Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
97355095 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2021-01-12 08:19 | 1 | 2021-10-02 18:18 | arcturusss ♦18 | здания лучше сразу делать прямоугольными |
77415518 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-11-22 08:59 | 1 | 2021-01-07 22:20 | opencarpatia ♦46 | I am going to delete this fake culvert you've added to "fix highway/waterway" crossing.I am asking you to STOP doing such edits without: a) onsite inspection b) using street imagery c) using survey from reliable sources.Using aerial images is NOT sufficient for this king of &q... |
2 | 2021-01-07 22:28 | opencarpatia ♦46 | Fake culvert deleted with following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97132820 | |
89176793 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-10 05:48 | 1 | 2020-12-24 21:15 | opencarpatia ♦46 | Hello, please explain why are you marking no existing objects??https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=835657255#map=19/48.88840/23.42518 |
2 | 2021-01-02 16:45 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi opencarpatia,According to the source you apply (local knowledge), I would say that you have to be right. That's why I have removed the existing culverts from the changeset.Thanks for helping improve the OSM. | |
96300429 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-12-23 06:48 | 1 | 2020-12-26 23:40 | ququruzka ♦203 | if you change name=* ,then please chnage also and name:uk=* |
2 | 2021-01-02 10:56 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi ququruzka,Thank you for the advice, is highly appreciated. | |
89022509 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-06 07:48 | 1 | 2020-12-20 01:33 | opencarpatia ♦46 | Hello, please explain why this crossing was marked as "ford"? Have you been there?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7790696971/history#map=19/48.72395/23.48316 |
2 | 2020-12-27 17:47 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hello opencarpatia,Usually if in the image is visible and clear then it receives a tag (in the given example ,,ford,,), otherwise we don't touch it. Please be informed that for editing and completing different tasks, we use Maxar Premium Imagery layer, which is the most accurate to actual g... | |
3 | 2020-12-28 13:37 | opencarpatia ♦46 | Hello & thanks for the response. Indeed Maxar is quite detailed & up to date.But when doing further updates, please be aware that waterways added with recent massive import by VARVAR8 are extremely inaccurate. They often cross buildings, are displaced, duplicate already existing or simpl... | |
4 | 2021-01-02 10:56 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi opencarpatia,Thank you for sharing the above information with us. I understand your position and I totally agree with it. Best of luck! | |
93406877 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-11-02 09:11 | 1 | 2020-11-02 09:20 | Dyoma ♦25 | What the hell? Why you move my edits? It was mapped with offset. Maxar with 0;0 is not correct for this part. Please revert all your recent edits or I will do that! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93406877 |
2 | 2020-11-03 11:02 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Dyoma,Thank you for letting us know about this issue. The information provided makes this case clear and obvious.We do apologize for all the inconveniences created. We are all human and we all learn to become more knowledgeable in improving OSM.Thank you again for your understanding. | |
92207794 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-10-09 05:12 | 1 | 2020-10-09 06:20 | dval ♦426 | Hi, User4! Ваш брод вылезает на берег, где брода не может быть по определению (Definition of ford: a shallow part of a body of water that may be crossed by wading.; Брод — неглубокое место в реке или ручье, ... |
2 | 2020-10-09 07:43 | dval ♦426 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes : "The highway should share nodes with the riverbanks where it crosses them and also a node with the waterway=* where they cross. Split the highway between the riverbanks and apply ford=yes to this segment". | |
3 | 2020-10-09 10:03 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi dval,Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further. | |
89749512 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-21 13:41 | 1 | 2020-09-06 17:39 | olehz ♦391 | How many times should I tell you? Don't touch the roads!!! You ignore GPS-tracks and think that Maxar is an absolute truth. You don't improve, you make it worse! |
88091705 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-07-16 13:50 | 1 | 2020-07-24 08:01 | ID`s ♦54 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635577704 Был проложен отвратительно. Прямо сквозь парковку. 3 раза крутили, в итоге все сломали.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7721184487 В этой точке НЕТ ни ворот, ни... |
2 | 2020-07-26 15:00 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for letting us know about this changeset. We'll analyze carefully these edits and will take much care further. | |
88088073 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-07-16 12:14 | 1 | 2020-07-17 05:25 | AlexRiabtsev ♦46 | Please, revert your changes of the geometry of the street. It became broken for routes and symmetry. Thanks in advance! |
2 | 2020-07-17 05:51 | ID`s ♦54 | Stop doing useless work! | |
3 | 2020-07-17 12:18 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Please accept our apologies for the circumstances created. Because we realign a lot, we correct many topology and data integrity errors, mistakes could happen.Also, we use Maxar Premium Imagery which is different from Bing. The differences are really significant that's why appeared thi... | |
88121395 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-07-17 06:05 | 1 | 2020-07-17 06:12 | ID`s ♦54 | Stop doing useless work!!! |
2 | 2020-07-17 10:22 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi ID`s,Thank you for your remark.I would like to assure you that we take into consideration all the viewpoints we receive. I am firmly convinced that the ambiguity appeared because of using of two different editing sources, Maxar (which one we use) and Bing. Both of them are good, neverthel... | |
87143616 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-06-25 13:32 | 1 | 2020-07-13 05:36 | *Martin* ♦641 | Hello. You hhave placed fords on nodes shared by both highway and stream. Did you survey it that those are really fords and not eg. culverts? |
2 | 2020-07-13 15:22 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Mostly, we use Maxar Premium Imagery (which tends to be the freshest imagery) and from those images we clearly see that there are no culverts. In case the image is vague we don't change anything. If we have an intersection between a stream and track for example we classify it as a ford. ... | |
3 | 2020-07-13 15:49 | *Martin* ♦641 | Hello,I have checked Maxar Premiom and even much better source in Slovakia - Ortofotomozaika SR (for example https://www.freemap.sk/?map=20/48.987681/22.449477&layers=Z) and no doubt you can't see a culvert. The problem is that to see a culvert you must be looking from a sinde, not from... | |
4 | 2020-07-14 17:47 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hello,The source you have indicated above (Ortofotomozaika SR) is a good one indeed.Thank you very much for the suggestions and for the advice. Sharing your experience will help us to achieve better results. | |
84735701 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-06 06:20 | 1 | 2020-05-10 18:14 | andygol ♦488 | Your edits were reverted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84981917 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84735701 |
2 | 2020-05-15 17:37 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Could you please let us know, what exactly Hi,Could you please let us know, what exactly have been done wrong in this changeset?Each detail provided by you will be highly appreciated.Thank you! | |
84895961 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-08 12:52 | 1 | 2020-05-08 14:56 | saintam1 ♦158 | Hi,Mapillary clearly shows this as a one-way: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=42.69967217&lng=23.2956726942&z=17&pKey=xwlZqXO_Zge8rZX3UtTDEg&x=0.609051443225836&y=0.34440389864204274&zoom=0But the Mapillary image is over a year old, maybe it's ... |
2 | 2020-05-10 06:59 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,We use Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), which tends to be the freshest and the best imagery. Please let us know if you have any other questions. | |
3 | 2020-05-10 08:17 | saintam1 ♦158 | But how can you tell from satellite imagery that a street is not one-way? | |
84875570 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-08 07:35 | 1 | 2020-05-08 13:38 | saintam1 ♦158 | Hello, the road is visible as one-way in Mapillary imagery (which is now over a year old), are you sure it's no longer the case? |
84388331 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-30 07:06 | 1 | 2020-04-30 21:29 | VARVAR8 ♦142 | Харош спамити, Люцифере!В Україні слово вулиця йде після назви... |
2 | 2020-04-30 21:29 | VARVAR8 ♦142 | Хіба важко записати правильно? | |
3 | 2020-04-30 22:12 | VARVAR8 ♦142 | Вибачай. Не ти помилився... Перепрошую. То було до тебе. | |
4 | 2020-05-01 17:51 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Could you please be more specific regarding your comment!Thank you | |
82922544 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-01 12:16 | 1 | 2020-04-01 17:44 | literan ♦6,682 | why private??? there is free access there for foot and bicycles. Reverting. |
2 | 2020-04-03 06:14 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Thank you for informing us about this edit.Reverting it in a correct way is highly appreciated by us. | |
82926877 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-01 13:44 | 1 | 2020-04-01 17:37 | literan ♦6,682 | why private? anyone may freely move on these segments https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.757165%2C55.751487&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=233.156985%2C4.517632&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.635405%2C55.752152&panorama%5Bspan%5D=119.012723%2C80.000000&... |
2 | 2020-04-02 18:16 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for letting us know about this change set. Obviously, it is not a private area. I believe that this happened because in the imagery we use for editing the details were barely noticeable. | |
82380409 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-03-19 08:22 | 1 | 2020-03-19 12:48 | mosstreet ♦232 | Hey. You use outdated bing layers, the meaning of your rights is due to the fact that you enter data on the card that does not exist and in addition, correct what is true? You need few other countries or places in Russia where from entering data, even if outdated, it would be useful for at least som... |
2 | 2020-03-21 08:41 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for your message. We do appreciate your recommendations. I want to inform you that we use Maxar Premium Imagery also, which tends to be one of the best.I assume that this edit was involuntary done. Please, accept our apologies. | |
80311983 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-01-30 11:50 | 1 | 2020-01-30 11:57 | Ars-UA ♦260 | Вы портите геометрию улиц. Не трогайте Мариуполь. You spoil the geometry of the streets. Do not touch Mariupol. |
2 | 2020-01-30 14:04 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Ars- UA,Thank you for informing us about your objection. Be sure, our goal is to improve the area not to get it worse.However, I would appreciate your effort if you will write me back, what exactly have been done wrong.Many thanks. | |
75719174 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-10-15 12:24 | 1 | 2019-12-29 22:15 | zalex_ua ♦37 | why do you break things by this absolutely unneeded edits ??? ....It will be reverted ! |
2 | 2019-12-30 09:34 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Thank you for letting us know about this edit.Whereas, we do commit a lot, a technical mistake was made. | |
77272108 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-11-19 11:37 | 1 | 2019-11-26 22:06 | maraf24 ♦5,255 | There is no way you can decide whether there is a culvert or bridge by using Maxar Imagery. |
73916125 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-08-30 10:56 | 1 | 2019-08-30 10:59 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Greece: destination=Ιωάννινα;Χώρος ανάπαυσης Αμφιλοχία;destination:ref=A5;tagged motorway_junction |
73842127 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-08-28 13:25 | 1 | 2019-08-28 13:31 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Greece: destination=Θεσσαλονίκη;destination:ref=A2 |
73747524 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-08-26 11:33 | 1 | 2019-08-26 11:37 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Greece: destination=Ανατολικό Ζαγόρι;Μάζια;tagged motorway_junction |
72838083 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 05:25 | 1 | 2019-08-02 06:45 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Батурин;Глухів;destination:int_ref=E 101;destination:ref=M-02 |
72839310 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 06:11 | 1 | 2019-08-02 06:42 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Одеса;Луганськ;Житомир;Ковель;Львів;destination:int_ref=E 95 |
2 | 2019-08-02 06:44 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Одеса;Луганськ;Житомир;Ковель;Львів;destination:int_ref=E 95 | |
72839456 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 06:18 | 1 | 2019-08-02 06:41 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Радивилів;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-06 |
72840270 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 06:47 | 1 | 2019-08-02 06:40 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:forward=Рава-Руська;Київ;destination:backward=Львів;destination:int_ref:forward=E 372;E 40;destination:ref:forward=M-09;M-06;destination:ref:backward=H-02;tag oneway=no |
72845383 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 09:01 | 1 | 2019-08-02 06:35 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Дніпро;Полтава;Київ |
72794791 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 05:21 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:37 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Кременчук;Олександрія;destination:int_ref=E 584;destination:ref=M-22 |
72796481 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 06:34 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:34 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Сімферополь;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=35A-002 |
72797141 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 07:00 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:33 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Шербаківка;Бєлгород;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=M-20 |
72798311 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 07:36 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:30 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Лубни;Полтава;Харків;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03 |
72799295 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 08:01 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:28 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03 |
2 | 2019-08-01 08:29 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03 | |
72805589 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 10:45 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:25 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:int_ref=E 471;destination:ref=M-06 |
72809229 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 12:08 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:23 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Чернігів;destination:int_ref=E 95;E 101;destination:ref=M-01 |
72809962 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 12:25 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:21 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 |
72810889 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 12:45 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:19 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Безп’ятне;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 |
72811724 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 13:04 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:18 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Зелений Гай;Одеса;destination:int_ref=E 58;destination:ref=M-14 |
72813571 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-30 13:44 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:44 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:forward=Центр;Леміщиха;destination:backward=Одеса;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:ref:bacward=M-05;tag oneway=no |
2 | 2019-08-01 08:15 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:forward=Центр;Леміщиха;destination:backward=Одеса;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:ref:bacward=M-05;tag oneway=no | |
72854600 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-31 12:37 | 1 | 2019-07-31 14:17 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:backward=нафтозавод;destination:forward=Київ;tag oneway=no |
72761587 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 09:24 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:54 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Первомайське;Джанкой;Харків;destination:ref=35A-002;destination:int_ref=E 105 |
72761859 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 09:32 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:52 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Kиїв;Одеса;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref=E 95 |
72765093 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 11:09 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:51 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:ref=M-07;destination:int_ref=E 373 |
72765282 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 11:15 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:49 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40 |
2 | 2019-07-31 08:49 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40 | |
72766794 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 11:54 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:47 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:ref=M-06;destination:int_ref=E 50;E 471 |
72772028 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 13:54 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:36 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 |
2 | 2019-07-31 08:38 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 | |
3 | 2019-07-31 08:41 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 | |
72772865 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-29 14:12 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:33 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Біла Церква;Умань;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05 |
72627568 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 06:00 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:24 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Кільцева дорога;destination:ref=T-10-27;destination:int_ref=E 40 |
72631032 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 07:48 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:21 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination:int_ref:backward=E105;oneway=yes;destination:ref:backward=M18;destination:ref:forward=M18;destination:int_ref:forward=E105 |
72631861 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 08:07 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:10 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Калинівка;Вінниця;Могилів-Подільський;destination:ref=M-21;destination:int_ref=E 583 |
72632875 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 08:29 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:07 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Житомир;destination:ref=M 21 |
72638237 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 10:44 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:04 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Львів;destination:int_ref=E 372 |
72642077 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 12:13 | 1 | 2019-07-31 08:01 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Тернопіль;destination:ref=M-12;destination:int_ref=E 50 |
72645403 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-25 13:20 | 1 | 2019-07-31 07:52 | User4 - Lightcyphers | UKR: added destination=Kиїв;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:backward=Kиїв;destination:forward=Ставище;Володарка;Житомир;destination:ref:forward=P-18;destination:ref:backward=M-05;oneway=no |
72091383 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-10 11:54 | 1 | 2019-07-16 07:29 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Belarus: added destination=Вайнілава;destination:forward=Чэрвень;Мар’іна Горка;destination:ref=H9934;destination:ref:backward=M4;oneway=no tag |
72181243 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-12 13:27 | 1 | 2019-07-12 13:32 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Belarus: added destination=Пухавічы;Угалец;destination:ref=H9383;tagged motorway_junction |
71897854 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-04 13:40 | 1 | 2019-07-04 13:58 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Belarus: added destination=Чавусы;Крычаў;Гомель;destination:ref=M8;destination:int_ref=E95;destination:backward=Чавусы;Крычаў;Гомель;destination:forward=Расна;Мсцiслаў;destination:int_ref:backward=E95;destination:ref:backward=M8;destination:ref:forward... |
71786031 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-07-01 13:47 | 1 | 2019-07-01 13:50 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Belarus: added destination:=Мiнск;destination:ref=M2;tagged motorway_junction #Kaart-MR-8035 #Lightcyphers |
71631960 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-06-26 10:53 | 1 | 2019-06-26 11:01 | User4 - Lightcyphers | Belarus: added destination=Брэст;destination:country=Чарнігаў;destination:int_ref=E95;destination:ref=М8;tagged motorway_junction |
67812593 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-03-05 16:35 | 1 | 2019-03-08 10:02 | Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers ♦16 | Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7TtThScAJGPbFJmRXBYaHV0NnBQajVVcWk3ckNJNXMtb2JF/view?usp=sharing |
64563459 by User4 - Lightcyphers @ 2018-11-16 11:44 | 1 | 2018-11-18 14:27 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!You created some ways without tags here, they looks like residential roads to me.There are some roads with highway=track, did you use that because they are unpaved? If they are residential roads you should use surface=unpaved or similar to map that.There is also one with highway=trackrwhi... |
2 | 2018-11-19 20:17 | Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers ♦16 | Hi there.Some residential roads in Moldavian villages are so bad that only a tractor or ATV can pass them. I know that mapping for render (or in our case, for routing engines) is a bad practice but these paths are so bad that just 'unpaved' is not enough to not confuse users. | |
3 | 2018-11-19 20:18 | Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers ♦16 | fixed typo in tag value and connected to road | |
4 | 2018-11-19 20:31 | GerdP ♦2,751 | In many countries highway=track also means access=agricultural. You may use smoothness=*, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness |