| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169731481 by Stereo @ 2025-07-30 17:03 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Thierry1030 ♦283 | hello, we sent you an invitation for a social event this weekend. Did you receive it?Thierry, on behalf of osm.be |
| 167500168 by Stereo @ 2025-06-11 16:41 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Stereo | See also https://transports.public.lu/content/dam/transport/publications/20230207-presentation-mmtp-vdl-cfl-suppression-pn13-03-mail-tbraun-rz.pdf |
| 166632502 by Stereo @ 2025-05-22 22:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | user_5359 ♦20,704 | Hello! Please have a look on https://osm/way/1388890713. What is the mean of the tagsCANTON = RedangeCOMMUNE = BeckerichDISTRICT = DiekirchLAU2 = 0701(no other OSM keys)? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Stereo | Oh, that's a stray from my manual conflation. Thank you for spotting it! | |
| 165335878 by Stereo @ 2025-04-23 14:05 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Stereo | Sorry, wrong changeset comment! This was adding a ghost bike from survey. |
| 165258632 by Stereo @ 2025-04-21 21:14 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | user_5359 ♦20,704 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/50192463 (one of thirteen objects). What is the mean of the tag false=A? |
| 146794967 by Stereo @ 2024-01-28 20:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Stereo | Used Strava too for the Bramley summit trail |
| 145318877 by Stereo @ 2023-12-20 07:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | TheBestIdea ♦119 | Hey Guillaume,This block of McGuinness (Green to Freeman) is in fact now 2way for bikes. I've surveyed it. I'm going to revert this.Brandon |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Stereo | Hi Brandon! Indeed, it is now. Thank you! | |
| 144851296 by Stereo @ 2023-12-07 03:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | akadouri ♦62 | "loc_name"="Sauron Tower" 🤔 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Stereo | If you search for “Sauron tower Brooklyn” it’s pretty clear. | |
| 141623887 by Stereo @ 2023-09-22 22:18 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,561 | many sidewalks here have been tagged as crossing 😱 Fixed in 142000761 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141623887 |
| 131156487 by Stereo @ 2023-01-11 17:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | merci pour l'info :) |
| 124700806 by Stereo @ 2022-08-09 19:40 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 ♦975 | Hello Stereo,You've added a lot of crossing:marking=no on crossings which have zebra markings according to aerial imagery (they are also tagged with crossing_ref=zebra). Assuming you were tagging their colour, you should probably use crossing:markings:colour.Best regards,Dimitar |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Stereo | Здравейте Dimitar! Yes, that tag didn't exist yet back then. It's probably ripe for a mechanical edit in Luxembourg. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Stereo | Actually, looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings, it looks like that tag is for the lines itself, not the background colour. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 ♦975 | Would crossing:markings=zebra:bicolour + crossing:markings:colour=red work? | |
| 119803171 by Stereo @ 2022-04-17 03:39 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | VLD549 ♦319 | Hi, could you indicate where you got the name change from? Many sites seem to use Haardter Wee as spelling. Thank you.https://lux.postcodebase.com/node/8009 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Stereo | Hi! The street sign at the intersection says Haardterwee in one word. The cadastre, unhelpfully, has Haardterwee in its address database and Haardter Wee on its maps. Linguistically, I think two words is correct.Would you be ok with "Haardter Wee" as an alt_name? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | VLD548 ♦20 | Spelling of Haardter Wee is ok. Thanks. | |
| 117661074 by Stereo @ 2022-02-21 03:43 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | If it's you using highway=busway, please, stop it : the road disappear with this and it's problematic. Use highway=service + psv=yes + bus=yes instad. And busway refers to BRT, but Luxembourg doesn't have BRT. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Stereo | Sorry I missed your comment. Works for me! | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Stereo | I mean, tagging as highway=service and psv=yes and bus=yes instead of highway=busway works for me. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | No problem, thanks! | |
| 117507313 by Stereo @ 2022-02-17 08:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | The lights/crossings you separated are not right. The car traffic lights are not at the stop, they are at level of the crossing. In extra it complicates the data and eye visualisation (same info in different spots is worse than same info at the same spot). |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Stereo | Usage as documented on wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signalsThe data is consumed in that form by zug.lu | |
| 118216943 by Stereo @ 2022-03-08 00:19 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | akadouri ♦62 | Getting a head start huh!Should we set `operator:wikidata=Q1058767` on these on the DOT racks? (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1058767)I'm not sure there's a better way to conflate the various operator tags (DOT, NYC DOT, NYC, etc). |
| 117455804 by Stereo @ 2022-02-16 00:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | Please, putting "highway=busway" is a very bad idea, it breaks the renders and appears as "Undefined" in the editor. It's note the first time so stop it please. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | PS : As it is mentioned in the Wiki, for the moment the standard layer does not render it. So when time comed, it will not be a problem anymore. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Lyon-St-Clair ♦128 | PS: In the wiki this tag is for BRT (BHNS in french) systems, not standard bus lines. Or at the moment Luxembourg doesn't have BRTs system. | |
| 112382292 by Stereo @ 2021-10-11 16:26 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | b-jazz ♦904 | Hey Stereo, the pedestrian stairs from street level up to bridge level need to be split so that the way doesn't cross over itself, which is topologically incorrect. If you look at my changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111830687), you'll see what I'm talking about. Can ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Stereo | Ah! I'll count the steps on all bits to tag them separately so we can both be happy. The way intersects itself but there is no connecting node, so I think this is a false positive from OSMI. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | b-jazz ♦904 | I'm not sure what change you're going to make to make us both be happy. If it has already happened, it isn't correct IMO. Ways shouldn't cross over themselves. They should be split and the layer attribute should be set appropriately. I don't consider this a false positive fo... | |
| 46280091 by Stereo @ 2017-02-21 16:43 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Hi G! You added this way 4 years ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2447715 I know it's a long shot but i'd like to know what's your source to have it made also designated for cyclists? Then user m sator added also a local cycle route relation. The problem is that this way https:/... |
| 99812070 by Stereo @ 2021-02-23 09:44 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Stereo | -e |
| 99755285 by Stereo @ 2021-02-22 15:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | dmlu ♦164 | 👏👏👏 |
| 98926455 by Stereo @ 2021-02-08 18:57 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Jorisbo ♦164 | Hi Stereo, a couple of days ago you added oneway=yes to a small part of route de beaufort (id 363709735) connecting to route de Dillingen. Is this correct? Mapillary shows roadworks, but it seems unlikely this short piece has become oneway. Kind regards, Joris |
| 69390716 by Stereo @ 2019-04-19 22:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Андрей Клопов ♦16 | G'dayWhy did you assign this road a tertiary class? In all respects, it is similar to the primary road.Thanks |
| 87655613 by Stereo @ 2020-07-07 12:34 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Addresses that had no *match, even |
| 86895681 by Stereo @ 2020-06-19 22:15 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | dmlu ♦164 | What an effort! 💪 |
| 85466925 by Stereo @ 2020-05-19 23:23 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ma-rt-in ♦1,772 | Hello,is it really necessary to enter data, as it is not possible to verify anything on site? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Hello,I find it interesting, and have been able to verify that information without leaving confinement, so yes :)Happy mapping,Guillaume | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | ma-rt-in ♦1,772 | I think it's more like you were copying from old maps. Because for an old Roman bridge on the border between Germany and Luxembourg there are no longer any clues on the spot and would therefore not be verifiable on site. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | "Rue des Romains" on one side which is a pretty good clue, plus old books, yeah. | |
| 82367677 by Stereo @ 2020-03-19 01:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Dragash and Decan boundaries from KCA. Sorry for the huge changeset and the bad changeset comment. |
| 76529972 by Stereo @ 2019-11-02 15:02 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | borishag ♦163 | ICI PARIS XL; you have deleted the adress tags, Why?B.HagemanEditor AS Watson strores |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Hello Boris, the addresses are (or soon will be) on the surrounding ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42311005 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | borishag ♦163 | All 1760 AS Watson stores in OSM in the Benelux and France have adress tags in nodes. Please restore nodes 4709065892 and 4711241595.b.hageman@nl.aswatson.com | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | dmlu ♦164 | Hi,Boris: Doesn't the AS Watson stores "backend" include/process inherited addresses from the surrounding building outline?Duplicating address information increases the maintenance costs / effort required to import all the addresses from open data and keep the addresses in OSM... | |
| 73812666 by Stereo @ 2019-08-27 19:44 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,980 | Hi, it should be diplomatic=consulate. Other tags of your's seem to be OK. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Hi aceman444,So office=diplomatic + diplomatic=consulate + consulate=honorary_consulate ? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,980 | Yes, consulate=honorary_consul , but only where it is honorary consulate. There are other types of consulates too.Seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Ddiplomatic for the combinations. | |
| 76533123 by Stereo @ 2019-11-02 17:11 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Stereo | Accidentally did changes in two regions; sorry. |
| 73553087 by Stereo @ 2019-08-20 19:03 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | supauser ♦1 | Thank you for your hard work! |
| 65969550 by Stereo @ 2019-01-02 20:04 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | landuse=civic_admin is still just a drafted proposed feature. We should stick to the adopted consensuses . |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Stereo | We should, but there's currently no other way of describing this, no? What do you think we should use instead?Drafted proposals don't mean much - wayside crosses or smoking are proposals that happen to be widely adopted. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | It does mean something. It helps community to decide on how to use certain elements. :) For Wayside crosses, the tag exists since 2009, there are 104573 elements, hence adopted "de facto". For Smoking_area, the tag is fairly new, only 969+207 elements, not really widely adopted (only 1... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Even in our Quartier Européen, there are mixed in hotels, concert hall, swimming pool.... | |
| 65964856 by Stereo @ 2019-01-02 17:06 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mjlux ♦7 | Moien, den Tramsarrêt "Philharmonie-MUDAM" ass den Ament den eenzegen, deem säin Numm am Standard Layer net ugewise gëtt. Ech mengen, dat kënnt dovunner, dass du hei "station:railway" ewechgeholl hues. Ech weess elo net, wat richteg ass, mä 't sollt... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Stereo | Moien! Merci fir däi Message a pardon fir di spéit Äntwert. Jo, wahrscheinlech well railway=station net méi drop ass. Op der anerer Säit ass dat wirklech nëmme fir eng Gare geduecht. Sou vill wéi ech vum Tram begeechtert sinn, soll all Halt wirklech bei zoom ... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | mjlux ♦7 | Merci fir deng Äntwert! Fir mech ass dat heiten een "tram stop" an ech géif et esou taggen wéi et op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trams#Tram_stops steet. Mä den User Lyon-St-Clair huet eise ganzen Tram op "light rail" mat iwwerall "railway=stat... | |
| 54984124 by Stereo @ 2017-12-28 14:00 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | mueschel ♦7,255 | Hi,could you check this way, it got two strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549560168Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Stereo | Indeed, thanks Jan! I've fixed it. | |
| 54131311 by Stereo @ 2017-11-27 19:56 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Why did you resplit these 2 areas and added back the tags+relations which are already in the main way?- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5431- 71572/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457353964/history The tags are duplicated, overloads the rendering with text (way + area name), creat... |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | links corrected: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543171572/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457353964/history | |
| 54004920 by Stereo @ 2017-11-22 15:55 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | Tramschapp Fixme:Schinnen gesait een net ganz gudd, mee sie sin do :) |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | Luxexpo Nord Fixme:Hun der den Arrêt op dei richtech Plaaz gesaat. Ab dem 10.12.2017 firt awer nemmen Linn 16 doriwer.Et kennt nach en Arrêt bei hannert Kraizung fir Linn 1,20,25 well dei et schweier haaten op dei kuerz Distanz 3 Spueren ze wiësselen. Ech setzen en mol dohinn wo... | |
| 50630985 by Stereo @ 2017-07-27 20:24 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | wilda69 ♦29 | Hi Guillaume,Yes it was opened Friday afternoon and I visited it yesterday morning after the Gasperich trip. The construction that remains is the service road for the farmer. This in theory should connect further East with the area around N49 30.108 E6 08.725 where there is currently a fence. I ha... |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | wilda69 ♦29 | Guillaume, I investigated the area today and replotted the old by-pass as it is now. The reason being that there is unrestricted access coming from the landfill. A lot of the by-pass has already had its concrete removed. The construction to the East looks like a massive underground water complex p... | |
| 49239770 by Stereo @ 2017-06-04 11:13 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ikew ♦1 | Ich habe hier vor Ort weder den Weg laut OSM, noch überhaupt einen erkennbaren Weg oder Pfad gefunden. Der FALSCH angegebene Weg stellt aber die kürzeste Verbindung zu einem Geocache in der Nähe dar, was über kurz oder lang zu (vermeidbarem!) Ärger führen wird! |
| 45214763 by Stereo @ 2017-01-16 12:41 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,255 | Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data? |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | trial ♦1,195 | +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.It is an e... | |
| 4 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,255 | And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules. | |
| 5 | ~ 9 years ago | trial ♦1,195 | Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ... | |
| 6 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,255 | The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning. | |
| 7 | ~ 9 years ago | trial ♦1,195 | Right. Time to cleanup! | |
| 23005970 by Stereo @ 2014-06-18 14:06 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | tyr_asd ♦471 | lol |
| 44692454 by Stereo @ 2016-12-26 22:02 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Erdrandbewohner ♦19 | Rolltreppe Tiefgarage? Nein, das ist ein ganz normales Treppenhaus, welches die Tiefgarage mit der Platzoberfläche verbindet. Ich benenne es mal um. :) |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Aha, danke dir! | |
| 44208870 by Stereo @ 2016-12-06 13:03 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | mueschel ♦7,255 | Hi,I found the keys ref:FLIK and ref:flik - can you just use one spelling? Btw, did you check that this source is licensed in a way compatible to OSM?Jan |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Hi Jan,Yes, the data is CC-0, https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/referentiel-des-parcelles-agricoles-flik/You’re right that it’s not good to mix the case; I’ll correct the lowercase to FLIK. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Done, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44295866Thank you for making me aware of this! | |
| 43747057 by Stereo @ 2016-11-17 22:11 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Source = very_local_knowledge |
| 43501833 by Stereo @ 2016-11-09 01:15 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Guillaume, do you know really what you are doing? You are breaking elements! That's vandalism within OSM data!https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384165265And here you are putting layers over layers and fences over fences, is that what you call MP simplification??? That's awkward editing... |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | By the way, by viewing your flawed edits... I think that can you stop looking over my shoulder and patronizing me... I haven't said anything for months, trying to be conciliating. But since you are being hypocrite and quiete disrespectful, enough is enough. | |
| 42671939 by Stereo @ 2016-10-05 23:54 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | mavl ♦77,076 | Hello, Stereo. What wrong with way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372411024/history You wrote "Simplified multipolygons." Why? If something is marked as multipolygon, then it's ok. |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Hello mavl,Thank you very much for your message. It's always interesting to think about mapping practice.Before my edit, there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways.After turning these into areas, and using big inner islands to contain groups of ... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | mavl ♦77,076 | Thank you so much for your answer. «there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways» Maybe, the contributor has not finished work yet. I have looked the data in iD and in JOSM. It looks as in other places of a planet (as usually). If we h... | |
| 38823878 by Stereo @ 2016-04-24 00:48 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Hi Guillaume,in this changeset (4 months ago) you have removed many of the address interpolation I have made at the beginning of the year. Now only the address-from and -to are left (E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.58985/6.10251)Just wanted to know if that is the result wan... |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Stereo | Hello Javier,Oh no! No, that was not the intended result!However, I do intend to import the open data address points, which will replace these.I'd love to chat about it if you're on whatsapp/google hangouts/iMessage/facebook/twitter - shoot me a message with your contact?Gu... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Hi Guillaume,Ok I see, the interpolations will be replaced by single address points when importing the open data.As arranged I am not adding any new addresses after our last discussion (just added one or two when updating a construction area).My skype ID is dzien_dobre (I don't use ... | |
| 38827592 by Stereo @ 2016-04-24 07:46 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | gcaspar ♦7 | Hi Stero. you seem to have dissected the roundabout in Berschbach. Now that area is not routable anymore because of the oneway attributes of the former roundabout segments. Please fix that!I know that the roundabout is at the moment suspended. But that's only temporary until the new bridge ... |
| 35056511 by Stereo @ 2015-11-03 14:02 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | GerdP ♦2,856 | please see my comment here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35008086 |
| 33531116 by Stereo @ 2015-08-23 19:09 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Tu as une erreur d'OSMi sur les bâtiments de la BEI (Banque euro. d'inv.): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.13836&lat=49.62088&zoom=17&opacity=0.95&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_close... |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | Stereo | Tu as tout à fait raison, ce n'est pas le bon type de relation. Par contre, j'ai laissé ça avec trois polygones pour les trois parties, je ne vois pas l'intérêt de multipolygones ici. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 years ago | SHARCRASH ♦753 | Je croyais que tu allais encore fignoler les bâtiments avec les surfaces vertes internes, sinon pas trop d'intérêt en effet. :) | |
| 19855048 by Stereo @ 2014-01-07 00:04 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | naoliv ♦1,783 | Stereo, I don't understand why and what you did here: you have deleted a valid route relation and, among other things, included toll=yes in every part of the highway. |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | Stereo | Hi Naoliv,Thank you for your comment. The route relation was wrong in many places and badly tagged; I reproduced the tags on the segments where they made sense. If you know that some segments are toll-free, the best thing to do would probably be to tag them with toll=no. | |
| 29982158 by Stereo @ 2015-04-04 21:57 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | 4rch ♦138 | Hello Stereo,as national boundaries are a sensitive case it would be great if you could inform the affected communities first before you apply big changes. What exactly are you modifying? We have a thread in the german subforum regarding international boundaries: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/vie... |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | Stereo | Hi Arch,I've replied in the forum, and will reply more later. |