| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178393510 by SK53 @ 2026-02-11 07:44 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 14 days ago | ivanbranco ♦2,875 | Hi SK53,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542597891what's the meaning of circumference=.2? Does it mean 0.2?what's the meaning of "height=2 7"? Does it mean 2.7? Or does it mean that one stem is 2 and another one 7, since is tagged as multistemmed=yes?thanks an... |
| 53243322 by SK53 @ 2017-10-25 18:42 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi,Very old changeset. :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792711335/https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5189181956/There may be confusion between these two shops. The address and fhrs:id=* data may be an issue. Not clear if Seacoast Stores is still called that. |
| 59844227 by SK53 @ 2018-06-14 12:43 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8381821Apologies, an old edit. :)Could I check what guid=27 means? It's an exceptionally rare tag. |
| 146334363 by SK53 @ 2024-01-16 18:30 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227226873/This says "fixme=demolished (not on latest ESRI Imagery"Is is there now? 7 Sept 2023 imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | SK53 | Yes, obviously replaced between 2020 (Bing Srreetside) and that imagery date. Have removed fixed and put in a start date. | |
| 17998142 by SK53 @ 2013-09-23 20:03 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marc__marc ♦1,507 | Hellohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239128864does coniferous=spruce_woodland mean genus=Picea ?Regards,Marc |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | SK53 | Finally catching up: possibly! The notion of the tag is to delineate a plant community not the dominant_taxon key, where "Picea" would be an appropriate value.This was very much a bit of experimental tagging trying to find relatively simple tags for woodland plant communities. Subseque... | |
| 86937588 by SK53 @ 2020-06-21 15:02 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I think that "location=rii" might be a typo?See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gpC .Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | SK53 | Fixed a few so far: road alignments need a lot of tidying in this area. Will do rest in a sensible editor | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Thanks - down to 388 now... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Now down to 333 - thanks! | |
| 22122165 by SK53 @ 2014-05-04 10:23 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164627765/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this editshop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=trade + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta... |
| 143008767 by SK53 @ 2023-10-23 09:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Karl Addison ♦1 | CLOSED DUE TO HS2 |
| 122241563 by SK53 @ 2022-06-11 09:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068742206/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 95174786 by SK53 @ 2020-12-02 19:45 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Milhouse ♦28 | Hi! Thanks for your awesome work tagging so many solar panels - I've been trying to add more myself to keep the count up to date.On this changeset I noticed a module count that looks several times too big. I'm not sure:1) Whether to cut them down to a single node with a more accurate m... |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | SK53 | Hi,No these look OK. Each group of modules is arranged as 4 rows of 10, so module count of 40 is correct. The idea of mapping each group separately is that it makes it much easier if one wants to convert them to areas.At present a useful way of checking module counts is to draw lines along e... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | Milhouse ♦28 | Ah, brilliant, thanks for the tip about measuring the dimensions of the panels. I didn't know any of that. I'll have to revisit the ones I added in the last week or two to check I haven't undercounted lots!I didn't hear about loss of high resolution imagery, that would be a sha... | |
| 19485961 by SK53 @ 2013-12-16 17:58 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse2 ♦495 | Any idea what "building=s" is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252175919#map=19/53.269303/-3.914435 ? |
| 42071262 by SK53 @ 2016-09-11 05:41 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4395654557/history has shop = pet_supplies that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=pet_supplies ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ? If yes, what... |
| 159519604 by SK53 @ 2024-11-24 02:50 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SK53 | Nottingham Post article on The Waterfront closure https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-news/future-prime-nottingham-pub-suddenly-9720103 |
| 150108648 by SK53 @ 2024-04-17 03:55 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,033 | Heya, I’m not sure it’s right to call Ribblehead a hamlet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/513869708). I’ve always known it as referring to the area of moorland. One pub, one station and a handful of spread-out farms don’t make a hamlet. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Yeah, I'd agree it's a marginal call, but it appears to be in the address for the Station Master's House which is unlikely for a locality. I moved the node closer to where OSGB have it (I.e. near the pub & station). I'd have thought 100 years or so there would have been a... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,033 | Unlikely but not impossible? Ribblehead might just be a special case of addressing.The new location for the node looks fine to me. I agree that 100 years ago it would definitely have been considered a hamlet (probably with a population in the hundreds for a time, if you also count those who live... | |
| 52409183 by SK53 @ 2017-09-27 09:52 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello!You usedcycleway=aslbon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132750414/historyHave you maybe meantcycleway=asl?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used this... |
| 7973092 by SK53 @ 2011-04-26 10:18 ~ 14 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40426231/history has access:psv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | That was probably some variant tagging on use at the time. I suspect it means motor_vehicle=no as well. I will need to check ifbI have a photo | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Yes, No entry except buses sign. Have updated. | |
| 146562468 by SK53 @ 2024-01-22 17:10 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,could you check the trees for uncommon tags? ncc_tree_code = 158320 site_tree_no = 15.00-> reference numbers should use the "ref:XYZ" syntax. sitename = Middleton Boulevard -> seems to be a likely unnecessary object:addr or location tree_type-> shoul... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Yes, well caught : site_tree_no, sitename & tree_type should not be there. The ncc_tree_code is not necessarily a "ref" in OSM terms (it is not the same as the markers on the trees) and is there to allow checks for new trees etc. | |
| 77587998 by SK53 @ 2019-11-26 16:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | kapazao ♦1,001 | Hi, could you explain what is location=heliostat?Is there any other better location tag to use here?Regards |
| 130563259 by SK53 @ 2022-12-27 15:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | My recollection is that this is artificial turf, yes. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Most of them are & have been for many years at least at a decent club standard. | |
| 141074870 by SK53 @ 2023-09-10 17:49 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I'm guessing perhaps residential not reservoir :) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206690291 | |
| 141419311 by SK53 @ 2023-09-18 11:14 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Carlos Brys ♦273 | Thank you very much.I apologize for my mistake. |
| 36920361 by SK53 @ 2016-01-31 16:47 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3980022261field_4=55.181928field_5=-6.720907field_6=1field_4 and field_5 seem to be location. Any idea what field 6 is? |
| 136385221 by SK53 @ 2023-05-21 19:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Source image for VR royal_cypher: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=175971688130124 |
| 65530876 by SK53 @ 2018-12-16 20:15 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hello,I'm guessing that "disused:admin_level=Ulex europeaus" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655452132 presumably isn't what was intended?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 | Fixed now. | |
| 62462217 by SK53 @ 2018-09-10 17:41 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624458106/historysurface=linoWould surface=linoleum would fit ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dlinoleum |
| 134562771 by SK53 @ 2023-04-06 06:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Reviewed and removed/reverted. |
| 133557059 by SK53 @ 2023-03-11 15:12 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | jmarchon ♦440 | Hello,It looks like the Wikidata code you added here is for the brand, not for this specific bank location. I've improved the tagging to reflect this.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | This is actually the head office so it would have been appropriate, but my intention was in creating the wiki data item was to support use as brand. | |
| 115177046 by SK53 @ 2021-12-20 18:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Link to paper on installation of solar panels here. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Forgot link https://www.sd-commission.org.uk/data/files/publications/Bronllys%20Hospital%20Solar%20Energy%20Project.pdf | |
| 115225228 by SK53 @ 2021-12-21 20:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | No idea what the "man_made=standing_stone" such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9356645968/history are like here - are they like any of the first four stones at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/-25.00734/135.17517 ? If so, I can detect them as one category or anothe... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | They are components of modern stone circles (built in 2000 IIRC), but Wales has a lot in the form of Gorsedd stones. A picture here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3311833. Usually such things fall under historic=archaelogical_site, but these are neither. They aren't unique in that quite... | |
| 20049050 by SK53 @ 2014-01-17 11:29 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hungerburg ♦419 | Dear SK, the avalanche_protection features are still in place. Would you mind, if I change those to snow_bridge with underscore (as on the wiki :) and fence for barrier? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | I suppose this is the consensus, I don't think they are fences though, even though they are distinctly barriers. There are all sorts of odd tags with avalanche protection (passive) and (active) which I think can lead to confusion : e.g., showing CatEx as aerialways. There is a distinct prob... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Hungerburg ♦419 | Hmm, snow bridges are barriers, I found a lot, that were mapped fence, nothing else. What would you call this, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684105108 - those are like fins, the mountain sides concrete/stone/walls, the valley side a steep slope. Are those "berms"? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Yes I think I would call them berms. The one's I've mapped closest to this are in the Val St Antonien (and are very characteristic of Walser houses in that valley), and I did use berm (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Avalanche_protection#House_defenses_in_St_Antonien,_Graubunde... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | I'm a little puzzled by these, because although they will disrupt an avalanche flow, they don't seem to be protecting anything on immediately downhill of the obstruction. Retaining wall is clearly wrong as one would expect a retaining wall to have the wall part to be on the lower side. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | They are described as concrete wedges in this document: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/10851_avalancheprotection.pdf.Long ago one of my Praktikants at UBS in Zurich was the son of the director of the Swiss Avalanche Institute, would be a useful contact now. | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | Hungerburg ♦419 | In New Zealand, "avalanche diversion berms" are built, but no image, but diversion sounds right to me.The Arzler Alm Lawine 2019 destroyed most of protection that was there, so these are just rebuilds, they cost 600.000 Euro; https://www.ibkinfo.at/abschluss-sanierung-lawinenbauwerke -... | |
| 8 | ~ 3 years ago | Hungerburg ♦419 | If you put the tiris DGM (lidar) in background, you will see the structures continuing further down and the big dam there too. | |
| 9 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Ah, very interesting. The paper I linked earlier talks about "bumps" which are energy dissipation devices rather than straight protection (they have a high angled face which forces the flow into the air with some loss of energy). The discussion in the paper seems to always associate them w... | |
| 10 | ~ 3 years ago | Hungerburg ♦419 | The paper mentions Arzler Alm! The french site on same page here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8278528709 ? | |
| 11 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Definitely time to start a thread on community.osm. I'll see if I can find some of the Icelandic & Norwegian examples, in the meantime there are also these above Pontresina https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981577482/history#map=17/46.49516/9.90856 | |
| 129198505 by SK53 @ 2022-11-21 13:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Milhouse ♦28 | Hi - I noticed that you changed The Prince of Wales to "outdoor_seating"="no". Do the picnic tables in front of the pub not count?Steven |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Not my intention, so I'll put it back to yes. Jerry | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Done. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Milhouse ♦28 | I thought you might be making a subjective judgement about whether anyone would want to sit outside at a busy road junction! ;-)I think this might usefully be the distinction between "outdoor seating" and "beer garden"...Thanks for putting the key back.Steven | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Hi Steven,No, not in a position to make such judgements. Years since I used to frequent the area. I just happened to see something about the Dodo micropub & was intrigued if it had been mapped & saw the opportunity to add some "fhrs:id" values.I totally agree about "ou... | |
| 119459067 by SK53 @ 2022-04-08 08:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dave Venables ♦177 | I've added a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3434277 as I think this changeset may have accidently dragged a Castle Wharf footpath node across the Nottingham Canal and joined it to Wilford Street. Changeset does have warning:cross_waysI don't seem to be able to disconnect the nod... |
| 124895031 by SK53 @ 2022-08-14 16:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9953006571. What is the meaning of the tag ENE = WSW? |
| 116083331 by SK53 @ 2022-01-12 21:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | redd ♦486 | Hi SK53,thanks for you very active contributions to OpenStreetMap. It seems like you did an typo on building=semidetached_houseqaa on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807477682.Can you have a look again on that one?Thanks,redd |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Jez Nicholson ♦74 | nil desperandum Jerry, I've fixed it. - Jez | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | redd ♦486 | Thank you! | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Jez - thanksredd - I think you can fix things which are obvious typos without needing to contact people. In this case I clearly was trying to square the building whilst focus was in the tag field (and possibly then added a couple of Josm shortcut keys as well!) | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | redd ♦486 | Hi SK53,thanks for that feedback. I did clean up some typos by myself in the past, but it was kind of desperating work. Also feels like very lonely work without any human interaction. Therefore I prefer now to get in touch with the other poeple worrking on OpenStreetMap when I find any errors or s... | |
| 124604213 by SK53 @ 2022-08-07 16:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/880100255/history. Is there any reason to add a character x to the key power? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Thanks for picking it up. I add the "x" which then allows me to divide a way in iD without it creating a relation. I should of course remove the "x" now, which I did do on the other half. As the building & the panel dont coincide it needs editing anyway. | |
| 123772876 by SK53 @ 2022-07-18 17:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | MelancholicSlav ♦25 | Hi, I can agree that Barnstable is better classed as a town than a city, but I am moving the Barnstable town and Hyannis nodes back to where I previously put them. I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be allowed to move city/town nodes to a more central location if I see fit. Hyannis is ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | You are confusing the administrative division of Barnstable with the place within it. There are already admin relations for the "Town of Barnstable" with city type goverment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2387624) and the actual Barnstable which is on Highway 6A (https://www.opens... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | MelancholicSlav ♦25 | The Barnstable village node is now admin_centre of the Barnstable village administrative boundary. Apologies for the confusion. | |
| 72600587 by SK53 @ 2019-07-24 12:40 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | lyctkel ♦363 | Hi SK53 ,currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706967288 which uses building=toilet_block.This tag is only used twice.From my point of view building=toilets would fit better.Regards,lyctkel |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Toilet block, Shower block, Washroom block are pretty standard descriptions for distinct buildings for these purposes (e.g., in campsites, schools, military barracks etc) and I think other forms will always have "block" as part of the name. I must have tagged it this way because that is h... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | lyctkel ♦363 | Hi Jerry,Thanks for the details. I added a description.Regards,lyctkel | |
| 51876993 by SK53 @ 2017-09-09 11:34 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | lyctkel ♦363 | Hi SK53,currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258091038 which uses building=youth_hostel.This tag is only used here.From my point of view building=hostel would fit better. That tag is used 176 times worldwid... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 | Hi,Yes, I think that would be fine, although it may lose a bit of nuance (hostels in UK English may be for other purposes than tourism: students, nurses, workers etc). I wanted to capture that this was purpose built by the YHA and consequently rather unusual.Jerry | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | lyctkel ♦363 | Hi Jerry,I understand your motivation and for the moment no better idea how to map it as is was. I don't care so much if this tag is changed. It is only important for me to understand it and to enable other mappers to understand it as well.It looks to me as if this building is used as a hos... | |
| 50336092 by SK53 @ 2017-07-16 22:00 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | DaveF ♦1,625 | Hihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508028510If accessible by motor vehicle, shouldn't this be track rather than footway? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Interesting question. In practice Hilbre is not accessible by car for anyone other than people with very specific permission (the Land Rover when I visited belonged to a bird ringing group). The owners, Wirral Council are quite clear that it can be visited by foot only https://www.wirral.gov.uk... | |
| 118038368 by SK53 @ 2022-03-03 00:59 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Damn, iDs autocomplete! Thus was adding tags to existingbtooftop solar |
| 114612706 by SK53 @ 2021-12-06 10:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! What is the meaning of the key SK53:solar? Can I assume that this is "only" a private work tag in a production database and thus this tag will disappear again at some point? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Yes, exactly that. Enables buildings mapped initially as nodes can be quickly found in a separate pass for conversion to area (the extra precision afforded by the cadastral parcels means offsets need to be done for each building, which interferes with solar mapping workflow).Subsequently I now h... | |
| 115534852 by SK53 @ 2021-12-29 19:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Of course I meant Stanley Common |
| 115492084 by SK53 @ 2021-12-28 23:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | This was a general tweaking of roads to match imagery realigned to the LR land parcels; not sure why an old changeset comment appeared (autocomplete I expect) |
| 115141823 by SK53 @ 2021-12-19 22:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Sorry unintentially did two separate changes in this changeset (adding cutlines in Owston, Leics, and adding an outdoor centre & archery butts near Llanwrtyd Wells |
| 50311895 by SK53 @ 2017-07-15 19:00 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PeterPan99 ♦43 | In this changeset, you have left 2 ways (507835856 and 507835860) as line features tagged with “natural=wood”, which is normally reserved for area features. Can you resolve this, please? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Took me a while to work out what I intended, but I was using Potlatch where one can copy the last used tags onto a new way & obviously accidentally had touched the wood not the cutline to the N of these too. Now corrected.Thanks for asking: dont think it would be easy for anyone else to work... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | PeterPan99 ♦43 | Thanks for sorting this out. | |
| 58832630 by SK53 @ 2018-05-09 21:08 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PeterPan99 ♦43 | I notice (as part of a MapRoulette Challenge) that in this edit you have left Way 587036831 as a line, but tagged as "leisure=nature reserve", which is normally an area. I am reluctant to delete it from my armchair; can you resolve, please? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | It can go, must have just got left accidentally when I had to chop up the original nature reserve polygon & reassemble on it's much smaller new boundaries. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | PeterPan99 ♦43 | Many thanks. I will delete it. | |
| 115063200 by SK53 @ 2021-12-17 16:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check http://www.om.org/way/255119152. Is there an difference between the use key cadw_ref and ref:cadw ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Thanks, indeed it is. I fancy I've been using cadw_ref for odd things and someone is silently changing them without pointing it out. A bit annoying that the key is formed in a different way to the equivalent key across the border in England.I had been meaning to check what was used, but as ... | |
| 114394070 by SK53 @ 2021-11-30 09:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Panthro83 ♦2 | I've resolved some conflicts as I pushed further updates after your tweaks - (on waie inn building multi polygon - clearly we both had the same idea in improving this building!) |
| 114116518 by SK53 @ 2021-11-22 22:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Bexhill-OSM ♦103 | Nice. I do love a bit of sneaky solar :) |
| 112156887 by SK53 @ 2021-10-06 08:07 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,875 | Hi SK53,what's the meaning of folly=yes? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | See https://e.n.wikipedia.org/wiki/FollyThere are various books on follies in Britain (this is a good overview http://follies.org.uk/index.php/books/), and it would be nice to be able to identify them. My favourite is the Pineapple at Dunmore https://www.nts.org.uk/visit/places/the-pineapple. Ma... | |
| 19017633 by SK53 @ 2013-11-20 16:33 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | This was a while ago, but an odd tag "addr:vector=opposite" appears to be been added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43303737/history in this changeset. There's only one other instance of this key worldwide, so I was wondering what it's purpose is, and if the information wou... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Experimental. The vector represents which way housenumbers go w.r.t to the street way, so opposite means that house numbers rise in the opposite direction to the direction of the way. The idea is that one can start to infer predicted housenumbers based on the vector direction. I stopped thinking abo... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | I guess in principle it is equivalent to addr:interpolation ways on either side of the road. | |
| 20580267 by SK53 @ 2014-02-15 16:36 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | This was a while ago, but an odd tag "addr:vector=backward" appears to be been added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59551258/history in this changeset. There's only one other instance of this tag worldwide, so I was wondering what it's purpose is, and if the information wou... |
| 112896990 by SK53 @ 2021-10-24 08:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,you added a couple of 'gene' tags here, could you check that? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197050224 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113130575Thanks | |
| 111924506 by SK53 @ 2021-09-30 16:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | agggh, accidentally started on St Michaels near St Fagans (not completely used again to PL3's changeset cf iD) |
| 109166100 by SK53 @ 2021-08-04 22:05 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Accidentally used, old changeset description. This was adding the house Afallon on S side of river. It was the former minister's house (on older maps called Blaen-Dyffryn), but Afallon on the post-WWII 1:10560, which is it's current name & the name when my mother lived there 1941-4 (is... |
| 76064484 by SK53 @ 2019-10-22 18:33 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dave Venables ♦177 | I've changed this back to the Blue Bell https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/870029/The-Blue-Bell-Inn-Nottingham as I think Route One is in the Cornerhouse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8976390965 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dave Venables ♦177 | My mistake regarding the cornerhouse. Have moved the recently created Route One node back here. Food Standards have both the Blue Bell Upper Parliament Street and Route One Forman Street which is confusing. Expect they will deactivate the Blue Bell one. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SK53 | Yeah, I actually surveyed this one! I think the Blue Bell always had two addresses. Certainly it had doors at both ends the only time I drank there, seemed a pleasant boozer back then.Some FHRS Ids do tend to be zombies. | |
| 66433766 by SK53 @ 2019-01-18 17:01 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marc__marc ♦1,507 | Hello SK53 :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240132957it's a amenity=clubhouse ?Regards,Marc |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Hi Marc Marc,I'm not sure the tag existed when I did this. Golf clubs in UK can be a bit complicated as some function as private members bars (amenity=social_club), but I think in this case clubhouse is appropriate, as I think the latter case is mainly true in Scotland. But if the club hous... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | marc__marc ♦1,507 | Hello Jerry,thanks for the feedback.feel free to improve the objet, your have the local knownledge I didn't have :)if you don't want it, I can of course take care of itRegards,Marc | |
| 34443555 by SK53 @ 2015-10-05 09:06 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,794 | Hi,I've been looking at tagging, local to me, an arboretum. And I came across this as one of the earlier ones. Looks like it still is, combined with the cemetery. You have it tagged as a nature reserve... would arboretum not be more specific and appropriate? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Abney Park may have been an arboretum around 200 years ago, but certainly not now. Since the cemetery company ran out of cash (1970s IIRC) the place became quite wild with trees self-seeding and growing anywhere. It's full of strange things, which are growing wild: Service Tree of Fontainebleau... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,794 | Ok ... I'll put it into OMH then. Could be a cool place to visit in hot weather. | |
| 21416257 by SK53 @ 2014-03-31 09:55 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | marc__marc ♦1,507 | Hello SK :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390341214Is it deliberate to put the tags on a node of the building?and is this a sailing club or the harbour or both in the same building ?Regards,Marc |
| 102012164 by SK53 @ 2021-03-30 22:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Havent really untangled the two minor power lines heading NNE from substation outside Blaenporth |
| 99833825 by SK53 @ 2021-02-23 14:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ConsEbt ♦27 | Awesome that you spotted it.Did you intentionally not add any capacity numbers?There are sources around?http://www.t2energy.com.au/projects/rugbyrun.htmlhttps://duckduckgo.com/?t=canonical&q=Rugby+Run+solar+farm&ia=web |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Mainly because I'm not familiar with what are usable sources in Oz. We're lucky in the UK because the govt publishes details of all solar farms with power. | |
| 95833243 by SK53 @ 2020-12-14 21:03 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Peter Newman ♦36 | Hi @SK53, I wonder if a lot of these were done by StreetComplete. I don't know the logic behind it, but you could try raising an issue and you might be able to get the value added automatically if it's normal UK tagging:https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/ |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Sounds like it, @trigpoint pointed out a few others elsewhere. Thanks for the hint. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Peter Newman ♦36 | Good luck, happy to give some input if it helps when you've opened the issue. | |
| 97299397 by SK53 @ 2021-01-11 10:44 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,you added the new tag 'dedicatee' here, shouldn't that be 'subject'? |
| 95324282 by SK53 @ 2020-12-05 06:49 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi SK53,Our team recently came across the edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881203327/history while going through this changeset. This particular way created by you was not matching with any of the satellite imageries available. Also since this road is not connected to any parent road segment... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Hi,There was an error in my mapping, but your edits compounded it. In fact the highway=residential should have been landuse=residential. A good clue was that as a road it did not correspond to any aerial imagery. I've now corrected it & removed the road added to fix the non-existent isl... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Thanks for your quick response and fixing the error Jerry. I thought the same, but considering your local knowledge, was doubtful to make the changes before contacting you. Happy that error got resolved.Happy mapping!Jothirnadh | |
| 94758506 by SK53 @ 2020-11-25 08:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Not Brockenhurst, but New Milton |
| 94524402 by SK53 @ 2020-11-20 21:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Please watch out for typos:generator:sola4r:modulesgenerator:solar:m4odulesgenerator:solar:modu2lesgenerator:solar:modules4 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | See how these happened, for some reason the key field got focus not the tag field when overwriting in advanced editor. The numbers should have replaced the number in the tag field. Now fixed. | |
| 92621524 by SK53 @ 2020-10-17 09:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Thanks for deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859897146/history . Do the other edits by this user (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zxk ) look OK? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Not really enough local knowledge (I did wander down past the school/leisure centre complex back in Jan to Machins Lane. Kevjs1982 is more likely to be aware of current status. | |
| 90137025 by SK53 @ 2020-08-30 07:05 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mcld ♦72 | 7 GW? Are you sure?! I might have to come and visit this :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90137025 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7858088791 | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | For some reason this appears as a preset in Vespucci and can therefore be accidentally set. Fixed | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Thanks. I've raised it as an issue here: https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset/issues/209 | |
| 90865655 by SK53 @ 2020-09-14 12:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Thanks!This should resolve the issue raised with the DWG that was mentioned at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2020-September/thread.html#2651 . |
| 89467113 by SK53 @ 2020-08-16 09:51 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Correction Teignmouth not Kingsteignton |
| 89202433 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:33 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 89202973 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 89203221 by SK53 @ 2020-08-10 13:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Correction this is LSOA 6B |
| 88790625 by SK53 @ 2020-07-31 16:03 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Another search for solar using UPRN nodes, but this time I clustered the nodes in QGIS using DBSCAN with distance of 0.0005 degrees and took centroids of clusters. This reduced targets from ~1500 to ~110, although road UPRNs mean the centroids not necessarily located near buildings. With 100 nodes a... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | One further note the FIT number of installations in East Devon 009B LSOA is 83, but I mapped 100. A couple of installations were several discrete panels on farm buildings which upped the count. | |
| 88504004 by SK53 @ 2020-07-25 19:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | On the Eastern approach to the railway you have moved the traffic lights to node 7747294016, while before it was on one ~20 metres to the East.I cycled through this 4 days ago and it has not moved back to its pre-2018 position |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Ah, sorry the position looked very odd & so I checked against Mapillary traces. As the railway line was missing bridges and pedestrian crossings I just thought it was misplaced and dinnt check if it had recently been updated. I'll change it back.The bridge looks to be a low bridge, but ... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Ah, I've reviewed this again and the traffic light position as it was originally was too far East, roughly in line with first house to the S, or around 50 m (has been at that location for a very long time, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/212763059/history), and for some reason thought I ... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | So at the moment the road is closed between March and August (maybe later) due to construction works for the A15 Lincoln Bypass. Beyond the last house the road is closed, however there is still access for pedestrians, cyclists and maybe horses too, however here they share the main road as the paveme... | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Thanks, I'll add the maxheight, and see if I can check any bridges further S (often a railway was built to same tolerances so its a good way to track other missing height restrictions).I'd noticed the street lights but hadn't added them as lit=yes. Sounds like you're tracking... | |
| 88353192 by SK53 @ 2020-07-22 13:51 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check the node http://www.osm.org/node/7737136295 again. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Thanks for the note, someone already edited & I have now restored the correct value. (When copying items in iD, sometimes the focus goes to the tag editor rather than the map and a different paste buffer goes into the key or tag field, but its easy to miss when mapping a single object). | |
| 87711381 by SK53 @ 2020-07-08 12:33 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,033 | Nice work on South Lakes solar recently :) |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | New imagery makes a fantastic difference! | |
| 87540220 by SK53 @ 2020-07-04 20:05 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check the modification of www.osm.org/node/7683585818/history and www.osm.org/node/7683585814/history |
| 86319535 by SK53 @ 2020-06-07 20:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Geaquinto ♦25 | 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 |
| 40708896 by SK53 @ 2016-07-13 10:48 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | This appears to not be part of Inch St Lawrence civil parish. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Gosh, this goes back to the dim & distant past when the boundaries of Co. Limerick were lines drawn around GNIS import nodes. Will have a quick look, but may not have any memory of what I did before. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi, I should have included a link there. :) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TPf | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Ah failed to spot you'd fixed it. No matter have added a few plantations, ringforts & Cistercian Abbey ruins. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | I didn't fix it. This stray bit id the problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430750207#map=14/52.5556/-8.5299 | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Sorry for being dense I was looking for a townland in the wrong parish, should be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430750207#map=14/52.5556/-8.5299 | |
| 79191686 by SK53 @ 2020-01-04 15:19 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | Just wondering if you've made a typo with royal_cypher=àrtVR on this postbox: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7107294126 ... |
| 78418628 by SK53 @ 2019-12-14 22:13 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Hi - is source=solar a glitch? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Yes, presumably iD added the source_ref when I tried to add source=survey. Fixed | |
| 83580935 by SK53 @ 2020-04-15 09:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Great, thanks Jerry. I've just detected this glitch myself, and was about to ask if the tag was deliberate or not. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | I havent corrected them all because I was unable to run josm on my old laptop, but have just done so now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84932590 | |
| 84522593 by SK53 @ 2020-05-02 13:59 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,137 | Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and user/trigpoint were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.Regards Bernard. |
| 84158901 by SK53 @ 2020-04-26 21:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SK53 | Reference for anyone (like me) wondering what happened to the cable car http://www.seilbahn-nostalgie.ch/cassons.html |
| 75106171 by SK53 @ 2019-09-30 14:41 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mcld ♦72 | I see some location=yes tags here. Were they perhaps intended to be location=roof? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Thanks Dan, have fixed some. Jerry | |
| 77364066 by SK53 @ 2019-11-21 08:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,I found 325 nodes with the tag "generator:solar: modules" - could you fix the spelling and remove the space?ThanksJan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Thanks. Looks like the tag should be deleted from a lot of them anyway. I must have inadvertently copied a node with that tagging, because I certainly did not intend to add the module number with these edits. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | OK I've removed the tag (the figure of 18 was probably valid for 1 of them!) | |
| 77288230 by SK53 @ 2019-11-19 19:07 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | I may need to revist whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340864012 is actually a public footpath. There is definitely a post with a waymarker leaving the old service road. I hope I have a photo. |
| 75193357 by SK53 @ 2019-10-02 15:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Hi - there's quite an odd copy-paste error in these two nodes!https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6844935727https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6844935728I at first thought it might be spam until I recognised your user ID. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Thanks, if one doesn't exit the tag field in iD and then try to copy a solar panel this is what happens. I usually catch them I think.Anyway in fixing them I found another & added the buildings . | |
| 76777827 by SK53 @ 2019-11-07 21:23 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way 404294617 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Yes, I'd think so & there's a typo. | |
| 73040631 by SK53 @ 2019-08-05 21:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mcld ♦72 | A presumed typo in node 6685472039: generator:output:electricity="Xu Zhang". I'll change it to "yes" |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Thanks | |
| 19667570 by SK53 @ 2013-12-27 19:34 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | DaveF ♦1,625 | HiWhat's a 'religious_precinct'https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=18/51.35309/-0.16693 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Just what it says, a more general tag than churchyard (works for monasteries, non-Christian religions etc). Tthe widely used tag, particularly in Poland I believe, is just landuse=religious, but I think that misses a bit of context, e.g., when it's a monastery which is also a school. The tag wa... | |
| 73245047 by SK53 @ 2019-08-11 16:03 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Should be Carn Mill, St Helens |
| 71776219 by SK53 @ 2019-07-01 08:45 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,here are 72 objects with the tag "generator:solar:nodules" instead of "...modules". Could you have a look and fix these?Jan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Thanks, was hoping by now iD would autocomplete this one, but have to type the whole damn thing | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SK53 | Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71811740 | |
| 58485005 by SK53 @ 2018-04-27 18:23 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Is there two versions of the beach here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224267761https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2639647 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Good catch I was in process of removing the beach as an MP, but obviously forgot a bit | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Cool | |
| 68896566 by SK53 @ 2019-04-04 19:25 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Hi Jerry - you listed the capacity as 27.5 MW. In the REPD list I see it given as 25.7 MW, so I'm just checking - is that number as intended, or were digits swapped? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Hi Dan, digits swapped for sure. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | mcld ♦72 | Thanks, fixed | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Good opportunity to say I've added a few others in NI & East Mids but haven't necessarily added a repd:id tag or updated the main list | |
| 34775943 by SK53 @ 2015-10-21 11:43 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Any idea what the fixme on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74484781/history is for? I've merged the details from the pub node with the pub/building way, but I'm not sure what the fixme was added for,Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | I'm sure it's not needed know. Looking at the history I probably drew part of the building as a separate building way with the fixme on, and ended up (perhaps) merging them in the same changeset. You can see that the node count goes up at the same time. So I suspect it's been redundan... | |
| 56388649 by SK53 @ 2018-02-15 16:12 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | alexkemp ♦24 | Chase Farm has already been mapped by myself 2 years ago. There is zero reason to 'guesstimate' it |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | alexkemp ♦24 | Ah! It is a guesstimate of *Chase Farm Housing Development* rather than 'Chase Farm'. Perhaps change the name rather than cause search conflicts? | |
| 66645742 by SK53 @ 2019-01-25 22:45 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tags gate_finial \thorse_headman_made \tgate_fniialThese are not used in any other place and seem to contain some spelling mistakes.Jan |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=horses+head+gate+finial&qpvt=horses+head+gate+finial&FORM=IGREand yes the man_made tag is mis-spelt | |
| 34419262 by SK53 @ 2015-10-04 03:29 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | The tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373714377 is spelt wrong, but does it need any other tags (landuse=grass, something like that)? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Fixed, I abhor landuse=grass in this situation (or leisure=pitch etc, golf=hole as a line). Any golf=* tags with the exception of bunker & hazards should be treated as default surface=grass. There's no harm in rendering fairway & green in different greens from the leisure=golf_course of... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | I've now tried to make the golf course cover most of the area which belongs to it including the club house. There are lots of areas of chalets around here which make it a little difficult to separate stuff out. | |
| 66303796 by SK53 @ 2019-01-14 14:28 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | nplath ♦23 | Why haven't you used the good old 'deciduous'? Or has marscescent another meaning? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Yeah, it has another meaning: trees where the leaves go brown but are not dropped. This is a classic example a Beech hedge, but there are forests of this type (e.g., Pyrenean Oak in Spain). Wikipedia has a write up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcescence (and I must check the spelling). I notice... | |
| 66067674 by SK53 @ 2019-01-06 11:45 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Skippern ♦280 | Thanks for your assistance |
| 65880927 by SK53 @ 2018-12-30 06:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | I've done as much as I can using Vespucci. Working out which buildings have been demolished to accommodate the new A&E requires a bigger screen. So will return to this shortly. In meantime yes I know there are crossing buildings. |
| 57360018 by SK53 @ 2018-03-20 17:25 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | neuhausr ♦346 | Quick question, is the leisure=fitness in the old factory off Alfreton Rd to the southwest supposed to be fitness_centre instead? Thanks |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Yeah, wanted to avoid amenity=gym; I guess it's leisure=fitness_centre, sport=fitness | |
| 32304579 by SK53 @ 2015-06-30 10:33 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Hi, Some untagged nodes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823713 - they approximate the boundary line. Can they be deleted? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Similar cluster here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823708#map=17/52.56603/-9.35515 | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Cant see any reason to keep them; or even how they got created in the first place. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | "or even how they got created in the first place" - I know that feeling. :)I think they're all deleted now. | |
| 65094418 by SK53 @ 2018-12-02 12:46 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Sorry didn't change changeset: this was adding skiing & pitch to Plas y Brennin ski slope |
| 38102029 by SK53 @ 2016-03-27 15:45 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Wulfmorn ♦195 | are you sure you want this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081403321 to be highway=step? its a one of a kind tagging globally. :) |
| 64401632 by SK53 @ 2018-11-12 11:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ACS1986 ♦61 | Hi Jerry, I've fixed this one but for future reference it's 'Wetherspoon' (without an 'a').Kind regards,Adam |
| 64243591 by SK53 @ 2018-11-06 20:16 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mrlanduse ♦19 | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solar if you haven't deliberately tagged the solar farm your way. |
| 59425597 by SK53 @ 2018-05-31 10:39 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Just to let you know that the correct tag is place=island/islet for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592336417 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592336423 |
| 56461950 by SK53 @ 2018-02-18 12:29 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Is all of this way a stream? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302619386#map=15/55.2148/-7.0136 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Good spot. No looking at the aerial imagery it probably is not (also comparing with GSGS 4136). I suspect I added the stream tag before I cut the way into pieces. It is certainly a stream where it goes under the R241 and the upper road, as I ground surveyed those locations). I've removed the st... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | VictorIE ♦1,081 | Cool. | |
| 53999117 by SK53 @ 2017-11-22 11:39 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Hi, the correct tag is amenity=bicycle_repair_station (have fixed it for you) |
| 29493673 by SK53 @ 2015-03-15 12:26 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Any thoughts on what the designation of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59244299/history should be really? There are a couple of "designation=yes" around here... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Ones where I could see the green sign from the car, but couldn't read the lettering IIRC. One might be able to make a guess from old maps (bridleways usually shown as a double dotted line), or just possibly geograph images (although this one shows pretty much the view I had from the car http://... | |
| 60142779 by SK53 @ 2018-06-25 09:24 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | will_p ♦149 | Hi,Was the change from Costa to LCosta intentional?Will |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | Naturally not. Vespucci does this kind of odd thing when I'm not looking! For various reasons I haven't reviewed the added data either. Incidentally I surveyed this bit on Sat, but you got your edits in first. I noted that you put DEBRA in all upper case, whereas I'd gone for all lowe... | |
| 59817773 by SK53 @ 2018-06-13 17:28 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SK53 | One bit of coastline is wrong way round, should be corrected soon. |
| 59310858 by SK53 @ 2018-05-27 10:46 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,could you check this way, the tag 'strans' looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591343364#map=18/52.89320/-1.08773 |
| 58117273 by SK53 @ 2018-04-15 18:40 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Adding some detail around Charley Woods NR. Flash blocked me from typing anything at end of edit. |
| 57325003 by SK53 @ 2018-03-19 17:33 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,137 | Hi, could you check Way: 571062876 http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-5.70342&lat=50.06261&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_waypretty sure it's accidentally mapped.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Feel free to delete it. Getting imagery to display for these islets proved a bit tricky in Potlatch | |
| 57506721 by SK53 @ 2018-03-25 12:49 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | will_p ♦149 | Another relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148106 |
| 56849425 by SK53 @ 2018-03-03 15:06 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | fkv ♦585 | The buildings are not completely gone, there are remains of the walls and interior (a scale). That's why they are tagged with building=* + building_condition=*, just like many other ruins. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:condition . Of course, a ruin should not be rendered ... |
| 55268365 by SK53 @ 2018-01-08 16:06 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi in way 549976106 you have put foot=permissive; yes - can you confirm which is correct?ThanksMike |
| 55435350 by SK53 @ 2018-01-14 16:10 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hi - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553075716#map=17/53.13572/-1.29515 is a golf hole/fairway/whatever rather than woodland? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Yes, rather obviously! | |
| 35791541 by SK53 @ 2015-12-06 18:04 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️⚧️ ♦364 | This is a weird, long and untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384707302#map=12/51.6206/-9.3257 ). I presume that's a mistake and can be deleted? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Yes it can be deleted. It's not a mistake, but a temporary element which I should have removed once the boundary was complete. It is a very rough approximation of a barony boundary, which I used as a guide to find the proper townland boundaries. It may appear in the history of the barony relati... | |
| 52409400 by SK53 @ 2017-09-27 10:00 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | Did you mean "swing"? not "swng" |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | probably | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Adding a link to the relevant way makes it a bit easier to check. Yes it should be swing on Old Goole Bridge. As the edit was to stop routers avoiding these bridges: it worked as I intended, even if I didnt quite use the right tag | |
| 44998218 by SK53 @ 2017-01-08 11:14 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Just to let you know that I've changed this line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464533061 and others around it to the more used man_made=cutline |
| 38048271 by SK53 @ 2016-03-24 19:35 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405528505 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Wire fence (from photos), now added along with a lot of other features | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Thanks! | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | More to be done. I dont think many field boundaries got added, all TS-C woods need severe tidying up etc. Lots of unmapped woodland towaards Lurgashall. | |
| 20644880 by SK53 @ 2014-02-18 20:42 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2679422663 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | A wooden gate; fixed | |
| 33003129 by SK53 @ 2015-07-31 10:40 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | ... so there was I looking for wind turbines, and I found this one. It's the only "power:generator=wind", and there are various other ones in use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wind#values . |
| 52485012 by SK53 @ 2017-09-29 18:22 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I've never been there, but can't believe that "wreck" makes sense here? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | I dont either & sound mirror isnt spelt correctly. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Looks like it was mentor tag-fiddling http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24464842, but I now seem to have changed it to fix (wtf !?) | |
| 52906163 by SK53 @ 2017-10-13 18:48 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Pink Duck ♦171 | Why use "St " abbreviation in churches when "St " has for years been unaccepted for road name abbreviations? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Richard ♦226 | 'St' is standard British orthography to denote a saint, rather than simply an abbreviation. Please see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Because it hasn't, please read: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion.I would also suggest being a little lighter in the tone of your comments: it might be offputting ... | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | Pink Duck ♦171 | I have reviewed 1,034 churches in Norfolk and the Church of England website and I would say around 60% of them use the written word Saint when self-describing. The signage is shortened I believe through brevity, a contraction, not an abbreviation, and for search systems it is far easier to reduce th... | |
| 5 | ~ 8 years ago | Pink Duck ♦171 | In this particular case, I accept the contracted form is acceptable as I can find no official alternate form. The short_name tag will help search agents still match with a full form query. | |
| 52724867 by SK53 @ 2017-10-08 08:43 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530972231 really a separate road to the A38? I thought it was just a right turn lane separated by chevrons (as per the imagery)? I know that some other sections are fairly separated (e.g. by the garage) but thought that this wasn't? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Yeah, fairly marginal. There is an island separating the turn lane from straight on. Don't think there are turn restrictions though. I was meaning to add the unrestricted speed limit from the M1 roundabout :-) | |
| 52656181 by SK53 @ 2017-10-05 14:26 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1013541520http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3765158987`not:postcode=` instead of perhaps`note=not postcode ...`? |
| 52631010 by SK53 @ 2017-10-04 16:53 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | `riyal_cypher=¢VIR` instead of`royal_cypher=GVIR`? |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5148016961 | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2364969246`ild_name` -> `old_name` ?`old_amenity` -> `disused:amenity` ?`shoo=cacabt` ?!?! | |
| 52515196 by SK53 @ 2017-09-30 15:54 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | osmaccount ♦5 | Did you mean royal_cypher in the post box? #typo |
| 52313347 by SK53 @ 2017-09-23 20:05 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | new key `foor` (instead of `foot`?) athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527121626http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527121624@SK53: i've just commented it for public, which can correct it, if they want. I have no local knowledge, so i won't correct it ;-) |
| 52282210 by SK53 @ 2017-09-22 16:26 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8035155 you have tagged `maxpseed` instead of `maxspeed`, right? #typo |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Please correct typos, no need to send me a message. | |
| 52212698 by SK53 @ 2017-09-20 14:14 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109723260 you have tagged `sourcex` instead of `source`, right? #typo |
| 51848041 by SK53 @ 2017-09-08 14:38 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,307 | Hi, just in case you're unaware the tag for an asl seems to be cycleway=asl https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088895560 |
| 50698997 by SK53 @ 2017-07-30 17:32 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | Some more suspect postcodes in this changeset I think (presumably the same software bug you mentioned before). According to Code-Point Open "NG16 2WX" is right for the Awsworth properties, but not for the ones in Swingate on Babbington Lane. But both sets have been marked: https://overpass... |
| 51346382 by SK53 @ 2017-08-22 15:21 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | Are you sure about the postcode of "NG1 2JP" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5051595384 ? The NG1 district is in the centre of Nottingham, about 10km away.(Discrepancy found using http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/location-errors.cgi ) |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Typos do happen. I imagine it's NG16 like everything else in Awsworth | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | Robert Whittaker ♦306 | I wondered that too, but NG16 2JP is in Kimberley, not Ashworth. So it's presumably not just a missing 6. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | It's an unintended Vespucci feature. It assumes that (unless you've flushed the data) the next address will have the same postcode as the last. Normally I spot it and delete the postcode.I've mentioned it to Simon, perhaps I need to file an issue. | |
| 51794157 by SK53 @ 2017-09-06 21:42 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5084695926 it should be `post_box:type` instead of `post_box 'type`, right? #newkey #typo |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Please fix typos directly & don't send me messages. I'm trying to input a lot of data from 2 big trips whilst my memory is still clear, so I know the data is unlikely to be perfect. | |
| 51919977 by SK53 @ 2017-09-10 20:35 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Harald Hartmann ♦837 | Hello SK53. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523464013 it should be `name` instead of `nsme`, right? |
| 50115490 by SK53 @ 2017-07-07 18:29 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | dforsi ♦52 | You may want to check the tag "barruer" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505899095 |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Will be checking it anyway as I need to look at photo to see what kind it is & whether there was a stile or gate. Dont know why this didnt autocomplete | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I think the bridge at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901990 has got a bit carried away too :) | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | dforsi ♦52 | Sometimes we see strange things :)Also this tunnel with layer=1 should be -1 I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901985 | |
| 49715051 by SK53 @ 2017-06-21 09:21 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | oormilavinod ♦309 | hey SK53!! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing bad angled roads. please make sure you be little more careful while making edits |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SK53 | Very kind of you to welcome me, but it's a bit late: I've been on OSM since Dec 2008.I've looked very hard for the dragged node, but can't find it. In future please provide the url of the actual object. It saves a lot of time. It may be that whatever you were referring to was... | |
| 45742577 by SK53 @ 2017-02-02 10:28 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Any idea about the overlap between http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430341/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430347 here? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Yes, I plan to merge them in JOSM too tedious to do in PL2! | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Now done | |
| 45654220 by SK53 @ 2017-01-30 14:59 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Wrong comment: actually merged buildings & nodes of pub & social club to improve element legibility |
| 45366886 by SK53 @ 2017-01-22 10:52 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-) | |
| 45037764 by SK53 @ 2017-01-09 21:34 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,041 | Hi,could you check the ':name' tag of this forest? Looks like you wanted to use another key there.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222070183 |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Thanks it needed a source:name | |
| 42931317 by SK53 @ 2016-10-16 08:21 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,137 | With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Removed. Turns out it was an accidentally duplicated from the grammar school way even though it doesnt look quite the same. | |
| 41519414 by SK53 @ 2016-08-17 19:17 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Robowolfer ♦4 | whats means "source;maxspeed=Bing;Mapillary" ? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | Mapillary images were used to determine the values of speed limit changes & Bing the position. Should have a colon not comma | |
| 41531235 by SK53 @ 2016-08-18 10:45 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Robowolfer ♦4 | whats means "source;maxspeed=survey" ? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SK53 | It should, of course, be source:maxspeed=survey. It means that I have driven this road & noted changes in speed limit (rather than used other sources). | |
| 2045166 by SK53 @ 2009-08-05 12:23 ~ 16 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Just checking - should http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38572070/history be both an abandoned railway and an admin boundary? If it's the west edge of a cutting I'd guess that it's not actually a (former) railway, and if it (the NR) lies wholly in the county, wouldn't that make th... |
| 41198999 by SK53 @ 2016-08-02 18:25 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | In addition to footway=sidewalk on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4072398 I'd also suggest sidewalk=separate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136720321 .(I know that this all dates from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24421774 , but that mapper appears to be long gone)Cheers,A... |
| 30146274 by SK53 @ 2015-04-11 16:30 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | Please check oneway http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.164634&mlon=-3.125412&zoom=17 It seems to be in the wrong direction. |
| 28015718 by SK53 @ 2015-01-09 10:10 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Can you remember what sort of shops http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3278263024 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3278247063 were? They're currently "shop=survey" |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Yes easy enough as it was a photo survey: clothes & shoes. | |
| 32993254 by SK53 @ 2015-07-30 20:58 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Just wondered if you got a chance to see if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363227213 still exists? I walked past on the main road a couple of weeks ago, and it looks like "Prospect Court" is new-build residential - http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?zoom=18&lat=5... |
| 36548589 by SK53 @ 2016-01-13 12:27 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | Please check: highway=traffic_island is only used by you. I guess you meant traffic_calming=island? |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | sorry, meant only used by you for nodes | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Yes, I did mean it! OSM has free format tagging. I needed to do quite a lot of work on this to replace erroneous edits by someone. | |
| 21473338 by SK53 @ 2014-04-03 09:51 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Just a heads-up - based on the other edits by the user, I suspect that the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1043521532/history (which was created here) might be incorrect and need checking. |
| 30129126 by SK53 @ 2015-04-10 20:34 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Can you think of any reason why http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337856541 shouldn't be man_made=reservoir_covered ? |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | No! Looks very odd: accidental reuse of tags from another way?Point of reference is garden centre where stopped for a coffee. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Well can't remember them, but marked as such on OSSV (together with pumping station), so probably noted it was a 'water board' site. | |
| 36051330 by SK53 @ 2015-12-19 17:53 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386672698 really still not complete yet? It's been on the go for a couple of years - I'd have thought it'd be finished by now. |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Yup, so would I: marking it as still construction might help getting the it finished. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Thinking back, I suspect it probably is complete (I'd have marked it as construction when I added the medical centre 18 months ago I suspect). Would need someone walking past to check though. | |
| 36044071 by SK53 @ 2015-12-19 12:26 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | MCDA ♦114 | Phewwwwww That was some work! |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | It's closing down imminently, but I eventually realised that the Geograph picture shows it at the end of the building with the garden centre bit beyond. That gave me a chance by looking at the places I'd previously mapped as landuse=retail. I must say I'd hoped the detective work woul... | |
| 29854708 by SK53 @ 2015-03-30 16:24 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | please review way 335594195:I've changed highway=gallop to highway=bridleway.leisure=track,sport=horse_racing seems to be no good alternative here |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | A horse gallop isn't really a bridleway though, is it? (at least, the ones I'm familiar with, in Notts and Yorkshire, aren't).FWIW I've tended to map them as tracks, but made sure that access and surface are mapped properly, but having them as a distinct highway type isn'... | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | @SomeoneElse:See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/460802Should I revert the change? | |
| 4 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I'd definitely revert the changes here and in Yorkshire to "bridleway" - it'll need a bit of investigation into "what do people map horse gallops as" (in the UK and elsewhere). The Yorkshire one's further complicated by the fact that it was mapped ages ago, and gr... | |
| 5 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | what do mean with revert to bridleway?the original mapping was highway=gallop | |
| 6 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I meant "revert your changes in which you changed them to bridleway". Sorry I didn't make it clear (English clauses can be ambiguous enough at the best of times). | |
| 7 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | okay, done | |
| 29711417 by SK53 @ 2015-03-24 19:23 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | bitte prüfen: node 3416433524highway=steil klingt nachincline=* für den Weg? |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Thanks, was highway=stile. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | which should be barrier=stile now ;-) | |
| 4 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Knew there was something missing | |
| 21603175 by SK53 @ 2014-04-10 09:11 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | southglos ♦121 | HiJust noticed that this changeset added a load of man_made=surveillance / note="On no entry sign pole" by Westbourne Terrace near Sussex Gardens; is it really that Big-Brotherish, or should they be trees?Cheers. |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Good spot; I imagine they are trees! They'll be London Planes too. | |
| 1286010 by SK53 @ 2009-05-22 14:10 ~ 16 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/409684580 here either needs to be changed to something or deleted? It just seems to have "Garmin" tags at the moment. |
| 20889679 by SK53 @ 2014-03-03 14:40 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | please review:the tag highway=aslbon node 662550884looks like a typo, I've no idea what it meansand it is only used once in OSM |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | A direct link would really help instead of having either a) to cut-and-paste the value, or b) step through the edited nodes. In fact I can guess fairly straightforwardly that this should be highway=asl and that the key 'b' should have added source=Bing. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Fixed | |
| 4 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,829 | thanks, I'll paste full links in future comments | |
| 5 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Yes, do please. As most of the edits were shops I wouldn't have guessed exactly what it was immediately. | |
| 19315021 by SK53 @ 2013-12-06 23:58 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | pratikyadav ♦32 | Thank you for adding the details. |
| 33592375 by SK53 @ 2015-08-26 10:22 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hi Jerry, Which router was it that didn't understand bicycle access through the gates here? |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Strava, this one specifically http://labs.strava.com/routing-errors/#250/9/-1.34445/53.26357 | |
| 4853492 by SK53 @ 2010-05-30 15:58 ~ 15 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | There's an interesting VMD vs OSSV discrepancy at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/759644115 . The OSSV version of Dover Beck seems to fit with GPS traces (and pretty closely to Bing) further up towards Oxton; I wonder why VMD seems to be 2-3m out? |
| 18891944 by SK53 @ 2013-11-14 11:24 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | Zbigniew_Cz ♦980 | fajnie byłoby, gdybyś nie poprawiał geometrii ulic do nieskalibowanego podkładu Bing. Swego czasu wyrysowałem dokładnie ulice w Sandomierzu do podkładu z Geoportalu i widzę, że część poprzesuwałeś. |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | My changes were based on survey & my own GPS traces | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | Zbigniew_Cz ♦980 | ok, thanks | |
| 4 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | A more general comment: adding source tags really helps (for instance it would have been obvious that there was another source of aerial imagery in this area). But my Polish edits are only of places I have visited & for which I have GPS traces (and sometimes photos). | |
| 31248655 by SK53 @ 2015-05-18 08:58 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hi - I'm guessing you meant "leaf_type=broadleaved" not "leaf_type \tbroad_leaved" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345895603 et al as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leaf%20type?uselang=en-GBI've just tidied up a load of mine in Clipstone... |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | SK53 | Yeah can never remember there are at least 3 options with underscore, hyphen or nowt. | |
| 28484731 by SK53 @ 2015-01-29 12:12 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | neuhausr ♦346 | another changeset which left a number of ways with incorrect key tags - see OSMI http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-79.93033&lat=42.04117&zoom=10&opacity=0.96&overlays=way_with_short_or_long_key |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SK53 | thanks, think I've fixed a few (caused by focus of editor being on tag window not edit window). Several probably could do with tiger_reviewed=no being removed | |
| 28973598 by SK53 @ 2015-02-20 09:33 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | neuhausr ♦346 | there's a bunch of key typos in this changeset, can you try to review & fix? (I noticed w/ OSM Inspector & did a few) |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SK53 | Thanks for the warning.Hmm, had a quick search and cant see anything particularly dramatic, other than one or two ways with y=Texas, MO. This tag should be deleted (it's one of the useless TIGER Tags). Perhaps you caught any real nasties.Shame its another yurp person doing the spotting! | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | SK53 | Hope I've caught them, mainly where "y" replaces a key value. | |
| 29570971 by SK53 @ 2015-03-18 14:54 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | will_p ♦149 | I'm guessing this was unintentional: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333428689. It duplicates the Wickes on the other side of the road.Will |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SK53 | Certainly was! | |
| 28470207 by SK53 @ 2015-01-28 17:28 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | I don't know how you did this, but you broke an intersection along West Carson Street here in Pittsburgh with this changeset. Somehow, you removed a node from this way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54223992 ), which disconnected a connecting road, which somehow retained the node you remo... |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SK53 | Interesting, possibly an editor bug in potlatch 2.0, or a keyboard glitch (which I've noted in past couple of days), or just possibly a case of editor not loading everything. I was almost entirely using the simplify option to reduce the node count on TIGER imported ways, which then makes it WAY... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | rickmastfan67 ♦234 | Well, I do try to keep a tab on all changesets in the Pittsburgh area when I have the to look at them. Thank goodness for the RSS feed of the local changesets I have. :) |