| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41447672 by Stefan de Konink @ 2016-08-14 14:12 | 1 | 2017-08-23 14:10 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review:highway=grass is not widely used, I assume you meant highway=footway + surface=grass? |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 16:25 | Stefan de Konink | Nope, it is a routable surface, not a footway. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-23 16:28 | GerdP ♦2,751 | So maybe highway=service ? | |
| 4 | 2017-08-23 16:36 | Stefan de Konink | No, highway=grass. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-23 16:40 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Well, the highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface.Why do you think that you have a special case here? | |
| 6 | 2017-08-23 16:50 | Stefan de Konink | Because there is no road. | |
| 7 | 2017-08-23 16:54 | Stefan de Konink | The hole purpose of having added these tags is the ability to route pedestrians over the camping place. Hence the highway tag is used on surfaces which form a graph. The highway=grass is not rendered. Don't do any harm, in the database, and should have been implicitly followed, sadly the OpenSt... | |
| 8 | 2017-08-23 17:03 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Sounds somehow crazy. A way that is not a road and should not be displayed as road should still be used like a road? | |
| 9 | 2017-08-23 17:08 | Stefan de Konink | Exactly. The surface is a field of grass used for camping. While passing the surface in the middle moving to another campingfield is a highway activity. Don't want to render it on the map, do want to route over it. | |
| 10 | 2017-08-23 17:11 | GerdP ♦2,751 | What router supports this mapping? | |
| 11 | 2017-08-23 17:14 | Stefan de Konink | OpenTripPlanner, RoutingKit, probably any router that can be configured to use tags. | |
| 12 | 2017-08-24 07:08 | GerdP ♦2,751 | So you tell the people who arrive at the camping to install this software and configure it just to find something like a trampoline? I can't believe that. Besides that I still think that the highway tag should not be used here. | |
| 13 | 2017-08-24 14:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,357 | For info - "highway=grass" hasn't exactly troubled the scorers at taginfo:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=highway%3Dgrass . It's only used in this one location. | |
| 14 | 2017-08-24 19:50 | Stefan de Konink | I honestly don't care what you think. You are not familiair in the area, have not micromapped it, and the tagging is part of the openstreetmap database, and has not been used in rendering profiles.I don't care about scores too. It seems you are only trying to formalize tagging, but don... | |
| 15 | 2017-08-25 05:16 | GerdP ♦2,751 | A possible alternative may be highway=virtual It is also undocumented and not often used (64 times) but at least more self explaining,and I think it is used for the same purpose. | |
| 16 | 2017-08-25 12:32 | Stefan de Konink | Thanks, this is a good suggestion. I would be happy to use it. | |
| 17 | 2018-09-20 16:36 | Allroads ♦420 | In the world of cross country rally roadbook riding riding a straight line between two points, waypoints, is HP with C, (french) Horse Piste, (englisch) Off track, (spanisch) Fuera de pista, then you riding on compass, C, CAP (french), bearing (english), rumbo (spanisch). The line should be named: ... | |
| 55154693 by Stefan de Konink @ 2018-01-04 11:25 | 1 | 2018-01-04 15:33 | eggie ♦40,607 | De door de eigenaar verwijderde weg is inmiddels reverted. Als het goed is staat deze nog gewoon op access=private.. precies wat de eigenaar van het terrein wil. |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 15:56 | Marnixverbrugge ♦4 | Ik begrijp dat dit voor u belangrijk is. Maar dan klopt nog steeds de aanduiding veld- of bosweg niet voor het gedeelte wat over het erf gaat. Hier moet de weg aangeduid worden als oprit. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 16:14 | eggie ♦40,607 | Het is goed als track gemapt, maar we gebruiken vaak ook wel highway=service...met . service=driveway Een track is niet speciaal een bosweg. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_FeaturesJe bent vrij om het aan te passen. | |
| 41442428 by Stefan de Konink @ 2016-08-14 08:45 | 1 | 2016-11-06 20:16 | AdVerburg ♦144 | Osmose vindt het geen geslaagde test. (Bad usage of area=yes. Object is already an area by nature).Wil je er nog eens naar kijken? Groet Ad. |