| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86708812 by ansukess @ 2020-06-16 08:36 | 1 | 2021-09-17 15:55 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, why would a way drawn through a car park that is already tagged as access=customers be private?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2021-09-27 07:40 | mundlk ♦19 | Hi Phil,Thanks for bringing this to us. Our editor might have missed checking the landuse feature and added access=private based on the gate visible. Apologies for the genuine miss. We have now added access=customers as it seems the right edit to be done.Best Regards,mundlk.PS: Replying on... | |
| 95930846 by ansukess @ 2020-12-16 09:35 | 1 | 2020-12-18 14:31 | ndm ♦889 | Redrawn this so service road goes on correct side of tree (see Bing Streetside) and doesn't impinge on the building visible in Bing. |
| 2 | 2020-12-22 16:04 | ansukess | thanks for checking into our edits. apologies for the misalignment. i was confused with the street view and misinterpreted the geometry. thanks for the quick correction. going forward, i will be more cautious with the geometry before saving the edits. always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 93283856 by ansukess @ 2020-10-30 10:29 | 1 | 2020-12-04 09:43 | rskedgell ♦1,535 | You inadvertently dragged node #317083657 at the junction of Alexandra Road and Herbert Road over to Saxon Close.Fixed inhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95283565 |
| 2 | 2020-12-08 10:22 | ansukess | Hi rskedgell,Thanks for checking my edit, I have unintentionally dragged the node while verifying the other areas in the vicinity which was saved into OSM. I apologise for this error from my end. I ll keep a tab on this in my future edits. Thanks for correcting my edit. Always happy to learn from ... | |
| 82053623 by ansukess @ 2020-03-11 10:45 | 1 | 2020-10-08 23:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780156938 was offset a bit north-south. You can tell by looking at the alignment compared to Bing imagery, which matches OS_OpenData_StreetView.I'm guessing that the ESRI imagery that you were using was not very ell aligned here.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2020-10-09 16:35 | ansukess | Thanks for checking into our edits. Going forward, I will make sure to align the added roads with respect to the geometry of the vicinity. Thanks for your valuable suggestions. Always happy to learn from the Community. | |
| 76760579 by ansukess @ 2019-11-07 14:00 | 1 | 2019-11-11 12:46 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.This is not a public residential road, but a private driveway. Please could you correct it.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-11-12 06:35 | ansukess | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake. Made the necessary changes .please refer change set (76941589).Please let me know if any further changes are to be made, Always happy to learn from community.Regards,ansukess. | |
| 74114321 by ansukess @ 2019-09-05 06:52 | 1 | 2019-09-05 11:25 | TheNet1996 ♦175 | Hi,the road goes through the house nr. 28???BRMike |
| 2 | 2019-09-05 14:03 | tux67 ♦1,945 | @Mike - I guess a rhetoric question - highway obviously needs to be more to the east . @ansukess - I guess you have a supervisor to check with. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-05 15:32 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Hi ansukess, please keep in mind that most aerial images show considerable lateral offset so you always need to align the imagery (to GPX traces, or objects already given) before copying from it. Newly drawn objects should always fit into the existing data. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-06 10:38 | ansukess | Hi Mike,Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake and I have understood the severity. I had a discussion with my team and now I am aware of the imagery offset feature. I will take this as a learning and will be more careful going forward. I have improved the edit (#74167449). Let... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-06 12:29 | TheNet1996 ♦175 | Hi ansukess,please make a recheck of the railway in the area which you have edited. The railway tracks are no more in a straight line - it's more a "Z"! Also the Street "Stadtberger Str" is incorrect now.In general, i don't understand your edit at all because th... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-06 14:08 | Himanshu Galyan ♦6 | Hi Mike,Thanks for noticing this. I have corrected the mistake of our team member. He is new into the system hence this mistake happened. I have had a word with him and have asked him to be extremely cautious while adding the data into OSM. Also, we have initiated a fast paced internal quality rev... | |
| 74123631 by ansukess @ 2019-09-05 10:04 | 1 | 2019-09-05 14:06 | tux67 ♦1,945 | @ansukess - please get someone at amazon to qualitty check your changesets. It's not task of the volunteer OSM community to ensure that your additions follow basic quality guidelines. |
| 2 | 2019-09-05 14:07 | tux67 ♦1,945 | here again a way runs through 2 buildings | |
| 3 | 2019-09-06 10:23 | ansukess | Hi Tux67Thanks for looking into my edit. I have understood the mistake. I have taken the help of my team to understand this and learn how to avoid such edits. I will take this as a learning and will not repeat this in future. I have improved the edit (#74167028). Let me know in case you have any... |