| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138131793 by bathines @ 2023-07-05 06:05 | 1 | 2023-07-06 21:34 | Map-Peter ♦337 | Hello bathines, that: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=138131793 is not how it is done in OSM -> use: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead of delete the highway. Because the highway is still visible on many aerial images. So in this case only change &... |
| 2 | 2023-07-07 14:17 | bathines | Hello Map-Peter,Thank you for reviewing the edits and making the necessary corrections. I relied on Bing aerial imagery and Mapbox imagery while making the edits, but I couldn't find a clear road. As a result, I deleted the service road. However, moving forward, we will try to change the ta... | |
| 121743999 by bathines @ 2022-05-31 03:14 | 1 | 2022-05-31 05:01 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello!Out of curiousity: can you point me to the place where access:delivery=* is documented? I haven't come across this tag yet.All the best! |
| 2 | 2022-06-07 06:31 | bathines | Hi,Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. We have started adding this tag based on OSM community suggestion. For further information, check this diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jguthula/diary/392437. | |
| 117751070 by bathines @ 2022-02-23 04:31 | 1 | 2022-04-30 13:29 | chris66 ♦373 | Hier befindet sich in Realität kein Tor. |
| 2 | 2022-05-02 15:36 | bathines | Hi Chris,Thanks for the feedback. I have added a gate based on the internal driver feedback. Thank you for correcting the edit and making necessary changes. Thanks and Regards,bathines | |
| 110318555 by bathines @ 2021-08-27 05:54 | 1 | 2021-11-04 21:31 | jodd ♦120 | Hi bathines,this part of the street Querstraße is no longer a oneway street. I had changed it before. I set oneway=no with changeset 113386755.jodd |
| 2 | 2021-11-06 11:45 | bathines | Hi Jodd, Thanks for letting me know and making the necessary corrections. I have added the one way directions based on Open street cam images which can be out dated. Thanks again for making these changes as per the latest information. Best regards, bathines. | |
| 111014428 by bathines @ 2021-09-10 09:27 | 1 | 2021-09-13 10:11 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Did you read the wiki of hw=track? Ways to a settlement can not be track. |
| 2 | 2021-09-14 14:43 | bathines | Hello SafetyIng, Thanks for bringing this up to me. I have rechecked the wiki page for highway=track. I have modified the road classifications as per wiki and your suggestions(changeset :- 111200043). Thanks again for reminding this to me. Happy day! Regards,bathines | |
| 106936368 by bathines @ 2021-06-25 05:45 | 1 | 2021-06-25 14:13 | SafetyIng ♦348 | If there is a house (why not tag it?) Then the way"Am Weinberg" is a highway=serviceand the way 958077582 is highway=service + service=driveway |
| 2 | 2021-06-25 15:58 | bathines | Hi,As per bing aerial imagery, the road condition seems to be not very ideal for vehicles, as there are track marks and vegetation. Also, there is no vehicle presence proof as per the available resources in OSM. Hence, I have tagged it as highway= track. I assumed the single entity to be a farm ho... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-25 21:34 | SafetyIng ♦348 | What is there "not ideal for vehicles"? It is a multitrack, compactec way.....?!But for "track" there is a rule: "Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag. "See also the first three pictures at https://wiki... | |
| 106938203 by bathines @ 2021-06-25 06:17 | 1 | 2021-06-25 14:09 | SafetyIng ♦348 | both ways are driveways |
| 2 | 2021-06-25 15:43 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I have now converted the segment to driveway based on you feedback (changeset: 106971168). Apologies for the inconvenience.Regards,bathines | |
| 104160138 by bathines @ 2021-05-05 05:48 | 1 | 2021-05-06 06:04 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-05-07 09:11 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have added segment as per available OSM resources. As I was unaware of the type of entity. I have not added service = driveway. Kindly, confirm the same so that we can add the appropriate tag. | |
| 3 | 2021-05-07 09:12 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for looking into my edit. I have added segment as per available OSM resources. As I was unaware of the type of entity. I have not added service = driveway. Kindly, confirm the same so that we can add the appropriate tag. | |
| 4 | 2021-05-07 09:18 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Ich bitte um Ergänzung von service=driveway. | |
| 5 | 2021-05-09 07:53 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for the Quick turn around. I have made the changes as per your suggestions (Changeset:104387240 ).Good Day! | |
| 104164429 by bathines @ 2021-05-05 06:54 | 1 | 2021-05-06 06:06 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-05-06 14:06 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for checking my edits. I have added the missing segment as per available OSM resources as I was unaware of the building type I have added highway = service. But, As it is a residential area, in this scenario it would be more apt to tag it as a driveway. Please find the changeset (104258... | |
| 104162924 by bathines @ 2021-05-05 06:32 | 1 | 2021-05-06 05:50 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo bathines,das ist ein Betriebshof und keine Straße.Ich habe die falsche Straße daher wieder gelöscht.Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-05-06 14:03 | bathines | Hi, I have added the missing segment as per the available OSM resources. As there was no information regarding the entity , I was unaware that it was a depot. Thanks for correcting my edit. Always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 104030900 by bathines @ 2021-05-03 06:49 | 1 | 2021-05-03 10:09 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo bathines,1.) welches Fahrzeug kommt auf dem südl. Straßenabschnitt da noch durch ?Siehe Bing aus 2019 !!!2.) wo gibt es Mapillary-Bilder von dort ?3.) wo gibt es OpenStreetCam-Bilder von dort ?Bitte Wege löschen ! |
| 2 | 2021-05-04 10:51 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the segments based on Maxar imagery and esri world imagery available in OSM as bing aerial imagery does not have vintage displayed. I have also verified all the available resources in OSM to make the edit which is why all the resources are auto ... | |
| 3 | 2021-05-04 12:12 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo bathines, bitte als Quelle nur die Medien angeben, welche für das neu eingefügte OSM-Objekt auch wirklich verwendet wurde.Wenn dort keine Mapillary-Bilder und auch keine OpenStreetCam-Bilder zur Verfügung standen, sollten diese auch nicht als Quelle aufgeführt werden! | |
| 4 | 2021-05-05 10:32 | bathines | Hi, Thanks for the quick turn around. As mentioned above the media source got auto captured into the changeset. I am unsure on how to remove it. Kindly, help me out incase you have any idea on editing these before saving the edits. Always happy to learn from community. | |
| 5 | 2021-05-05 13:20 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo bathines, das sollte Ihnen ihr Chef sagen können. | |
| 6 | 2021-05-05 15:37 | bathines | Hi, I have turned on mappilary overlay to check if they are present, but id editor has auto captured it in the imagery used column. As it is already saved we would not be able to change the captured data. Will keep a check in our future edits. Thanks | |
| 102569231 by bathines @ 2021-04-08 13:41 | 1 | 2021-04-08 15:16 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | Does this turn ban also apply to bicycles? |
| 2 | 2021-04-09 11:47 | bathines | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the turn restriction based on the mapillary street level imagery. I have not modified the bicycle access as there is no valid evidence to add the restriction. It can be helpful if your local knowledge can improvise our edit quality. Please let me know... | |
| 98232155 by bathines @ 2021-01-27 13:15 | 1 | 2021-01-27 16:57 | johsin18 ♦160 | I don't see the point in leaving the already existing part a "residential" road, it should also be made a service road. |
| 2 | 2021-01-29 10:46 | bathines | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not changed the existing road as I don't have enough resources to make the change. please find the suggested modifications in the changeset 98357482. It is good to see the community improvising our edit quality. Always happy to learn from the communi... | |
| 96779889 by bathines @ 2021-01-01 16:54 | 1 | 2021-01-03 14:52 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 96850173 where the changeset comment is: Revert Facebook AI edit. The bypasses you added are oneways, in addition a couple of turn restrictions were missing as well. Do it correctly or skip it please! |
| 2 | 2021-01-03 14:53 | Nakaner ♦3,153 | Hi,please have a look how such intersections are mapped in Germany and learn the gold standard before you start using Facebook's AI stuff. Thank you.Best regardsMichael | |
| 3 | 2021-01-04 14:16 | bathines | Thanks for checking into our edits. My sincere apologies for the missed attributes. Going forward, I will make sure to add all the features before saving my edits. Once again, Thanks for the correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement it in my future edit... | |
| 96053857 by bathines @ 2020-12-18 08:37 | 1 | 2020-12-18 10:42 | tux67 ♦1,945 | This is obviously not a parking aisle, but a service road (one way) to leave the complex. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96053857 |
| 2 | 2020-12-22 02:45 | bathines | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have misinterpreted the road as parking aisle. Thanks for improvising my edits. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in this future edits. Always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 92549778 by bathines @ 2020-10-16 03:14 | 1 | 2020-10-16 08:01 | lakedistrict ♦308 | Hi, unfortunately this changeset is wrong. There is only one barrier which was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264452143. Crag Walk is drivable all the way from Helm Road to the bollard linked above. Reverted in 92566848. |
| 2 | 2020-10-16 15:57 | bathines | Hi, thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the barrier based on the internal driver feedback and OS open data. I have added the note so that the community would validate it with the ground reality. Thanks for the modification, it is good to see the community improvising our edits. Always h... | |
| 92149322 by bathines @ 2020-10-08 06:40 | 1 | 2020-10-08 20:04 | ndm ♦889 | You need to change "access=private" at the gate not before -- the oriignal edit breaks cycle routing. |
| 2 | 2020-10-10 02:35 | bathines | Thanks for your valuable suggestions. it is good to see the community improvising our edits. Going forward, I will make sure to consider the access tags of the adjoining paths before making the edits. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in my future edits. | |
| 85916007 by bathines @ 2020-05-29 03:29 | 1 | 2020-06-02 21:51 | Chris Fleming ♦375 | HI, do you have any evidence of these been connected. This looks to me like 2 separate properties, each with it's own entrance? |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 06:28 | bathines | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into our edits. I have made this edit based on the aerial imagery, it is little ambiguous as it is partially covered by vegetation. Apologies, if it is contradicting with the ground reality. Please find the changeset (86114229) for the suggested modifications. ... | |
| 82922591 by bathines @ 2020-04-01 12:16 | 1 | 2020-04-12 12:44 | messpert ♦65 | This is a private drive. We do not normally map these in the UK unless they are particularly long or are significant in some other way. At least you have now added the right access, but where is the remotely controlled gate? |
| 81119476 by bathines @ 2020-02-17 14:06 | 1 | 2020-02-18 09:48 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hi bathines,you added some tracks to OSM. Tracks are roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc. (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack).IMHO this roads are driveways (highway=service + service=driveway): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 14:30 | bathines | Hi OSM_RogerWilco, Appreciating your time for checking my edits. After further deep dive, we realized that it is an error from our end and rectified it. Please find the changeset (81175723) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community. regards bathines ... |