Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
8 changesets created by amsshalo have been discussed with 6 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
131990346
by amsshalo
@ 2023-02-02 07:35		12023-06-18 00:13nw520
♦157		 Hi amsshalo, are you absolutely sure that https://osm.org/way/24408696 is oneway only? Mapillary imagery suggests otherwise.
22023-06-21 10:42amsshalo Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset and reversing my changes.
The modest physical structure confused me for a physical median.
I'll be more careful in similar situations in the future.
Looking forward to learn more from you.
Thank you.
132360932
by amsshalo
@ 2023-02-10 13:48		12023-03-14 12:44skyper
♦871		 Hallo amsshalo,
bitte benutze den Luftbilder des Bundeslandes Nordrheinwestfalens (NRW) in NRW.
In den angegebenen Quellen finde ich kein einziges Bild an der Stelle. Welche Quelle hast Du benutzt. Bitte teile mir einen Link zu einem Foto, wo ein Verkehrszeichen ersichtlich ist, danke.

Grü...
22023-03-22 18:02deepikja
♦58		 Hi,
Thank you for helping us with your insights on the sources to be updated for every changeset. We will surely take your suggestions on the addition of the correct sources into account while making the further edits. The editor here made the edit based on Esri world aerial imagery.
The editor h...
32023-03-23 17:19skyper
♦871		 Hi,
once again the layout of parking spaces might be a hint but is no proof and does not justify to add one-way tags. Please, follow the rules for armchair-based edits and if you do not find clear evidence do not ask me to proof you wrong but e.g. send one of your drivers to take some useful pictur...
42023-04-02 17:38deepikja
♦58		 Hi Skyper,
We will ensure that going forward for the future edit’s, editors look for additional proofs such as lane markings, sign boards to conclude the directions for any segment.
In this case the fish bone parking scales are very evident and clear enough using the latest aerial imagerie...
132235782
by amsshalo
@ 2023-02-08 04:59		12023-03-14 12:55skyper
♦871		 Hallo amsshalo,
auch hier der Hinweis auf die Luftaufnahmen des Landes NRW.
Wie passt `oneway=yes` zu `lanes=3`, `lanes:forward=2` und `turn:lanes:forward=left|right`? Bitte teile mir ein Link zu einem Bild, wo die Verkehrszeichen ersichtlich sind. Sollte bei den vielen verwendeten Quellen ja kein...
22023-03-22 18:32deepikja
♦58		 Hi,
Thank you for alerting us regarding this edit. This is a completely wrong alteration made by the editor, which was also missed by our internal reviewer.
I have deleted the directions based on the lane markings seen in mapillary and open street camera as they the signs make it very evident that...
125837927
by amsshalo
@ 2022-09-06 04:38		12022-09-18 15:07DUGA
♦549		 I've left enough nodes for you to draw service roads.

Please reuse existing nodes as much as possible.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092254742#map=19/41.78610/-76.06570
22023-02-10 10:07amsshalo Hello DUGA,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and highlighting the issue.Apologies for adding multiple nodes. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again.
Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
amsshalo
126722404
by amsshalo
@ 2022-09-28 05:38		12022-09-28 09:18Nakaner
♦3,153		 Hi,

how do you know that this service way is private and not open to the public?

Best regards

Michael
22023-02-10 10:04amsshalo Hello Nakaner,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset 126722404.Thanks once again and looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
amsshalo
120248924
by amsshalo
@ 2022-04-27 09:15		12022-04-27 11:49emersonveenstra
♦1,462		 Hi,

how did you decide to make this a oneway street? There's no signs or marks on the road to indicate it
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120248924
22023-02-10 09:59amsshalo Hello emersonveenstra,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
amsshalo
127661905
by amsshalo
@ 2022-10-17 10:05		12022-10-17 10:35Langlaeufer
♦1,330		 Wenn du die Straßen für Verkehrrsinseln aufspaltest , bitte das oneway nicht vergessen.

Weiterhin frohes Mappen
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127661905
22023-02-10 09:56amsshalo Hello Langlaeufer,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
amsshalo
131997097
by amsshalo
@ 2023-02-02 10:42		12023-02-02 13:23Langlaeufer
♦1,330		 a roundabout is signed by the traffic_sign for roundabout. without traffic sign it is not a roundabout - different rules (right before left)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131997097
22023-02-10 09:52amsshalo Hello Langlaeufer,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits.Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
amsshalo