Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
67842681 by abhap @ 2019-03-06 12:51 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:03 | SomeoneElse ♦13,465 | Hello,I'm not convinced that the motor_vehicle yag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672031389/history (which you corrected the spelling of, but did not originally add) is correct. What was the source here?Best Regards,andy |
61614367 by abhap @ 2018-08-13 06:47 Active block | 1 | 2018-08-13 20:55 | Madeline Steele ♦20 | Hello! This change set could create problems for our router and others, because it of the inconsistent use of access=private tags within the development. Our router won't go on a way tagged as access=private unless it's at the start or end of a trip, and I think this is pretty common. Sinc... |
2 | 2019-07-02 12:29 | abhap Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
61325075 by abhap @ 2018-08-03 10:38 Active block | 1 | 2018-08-03 18:49 | ndm ♦889 | Split? |
2 | 2019-07-02 12:28 | abhap Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
65132746 by abhap @ 2018-12-03 17:28 Active block | 1 | 2019-01-04 22:28 | skorasaurus ♦216 | hi, thanks for editing, but in this changeset, you had removed tags from several ways that I had already added (and personally have visited these places). These tags provided extra detail. For example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521261https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521253\... |
2 | 2019-01-05 17:35 | freebeer ♦1,598 | in the two i checked above, i would not have tagged them as osm driveways, which i understand to lead to a private residence (my interpretation may be wrong) and not to provide public the access to a carpark.this may be an american grammar use of the term though | |
3 | 2019-07-02 12:28 | abhap Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
67197160 by abhap @ 2019-02-14 15:11 Active block | 1 | 2019-02-14 20:22 | ndm ♦889 | Pretty sure some of this area is being demolished and re-developed |
2 | 2019-02-19 12:10 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into our edits.As bing satellite imagery is of 17th JUNE 2017 so we thought it is an accurate data to create the missing roads in this region.Please go ahead and change the data if you have local knowledge of recent changes.Please let us know if there are any further im... | |
3 | 2019-02-20 21:37 | ndm ♦889 | I think the outpatients at least is being demolished / reconstructed - maybe also the Cotswold ward too - I would maybe wait a while before editting there. |