| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160881171 by SherbetS @ 2025-01-01 18:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,734 | Can you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145829608 ?And enable checking import account inbox? |
| 124908478 by SherbetS @ 2022-08-15 02:19 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | gpserror ♦231 | Hi, something looks very weird with the two 'reverts' you did... if you look at the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585383651 it looks like you ended up deleting a bad tag change or something? Not sure exactly of the intent but something seems wrong here |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | The data in this import is below the quality I would consider useful for openstreetmap. I reverted the eddit offhand in JOSM last night and set all conflicts to others versions Can you explain what you are seeing that is problematic? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | gpserror ♦231 | It looks like version 1, h4ck3rm1k3 did the initial POI 12 years ago. Then in version 2, h4ck3rm1ke touched it again and changed man_made=mine.Then in version 3 you added land_use=quarry, which is probably not correct. But then in version 4, you deleted the POI.I would expect the POI resto... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | Okay. I reverted the second changeset the user made to avoid excessive conflictsThe I reverted the first changeset.Hope that explains it | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | gpserror ♦231 | Hmm... so that 12 year old data was incorrect perhaps? Now I really don't understand what's going on here. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | Yes. I was analyzing a sample of this data to assess the quality as a part of another import im working on.This user imported all this data without reviewing any of it using a bad tagging scheme. Since they data was already of very low quality I decided it would be better to revert the change.... | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,088 | Hello,Hate to bump the thread. Ran across a bad node that wasn't successfully reverted at the time:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585366799/historyFound another here as well:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585365219## BREAK ##That data seems more wrong than ever.... | |
| 153380115 by SherbetS @ 2024-06-30 17:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dillen GJ ♦51 | James,Not all courts all shown correctly but this could be due slow refresh issue’s ?I will check again over 24 hours, ok ?For now job well done ! Thank you very much ! |
| 138168268 by SherbetS @ 2023-07-06 01:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | Just in case you're not aware, this changeset was mentioned at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-get-an-importer-s-attention/110565/24 . |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | kn1ghtman ♦1 | This changeset deleted some of my updates. Please contact me so we can get these restored.Thanks. | |
| 119641202 by SherbetS @ 2022-04-12 22:26 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | os-emmer ♦353 | Hi SherbetS,you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9661821977https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=di... |
| 125880744 by SherbetS @ 2022-09-07 03:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Buster452 ♦11 | I see some odd tagging happening along the Pinhoti trail relation. Seems like tags for the relation were applied to the highway ways (like a distance tag). There was a road walk section where the road was a residential highway tagged with motorcycle=no (yet cars could still use it).I'm no... |
| 102153604 by SherbetS @ 2021-04-02 01:57 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | pantufla ♦293 | Hello, Asociación Banda Ciudadana Maracaibo doesn't seem like a tower at all. Maybe an office? |
| 133027457 by SherbetS @ 2023-02-26 02:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | emersonveenstra ♦1,465 | Hi,This changeset introduced duplicates of several nodes:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694121311 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689773793https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694121272 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689772743https://www.openstree... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | done.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133421106 | |
| 132809472 by SherbetS @ 2023-02-20 21:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | zluuzki ♦226 | Some questions...... Why did you rename this to "Oil Reserve"? That's wrong, because they're always, without exception, called "Petroleum Reserve" (short "SPR").... Why did you tag this as "man_made=works"? This is wrong, because "works&quo... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | hey zluuzki,I don't remember why I set the name to oil reserve. I can change it back in a day or so.do you have a suggestion for a better tag, or a tag I should propose? this seemed like the most appropriate option from what I read on the wiki.I don't see any reason why these o... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | zluuzki ♦226 | I would just use industrial=oil or maybe industrial=oil_storage as the main tag.I always use an area for larger industrial facilities like this because it contains more information.It might also make sense to only leave the address on the node, and move the other tags to the area. (And conne... | |
| 133053029 by SherbetS @ 2023-02-26 17:43 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | emersonveenstra ♦1,465 | Hi,This changeset introduced several duplicate nodes:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315851 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801264https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315552 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801355https://www.openstreetmap... |
| 131750948 by SherbetS @ 2023-01-26 22:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | goedegazelle ♦251 | Please don't remove tags like "mast:type", even if the tag is incorrect. It is still data that awas added by someone for a reason.Wiki: Automated edits are strongly discouraged unless you really know what you are doing! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | Where has this and the other mass edits been discussed and approved?Otherwise, a revert is urgently needed here! | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | Hi. can you link any objects where data was damaged? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | This is a general question!Where were these and the other mass changes discussed and approved?I expect a prior announcement and a list of which key-value is to be exchanged for which key-value. I am not interested in individual objects! | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | I am exchanging mast:type=communicationwith tower:type=communicationI also deleted the tag mast:type=column because I couldn’t think of an appropriate substitute tag. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | Again: Where were these and the other mass changes discussed and approved? | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | skyper ♦871 | Hi,it might be OK to change `mast:type=communication` to `tower:type=communication` but this still needs a discussion in advance if you want to perform this change on a larger scale like Sven (aka streckenkundler) mentioned. But there is no benefit to remove `mast:type=*` with other values. Probab... | |
| 8 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | >I also deleted the tag mast:type=column because I couldn’t think of an appropriate substitute tag.Sorry for writing it so harshly: This is exactly what I call vandalism! | |
| 9 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | For mass edits, I expect a list beforehand of what is to be exchanged. Pure deletion is not possible at all! That must be ruled out!This mass edit must be announced in advance and discussed within a reasonable time. That's why I think a complete revert is necessary here! | |
| 10 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenedit-mast-type-tower-type-disskutiert-und-abgesprochen/8291 | |
| 11 | ~ 3 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,147 | Stop your editing immediately! DWG is switched on for checking! | |
| 12 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | > Where were these and the other mass changes discussed and approved?I had not had prerequisite discussion before making these changesets. My mistake. >That's why I think a complete revert is necessary here!I’m fine with this. | |
| 13 | ~ 3 years ago | Woazboat ♦105 | I don't see the problem with changing the unconventional mast:type to the accepted tower:type, but tags definitely shouldn't simply be removed. | |
| 14 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | @SherbetS Thanks. | |
| 15 | ~ 3 years ago | Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 | Reverted by DWG. User incorrectly made mass edit without realising local differences: changeset/131985470 | |
| 131715318 by SherbetS @ 2023-01-26 00:53 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | Hello,This looks very much like a mechanical edit. I haven't seen any discussion with the local community. If you you did that, can you explain where? If not, it may need to be reverted.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | Alas, it seems that you have ignored the problems that you caused previously:http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12163682 | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | Hi Andy,I had not had a discussion before I made this change. I’ll be happy to have discussion before editing again if revert is needed.-SherbetS | |
| 131630230 by SherbetS @ 2023-01-24 02:00 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | You seem to have deleted information on at least one node, which was mapped as a maypole: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9973120591 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | silversurfer83 ♦3,955 | Please don't change tags without ensuring the correctness of your changes. Maypoles, for example, are a thing throughout Europe. Also, if you don't have streetside imagerie to confirm, don't change something just because it seems plausible to you. A fixme would be better in many cases... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | hello.I have edited the object in question to use the correct tagging.religious extremists have had these removed in my part of the US, so I had no idea there was a documented tag for them on the wiki.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmaypole-SherbetS | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | silversurfer83 ♦3,955 | Hello SherbetS,As you saw for yourself, it is even a documented tag. But even if it were not, deleting it in other places just because of religious beliefs which most of the world don't share ain't right. Should you encounter such edits or remember where they happened, please report ... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | Silversurfer83,I did not mean to delete the data on this particular object. OSM is about what is on the ground, after all.I have undone the damage on the object listed. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | I'm intrigued that religious extremists had those removed anywhere in the US! I guess the original Wicker Man never got a release there either? :) | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | silversurfer83 ♦3,955 | @sherbetS thank youkeep those religious types in check ;) | |
| 131626971 by SherbetS @ 2023-01-23 22:26 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | sorry for the big box! |
| 127941213 by SherbetS @ 2022-10-23 00:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | Thanks - I've reverted the others in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127955987 . |
| 124107448 by SherbetS @ 2022-07-26 17:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | additional sourcing information:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124072849https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Alabama#Potential_Data_Sources |
| 123188836 by SherbetS @ 2022-07-04 12:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | RollTideRoll_asdfjkll ♦32 | Building go BOOM! I was there to watch the implosion too! |
| 120268867 by SherbetS @ 2022-04-27 16:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SethY861 ♦4 | Reverting things without coming to a consensus with the other person is rude. Also your unwarranted reversion also caused other changes in that changset that you did not care to look through to me unnecessarily removed. And my argument still stands. The definition of a trunk on the state page sa... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SherbetS | I have responded to comments on the main changeset. | |
| 119576952 by SherbetS @ 2022-04-11 12:22 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,734 | thanks! |
| 118380356 by SherbetS @ 2022-03-11 21:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,160 | These buildings are duplicated. Please fix --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118380356 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | Damn mapwithai | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,160 | I haven't had any issues. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | Hello Spaghetti Monster,I have repaired the damage done to the data I added in this changeset. I'm not sure what happened, but before I uploaded in JOSM, something got botched when I uploaded, so the buildings were duplicated. You can see the fix at changeset/118743527 | |
| 115960526 by SherbetS @ 2022-01-09 22:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Cleveland steamer ♦9 | Please give complete changeset comments out of courtesy to the other mappers. Even with a hashtag in front it wouldn't be sufficient. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | Hello Cleveland streamer,The comment on this changeset was automatically assigned by the OSM US tasking manager. I think that the comment is sufficient because you can look up the project and read a detailed description.I don't manage the project so I didn't actually choose for thi... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,734 | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsThis is not a sufficient or good changeset comment.> you can look up the project and read a detailed description.Not really. I am a relatively experienced person as far as OSM goes and have no idea how to do this as this c... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Minh Nguyen ♦606 | Here’s the tasking manager project: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/248 | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | Minh Nguyen ♦606 | https://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/issues/4959 requests that the tasking manager tag the changeset with the project URL like MapRoulette does. | |
| 113745956 by SherbetS @ 2021-11-13 21:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Arun Ganesh ♦5 | Dear Sherbet,are you fixing waterways without checking their existence? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | I try and check the existence of every waterway I edit with the imagery. If you found one that I incorrectly changed, please send it to me. | |
| 113968279 by SherbetS @ 2021-11-19 00:18 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | kawino85 ♦44 | The ref at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8958787/history is wrong, this could be reverted. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,724 | I don't think that anyone would want to revert a changeset just because one "ref" value on one relation is wrong - is anything else wrong in the changeset?Best regards, Andy. | |
| 109486434 by SherbetS @ 2021-08-10 22:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Smaller changeset areas, please. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | I manually reviewed every object that was changed to make sure that I did not incorrectly modify anything. I want to know what makes a changeset too big. In my opinion, this changeset is of a fair size, since I only edited objects in france and that is what the changeset spans. Is there a wiki page ... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Apologies, I had not noticed your reply until now.To clarify, I'm not commenting on how many elements were changed, but the area of the bounding box.Besides other countries, in my case it also spans the Channel Islands (which haven't been French territory for nearly a millennium, n... | |
| 110045670 by SherbetS @ 2021-08-22 00:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | marvyn, not cotswold |
| 109651361 by SherbetS @ 2021-08-13 22:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 ♦293 | Please explain the reason for this change. They were tagged as communication_tower for a reason. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | NKA ♦254 | This is a unwanted and undiscussed mass edit. The towers in question are the largest and the main communication towers ("hovedsendere") in Norway, which constitute the core radio network. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | can you point to any particular towers that were incorrectly tagged? I tried my best to match the data to the information on the wiki. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Gazer75 ♦293 | You changed them all from communication_tower to tower. Those two are not the same. The wiki is kind of confusing on this unfortunately.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | in my interpretation, a tower is a structure with places to stand, while a communications tower is a tower that is greater than 100 meters tall. I downloaded all the objects with man_made=communications_tower and changed any that I found didn’t meet this specification. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | NKA ♦254 | The 100 meters mentioned in the wiki is just an indication, not a strict limit. Your mechanical edit has destroyed a carefully curated selection of special communication towers in OSM for Norway.I am going to revert this changeset. Bye. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | SherbetS | okay. | |
| 102675955 by SherbetS @ 2021-04-10 01:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,528 | Hello.Please try to contain each changeset limited to a smaller geographic area. Unfortunately, the way OSM works, your 3 communication towers notified everybody who watches the map for changes in the Eastern US. 😅 If you were to make 3 separate changesets, only people local to those areas woul... |
| 102360683 by SherbetS @ 2021-04-05 23:55 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,479 | Hi and thanks for letting the world know. While you're at it, think you might want to look at tower:type=Cellular_tower too.ciao |
| 101889933 by SherbetS @ 2021-03-28 21:15 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Tysseract ♦2 | This edit did not preserve the history of the masts... in the future with the JSOM plugin https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/UtilsPlugin2 you can use ctrl+shift+G to transfer the old history to a new object |
| 101850420 by SherbetS @ 2021-03-27 19:00 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SherbetS | correction: Maine |