5 changesets created by abhap have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
67842681
by abhap
@ 2019-03-06 12:51
Active block
12019-07-05 15:03SomeoneElse
♦13,465
Hello,
I'm not convinced that the motor_vehicle yag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672031389/history (which you corrected the spelling of, but did not originally add) is correct. What was the source here?
Best Regards,
andy
61614367
by abhap
@ 2018-08-13 06:47
Active block
12018-08-13 20:55Madeline Steele
♦20
Hello! This change set could create problems for our router and others, because it of the inconsistent use of access=private tags within the development. Our router won't go on a way tagged as access=private unless it's at the start or end of a trip, and I think this is pretty common. Sinc...
22019-07-02 12:29abhap
Active block
Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
61325075
by abhap
@ 2018-08-03 10:38
Active block
12018-08-03 18:49ndm
♦889
Split?
22019-07-02 12:28abhap
Active block
Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
65132746
by abhap
@ 2018-12-03 17:28
Active block
12019-01-04 22:28skorasaurus
♦216
hi,

thanks for editing, but in this changeset, you had removed tags from several ways that I had already added (and personally have visited these places). These tags provided extra detail.

For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521253\...
22019-01-05 17:35freebeer
♦1,598
in the two i checked above, i would not have tagged them as osm driveways, which i understand to lead to a private residence (my interpretation may be wrong) and not to provide public the access to a carpark.

this may be an american grammar use of the term though
32019-07-02 12:28abhap
Active block
Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
67197160
by abhap
@ 2019-02-14 15:11
Active block
12019-02-14 20:22ndm
♦889
Pretty sure some of this area is being demolished and re-developed
22019-02-19 12:10yaswap
♦68
Hi ndm,
Thanks for looking into our edits.As bing satellite imagery is of 17th JUNE 2017 so we thought it is an accurate data to create the missing roads in this region.Please go ahead and change the data if you have local knowledge of recent changes.
Please let us know if there are any further im...
32019-02-20 21:37ndm
♦889
I think the outpatients at least is being demolished / reconstructed - maybe also the Cotswold ward too - I would maybe wait a while before editting there.