| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91051094 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-17 13:26 | 1 | 2021-07-07 16:59 | dval ♦426 | Hi, User5! Вы (ваша команда) то добавляете ford на хайвее от берега до берега, то сейчас удаляете их. Второе излишне, поскольку предусмотрено Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dye... |
| 83253938 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-08 12:34 | 1 | 2021-01-29 11:06 | Murcik ♦29 | Не безобраничайте, пожалуйста. Не все валидаторы валидируют правильно.Их авторы не читают wikihttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9E.D1.81.D0.BE.D0.B1.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.83.D1.87.D0.B0.D0.B8 |
| 77529621 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-11-25 14:43 | 1 | 2020-08-03 20:23 | Myazyk ♦574 | Ти малюєш на карті шо попало!Мости і кульверти місцями міняєш або наносиш їх там, де насправді є брід.На фіга то робити, якщо ти не знаєш місцевості? |
| 2 | 2020-08-05 21:12 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for letting us know about this changeset.We'll analyze carefully these edits and will take much care further. | |
| 83575543 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-15 08:11 | 1 | 2020-04-15 17:09 | literan ♦6,682 | пожалуйста, не делайте общие точки у строящихся дорог и имеющихся. Имеющиеся дороги там будут перкроены. Вы причиняете неудобство для будущих правок. Откачу. |
| 81874939 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-03-06 15:33 | 1 | 2020-03-07 07:17 | mosstreet ♦232 | Your edit should be rolled back, do it yourself? And in general, roads in the Pskov region should not be ruled, especially the main ones. Bad mapping. |
| 2 | 2020-03-09 11:09 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for informing us about this edit. Be certain that our goal is to improve the roads, not to get them worse.I observed that you have used for editing Bing Aerial Imagery control method, which is not considered one of the best at the present time.Please, let me know if you still want... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-09 11:25 | mosstreet ♦232 | HiI use that substrate which uses the minimum discrepancy with gps tracks. If there is a need, then according to a number of signs the freshest is selected, the object is drawn in it and shifted out of objects in the one that is more accurate on the ground. I corrected your edit. Edit Package: 819... | |
| 77272349 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-11-19 11:41 | 1 | 2019-11-19 20:55 | BohdanKuts ♦49 | Hi!Could you please help me to understand what data and how was used to make T-18-06 alignment? |
| 76589864 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-11-04 12:25 | 1 | 2019-11-04 12:57 | iorant ♦10 | Hi. Why are you changing correctly aligned data to misaligned maxar without checking the gpx/strava tracks? And not only here but in your almost all previous changesets. Same as User1-User4.https://imgur.com/vA2yX1c |
| 68335889 by User5 - Lightcyphers @ 2019-03-20 13:26 | 1 | 2019-03-20 13:52 | Buraddo ♦144 | What geometry did you improve? Using old imagery and putting a lot of nodes that don't even correlate with the data in OSM doesn't help anybody, this edit and a lot of others like this one are damaging. |
| 2 | 2019-03-27 15:42 | Anatolie GOLOVCO - Lightcyphers ♦16 | For history purpose. We had discussed in chat. All issues with ref`s where solved in following relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9395909 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9398352 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9431523 |