| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91407662 by ambarapu @ 2020-09-24 06:10 | 1 | 2022-08-12 15:00 | clay_c@wonder ♦18 | Hi ambarapu,The residential road you've added in this changeset does not exist on the ground. Yesterday, one of our drivers was directed down this road and found that it wasn't there. I've gone ahead and reverted it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124822116-Clay |
| 2 | 2022-10-28 10:49 | ambarapu | Hi,I apologise for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my change set and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect road digitisation. This is an honest mistake from my end, going forward I'll ensure to check for the latest aerial imagery before making any edits. Thank... | |
| 81224545 by ambarapu @ 2020-02-19 13:53 | 1 | 2020-06-24 13:11 | aweech ♦369 | Found to be incorrect on survey. Please be more careful when adding access=private. |
| 2 | 2020-06-25 09:17 | ambarapu | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit, Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,ambarapu. | |
| 76388625 by ambarapu @ 2019-10-30 11:20 | 1 | 2020-05-17 00:51 | maxerickson ♦234 | Changing "Terminal Road" to service was incorrect. It's clearly a publicly maintained street in an industrial area. Those are highway=unclassified in the US. |
| 2 | 2020-05-18 05:33 | ambarapu | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for adding the incorrect highway tag. Will ensure not to repeat such errors going forward. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,ambarapu | |
| 74801664 by ambarapu @ 2019-09-23 11:13 | 1 | 2019-10-28 11:48 | maxerickson ♦234 | Take care when there are features near the roads. Here the point is part of the boundary rather than the highway, so there is no connectivity:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6817206048I saw other service roads in the area with the similar problem. I didn't check if they were Amazon L... |
| 2 | 2019-10-29 12:47 | vsahith ♦36 | "Hi,Thanks for letting me know. I see that our editor as accidentally connected the node to the admin boundary, I have corrected the same under Changeset #76343700 and have passed the feedback to them.Regards, vsahith. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-29 12:53 | maxerickson ♦234 | Do the editors not have direct access to messages sent to them?That is now how the message system is meant to be used. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-29 12:54 | maxerickson ♦234 | Sorry, *not* how the system is meant to be used. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-29 13:10 | vsahith ♦36 | Hi,Sure, will make them respond directly hereafter.Thanks,Vsahith |