| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 118211759 by VéloJesse @ 2022-03-07 20:30 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | MadelNL ♦71 | Hoi Jesse,Kennelijk is er iets misgegaan met het toevoegen vd de wijk HeerenPark. Zo lijken er huisnummers en zelfs adressen niet te kloppen.Is het jou bekend dat BAG-import, normaal, via het forum gebeurd? |
| 131726738 by VéloJesse @ 2023-01-26 10:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Thanks for adding POLIS.Just one detail here: there was already a node with housenumber 98 in the relation.Adding another node with the same number is okay… but there should be only one housenumber 98 in the associatedStreet relation, then.Don’t worry, it’s fixed... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | VéloJesse | OK, thanks for letting me know and for fixing! | |
| 127256888 by VéloJesse @ 2022-10-09 16:12 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Thierry1030 ♦270 | Hello,Thanks for the update!Small remark:in "opening_date" you need to fill in a date in the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20date?uselang=nlWhen a building is ready you need to use year_of_construction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:year_of_cons... |
| 127766645 by VéloJesse @ 2022-10-19 08:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Don’t let the standard text boxes in the iD editor fool you: postcode and city are visible in the editor (because the editor can be used in any country) but those fields should never be filled in Belgium, because they are automatically obtained either from existing postcode zones or ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | VéloJesse | I was not aware, thanks for letting me know! | |
| 118094368 by VéloJesse @ 2022-03-04 13:50 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | eggie ♦44,996 | Dag VeloJesseBeter geen access=no taggen op wegen en paaltjes icm met andere tags.Ik heb moped en mofa =yes toegevoegd hier.access=no heb ik verwijderd.Het is bijna altijd fout.MVGeggie |
| 118365343 by VéloJesse @ 2022-03-11 13:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Names with several " - " strings will be incorrectly parsed by the validator, which considers this to be where multilingual names are split.In that case we usually use ndashes, e.g. "Commissariat de police 3 – Roodebeek - Politiecommissariaat 3 – Roodebeek&qu... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | VéloJesse | Fixed it. Thanks! | |
| 115752407 by VéloJesse @ 2022-01-04 12:15 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Thanks.Just one thing: beware of the correct spelling for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9391972947/history |
| 116841510 by VéloJesse @ 2022-01-31 21:44 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Voor de locomotief mag jij dit proberen:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dlocomotive |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | VéloJesse | Top, merci! | |
| 116258977 by VéloJesse @ 2022-01-17 15:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,I suppose this footway is not a tunnel under a building but a passage across a building, right?In that case, you can split the footway where it intersects the building and tag the middle part with tunnel=building_passage. And no layer tag, of course. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | VéloJesse | Yes, you're right! I've modified my edits. Thanks! | |
| 91062019 by VéloJesse @ 2020-09-17 17:26 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | LucGommans ♦72 | Hoi, thanks voor je bijdrage! Het voetpad was wel toegevoegd, maar het zuidoost uiteinde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7917740559) was niet verbonden met het fietspad terwijl het er wel heel dichtbij lag. Ik ken de "Go Map" editor niet, normaliter zou dit niet moeten kunnen eigenlijk... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | VéloJesse | Bedankt voor de oplettendheid! Ik heb destijds wat OSM apps getest maar was er niet zo tevreden over. Nu edit ik weer 'gewoon' via de browser. | |
| 92175147 by VéloJesse @ 2020-10-08 12:12 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Do not forget to fill the name field too, this is the most important one. ;-) |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Hah, thanks for checking! | |
| 90854146 by VéloJesse @ 2020-09-14 09:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | The new infrastructure is supposed to be temporary, right? We had settled not to change anything here before getting the confirmation the new dual cycle track would stay.Moreover, the situation on the eastbound sidewalk is very erratic: D9 were supposed to be removed, yet some parts do still have... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Temporary in this case can be up to 2 years. I see your point but someone can always edit it into the original position when the ‘test phase’ is over. So to me it makes sense to update this street in OSM. AFAIK, it also illegal to bike on the north side of the street where the old bike p... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | OK, let’s keep it for the moment. After all, it will be easy to know when the situation changes.I’ve done a few minor changes to your design.Also, the north sidewalk still has D9 signs everywhere, I often use it. | |
| 90574642 by VéloJesse @ 2020-09-08 09:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,First of all, many thanks for adding more stuff to the map. I like your edits.One thing. When you create a node for a shop, and when this node is entirely contained within a building that already has an address, there is no need to fill all the address tags on the shop itself.The addre... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Thanks for you comment and fixing my edits. So when there's two or more addresses in one building, I should add the address to the node? And when there's only one address in a building, I shouldn't add the address to a node? Also, out of curiosity: how do you keep track of all edi... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Here is the usual way to proceed for addresses, each time with a good example.A small house is an area and we put the address tags on the area itself.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227006414A large house is an area that only has building=yes and we create several nodes inside it, one fo... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | There are 3 buttons in osm.org: Edit | History | Export.The magic comes from "History", then you can see recent changes on the map.It is fairly hard to use because there are a lot of giant changesets that cover Belgium but did not change anything here.I use it every now and then, tha... | |
| 90578678 by VéloJesse @ 2020-09-08 10:02 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Your edit creates validation issues. The key to use here is "dog", not "dogs". |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Thanks, I've fixed it. | |
| 90073011 by VéloJesse @ 2020-08-28 09:52 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,I suggest you ignore "fixes" suggested by iD.iD is a simple online editor, it can track some mistakes but there are many false positives.An example here: you created a node to join ways 644843302 and 484533855 near Madou station.The first one is the cycle track, the second on... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Apologies! Will check better next time. | |
| 88770818 by VéloJesse @ 2020-07-31 08:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | bxl-forever ♦2,849 | Hello,Adding gardens is nice and useful.Just one piece of advice: do not forget to add "access=private" and "garden:type=residential".Otherwise, plenty of apps will treat them just like public gardens and will mislead people looking for a green area to have some rest. :-( |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | VéloJesse | Thanks for letting me know. I hadn't seen those tags. I've updated it now. |