| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70684114 by anilredd @ 2019-05-28 06:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,736 | Hello,What was the source of the access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | anilredd | Hi, I missed out reverting this changeset. I have reverted the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads. Changeset="reverted changeset"Regards,Anil. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,736 | Thanks - there are a few others that need looking at too - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/LCf . | |
| 73114237 by anilredd @ 2019-08-07 14:07 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,658 | Hi, this looks like a shared driveway, not a public residential road. Shared driveways are a common characteristic of current developments.When adding residential roads in new build areas please remember that it is very unlikely that the local mapper who surveyed the area would have missed a publi... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | anilredd | Hi Phil, Thanks for looking into the edit. I have added the residential road tag to this segment as all other similar road segments in the vicinity have residential tags. I also looked in the OS open data but unfortunately the roads were not updated there. Hence, I concurred with the local mappe... | |
| 72793871 by anilredd @ 2019-07-30 04:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | GinaroZ ♦1,304 | Hi, thanks for adding the road - however it is slightly out of alignment with the rest of the map, because you have used Maxar imagery.Please make sure you take the time and check, then adjust the imagery before editing if using Maxar. Cheers |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | anilredd | Hi GinaroZ, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have made the edit according to your suggestion. I will take this as a learning and will follow it in my future edits. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. RegardsAnil. | |
| 64680028 by anilredd @ 2018-11-20 04:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | Please don't remove the service=* tags from parking aisles and driveways. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | anilredd | Hi, Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for the updates. We will follow the suggestion going forward while editing parking aisles.Regards,Anil. | |
| 65631827 by anilredd @ 2018-12-20 07:01 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Removed private access -- not signposted as private -- serves 6 dwellings.Thanks for helping to improve OpenStreetmap here in Bristol -- please ensure all edits are accurate and based on up to date information and match on the ground information.This appears to be "organised editting&qu... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | anilredd | Hi, Thanks for commenting on the edit and apologies for the delayed response. This is our wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_LogisticsRegards,Anil. | |
| 64512955 by anilredd @ 2018-11-15 04:27 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | why have you made this road no longer continuous, and added two bollards on either side of the single existing row?On the imagery, this road is continuous and not broken as it is now drawn. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | anilredd | Hi,Thanks for the update.I have connected the roads and added a bollard per your suggestion.The road was split as the bollard was at a height from the road level which prevents any vehicular movement through it and sidewalks are present to allow pedestrians to pass through. Can you please ... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | thanks for this.the road segment should only be split in cases like a bridge out, or where the surface has been removed (which is not the case here), or perhaps been completely buried under an earthen wall for economic reasons. in the latter cases, there will often be an impromptu path created ... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | gseethar ♦67 | Hello sir,Thanks for that wonderful in-depth explanation on the various possibilities. Makes sense to mark them as a continued segment with a barrier. Always eager to learn more from the community.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 62936109 by anilredd @ 2018-09-26 07:01 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,658 | Hi, thank you for this addition but where did these turn restrictions come from? I do not remember any such signs along this road and there are none shown on mapillary. Turn restrictions are only used for legal restrictions and should not be used to improve routing.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | pattamaa ♦15 | Thanks for the update, Phil we have removed the turn restrictions as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them. | |
| 62359430 by anilredd @ 2018-09-07 02:16 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Rich1234 ♦85 | Hi. Thanks for helping improve OSM.Note that the satellite images (Esri World) shows that this new road ends in a cul-de-sack. Therefore, you should have additionally tagged the node in the center as a highway=turning_circle as part of adding the new road in order to accurately reflect reality... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | anilredd | Hi, Thanks for bringing it up, I have made the edit accordingly. |