geaquinto ♦25 | 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 |
| 40708896 by SK53 @ 2016-07-13 10:48 | 1 | 2020-05-10 21:50 | VictorIE ♦906 | This appears to not be part of Inch St Lawrence civil parish. |
| 2 | 2020-05-11 08:53 | SK53 | Gosh, this goes back to the dim & distant past when the boundaries of Co. Limerick were lines drawn around GNIS import nodes. Will have a quick look, but may not have any memory of what I did before. | |
| 3 | 2020-05-11 09:24 | VictorIE ♦906 | Hi, I should have included a link there. :) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TPf | |
| 4 | 2020-05-11 09:46 | SK53 | Ah failed to spot you'd fixed it. No matter have added a few plantations, ringforts & Cistercian Abbey ruins. | |
| 5 | 2020-05-11 10:35 | VictorIE ♦906 | I didn't fix it. This stray bit id the problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430750207#map=14/52.5556/-8.5299 | |
| 6 | 2020-05-11 11:00 | SK53 | Sorry for being dense I was looking for a townland in the wrong parish, should be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430750207#map=14/52.5556/-8.5299 | |
| 79191686 by SK53 @ 2020-01-04 15:19 | 1 | 2020-05-11 09:37 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | Just wondering if you've made a typo with royal_cypher=àrtVR on this postbox: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7107294126 ... |
| 78418628 by SK53 @ 2019-12-14 22:13 | 1 | 2020-05-09 09:55 | mcld ♦68 | Hi - is source=solar a glitch? |
| 2 | 2020-05-09 10:27 | SK53 | Yes, presumably iD added the source_ref when I tried to add source=survey. Fixed | |
| 83580935 by SK53 @ 2020-04-15 09:30 | 1 | 2020-05-09 09:42 | mcld ♦68 | Great, thanks Jerry. I've just detected this glitch myself, and was about to ask if the tag was deliberate or not. |
| 2 | 2020-05-09 10:22 | SK53 | I havent corrected them all because I was unable to run josm on my old laptop, but have just done so now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84932590 | |
| 84522593 by SK53 @ 2020-05-02 13:59 | 1 | 2020-05-03 06:39 | BCNorwich ♦4,847 | Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and user/trigpoint were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.Regards Bernard. |
| 84158901 by SK53 @ 2020-04-26 21:07 | 1 | 2020-04-26 21:08 | SK53 | Reference for anyone (like me) wondering what happened to the cable car http://www.seilbahn-nostalgie.ch/cassons.html |
| 75106171 by SK53 @ 2019-09-30 14:41 | 1 | 2020-04-14 13:23 | mcld ♦68 | I see some location=yes tags here. Were they perhaps intended to be location=roof? |
| 2 | 2020-04-15 09:31 | SK53 | Thanks Dan, have fixed some. Jerry | |
| 77364066 by SK53 @ 2019-11-21 08:59 | 1 | 2019-11-22 09:10 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,I found 325 nodes with the tag "generator:solar: modules" - could you fix the spelling and remove the space?ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-11-22 11:58 | SK53 | Thanks. Looks like the tag should be deleted from a lot of them anyway. I must have inadvertently copied a node with that tagging, because I certainly did not intend to add the module number with these edits. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-22 18:34 | SK53 | OK I've removed the tag (the figure of 18 was probably valid for 1 of them!) | |
| 77288230 by SK53 @ 2019-11-19 19:07 | 1 | 2019-11-20 13:28 | SK53 | I may need to revist whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340864012 is actually a public footpath. There is definitely a post with a waymarker leaving the old service road. I hope I have a photo. |
| 75193357 by SK53 @ 2019-10-02 15:47 | 1 | 2019-11-18 10:18 | mcld ♦68 | Hi - there's quite an odd copy-paste error in these two nodes!https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6844935727https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6844935728I at first thought it might be spam until I recognised your user ID. |
| 2 | 2019-11-18 11:06 | SK53 | Thanks, if one doesn't exit the tag field in iD and then try to copy a solar panel this is what happens. I usually catch them I think.Anyway in fixing them I found another & added the buildings . | |
| 76777827 by SK53 @ 2019-11-07 21:23 | 1 | 2019-11-16 22:07 | mcld ♦68 | Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way 404294617 |
| 2 | 2019-11-16 22:16 | SK53 | Yes, I'd think so & there's a typo. | |
| 73040631 by SK53 @ 2019-08-05 21:14 | 1 | 2019-09-09 20:43 | mcld ♦68 | A presumed typo in node 6685472039: generator:output:electricity="Xu Zhang". I'll change it to "yes" |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 12:07 | SK53 | Thanks | |
| 19667570 by SK53 @ 2013-12-27 19:34 | 1 | 2019-08-23 23:21 | DaveF ♦1,562 | HiWhat's a 'religious_precinct'https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=18/51.35309/-0.16693 |
| 2 | 2019-08-24 19:46 | SK53 | Just what it says, a more general tag than churchyard (works for monasteries, non-Christian religions etc). Tthe widely used tag, particularly in Poland I believe, is just landuse=religious, but I think that misses a bit of context, e.g., when it's a monastery which is also a school. The tag wa... | |
| 73245047 by SK53 @ 2019-08-11 16:03 | 1 | 2019-08-11 16:14 | SK53 | Should be Carn Mill, St Helens |
| 71776219 by SK53 @ 2019-07-01 08:45 | 1 | 2019-07-02 08:16 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,here are 72 objects with the tag "generator:solar:nodules" instead of "...modules". Could you have a look and fix these?Jan |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 08:19 | SK53 | Thanks, was hoping by now iD would autocomplete this one, but have to type the whole damn thing | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 08:23 | SK53 | Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71811740 | |
| 58485005 by SK53 @ 2018-04-27 18:23 | 1 | 2019-04-16 15:24 | VictorIE ♦906 | Is there two versions of the beach here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224267761https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2639647 |
| 2 | 2019-04-16 19:52 | SK53 | Good catch I was in process of removing the beach as an MP, but obviously forgot a bit | |
| 3 | 2019-04-16 19:58 | VictorIE ♦906 | Cool | |
| 68896566 by SK53 @ 2019-04-04 19:25 | 1 | 2019-04-09 20:17 | mcld ♦68 | Hi Jerry - you listed the capacity as 27.5 MW. In the REPD list I see it given as 25.7 MW, so I'm just checking - is that number as intended, or were digits swapped? |
| 2 | 2019-04-09 21:29 | SK53 | Hi Dan, digits swapped for sure. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-09 21:44 | mcld ♦68 | Thanks, fixed | |
| 4 | 2019-04-10 08:41 | SK53 | Good opportunity to say I've added a few others in NI & East Mids but haven't necessarily added a repd:id tag or updated the main list | |
| 34775943 by SK53 @ 2015-10-21 11:43 | 1 | 2019-03-21 18:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Any idea what the fixme on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74484781/history is for? I've merged the details from the pub node with the pub/building way, but I'm not sure what the fixme was added for,Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-03-21 19:04 | SK53 | I'm sure it's not needed know. Looking at the history I probably drew part of the building as a separate building way with the fixme on, and ended up (perhaps) merging them in the same changeset. You can see that the node count goes up at the same time. So I suspect it's been redundan... | |
| 56388649 by SK53 @ 2018-02-15 16:12 | 1 | 2019-03-15 07:34 | alexkemp ♦24 | Chase Farm has already been mapped by myself 2 years ago. There is zero reason to 'guesstimate' it |
| 2 | 2019-03-15 07:39 | alexkemp ♦24 | Ah! It is a guesstimate of *Chase Farm Housing Development* rather than 'Chase Farm'. Perhaps change the name rather than cause search conflicts? | |
| 66645742 by SK53 @ 2019-01-25 22:45 | 1 | 2019-01-30 12:06 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tags gate_finial \thorse_headman_made \tgate_fniialThese are not used in any other place and seem to contain some spelling mistakes.Jan |
| 2 | 2019-01-30 12:45 | SK53 | https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=horses+head+gate+finial&qpvt=horses+head+gate+finial&FORM=IGREand yes the man_made tag is mis-spelt | |
| 34419262 by SK53 @ 2015-10-04 03:29 | 1 | 2019-01-19 19:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | The tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373714377 is spelt wrong, but does it need any other tags (landuse=grass, something like that)? |
| 2 | 2019-01-19 20:13 | SK53 | Fixed, I abhor landuse=grass in this situation (or leisure=pitch etc, golf=hole as a line). Any golf=* tags with the exception of bunker & hazards should be treated as default surface=grass. There's no harm in rendering fairway & green in different greens from the leisure=golf_course of... | |
| 3 | 2019-01-19 20:28 | SK53 | I've now tried to make the golf course cover most of the area which belongs to it including the club house. There are lots of areas of chalets around here which make it a little difficult to separate stuff out. | |
| 66303796 by SK53 @ 2019-01-14 14:28 | 1 | 2019-01-14 21:11 | nplath ♦23 | Why haven't you used the good old 'deciduous'? Or has marscescent another meaning? |
| 2 | 2019-01-15 10:19 | SK53 | Yeah, it has another meaning: trees where the leaves go brown but are not dropped. This is a classic example a Beech hedge, but there are forests of this type (e.g., Pyrenean Oak in Spain). Wikipedia has a write up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcescence (and I must check the spelling). I notice... | |
| 66067674 by SK53 @ 2019-01-06 11:45 | 1 | 2019-01-06 14:37 | Skippern ♦280 | Thanks for your assistance |
| 65880927 by SK53 @ 2018-12-30 06:21 | 1 | 2018-12-30 06:33 | SK53 | I've done as much as I can using Vespucci. Working out which buildings have been demolished to accommodate the new A&E requires a bigger screen. So will return to this shortly. In meantime yes I know there are crossing buildings. |
| 57360018 by SK53 @ 2018-03-20 17:25 | 1 | 2018-12-05 20:44 | neuhausr ♦331 | Quick question, is the leisure=fitness in the old factory off Alfreton Rd to the southwest supposed to be fitness_centre instead? Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-12-05 22:54 | SK53 | Yeah, wanted to avoid amenity=gym; I guess it's leisure=fitness_centre, sport=fitness | |
| 32304579 by SK53 @ 2015-06-30 10:33 | 1 | 2018-12-04 23:15 | VictorIE ♦906 | Hi, Some untagged nodes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823713 - they approximate the boundary line. Can they be deleted? |
| 2 | 2018-12-04 23:16 | VictorIE ♦906 | Similar cluster here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823708#map=17/52.56603/-9.35515 | |
| 3 | 2018-12-04 23:24 | SK53 | Cant see any reason to keep them; or even how they got created in the first place. | |
| 4 | 2018-12-05 11:12 | VictorIE ♦906 | "or even how they got created in the first place" - I know that feeling. :)I think they're all deleted now. | |
| 65094418 by SK53 @ 2018-12-02 12:46 | 1 | 2018-12-02 12:49 | SK53 | Sorry didn't change changeset: this was adding skiing & pitch to Plas y Brennin ski slope |
| 38102029 by SK53 @ 2016-03-27 15:45 | 1 | 2018-11-17 01:17 | Wulfmorn ♦193 | are you sure you want this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081403321 to be highway=step? its a one of a kind tagging globally. :) |
| 64401632 by SK53 @ 2018-11-12 11:18 | 1 | 2018-11-12 12:15 | ACS1986 ♦61 | Hi Jerry, I've fixed this one but for future reference it's 'Wetherspoon' (without an 'a').Kind regards,Adam |
| 64243591 by SK53 @ 2018-11-06 20:16 | 1 | 2018-11-10 22:02 | mrlanduse ♦19 | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solar if you haven't deliberately tagged the solar farm your way. |
| 59425597 by SK53 @ 2018-05-31 10:39 | 1 | 2018-09-19 22:15 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Just to let you know that the correct tag is place=island/islet for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592336417 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592336423 |
| 56461950 by SK53 @ 2018-02-18 12:29 | 1 | 2018-09-11 09:33 | VictorIE ♦906 | Is all of this way a stream? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302619386#map=15/55.2148/-7.0136 |
| 2 | 2018-09-11 15:51 | SK53 | Good spot. No looking at the aerial imagery it probably is not (also comparing with GSGS 4136). I suspect I added the stream tag before I cut the way into pieces. It is certainly a stream where it goes under the R241 and the upper road, as I ground surveyed those locations). I've removed the st... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-11 17:03 | VictorIE ♦906 | Cool. | |
| 53999117 by SK53 @ 2017-11-22 11:39 | 1 | 2018-09-04 22:29 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, the correct tag is amenity=bicycle_repair_station (have fixed it for you) |
| 29493673 by SK53 @ 2015-03-15 12:26 | 1 | 2018-08-08 15:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Any thoughts on what the designation of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59244299/history should be really? There are a couple of "designation=yes" around here... |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 16:03 | SK53 | Ones where I could see the green sign from the car, but couldn't read the lettering IIRC. One might be able to make a guess from old maps (bridleways usually shown as a double dotted line), or just possibly geograph images (although this one shows pretty much the view I had from the car http://... | |
| 60142779 by SK53 @ 2018-06-25 09:24 | 1 | 2018-06-27 14:32 | will_p ♦148 | Hi,Was the change from Costa to LCosta intentional?Will |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 15:01 | SK53 | Naturally not. Vespucci does this kind of odd thing when I'm not looking! For various reasons I haven't reviewed the added data either. Incidentally I surveyed this bit on Sat, but you got your edits in first. I noted that you put DEBRA in all upper case, whereas I'd gone for all lowe... | |
| 59817773 by SK53 @ 2018-06-13 17:28 | 1 | 2018-06-14 12:30 | SK53 | One bit of coastline is wrong way round, should be corrected soon. |
| 59310858 by SK53 @ 2018-05-27 10:46 | 1 | 2018-06-03 16:46 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you check this way, the tag 'strans' looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591343364#map=18/52.89320/-1.08773 |
| 58117273 by SK53 @ 2018-04-15 18:40 | 1 | 2018-04-16 14:17 | SK53 | Adding some detail around Charley Woods NR. Flash blocked me from typing anything at end of edit. |
| 57325003 by SK53 @ 2018-03-19 17:33 | 1 | 2018-04-10 12:38 | BCNorwich ♦4,847 | Hi, could you check Way: 571062876 http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-5.70342&lat=50.06261&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_waypretty sure it's accidentally mapped.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 14:34 | SK53 | Feel free to delete it. Getting imagery to display for these islets proved a bit tricky in Potlatch | |
| 57506721 by SK53 @ 2018-03-25 12:49 | 1 | 2018-03-25 17:29 | will_p ♦148 | Another relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148106 |
| 56849425 by SK53 @ 2018-03-03 15:06 | 1 | 2018-03-19 17:26 | fkv ♦585 | The buildings are not completely gone, there are remains of the walls and interior (a scale). That's why they are tagged with building=* + building_condition=*, just like many other ruins. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:condition . Of course, a ruin should not be rendered ... |
| 55268365 by SK53 @ 2018-01-08 16:06 | 1 | 2018-01-22 11:48 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi in way 549976106 you have put foot=permissive; yes - can you confirm which is correct?ThanksMike |
| 55435350 by SK53 @ 2018-01-14 16:10 | 1 | 2018-01-17 22:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hi - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553075716#map=17/53.13572/-1.29515 is a golf hole/fairway/whatever rather than woodland? |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 13:35 | SK53 | Yes, rather obviously! | |
| 35791541 by SK53 @ 2015-12-06 18:04 | 1 | 2018-01-05 13:22 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | This is a weird, long and untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384707302#map=12/51.6206/-9.3257 ). I presume that's a mistake and can be deleted? |
| 2 | 2018-01-06 10:47 | SK53 | Yes it can be deleted. It's not a mistake, but a temporary element which I should have removed once the boundary was complete. It is a very rough approximation of a barony boundary, which I used as a guide to find the proper townland boundaries. It may appear in the history of the barony relati... | |
| 52409400 by SK53 @ 2017-09-27 10:00 | 1 | 2017-12-23 19:17 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | Did you mean "swing"? not "swng" |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 20:57 | SK53 | probably | |
| 3 | 2017-12-23 21:09 | SK53 | Adding a link to the relevant way makes it a bit easier to check. Yes it should be swing on Old Goole Bridge. As the edit was to stop routers avoiding these bridges: it worked as I intended, even if I didnt quite use the right tag | |
| 44998218 by SK53 @ 2017-01-08 11:14 | 1 | 2017-12-18 16:33 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Just to let you know that I've changed this line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464533061 and others around it to the more used man_made=cutline |
| 38048271 by SK53 @ 2016-03-24 19:35 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405528505 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:10 | SK53 | Wire fence (from photos), now added along with a lot of other features | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 22:22 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 22:29 | SK53 | More to be done. I dont think many field boundaries got added, all TS-C woods need severe tidying up etc. Lots of unmapped woodland towaards Lurgashall. | |
| 20644880 by SK53 @ 2014-02-18 20:42 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2679422663 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:24 | SK53 | A wooden gate; fixed | |
| 33003129 by SK53 @ 2015-07-31 10:40 | 1 | 2017-12-04 00:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | ... so there was I looking for wind turbines, and I found this one. It's the only "power:generator=wind", and there are various other ones in use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wind#values . |
| 52485012 by SK53 @ 2017-09-29 18:22 | 1 | 2017-11-12 22:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I've never been there, but can't believe that "wreck" makes sense here? |
| 2 | 2017-11-12 22:35 | SK53 | I dont either & sound mirror isnt spelt correctly. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-12 22:39 | SK53 | Looks like it was mentor tag-fiddling http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24464842, but I now seem to have changed it to fix (wtf !?) | |
| 52906163 by SK53 @ 2017-10-13 18:48 | 1 | 2017-10-14 11:34 | Pink Duck ♦151 | Why use "St " abbreviation in churches when "St " has for years been unaccepted for road name abbreviations? |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 10:38 | Richard ♦220 | 'St' is standard British orthography to denote a saint, rather than simply an abbreviation. Please see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 10:41 | SK53 | Because it hasn't, please read: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion.I would also suggest being a little lighter in the tone of your comments: it might be offputting ... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 12:29 | Pink Duck ♦151 | I have reviewed 1,034 churches in Norfolk and the Church of England website and I would say around 60% of them use the written word Saint when self-describing. The signage is shortened I believe through brevity, a contraction, not an abbreviation, and for search systems it is far easier to reduce th... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-16 12:35 | Pink Duck ♦151 | In this particular case, I accept the contracted form is acceptable as I can find no official alternate form. The short_name tag will help search agents still match with a full form query. | |
| 52724867 by SK53 @ 2017-10-08 08:43 | 1 | 2017-10-10 10:34 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530972231 really a separate road to the A38? I thought it was just a right turn lane separated by chevrons (as per the imagery)? I know that some other sections are fairly separated (e.g. by the garage) but thought that this wasn't? |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 11:39 | SK53 | Yeah, fairly marginal. There is an island separating the turn lane from straight on. Don't think there are turn restrictions though. I was meaning to add the unrestricted speed limit from the M1 roundabout :-) | |
| 52656181 by SK53 @ 2017-10-05 14:26 | 1 | 2017-10-08 10:12 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1013541520http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3765158987`not:postcode=` instead of perhaps`note=not postcode ...`? |
| 52631010 by SK53 @ 2017-10-04 16:53 | 1 | 2017-10-05 11:00 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | `riyal_cypher=¢VIR` instead of`royal_cypher=GVIR`? |
| 2 | 2017-10-05 11:01 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5148016961 | |
| 3 | 2017-10-06 11:34 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2364969246`ild_name` -> `old_name` ?`old_amenity` -> `disused:amenity` ?`shoo=cacabt` ?!?! | |
| 52515196 by SK53 @ 2017-09-30 15:54 | 1 | 2017-10-01 09:56 | osmaccount ♦4 | Did you mean royal_cypher in the post box? #typo |
| 52313347 by SK53 @ 2017-09-23 20:05 | 1 | 2017-09-24 10:41 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | new key `foor` (instead of `foot`?) athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527121626http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527121624@SK53: i've just commented it for public, which can correct it, if they want. I have no local knowledge, so i won't correct it ;-) |
| 52282210 by SK53 @ 2017-09-22 16:26 | 1 | 2017-09-23 19:57 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8035155 you have tagged `maxpseed` instead of `maxspeed`, right? #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 20:06 | SK53 | Please correct typos, no need to send me a message. | |
| 52212698 by SK53 @ 2017-09-20 14:14 | 1 | 2017-09-22 06:41 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109723260 you have tagged `sourcex` instead of `source`, right? #typo |
| 51848041 by SK53 @ 2017-09-08 14:38 | 1 | 2017-09-21 22:55 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, just in case you're unaware the tag for an asl seems to be cycleway=asl https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088895560 |
| 50698997 by SK53 @ 2017-07-30 17:32 | 1 | 2017-09-16 17:43 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | Some more suspect postcodes in this changeset I think (presumably the same software bug you mentioned before). According to Code-Point Open "NG16 2WX" is right for the Awsworth properties, but not for the ones in Swingate on Babbington Lane. But both sets have been marked: https://overpass... |
| 51346382 by SK53 @ 2017-08-22 15:21 | 1 | 2017-09-11 17:43 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | Are you sure about the postcode of "NG1 2JP" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5051595384 ? The NG1 district is in the centre of Nottingham, about 10km away.(Discrepancy found using http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/location-errors.cgi ) |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 18:14 | SK53 | Typos do happen. I imagine it's NG16 like everything else in Awsworth | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 18:42 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | I wondered that too, but NG16 2JP is in Kimberley, not Ashworth. So it's presumably not just a missing 6. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-11 19:32 | SK53 | It's an unintended Vespucci feature. It assumes that (unless you've flushed the data) the next address will have the same postcode as the last. Normally I spot it and delete the postcode.I've mentioned it to Simon, perhaps I need to file an issue. | |
| 51794157 by SK53 @ 2017-09-06 21:42 | 1 | 2017-09-11 18:20 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5084695926 it should be `post_box:type` instead of `post_box 'type`, right? #newkey #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 18:42 | SK53 | Please fix typos directly & don't send me messages. I'm trying to input a lot of data from 2 big trips whilst my memory is still clear, so I know the data is unlikely to be perfect. | |
| 51919977 by SK53 @ 2017-09-10 20:35 | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:05 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523464013 it should be `name` instead of `nsme`, right? |
| 50115490 by SK53 @ 2017-07-07 18:29 | 1 | 2017-07-09 17:34 | dforsi ♦52 | You may want to check the tag "barruer" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505899095 |
| 2 | 2017-07-09 18:30 | SK53 | Will be checking it anyway as I need to look at photo to see what kind it is & whether there was a stile or gate. Dont know why this didnt autocomplete | |
| 3 | 2017-07-09 23:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I think the bridge at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901990 has got a bit carried away too :) | |
| 4 | 2017-07-10 07:27 | dforsi ♦52 | Sometimes we see strange things :)Also this tunnel with layer=1 should be -1 I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901985 | |
| 49715051 by SK53 @ 2017-06-21 09:21 | 1 | 2017-06-22 07:11 | oormilavinod ♦309 | hey SK53!! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing bad angled roads. please make sure you be little more careful while making edits |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 10:18 | SK53 | Very kind of you to welcome me, but it's a bit late: I've been on OSM since Dec 2008.I've looked very hard for the dragged node, but can't find it. In future please provide the url of the actual object. It saves a lot of time. It may be that whatever you were referring to was... | |
| 45742577 by SK53 @ 2017-02-02 10:28 | 1 | 2017-02-02 11:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Any idea about the overlap between http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430341/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430347 here? |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 12:10 | SK53 | Yes, I plan to merge them in JOSM too tedious to do in PL2! | |
| 3 | 2017-02-02 12:12 | SK53 | Now done | |
| 45654220 by SK53 @ 2017-01-30 14:59 | 1 | 2017-01-30 15:01 | SK53 | Wrong comment: actually merged buildings & nodes of pub & social club to improve element legibility |
| 45366886 by SK53 @ 2017-01-22 10:52 | 1 | 2017-01-24 09:58 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-01-24 10:14 | SK53 | Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-) | |
| 45037764 by SK53 @ 2017-01-09 21:34 | 1 | 2017-01-11 11:31 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you check the ':name' tag of this forest? Looks like you wanted to use another key there.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222070183 |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 11:40 | SK53 | Thanks it needed a source:name | |
| 42931317 by SK53 @ 2016-10-16 08:21 | 1 | 2016-12-18 07:11 | BCNorwich ♦4,847 | With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards |
| 2 | 2016-12-18 21:08 | SK53 | Removed. Turns out it was an accidentally duplicated from the grammar school way even though it doesnt look quite the same. | |
| 41519414 by SK53 @ 2016-08-17 19:17 | 1 | 2016-08-18 18:22 | Robowolfer ♦4 | whats means "source;maxspeed=Bing;Mapillary" ? |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 09:21 | SK53 | Mapillary images were used to determine the values of speed limit changes & Bing the position. Should have a colon not comma | |
| 41531235 by SK53 @ 2016-08-18 10:45 | 1 | 2016-08-18 18:23 | Robowolfer ♦4 | whats means "source;maxspeed=survey" ? |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 09:20 | SK53 | It should, of course, be source:maxspeed=survey. It means that I have driven this road & noted changes in speed limit (rather than used other sources). | |
| 2045166 by SK53 @ 2009-08-05 12:23 | 1 | 2016-08-15 10:28 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Just checking - should http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38572070/history be both an abandoned railway and an admin boundary? If it's the west edge of a cutting I'd guess that it's not actually a (former) railway, and if it (the NR) lies wholly in the county, wouldn't that make th... |
| 41198999 by SK53 @ 2016-08-02 18:25 | 1 | 2016-08-10 12:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | In addition to footway=sidewalk on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4072398 I'd also suggest sidewalk=separate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136720321 .(I know that this all dates from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24421774 , but that mapper appears to be long gone)Cheers,A... |
| 30146274 by SK53 @ 2015-04-11 16:30 | 1 | 2016-08-03 12:29 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Please check oneway http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.164634&mlon=-3.125412&zoom=17 It seems to be in the wrong direction. |
| 28015718 by SK53 @ 2015-01-09 10:10 | 1 | 2016-01-30 00:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Can you remember what sort of shops http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3278263024 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3278247063 were? They're currently "shop=survey" |
| 2 | 2016-01-30 12:02 | SK53 | Yes easy enough as it was a photo survey: clothes & shoes. | |
| 32993254 by SK53 @ 2015-07-30 20:58 | 1 | 2016-01-23 19:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Just wondered if you got a chance to see if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363227213 still exists? I walked past on the main road a couple of weeks ago, and it looks like "Prospect Court" is new-build residential - http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?zoom=18&lat=5... |
| 36548589 by SK53 @ 2016-01-13 12:27 | 1 | 2016-01-14 11:39 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Please check: highway=traffic_island is only used by you. I guess you meant traffic_calming=island? |
| 2 | 2016-01-14 11:47 | GerdP ♦2,751 | sorry, meant only used by you for nodes | |
| 3 | 2016-01-14 12:12 | SK53 | Yes, I did mean it! OSM has free format tagging. I needed to do quite a lot of work on this to replace erroneous edits by someone. | |
| 21473338 by SK53 @ 2014-04-03 09:51 | 1 | 2016-01-12 23:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Just a heads-up - based on the other edits by the user, I suspect that the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1043521532/history (which was created here) might be incorrect and need checking. |
| 30129126 by SK53 @ 2015-04-10 20:34 | 1 | 2015-12-28 19:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Can you think of any reason why http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337856541 shouldn't be man_made=reservoir_covered ? |
| 2 | 2015-12-28 19:28 | SK53 | No! Looks very odd: accidental reuse of tags from another way?Point of reference is garden centre where stopped for a coffee. | |
| 3 | 2015-12-28 19:30 | SK53 | Well can't remember them, but marked as such on OSSV (together with pumping station), so probably noted it was a 'water board' site. | |
| 36051330 by SK53 @ 2015-12-19 17:53 | 1 | 2015-12-23 14:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386672698 really still not complete yet? It's been on the go for a couple of years - I'd have thought it'd be finished by now. |
| 2 | 2015-12-23 17:09 | SK53 | Yup, so would I: marking it as still construction might help getting the it finished. | |
| 3 | 2015-12-24 13:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thinking back, I suspect it probably is complete (I'd have marked it as construction when I added the medical centre 18 months ago I suspect). Would need someone walking past to check though. | |
| 36044071 by SK53 @ 2015-12-19 12:26 | 1 | 2015-12-20 12:05 | MCDA ♦112 | Phewwwwww That was some work! |
| 2 | 2015-12-20 15:11 | SK53 | It's closing down imminently, but I eventually realised that the Geograph picture shows it at the end of the building with the garden centre bit beyond. That gave me a chance by looking at the places I'd previously mapped as landuse=retail. I must say I'd hoped the detective work woul... | |
| 29854708 by SK53 @ 2015-03-30 16:24 | 1 | 2015-10-31 14:31 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review way 335594195:I've changed highway=gallop to highway=bridleway.leisure=track,sport=horse_racing seems to be no good alternative here |
| 2 | 2015-10-31 15:23 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | A horse gallop isn't really a bridleway though, is it? (at least, the ones I'm familiar with, in Notts and Yorkshire, aren't).FWIW I've tended to map them as tracks, but made sure that access and surface are mapped properly, but having them as a distinct highway type isn'... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-31 15:26 | GerdP ♦2,751 | @SomeoneElse:See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/460802Should I revert the change? | |
| 4 | 2015-10-31 15:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I'd definitely revert the changes here and in Yorkshire to "bridleway" - it'll need a bit of investigation into "what do people map horse gallops as" (in the UK and elsewhere). The Yorkshire one's further complicated by the fact that it was mapped ages ago, and gr... | |
| 5 | 2015-10-31 15:47 | GerdP ♦2,751 | what do mean with revert to bridleway?the original mapping was highway=gallop | |
| 6 | 2015-10-31 15:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I meant "revert your changes in which you changed them to bridleway". Sorry I didn't make it clear (English clauses can be ambiguous enough at the best of times). | |
| 7 | 2015-10-31 15:56 | GerdP ♦2,751 | okay, done | |
| 29711417 by SK53 @ 2015-03-24 19:23 | 1 | 2015-10-29 19:52 | GerdP ♦2,751 | bitte prüfen: node 3416433524highway=steil klingt nachincline=* für den Weg? |
| 2 | 2015-10-29 19:57 | SK53 | Thanks, was highway=stile. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-29 19:58 | GerdP ♦2,751 | which should be barrier=stile now ;-) | |
| 4 | 2015-10-29 20:09 | SK53 | Knew there was something missing | |
| 21603175 by SK53 @ 2014-04-10 09:11 | 1 | 2015-10-29 09:39 | southglos ♦120 | HiJust noticed that this changeset added a load of man_made=surveillance / note="On no entry sign pole" by Westbourne Terrace near Sussex Gardens; is it really that Big-Brotherish, or should they be trees?Cheers. |
| 2 | 2015-10-29 12:10 | SK53 | Good spot; I imagine they are trees! They'll be London Planes too. | |
| 1286010 by SK53 @ 2009-05-22 14:10 | 1 | 2015-10-20 11:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/409684580 here either needs to be changed to something or deleted? It just seems to have "Garmin" tags at the moment. |
| 20889679 by SK53 @ 2014-03-03 14:40 | 1 | 2015-10-18 07:17 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:the tag highway=aslbon node 662550884looks like a typo, I've no idea what it meansand it is only used once in OSM |
| 2 | 2015-10-18 09:19 | SK53 | A direct link would really help instead of having either a) to cut-and-paste the value, or b) step through the edited nodes. In fact I can guess fairly straightforwardly that this should be highway=asl and that the key 'b' should have added source=Bing. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-18 09:22 | SK53 | Fixed | |
| 4 | 2015-10-18 09:59 | GerdP ♦2,751 | thanks, I'll paste full links in future comments | |
| 5 | 2015-10-18 16:28 | SK53 | Yes, do please. As most of the edits were shops I wouldn't have guessed exactly what it was immediately. | |
| 19315021 by SK53 @ 2013-12-06 23:58 | 1 | 2015-09-24 12:31 | pratikyadav ♦32 | Thank you for adding the details. |
| 33592375 by SK53 @ 2015-08-26 10:22 | 1 | 2015-08-27 13:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hi Jerry, Which router was it that didn't understand bicycle access through the gates here? |
| 2 | 2015-08-27 13:31 | SK53 | Strava, this one specifically http://labs.strava.com/routing-errors/#250/9/-1.34445/53.26357 | |
| 4853492 by SK53 @ 2010-05-30 15:58 | 1 | 2015-06-11 12:03 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | There's an interesting VMD vs OSSV discrepancy at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/759644115 . The OSSV version of Dover Beck seems to fit with GPS traces (and pretty closely to Bing) further up towards Oxton; I wonder why VMD seems to be 2-3m out? |
| 18891944 by SK53 @ 2013-11-14 11:24 | 1 | 2015-06-09 22:05 | Zbigniew_Cz ♦974 | fajnie byłoby, gdybyś nie poprawiał geometrii ulic do nieskalibowanego podkładu Bing. Swego czasu wyrysowałem dokładnie ulice w Sandomierzu do podkładu z Geoportalu i widzę, że część poprzesuwałeś. |
| 2 | 2015-06-10 07:18 | SK53 | My changes were based on survey & my own GPS traces | |
| 3 | 2015-06-10 07:22 | Zbigniew_Cz ♦974 | ok, thanks | |
| 4 | 2015-06-10 08:56 | SK53 | A more general comment: adding source tags really helps (for instance it would have been obvious that there was another source of aerial imagery in this area). But my Polish edits are only of places I have visited & for which I have GPS traces (and sometimes photos). | |
| 31248655 by SK53 @ 2015-05-18 08:58 | 1 | 2015-06-09 12:48 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hi - I'm guessing you meant "leaf_type=broadleaved" not "leaf_type \tbroad_leaved" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345895603 et al as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leaf%20type?uselang=en-GBI've just tidied up a load of mine in Clipstone... |
| 2 | 2015-06-09 13:34 | SK53 | Yeah can never remember there are at least 3 options with underscore, hyphen or nowt. | |
| 28484731 by SK53 @ 2015-01-29 12:12 | 1 | 2015-03-30 15:09 | neuhausr ♦331 | another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key |
| 2 | 2015-03-30 15:39 | SK53 | thanks, think I've fixed a few (caused by focus of editor being on tag window not edit window). Several probably could do with tiger_reviewed=no being removed | |
| 28973598 by SK53 @ 2015-02-20 09:33 | 1 | 2015-03-27 15:59 | neuhausr ♦331 | there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few) |
| 2 | 2015-03-27 20:33 | SK53 | Thanks for the warning.Hmm, had a quick search and cant see anything particularly dramatic, other than one or two ways with y=Texas, MO. This tag should be deleted (it's one of the useless TIGER Tags). Perhaps you caught any real nasties.Shame its another yurp person doing the spotting! | |
| 3 | 2015-03-27 21:15 | SK53 | Hope I've caught them, mainly where "y" replaces a key value. | |
| 29570971 by SK53 @ 2015-03-18 14:54 | 1 | 2015-03-19 12:24 | will_p ♦148 | I'm guessing this was unintentional: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333428689. It duplicates the Wickes on the other side of the road.Will |
| 2 | 2015-03-19 13:29 | SK53 | Certainly was! | |
| 28470207 by SK53 @ 2015-01-28 17:28 | 1 | 2015-02-11 02:27 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | I don't know how you did this, but you broke an intersection along West Carson Street here in Pittsburgh with this changeset. Somehow, you removed a node from this way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54223992 ), which disconnected a connecting road, which somehow retained the node you remo... |
| 2 | 2015-02-16 18:05 | SK53 | Interesting, possibly an editor bug in potlatch 2.0, or a keyboard glitch (which I've noted in past couple of days), or just possibly a case of editor not loading everything. I was almost entirely using the simplify option to reduce the node count on TIGER imported ways, which then makes it WAY... | |
| 3 | 2015-02-18 10:03 | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Well, I do try to keep a tab on all changesets in the Pittsburgh area when I have the to look at them. Thank goodness for the RSS feed of the local changesets I have. :) |