| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82118739 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-03-12 15:11 | 1 | 2021-09-22 06:02 | luiswoo ♦599 | Мил человек, у тебя с расшифровкой снимков совсем всё плохо? Как ещё объяснить причину появления у надземных переходных переходов через железнодорожные пути перес... |
| 89554903 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-18 06:48 | 1 | 2021-06-15 18:38 | olehz ♦391 | thanks for the shitty job |
| 96387092 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-12-24 12:59 | 1 | 2021-01-04 02:25 | 4004 ♦1,882 | there is a handful of turning circles in Belarus/Hrodna, this is not one of them - it's just a dead end service road/driveway |
| 87123359 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-06-25 07:43 | 1 | 2020-12-20 02:15 | opencarpatia ♦46 | Hello, why this part of the stream is marked as culvert? Have you been there? There is a bridge here. Currently it has only one lane & different surface & smoothness. |
| 2 | 2020-12-27 18:27 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hello opencarpatia,Thank you for the attention you pay to our commits. I do apologies if unintentionally this bridge was marked as a culvert. Probably, the image was not very comprehensible. Please inform us what other accurate sources are you using for editing, so we keep in mind in order t... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-31 05:51 | opencarpatia ♦46 | My source - is personal on site inspection. Please remove the culvert. | |
| 92558392 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-10-16 06:14 | 1 | 2020-10-16 15:27 | mavl ♦76,055 | Hello. This changeset moves the path by 7 meters. There is no reason to move this path because it is marked rightly. This changeset was reverted. The tag "flood_prone=yes" was added. |
| 2 | 2020-10-18 13:02 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hello mavl,Thank for your remark and your suggestion.The path was moved because of the differences in the images. The primary source we use is Maxar Premium Imagery, because this tends to be the most accurate to actual ground data. | |
| 92120379 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-10-07 15:07 | 1 | 2020-10-14 07:12 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | wrong edit, This is a winter road according to the name, Ice_road=yes should be here, not ford. I think you should know Russian for such edits |
| 2 | 2020-10-18 12:20 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Владимир К,Thank you for your remark. According to the name of the highway ,,Автозимник Верхнеколымск - Нелемное'' this definitely should be an ice road. | |
| 92423049 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-10-13 14:14 | 1 | 2020-10-14 07:04 | Tom Chups ♦19 | There isnt any pier in Maxar photo. Is it a hallucinations? |
| 2 | 2020-10-14 08:02 | Tom Chups ♦19 | I am sorry, it is my mistake. In new dron photo i can see this pier. | |
| 89244561 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-11 10:19 | 1 | 2020-10-13 20:20 | Myazyk ♦574 | Нащо наносити мости там, де їх нема, кульверти там де їх нема? |
| 92183437 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-10-08 15:24 | 1 | 2020-10-09 07:21 | dval ♦426 | Hi, User7! Ваш брод вылезает на берег, где брода не может быть по определению (Definition of ford: a shallow part of a body of water that may be crossed by wading.; Брод — неглубокое место в реке или ручье, ... |
| 2 | 2020-10-09 07:39 | dval ♦426 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes : "The highway should share nodes with the riverbanks where it crosses them and also a node with the waterway=* where they cross. Split the highway between the riverbanks and apply ford=yes to this segment". | |
| 3 | 2020-10-09 10:04 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi dval,Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further. | |
| 90863500 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-14 11:35 | 1 | 2020-09-25 14:09 | parukhin ♦153 | Hi! Why do you delete tags from restaurant and only move amenity=restaurant to new relarion? |
| 2 | 2020-10-01 19:21 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi parukhin,It was created a multi-polygon, therefore the tags were changed. Also, the restaurant was connected to another multi-polygon which is water. Should you have more questions, please contact us. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-02 06:24 | parukhin ♦153 | Yes, but when created multipolygon was deleted many tags.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295857500/history | |
| 91214167 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-21 08:49 | 1 | 2020-09-21 23:08 | skfd ♦277 | please stop cutting out lake from under floating buildings --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91214167 |
| 2 | 2020-09-27 19:13 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi skfd,The system was showing an error exactly for this building. In the tag details it was mentioned as building, if it was tagged as floating building, the changes would not have been made. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-27 19:17 | skfd ♦277 | please don't blame the system. you can not fix this error through satellite images. just put fiz me "is it floating or is it permanent?" and left locals survey it. | |
| 4 | 2020-09-30 17:46 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Thank you very much for this suggestion. It is really a good idea. | |
| 91420132 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-24 08:56 | 1 | 2020-09-25 12:16 | Tom Chups ♦19 | What the F@ck? Is it vandalism or idiocy? there are a tunnel here!!!! |
| 2 | 2020-09-27 19:22 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Tom Chups,Please accept our apologies for the circumstances created.Because we realign a lot, we correct many topology and data integrity errors, mistakes could happen.Thank you for your understanding. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-28 06:53 | Tom Chups ♦19 | please, be careful! last week, this user has already broken a multypoligon of Ladoga Lakes. It is still being rendered now. Thats a lot for one "professional contributor". | |
| 90859418 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-14 10:28 | 1 | 2020-09-18 13:00 | skfd ♦277 | Please don't cut holes in a pond for a *floating* building. there is water below it --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90859418 |
| 2 | 2020-09-20 18:32 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Thank you for your feedback. The information provided above, will help us to avoid the same situations in the future. | |
| 90704135 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-10 13:02 | 1 | 2020-09-12 14:24 | Stalker61 ♦290 | You unreasonably changed the true position of the ice crossing to please the validator. Your edit is completely undone. |
| 2 | 2020-09-20 18:14 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Stalker61,There was a misunderstanding between ice_road and ice_crossing. Thank you for noticing this issue. | |
| 90064095 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-08-28 07:20 | 1 | 2020-08-28 10:31 | olehz ♦391 | How can you know that there is a bridge, and not a tunnel or a ford? Stop doing this monkey job !!! |
| 2 | 2020-08-31 19:29 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi olehz,Usually if in the image is visible and clear then it receives a tag, otherwise we don't touch it. We use Maxar Premium Imagery layer, which is the most accurate to actual ground data. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-05 16:53 | olehz ♦391 | It's not treu. I noticed that your company makes a lot of mistakes (you rarely guess where the bridge is and where is not the bridge). If it is impossible to determine from the image, then you simply randomly designate a bridge or a tunnel. You can not do it this way! What's the point of h... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-13 20:31 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | @olehz,Undoubtedly you are an experienced editor, that's why I want to thank you for the attention you pay to our commits. Please inform us what other sources besides GPS-tracks are you using, so we keep in mind in order to prevent future disagreements. | |
| 90310483 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-02 14:39 | 1 | 2020-09-06 14:13 | olehz ♦391 | How many times should I tell you? Don't touch the roads!!! You ignore GPS-tracks and think that Maxar is an absolute truth. You don't improve, you make it worse!Return it as it was. I'm tired to correct your "improvements" !!! |
| 2 | 2020-09-13 19:53 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | @olehz,I do apologies if unintentionally the GPS- tracks have omitted in this edit. We also use GPS-tracks a lot, being an essential and an accurate source of editing. Thank you for your understanding. | |
| 90685086 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-09-10 07:49 | 1 | 2020-09-10 10:40 | skfd ♦277 | Those rectangles are just floating piers, dont cut them out of the lake please --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90685086 |
| 2 | 2020-09-10 10:59 | User7 - Lightcyphers | OSM task: error for the building in the water. "I rise the building like a bridge but my mistake was that I did not put tag layer 1." --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90685086 | |
| 86566318 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-06-12 12:06 | 1 | 2020-08-10 14:51 | olehz ♦391 | Idiot, what do you know about GPS-tracks? Stop moving roads |
| 2 | 2020-08-10 15:12 | olehz ♦391 | Crazy vandalism. I have to revert all your "improvements" | |
| 3 | 2020-08-11 16:45 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi olehz,Thank you for your remark. Because we realign a lot, we correct many topology and data integrity errors, mistakes could happen.Also, we mostly use Maxar Premium Imagery (which tends to be the freshest) which is different from other sources. I agree that the differences are really sign... | |
| 85256666 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-15 11:06 | 1 | 2020-07-03 10:58 | TimurRin ♦4 | You just ruined everything here |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 11:21 | TimurRin ♦4 | fixed your mess in 87500611 changeset | |
| 3 | 2020-07-04 08:07 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi TimurRin,Thank you for informing us about this changeset. We do understand your point of view regarding this edit, however I would like to assure you that our aim is to improve OSM not to ruin it. This happened because we use different types of imagery. We mostly use Maxar Premium Imagery w... | |
| 4 | 2020-07-04 11:34 | TimurRin ♦4 | Ok, thanks for your reply. Sorry that I didn't specify the reason of my rant: your edit affected only certain nodes of ways and areas, making them look unaligned to the other ones, and it surprised me (was this automated edit btw?). Since I live near this place, I don't really need any map... | |
| 5 | 2020-07-04 16:48 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Thank you for the explanation you provided, it is all clear now.Is not an automated edit, each edit is performed manually. We also correct many topology and data integrity errors.Thank you one more time for your cooperation and understanding. | |
| 86135264 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-06-03 12:05 | 1 | 2020-06-03 18:06 | literan ♦6,682 | service=driveway means road to cottage/dacha, lowest level in service road classification. Reverted |
| 2 | 2020-06-05 22:25 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi literan,Please be informed that, a driveway is a service road leading to a residence, property, or place of business. Even if there are a few parking spots on the property, it remains a driveway. (,,highway- service,, / ,,service- driveway,,.Defining the ,,service way,, more detailed:-ser... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-06 10:49 | literan ♦6,682 | Hi. I suppose that better you should read all the article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway, not only first sentence." It typically branches from a bigger road and leads toward an entrance to a specific destination (building, etc.). It may end at or pass the entrance,... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-06 12:54 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | @literanThank you for your prompt reply and the kind explanation. The image really proves that, there is an apartment building which requires a different tag. All the best. | |
| 85787598 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-26 18:48 | 1 | 2020-06-04 19:02 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Doubled road too |
| 2 | 2020-06-06 07:03 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Vladimir,Could you please let me know, which road was doubled ,,Новая улица,, or ,,Амурская улица,,? Thanks | |
| 3 | 2020-06-06 10:05 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Амурская улица was doubled with Новая улица above it | |
| 85896912 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-28 15:01 | 1 | 2020-06-04 18:52 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Hi!looks like you doubled the road here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66285856 |
| 2 | 2020-06-04 18:56 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | i fixed that | |
| 3 | 2020-06-06 07:15 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Thanks Vladimir for informing us about this edit.Because we do correct many topology and data integrity errors, could happen by mistake. | |
| 83204724 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-07 14:56 | 1 | 2020-06-04 18:58 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Hi!this is the service road, not unclassified |
| 2 | 2020-06-06 07:08 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi Vladimir,Thanks for this specification. | |
| 82530199 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-03-23 15:46 | 1 | 2020-05-28 18:52 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Добрый день. Вы специально занялись систематическими вандальными правками? |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 19:10 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Hey.Have you specifically engaged in systematic vandal edits? | |
| 3 | 2020-05-29 14:25 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,After performing a detailed analysis of this changeset, I can admit that the geometry was improved, by removing 21 nodes which were extra. The result: improved map after Maxar - the newest editing source. There is no evidence that the changes damaged the geometry.Therefore let's ... | |
| 4 | 2020-05-29 16:10 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Привет,Данный комментарий говорит только о том, что вы не просто вандалы, а циничные вандалы. Вам каяться надо, а вы плюете открыто в лицо. При этом вспоминаете о н... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-29 20:55 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,please tell us exactly what is wrong with my team's edits and what exactly you would like to see here. | |
| 6 | 2020-05-29 21:42 | Anton Khorev ♦254 | @LightcyphersYou don't need a detailed analysis to notice that after the discussed edits this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238304253 intersects with this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238217052 , this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266631678 intersects w... | |
| 7 | 2020-05-29 21:59 | Anton Khorev ♦254 | @Stalker61Пожалуйста, не надо писать про "вандальные правки", "плюете открыто в лицо" и подобное в обсуждениях правок. Ясно, что это не приведёт ни к какому по... | |
| 8 | 2020-05-30 04:43 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Добрый день АнтонА неужели это не видно? Вей улицы перенесли, перетащили на дома. Причем оригинально. Практически каждую отдельную точку по улице Ленина перетащил... | |
| 9 | 2020-05-30 13:59 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | @Anton KhorevThank you for the attached links. The explanation provided by you makes it all clear. Indeed the intersection of the roads and buildings is not an improvement, and this could be avoided indisputably. @Stalker61 Please accept our apologies. It was unintentional and I would like t... | |
| 10 | 2020-05-30 14:35 | Stalker61 ♦290 | @User6Thank you for acknowledging the fallacy of your actions. The best solution in this case is to roll back this and the edits I mentioned above.I personally do not have any personal complaints to you or to each individual member of your team. You have set for yourself a very difficult task - ... | |
| 11 | 2020-05-30 14:45 | Stalker61 ♦290 | @User6I apologize that I voluntarily or involuntarily offended you with my categorization and possibly overly high quality requirements for the data changed by your team members. First of all, I extend such requirements to myself and really want other users to strive for this. This is an image of ... | |
| 12 | 2020-05-30 15:39 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Reverting changeset # 82530199; 82118214 (erroneous data and unreasonable displacement vei street to nearby buildings)https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85985299#map=15/59.6431/67.4100Kondinskoye. Made necessary corrections after rollbackhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85985392#ma... | |
| 13 | 2020-05-30 16:10 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Here's another for clarity, the quality of satellite imagery presented by Maxar and Esri. I highly recommend viewing background images in josmhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/61.00332/68.99230 | |
| 85883833 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-28 10:32 | 1 | 2020-05-29 11:00 | Stalker61 ♦290 | ПриветОчередная правка вандального типа. Не трогайте данные, если вы не можете их реально сделать лучше.Опять приходится подчищать за вами.--------------------------------------... |
| 2 | 2020-05-29 20:54 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,please tell us exactly what is wrong with my team's edits and what exactly you would like to see here. | |
| 3 | 2020-05-30 14:51 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Hi,here everything is already brought by me in the appropriate form and does not require any action | |
| 85950640 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-29 14:01 | 1 | 2020-05-29 16:02 | mavl ♦76,055 | Hello. This changeset does not improve the geometry of the roads. For example, The direct road was turned into an indirect road. Rectangular corners was turned into non-rectangular corners. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150897463 Also the fence was moved to the wrong place: ... |
| 2 | 2020-05-30 12:22 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi mavl,Thank you for informing us about this changeset. Because we do correct many topology and data integrity errors, could happen by mistake. Please accept our apologies. | |
| 85823679 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-05-27 10:09 | 1 | 2020-05-28 16:40 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Добрый день. Может уже хватит калечить данные по кривому Maxar-у |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 18:56 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,We do use Maxar Premium Imagery because it tends to be the freshest and the best imagine. Improving OSM is our common aim, that's why I would be grateful if you'll let us know what's wrong with this edit.Thank you | |
| 3 | 2020-05-28 19:37 | Stalker61 ♦290 | HiI have no idea what goals your team is pursuing. I can see the real result of crippled data of previously scattered data using track alignment bing and dgs. Mach images have a widespread distortion and are absolutely not acceptable for editing. The results of your activity have done more harm th... | |
| 4 | 2020-05-28 19:45 | Stalker61 ♦290 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/59.5279/67.6924Here, the 5th and 7th also worked on improvements?You better not touch anything at all. Evil is not enough. | |
| 5 | 2020-05-29 13:49 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Dear Stalker61, I urge you to stop calling our activity - vandalism, as long as we use the best editing source, which you also use (Maxar Imagery). Even if some errors are made, this is not vandalism and we are analyzing each case separately to correct it. In addition to aligning geometr... | |
| 6 | 2020-05-29 17:05 | Stalker61 ♦290 | Привет,вы безусловно можете называть свою деятельность и оценивать результаты ее деятельности как хотите. Это ваше законное право.Мое законное право оценивать ... | |
| 83422896 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-12 10:27 | 1 | 2020-05-24 23:38 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Please, don't change service roads( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732358172/history) near apartments into hw=residential? it is wrong in Russia. |
| 2 | 2020-05-24 23:41 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | *wrong in most cases,of coursethere are some exceptions, but by default it should be hw=service | |
| 3 | 2020-05-26 18:52 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | All the changes are made according to the common rules. Therefore can you please share the source stating all the exceptions for Russia? | |
| 83290763 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-09 07:39 | 1 | 2020-04-24 10:26 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | Hi! why do you use Bing instead of newer Maxar? maxar is newer here, you can check on Мамонтово near. and there is no bridge, but ford |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 14:29 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi. Thanks for informing us concerning this edit. Mostly, our team is using Maxar Premium Imagery, occasionally we apply Bing Imagery, just for double checking a situation. I do believe this was a technical mistake. We do appreciate your suggestion. | |
| 83306919 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-09 11:55 | 1 | 2020-04-20 16:53 | Константин Гам ♦714 | wtf? |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 13:24 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Could you please be more specific regarding your comment!Thank you | |
| 83494222 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-13 19:31 | 1 | 2020-04-18 04:54 | Sowa1980 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2020-04-18 13:49 | Sowa1980 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-24 10:16 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | Hi,Our common purpose is to improve OSM and to offer reciprocal support when needed. Respectively, each edit done by our team is well analyzed using the freshest images. Glad to know that we can be helpful.Best of luck. | |
| 83736726 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-18 09:29 | 1 | 2020-04-20 21:31 | mosstreet ♦232 | Hi, why did you decide to designate the area like that? What are your ideas about Russia in your USA? No need to change |
| 2 | 2020-04-21 07:10 | User6 - Lightcyphers ♦51 | We are an international team, and mappers that work on these tasks have good ideas about Russia. We are keeping the communication in English to have a more transparent interaction. Edits that we are making are general quality improvements relating to routing, but are not related to a specific count... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-21 10:25 | mosstreet ♦232 | Your improvements are illiterate, let your united team deal with those countries in which it has an understanding of the specifics of the area | |
| 83762579 by User7 - Lightcyphers @ 2020-04-19 07:02 | 1 | 2020-04-19 15:42 | mavl ♦76,055 | Hello. This changeset ignores the real situation on the ground. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5038122024 highway=turning_loop does not exist here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329871547 It is not a path. It is the service road for railroad workers. https://www.op... |