| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86861076 by abvincen @ 2020-06-19 07:27 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | lvandergrift ♦1 | You incorrectly list the address for 2277 Waltonia Dr., can you remove? We get incorrect package deliveries frequently based off of your error |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | silakshm ♦21 | Hi, Thanks for reviewing my changeset, I have only added service road in this changeset (86861076) and did not alter or added address information for any building. However, I will investigate with our Internal team and get back to you with a resolution. Regards,silakshm | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | lvandergrift ♦1 | Have you been able to find out anything regarding the correct location for 2277 Waltonia Dr.? It seems like when you search the address, it includes a location linked to this service road | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | abvincen | Hi,We have changed the location of "2277 Waltonia Drive" to another location in our address database.Please do let us know if incase you are still receiving any wrong packages. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | lvandergrift ♦1 | We had an issue with some Amazon deliveries just the other day (Amazon has been able to deliver properly, usually it's UPS that has trouble) so not sure if that is reflecting your change. See below screenshot of where the correct location for 2277 Waltonia Dr. should be listed at:https://imgu... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | abvincen | Hi,We would like to update that we cannot correct or update the address location for UPS.Hence, we kindly request you to raise this issue to UPS team so that it can be fixed. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | lvandergrift ♦1 | Will try that, but UPS uses OpenStreetMap for their tracking data so the hope was I would get this solved at the source (here), and then that would ultimately solve the issue | |
| 111183508 by abvincen @ 2021-09-14 09:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | abvincen | Modified the geometry as per Driver feedback. |
| 102449463 by abvincen @ 2021-04-07 05:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Allison P ♦1,145 | Not sure how that happened, but thank you for fixing it! |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | abvincen | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and appreciation. Looking forward to learn more. Happy Mapping!Regards,abvincen --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102449463 | |
| 84250530 by abvincen @ 2020-04-28 08:40 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | stevea ♦317 | I appreciate the addition of this highway=service, especially that you added a barrier=gate tag on a node that looks geographically accurate.However, if this is really a driveway (if ANY of these highway=service roads you and Amazon Logistics adds is really a driveway), may I please ask you to A... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | abvincen | Hi,Thanks for the appreciation. In this case, I've added a service road as this appears to be a common entrance for 4 different entities. Due to which, I've assumed service would be an appropriate tag. Please let me know if I shall make it a driveway.Regards,abvincen | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | stevea ♦317 | Well, that's "OK" and maybe not perfect (you didn't see a street sign, for example), but because it serves four (rather than one), I'd hold off on the service=driveway tag. At least you've got the highway=service road, so "OK/fair."In future, as you add t... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | abvincen | Hi,Apologies for the delayed response. We are already adding driveways when the road leads to a single entity. Thank you for the inputs, looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,abvincen | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | stevea ♦317 | My pleasure to help. Good communication between contributors, especially as we share deeper experience (like that a service=driveway is for a single residence) makes for a better map! | |
| 80014148 by abvincen @ 2020-01-24 07:02 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mapman44 ♦527 | It is helpful to add additional tags to service roads, such as "parking aisle," "drive-through," etc. Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80014148 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | abvincen | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #80249210 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.Regards,abvincen. | |
| 76137440 by abvincen @ 2019-10-24 07:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), over (usually one node, but can also be different ways). |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | naaitha ♦18 | Hi,Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #76201903.Let me know if you have any other suggestions. Regards,naaitha. |