| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 179415432 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2026-03-05 20:58 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Wildsharky ♦346 | Revert of 179409197 |
| 178900016 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2026-02-22 14:00 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | MappingMore ♦340 | Revert of 178895298 |
| 174394863 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2025-11-08 21:16 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | Thanks for fixing :) |
| 149582652 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2024-04-04 18:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | Hi Sam, can you take a look Duaboni 1 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335766401 to confirm https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2164260850 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Sammyhawkrad | Duaboni 1 seems to be the right location. Verifying from my sources the label could be pointing to one of the two locations. | |
| 63060197 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2018-09-30 10:57 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5940464540/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplac... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Hi Mateusz, you are definitely correct. This should be place_of_worship. It's an edit from my early days and I guess OsmAnd didn't help with a good suggestion.Fixing it right away. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Thanks for a quick fix and followup on this ancient edit! | |
| 141302589 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2023-09-15 13:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | VlIvYur ♦154 | HelloIt's not the first time when you added linkedin tag that is not used by anyone except you in OSM. Others social links without contact: prefix are also not very popular. Consider using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:* scheme |
| 140858214 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2023-09-05 16:15 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please use the standard keys! Seehttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=whatsapp#keyshttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=linkedin#keysWhat ist the source and license of the import? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Keys without the contact prefix are equally valid.This is more of an update than an import. The name of the company has changed so I updated the names and added information gathered from their website. Each of item has a source tag | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Please reconsider your way of thinking with regard to the mentioned keys. Just because one spelling looks the same to people, the evaluation for linkedin must now be adapted. In my opinion, you are welcome to stick to the spelling without contact for your phone, email and facebook. | |
| 126521975 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2022-09-22 21:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | I am sure it should be moved to Mango Street instead but where? |
| 78599152 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2019-12-18 19:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | I have moved this node to the nearest building that looks more like a church, could you kindly review/confirm/revert. Thank you. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | I think you have placed it at the right location. I added it from the position of a note | |
| 104762182 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2021-05-16 10:14 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | Seems no visible strutures exist around node, may be take a look again. Also use ISO8601 for dates i.e. yyyy-mm-dd |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | It's a new school, the building structure is not visible on the available satellite imagery yet. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | thank you :), happy mapping | |
| 99766064 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2021-02-22 18:48 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | You might want to review the connectivity of "Dr. Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe Street" |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Alright sure | |
| 103134966 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2021-04-18 12:21 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | Use title cases and avoid UPPERCASES :) |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Haha I only use the acronym SHS or SHTS in the changeset comments | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Oh okay, in the description tag, my bad | |
| 78938545 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2019-12-27 18:54 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | InsertUser ♦484 | If the feature has always been listed as sourced form Google, it should be deleted rather than have its history obscured. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Are you saying I should delete the whole feature? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | InsertUser ♦484 | I would think so. The problem isn't that the tag contains a banned word, the problem that the source is one that OSM doesn't have permission to use.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | The object has been deleted --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/78938545 | |
| 77744814 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2019-11-29 22:08 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7020739683/historyHave you meant something like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dwaste_disposal ? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | No I didn't mean that. If you check the area, you can see that different waste tags have been used with each meeting the tagging convention. amenity=waste_dump_site here is used for unauthorised and indiscriminate waste disposal points. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Maybe landuse=landfill + informal=yes would fit in such case? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill "Unofficial dumping grounds" | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | It isn't a landfill site so it cannot be tagged as such. amenity=waste_disposal, amenity=waste_basket, amenity=recycling have all been used here but in this instance none of them fits. This is a local tag to meet a local need. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Do you have site of such location? WOuld https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HOUSEHOLD_TRASH_HAS_BEEN_DUMPED_IN_FRONT_OF_THE_NEW_YORK_CITY_INCINERATOR_PLANT_AT_GRAVESEND_BAY_-_NARA_-_547868_-_restored.jpg be a good illustration?I agree that landuse=landfill + informal=yes is also not ideal.\... | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Argh, it was supposed to be:Do you have photo of such location? Would https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HOUSEHOLD_TRASH_HAS_BEEN_DUMPED_IN_FRONT_OF_THE_NEW_YORK_CITY_INCINERATOR_PLANT_AT_GRAVESEND_BAY_-_NARA_-_547868_-_restored.jpg be a good illustration? | |
| 7 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | This is an example of ithttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Illegal_Waste_Dump_Site_in_Alogboshie,_Accra.jpg | |
| 8 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,769 | Thanks! I added it to OSM Wiki page documenting this tag.And I can say that landuse=landfill + informal=yes was definitely used for such cases.(though https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like definitely applies here) | |
| 86685556 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2020-06-15 19:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | pio2_122 ♦1,075 | Why are you drawing a building on an existing building?(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816300772, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816300771, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816300770) |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | My bad, I have been mapping offline and I failed to sync before uploading my changeset | |
| 86142643 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2020-06-03 15:04 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Rwawn ♦1 | شارع احمد الصاوي طنطا |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Rwawn ♦1 | Tanta Ahmed Al-Sawi | |
| 82349328 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2020-03-18 13:24 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | skfd ♦285 | Привет! Возможно будет точнее ставить building=house если там коттеджики \\ отдельные дома 😊https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=house |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Благодарю. Я картографирую удаленно, и я не знаю использование здания, поэтому я просто иду со зданием = даПеревод с английского с Google Translate | |
| 64784189 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2018-11-22 14:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️⚧️ ♦364 | For this road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646002848#map=19/33.06952/-4.27385 ) you fixed the typo with `smoothness`, but you didn't change the value which was `verry_bad`, and that's incorrect. 😉 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | So you have corrected that. Thanks!. I might not have looked at that one | |
| 71487531 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2019-06-21 16:06 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | woodpeck ♦2,601 | Hello Sammyhawkrad, in this changeset you have made a "mechanical edit" which is not a good idea. See here for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F In this particular case, the "Sugaladevi Wewa Feild Canals" that you have ed... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | We do learn everyday. Don't we? I have never given this a thought. Thanks for the heads up and info, going forward I will do it the right way.I actually used "Bing" though. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | One more thing - in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661932063 (and possibly others) I'm guessing that "Feild" is spelt wrong and might actually need to be "Field".Best Regards,Andy | |
| 70692848 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2019-05-28 11:24 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Enock4seth ♦629 | Thank you :) |
| 65069452 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2018-12-01 10:38 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | sergeybe ♦210 | Very cool! Thank you! |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Sammyhawkrad | Welcome |