63 Changesets created by User4 - Lightcyphers have been discussed with 6 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
97355095
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2021-01-12 08:19
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agoarcturusss
♦18
здания лучше сразу делать прямоугольными
77415518
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-11-22 08:59
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoopencarpatia
♦46
I am going to delete this fake culvert you've added to "fix highway/waterway" crossing.

I am asking you to STOP doing such edits without: a) onsite inspection b) using street imagery c) using survey from reliable sources.

Using aerial images is NOT sufficient for this king of &q...
2 ~ 5 years agoopencarpatia
♦46
Fake culvert deleted with following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97132820
89176793
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-08-10 05:48
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoopencarpatia
♦46
Hello, please explain why are you marking no existing objects??

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=835657255#map=19/48.88840/23.42518
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi opencarpatia,
According to the source you apply (local knowledge), I would say that you have to be right. That's why I have removed the existing culverts from the changeset.
Thanks for helping improve the OSM.
96300429
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-12-23 06:48
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoququruzka
♦204
if you change name=* ,then please chnage also and name:uk=*
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi ququruzka,
Thank you for the advice, is highly appreciated.
89022509
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-08-06 07:48
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoopencarpatia
♦46
Hello, please explain why this crossing was marked as "ford"? Have you been there?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7790696971/history#map=19/48.72395/23.48316
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hello opencarpatia,
Usually if in the image is visible and clear then it receives a tag (in the given example ,,ford,,), otherwise we don't touch it.
Please be informed that for editing and completing different tasks, we use Maxar Premium Imagery layer, which is the most accurate to actual g...
3 ~ 5 years agoopencarpatia
♦46
Hello & thanks for the response. Indeed Maxar is quite detailed & up to date.

But when doing further updates, please be aware that waterways added with recent massive import by VARVAR8 are extremely inaccurate. They often cross buildings, are displaced, duplicate already existing or simpl...
4 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi opencarpatia,
Thank you for sharing the above information with us. I understand your position and I totally agree with it.
Best of luck!
93406877
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-11-02 09:11
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoDyoma
♦26
What the hell? Why you move my edits? It was mapped with offset. Maxar with 0;0 is not correct for this part. Please revert all your recent edits or I will do that!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93406877
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi Dyoma,
Thank you for letting us know about this issue. The information provided makes this case clear and obvious.
We do apologize for all the inconveniences created. We are all human and we all learn to become more knowledgeable in improving OSM.
Thank you again for your understanding.
92207794
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-10-09 05:12
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agodval
♦426
Hi, User4! Ваш брод вылезает на берег, где брода не может быть по определению (Definition of ford: a shallow part of a body of water that may be crossed by wading.; Брод — неглубокое место в реке или ручье, ...
2 ~ 5 years agodval
♦426
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes : "The highway should share nodes with the riverbanks where it crosses them and also a node with the waterway=* where they cross. Split the highway between the riverbanks and apply ford=yes to this segment".
3 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi dval,
Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.
We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further.
89749512
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-08-21 13:41
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoolehz
♦400
How many times should I tell you? Don't touch the roads!!! You ignore GPS-tracks and think that Maxar is an absolute truth. You don't improve, you make it worse!
88091705
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-07-16 13:50
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoID`s
♦54
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635577704 Был проложен отвратительно. Прямо сквозь парковку. 3 раза крутили, в итоге все сломали.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7721184487 В этой точке НЕТ ни ворот, ни...
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Thank you for letting us know about this changeset.
We'll analyze carefully these edits and will take much care further.
88088073
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-07-16 12:14
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoAlexRiabtsev
♦46
Please, revert your changes of the geometry of the street. It became broken for routes and symmetry. Thanks in advance!
2 ~ 5 years agoID`s
♦54
Stop doing useless work!
3 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Please accept our apologies for the circumstances created.
Because we realign a lot, we correct many topology and data integrity errors, mistakes could happen.
Also, we use Maxar Premium Imagery which is different from Bing. The differences are really significant that's why appeared thi...
88121395
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-07-17 06:05
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoID`s
♦54
Stop doing useless work!!!
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi ID`s,
Thank you for your remark.
I would like to assure you that we take into consideration all the viewpoints we receive.
I am firmly convinced that the ambiguity appeared because of using of two different editing sources, Maxar (which one we use) and Bing.
Both of them are good, neverthel...
87143616
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-06-25 13:32
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years ago*Martin*
♦659
Hello. You hhave placed fords on nodes shared by both highway and stream. Did you survey it that those are really fords and not eg. culverts?
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Mostly, we use Maxar Premium Imagery (which tends to be the freshest imagery) and from those images we clearly see that there are no culverts.
In case the image is vague we don't change anything. If we have an intersection between a stream and track for example we classify it as a ford. ...
3 ~ 5 years ago*Martin*
♦659
Hello,

I have checked Maxar Premiom and even much better source in Slovakia - Ortofotomozaika SR (for example https://www.freemap.sk/?map=20/48.987681/22.449477&layers=Z) and no doubt you can't see a culvert. The problem is that to see a culvert you must be looking from a sinde, not from...
4 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hello,

The source you have indicated above (Ortofotomozaika SR) is a good one indeed.
Thank you very much for the suggestions and for the advice. Sharing your experience will help us to achieve better results.
84735701
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-05-06 06:20
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoandygol
♦495
Your edits were reverted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84981917
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84735701
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Could you please let us know, what exactly Hi,
Could you please let us know, what exactly have been done wrong in this changeset?
Each detail provided by you will be highly appreciated.
Thank you!
84895961
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-05-08 12:52
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agosaintam1
♦163
Hi,

Mapillary clearly shows this as a one-way: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=42.69967217&lng=23.2956726942&z=17&pKey=xwlZqXO_Zge8rZX3UtTDEg&x=0.609051443225836&y=0.34440389864204274&zoom=0

But the Mapillary image is over a year old, maybe it's ...
2 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
We use Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), which tends to be the freshest and the best imagery. Please let us know if you have any other questions.
3 ~ 5 years agosaintam1
♦163
But how can you tell from satellite imagery that a street is not one-way?
84875570
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-05-08 07:35
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agosaintam1
♦163
Hello, the road is visible as one-way in Mapillary imagery (which is now over a year old), are you sure it's no longer the case?
84388331
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-04-30 07:06
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoVARVAR8
♦142
Харош спамити, Люцифере!
В Україні слово вулиця йде після назви...
2 ~ 5 years agoVARVAR8
♦142
Хіба важко записати правильно?
3 ~ 5 years agoVARVAR8
♦142
Вибачай. Не ти помилився... Перепрошую. То було до тебе.
4 ~ 5 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Could you please be more specific regarding your comment!
Thank you
82922544
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-04-01 12:16
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoliteran
♦7,044
why private??? there is free access there for foot and bicycles. Reverting.
2 ~ 6 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Thank you for informing us about this edit.
Reverting it in a correct way is highly appreciated by us.
82926877
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-04-01 13:44
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoliteran
♦7,044
why private? anyone may freely move on these segments https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.757165%2C55.751487&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=233.156985%2C4.517632&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.635405%2C55.752152&panorama%5Bspan%5D=119.012723%2C80.000000&...
2 ~ 6 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Thank you for letting us know about this change set.
Obviously, it is not a private area. I believe that this happened because in the imagery we use for editing the details were barely noticeable.
82380409
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-03-19 08:22
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agomosstreet
♦232
Hey. You use outdated bing layers, the meaning of your rights is due to the fact that you enter data on the card that does not exist and in addition, correct what is true? You need few other countries or places in Russia where from entering data, even if outdated, it would be useful for at least som...
2 ~ 6 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi,
Thank you for your message. We do appreciate your recommendations. I want to inform you that we use Maxar Premium Imagery also, which tends to be one of the best.
I assume that this edit was involuntary done. Please, accept our apologies.

80311983
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2020-01-30 11:50
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoArs-UA
♦260
Вы портите геометрию улиц. Не трогайте Мариуполь.
You spoil the geometry of the streets. Do not touch Mariupol.
2 ~ 6 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Hi Ars- UA,
Thank you for informing us about your objection. Be sure, our goal is to improve the area not to get it worse.
However, I would appreciate your effort if you will write me back, what exactly have been done wrong.
Many thanks.
75719174
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-10-15 12:24
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agozalex_ua
♦37
why do you break things by this absolutely unneeded edits ??? ....
It will be reverted !
2 ~ 6 years agoUser6 - Lightcyphers
♦51
Thank you for letting us know about this edit.

Whereas, we do commit a lot, a technical mistake was made.
77272108
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-11-19 11:37
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agomaraf24
♦5,343
There is no way you can decide whether there is a culvert or bridge by using Maxar Imagery.
73916125
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-08-30 10:56
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Greece: destination=Ιωάννινα;Χώρος ανάπαυσης Αμφιλοχία;destination:ref=A5;tagged motorway_junction
73842127
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-08-28 13:25
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Greece: destination=Θεσσαλονίκη;destination:ref=A2
73747524
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-08-26 11:33
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Greece: destination=Ανατολικό Ζαγόρι;Μάζια;tagged motorway_junction
72838083
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 05:25
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Батурин;Глухів;destination:int_ref=E 101;destination:ref=M-02
72839310
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 06:11
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Одеса;Луганськ;Житомир;Ковель;Львів;destination:int_ref=E 95
2 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Одеса;Луганськ;Житомир;Ковель;Львів;destination:int_ref=E 95
72839456
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 06:18
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Радивилів;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-06
72840270
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 06:47
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:forward=Рава-Руська;Київ;destination:backward=Львів;destination:int_ref:forward=E 372;E 40;destination:ref:forward=M-09;M-06;destination:ref:backward=H-02;tag oneway=no
72845383
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 09:01
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Дніпро;Полтава;Київ
72794791
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 05:21
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Кременчук;Олександрія;destination:int_ref=E 584;destination:ref=M-22
72796481
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 06:34
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Сімферополь;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=35A-002
72797141
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 07:00
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Шербаківка;Бєлгород;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=M-20
72798311
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 07:36
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Лубни;Полтава;Харків;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
72799295
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 08:01
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
2 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
72805589
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 10:45
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:int_ref=E 471;destination:ref=M-06
72809229
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 12:08
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Чернігів;destination:int_ref=E 95;E 101;destination:ref=M-01
72809962
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 12:25
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
72810889
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 12:45
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Безп’ятне;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
72811724
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 13:04
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Зелений Гай;Одеса;destination:int_ref=E 58;destination:ref=M-14
72813571
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-30 13:44
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:forward=Центр;Леміщиха;destination:backward=Одеса;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:ref:bacward=M-05;tag oneway=no
2 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:forward=Центр;Леміщиха;destination:backward=Одеса;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:ref:bacward=M-05;tag oneway=no
72854600
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-31 12:37
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:backward=нафтозавод;destination:forward=Київ;tag oneway=no
72761587
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 09:24
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Первомайське;Джанкой;Харків;destination:ref=35A-002;destination:int_ref=E 105
72761859
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 09:32
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Kиїв;Одеса;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref=E 95
72765093
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 11:09
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:ref=M-07;destination:int_ref=E 373
72765282
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 11:15
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40
2 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40
72766794
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 11:54
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:ref=M-06;destination:int_ref=E 50;E 471
72772028
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 13:54
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
2 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
3 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Одеса;destination:street=Київська вулиця;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
72772865
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-29 14:12
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Біла Церква;Умань;destination:int_ref=E 95;destination:ref=M-05
72627568
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 06:00
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Кільцева дорога;destination:ref=T-10-27;destination:int_ref=E 40
72631032
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 07:48
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination:int_ref:backward=E105;oneway=yes;destination:ref:backward=M18;destination:ref:forward=M18;destination:int_ref:forward=E105
72631861
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 08:07
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Калинівка;Вінниця;Могилів-Подільський;destination:ref=M-21;destination:int_ref=E 583
72632875
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 08:29
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Житомир;destination:ref=M 21
72638237
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 10:44
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Львів;destination:int_ref=E 372
72642077
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 12:13
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Тернопіль;destination:ref=M-12;destination:int_ref=E 50
72645403
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-25 13:20
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers UKR: added destination=Kиїв;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:backward=Kиїв;destination:forward=Ставище;Володарка;Житомир;destination:ref:forward=P-18;destination:ref:backward=M-05;oneway=no
72091383
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-10 11:54
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Belarus: added destination=Вайнілава;destination:forward=Чэрвень;Мар’іна Горка;destination:ref=H9934;destination:ref:backward=M4;oneway=no tag
72181243
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-12 13:27
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Belarus: added destination=Пухавічы;Угалец;destination:ref=H9383;tagged motorway_junction
71897854
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-04 13:40
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Belarus: added destination=Чавусы;Крычаў;Гомель;destination:ref=M8;destination:int_ref=E95;destination:backward=Чавусы;Крычаў;Гомель;destination:forward=Расна;Мсцiслаў;destination:int_ref:backward=E95;destination:ref:backward=M8;destination:ref:forward...
71786031
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-07-01 13:47
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Belarus: added destination:=Мiнск;destination:ref=M2;tagged motorway_junction #Kaart-MR-8035 #Lightcyphers
71631960
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-06-26 10:53
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoUser4 - Lightcyphers Belarus: added destination=Брэст;destination:country=Чарнігаў;destination:int_ref=E95;destination:ref=М8;tagged motorway_junction
67812593
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2019-03-05 16:35
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoAnatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers
♦16
Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7TtThScAJGPbFJmRXBYaHV0NnBQajVVcWk3ckNJNXMtb2JF/view?usp=sharing
64563459
by User4 - Lightcyphers
@ 2018-11-16 11:44
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoGerdP
♦2,827
Hi!
You created some ways without tags here, they looks like residential roads to me.
There are some roads with highway=track, did you use that because they are unpaved? If they are residential roads you should use surface=unpaved or similar to map that.
There is also one with highway=trackr
whi...
2 ~ 7 years agoAnatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers
♦16
Hi there.
Some residential roads in Moldavian villages are so bad that only a tractor or ATV can pass them. I know that mapping for render (or in our case, for routing engines) is a bad practice but these paths are so bad that just 'unpaved' is not enough to not confuse users.
3 ~ 7 years agoAnatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers
♦16
fixed typo in tag value and connected to road
4 ~ 7 years agoGerdP
♦2,827
In many countries highway=track also means access=agricultural. You may use smoothness=*, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness