| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127646538 by amarajz @ 2022-10-17 04:17 | 1 | 2022-10-17 20:31 | impiaaa ♦429 | Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving on to another. |
| 2 | 2022-10-18 14:37 | amarajz | Hello, Thank you for your support, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thank you again, always happy to learn from community. Regards, amaraj... | |
| 101619502 by amarajz @ 2021-03-24 06:49 | 1 | 2021-06-25 16:56 | nashdoug ♦1 | The name change from Rocky Fork Road to Newsome Lane was incorrect. The name of the street is Rocky Fork Road, not Newsome Lane. |
| 2 | 2021-06-28 09:56 | amarajz | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the road name.Apologies for the incorrect road name that was added.I will be extra cautious going forward. Happy to learn from you! Regards,amarajz | |
| 106947375 by amarajz @ 2021-06-25 08:37 | 1 | 2021-06-25 13:37 | karson_ ♦146 | Hi. I went ahead and reverted your changeset. This road should not have been deleted. Instead it should have been demoted from highway=residential to highway=track. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106947375 |
| 2 | 2021-06-28 09:55 | amarajz | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.Apologies for deleting the residential road.Going ahead, I'll make sure to use "highway=track" tag for such road segments.Thank you again, always happy to learn from community. Regards,amarajz | |
| 72431008 by amarajz @ 2019-07-19 13:13 | 1 | 2021-05-30 13:33 | DUGA ♦549 | Where did you get the source that this road is paved?You were messing with the map. I'm local.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11999934/history#map=18/40.53373/-77.13472 |
| 2 | 2021-06-03 06:44 | amarajz | Hi, Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect surface tags, I'll ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you. Regards,amarajz | |
| 98017373 by amarajz @ 2021-01-23 12:03 | 1 | 2021-05-03 11:53 | MikeN ♦355 | Hi, why were these streets set to private? There are no gates shown on Bing Street view. There is a "private subdivision" sign, but the sign does not say "private, keep out". Most subdivisions could be described as private. |
| 2 | 2021-05-04 05:37 | amarajz | Hi,There is a gate at other end, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6536980167 and a private community sign board at John Dodd Road intersection. Considering these facts, combined with our driver feedback we have made roads as private. Please let us know otherwise, we will make changes accordin... | |
| 100785309 by amarajz @ 2021-03-10 14:27 | 1 | 2021-04-10 09:05 | mirror176 ♦26 | Leaving the parking lot connects to oneway roads; why the turn restriction as it is the only valid choice? |
| 2 | 2021-04-12 08:44 | amarajz | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit. I've made the necessary changes in the changeset (#102786399).Looking forward to learn more from you. Regards,amarajz | |
| 93524466 by amarajz @ 2020-11-04 07:51 | 1 | 2020-11-04 14:25 | karson_ ♦146 | Why would those road spurs deserve the tag highway=proposed? That particular road was built nearly 20 years ago. The highway=proposed k/v pair is supposed to be used for roads that have been platted, but where construction has yet to start. |
| 2 | 2020-11-05 06:06 | amarajz | Hi,Since the roads are incomplete and causing ""unreachable"" and ""no outlet"" errors on OSM, I have converted them into proposed for the mean while. Please suggest us if there is any other tag that will resolve these issues and we will incorporate the sa... | |
| 90352087 by amarajz @ 2020-09-03 09:35 | 1 | 2020-09-03 11:16 | skyper ♦871 | HiWhere is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?Where is the #hashtag of the task?Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?Reviewer?Cheers skyper |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 08:36 | amarajz | Hi, Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get ... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-04 10:42 | skyper ♦871 | Why can`t you follow your own rule?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics#Editing_ProcessWho is your instructor?Why did your instructor not tell you?Who is your reviewer?Why does your reviewer not react if you do not follow your own rules?Is it allowed in your company... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-07 12:10 | amarajz | Hi ,Thanks for posting your queries. This edit has been reviewed . Since #hashtag is not part of our system yet this has not been identified as wrong edits .In case of data issues or connection issues review team will ask us to correct us back and we correct it back within 24 hrs. Regards,ama... | |
| 80985223 by amarajz @ 2020-02-14 04:20 | 1 | 2020-02-14 04:21 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this Changeset : 80985223 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 80682121 by amarajz @ 2020-02-07 09:13 | 1 | 2020-02-07 09:14 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this Changeset : 80682121 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 76845942 by amarajz @ 2019-11-09 14:46 | 1 | 2019-11-09 14:48 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this Changeset : 76845942 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 76526102 by amarajz @ 2019-11-02 12:03 | 1 | 2019-11-02 12:05 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this Changeset : 76526102 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 76304246 by amarajz @ 2019-10-28 15:05 | 1 | 2019-10-28 15:07 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this Changeset : 76304246 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 75955239 by amarajz @ 2019-10-20 14:17 | 1 | 2019-10-20 20:48 | Glassman ♦5,275 | I removed the private access tag on the street. According to the county, this is a public road. If I'm wrong please let me know and I can revert my change. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75955239 |
| 2 | 2019-10-21 11:41 | amarajz | Hi,Thanks for correcting, I've added the tag because of the private road sign being present on the street view (https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=47.408922~-121.957603&lvl=17&dir=106.933&style=x&v=2&sV=1). As you may have local knowledge, I assume your edit to be true. Thanks... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-21 14:46 | Glassman ♦5,275 | Private road shown on street signs just indicate that no local government is responsible for it's upkeep. They are usually added by the developer. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-23 11:05 | amarajz | Hi,Thanks for the knowledge. I shall consider these boards before adding private tags to the roads.Regards,amarajz. | |
| 76003457 by amarajz @ 2019-10-21 14:36 | 1 | 2019-10-21 14:39 | amarajz | Hi,I have made the edits in this changeset : 76003457 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.Regards,amarajz. |
| 72458052 by amarajz @ 2019-07-20 11:30 | 1 | 2019-07-28 10:34 | freebeer ♦1,598 | one more, amazon team, then i will probably leave any more of this common type this morning unreported.single overlapping node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/705940962 at an intersection, i have merged it. also an older edit. |
| 2 | 2019-08-02 03:19 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks a lot for pointing out the issue. We have passed on the message to our team and asked them to check for repetition of this issue so we can have a tab on it and fix them immediately.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 3 | 2019-08-02 11:23 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hi ganesh,this seems to be some obscure logic bug in iD, infrequent, and not a mapper issue. i do not know if iD highlights overlapping nodes in an obvious way as Potlatch2, or the throbbing pulsating angry red pustule of potlatch1.in any case, as i repair more, including some non-amazon ed... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-02 13:10 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks a lot for the update. We are trying to find a pattern to it as well. We will keep you posted if we get find anything.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72560047 by amarajz @ 2019-07-23 13:50 | 1 | 2019-07-30 03:37 | freebeer ♦1,598 | hi again,this is a very strange edit, so i am leaving it as-is for analysis.i did not expect to find six nodes co-located on the highway. usually now i expect to see iD is reluctant to re-use an existing node when branching, on occasion.these are the first five listed below until the ga... |
| 2 | 2019-08-02 12:27 | gseethar ♦67 | Thanks a lot for pointing this out. I have deleted the duplicate nodes changeset #: 72937671.Regards,Ganesh |