13 Changesets created by aibek55 have been discussed with 6 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
184892110
by aibek55
@ 2026-07-01 04:08
~ 20 days ago
1 ~ 4 days agoyelisey90
♦552
partly reverted: no through access here according to all the maps & street-level photos, but no idea why is it impossible; the road should added only after on-the-ground examination

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185867126
184841400
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-30 08:33
~ 20 days ago
1 ~ 6 days agoyelisey90
♦552
These are not driveways. service=driveway is for access roads, that is generally leading to private houses. Roads to fuel stations are just service roads, please fix that.
184728635
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-28 06:14
~ 23 days ago
1 ~ 6 days agoyelisey90
♦552
You have relocated the building https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1202912220 more than 200 meters and "restored" it after is was marked as demolished. That is, de-facto you mapped a different building while re-using the way from another, demolished building. Why did you do that?
2 ~ 6 days agoyelisey90
♦552
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Don't_mix_the_history
185243125
by aibek55
@ 2026-07-07 04:57
~ 14 days ago
1 ~ 13 days agoevgenykatyshev
♦277
The building was shifted away from the building contour at NAPR imagery, while the source is specified as NAPR
185243464
by aibek55
@ 2026-07-07 05:10
~ 14 days ago
1 ~ 13 days agoevgenykatyshev
♦277
I noticed that you shifted buildings to the East, and now they are shifted against NAPR to the East. It seems strange considering you specified NAPR as a source of your edits.

Could you elaborate on that?
2 ~ 13 days agoevgenykatyshev
♦277
Also, I can see that you merged two buildings, making them have common nodes, while on the NAPR imagery, it's clear that there is spacing between them.

It looks like you used other imagery but NAPR
184626296
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-26 04:50
~ 25 days ago
1 ~ 23 days agoyelisey90
♦552
Once again, these are not parking_aisles
2 ~ 21 days agoaibek55 I fixed it.
184625832
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-26 04:31
~ 25 days ago
1 ~ 23 days agoyelisey90
♦552
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229528287 — this is not a parking_aisle. It's a road leading to a parking space, that is a regular service road. Please fix that
2 ~ 21 days agoaibek55 I fixed it.
184579587
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-25 11:39
~ 25 days ago
1 ~ 25 days agoyelisey90
♦552
partly rv - once again, read what a parking_aisle is

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184586453
2 ~ 21 days agoaibek55 Thank you for fixing
184564957
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-25 05:32
~ 26 days ago
1 ~ 25 days agoyelisey90
♦552
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1532167829 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971279000 are not parking_aisles. They lead from some other road to a parking lot; so they are just service roads. Only roads separating multiple parking spaces within a large parking lot should be mapped as service=p...
2 ~ 21 days agoaibek55 Thank you Yelisey, I fixed them.
184526826
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-24 14:23
~ 26 days ago
1 ~ 26 days agoyelisey90
♦552
Definitely not residential; and please do not remove tracktype & surface unless you are sure that the surface has changed.
Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184541702
2 ~ 26 days agoaibek55 Thanks for fixing it.
184313497
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-19 12:21
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoyelisey90
♦552
Now the road crosses the building, that's not right. Please fix that
2 ~ 28 days agoaibek55 Спасибо что заметили, все исправил!
184258200
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-18 07:44
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoyelisey90
♦552
Please note that you have left the relation an unenclosed inner border. It needs to be fixed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15419576
2 ~ 1 month agoElizen
♦78
Hello, the relation was fixed
184257248
by aibek55
@ 2026-06-18 07:15
~ 1 month ago
1 ~ 1 month agoyelisey90
♦552
Partly reverted & fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184258816
The northern part is clearly not indented for vehicles (maybe it used for them during the construction of the playground, but not more). And it visibly differs in surface, so in any case it's better not to merged th...