Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
30 changesets created by blackadder have been discussed with 22 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
404
by blackadder
@ 2005-10-02 22:35		12025-03-01 16:46Geocacher1
♦2		 Error, changeset not found
22025-03-01 22:53blackadder I'm not even sure we had changesets back then!
14248446
by blackadder
@ 2012-12-12 12:21		12024-12-28 17:30mueschel
♦6,562		 Hi,
a long time ago, you added the tag "blue_badge_holders=yes". Isn't that tagged disabled=yes nowadays?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20841793/history
158309283
by blackadder
@ 2024-10-24 18:41		12024-10-29 08:29Robert Whittaker
♦271		 Could I check if you intended to remove the shop=trade tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374420094 in this changeset? If so, what the current status of this branch?
22024-10-29 08:49blackadder A senior moment I guess ;-)
Fixed
Cheers
154486470
by blackadder
@ 2024-07-27 14:18		12024-07-30 15:42Syl
♦948		 Hello, the phone still work? Very few in France does.
22024-07-30 15:55blackadder Good question, alas I did not check it.
39264204
by blackadder
@ 2016-05-12 11:07		12024-02-02 14:28daganzdaanda
♦253		 Hi blackadder,
I noticed there are a few old "demolished_building = yes" in Birmingham. Do you think it's still sensible to keep them in the database? My guess would be, that they are long enough gone to be deleted. Of course the current tagging would use lifecycle prefixes instead....
22023-05-20 22:47blackadder Haha, yes, very early doors when we moved from just Segments to Ways
37663697
by blackadder
@ 2016-03-07 11:27		12018-11-09 19:38Josef73
♦272		 Hello, when is here open?
22018-11-10 10:25blackadder Sorry, I only visited once. I see I added some opening times when I edited it.
32023-01-11 18:39Josef73
♦272		 I will remove the opening_hours
6576160
by blackadder
@ 2010-12-07 15:43		12022-11-23 00:35Emilius123
♦393		 sweat
44519951
by blackadder
@ 2016-12-19 16:34		12022-07-03 14:25mueschel
♦6,562		 Hi,
you used the tag "wheeling_ramp" on two ways.
Could you check if one of the common ramp tags fits instead?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460573357
47619112
by blackadder
@ 2017-04-10 11:20		12022-06-28 15:12lyctkel
♦332		 Hi blackadder,
the temporary building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485844119 does now exist for 7 years. Maybe it's an option to change it to building=tent.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtent for details.Regards,
lyctkel
22022-06-28 20:33blackadder I agree, its definitely become at least semi permanent. Feel free to change the tags.

Cheers
Andy
53211355
by blackadder
@ 2017-10-24 15:18		12022-01-01 20:07ivanbranco
♦2,693		 Hi blackadder,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5186335889

was the place value supposed to be the name maybe? can you check it out?
22022-01-03 18:17blackadder Maybe, I can't honestly recall. Its certainly known as the Chapel Head site so feel free to change the tag.
110308164
by blackadder
@ 2021-08-26 21:16		12021-08-27 10:42Lee Carré
♦665		 “Jersey updates”

Care to be more specific? 😋

There's a handful of locals to whom such a comment is meaningless.
22021-08-27 16:34blackadder Ha, I'll try and be a little more specific next time. Lazy holiday time! Mostly tweaks to the Devils Hole and surrounding paths.
32021-09-18 23:28Lee Carré
♦665		 “tweaks to the Devils Hole and surrounding paths.”

👍 the area needs some attention.

Hell, the whole northern coast needs surveying.
110137484
by blackadder
@ 2021-08-23 21:07		12021-08-23 23:28Lee Carré
♦665		 “Jersey updates”

Care to be more specific? Looks like you mostly added several buildings.
22021-08-24 08:14blackadder Yep, staying in one of them for a few days
32021-08-24 10:21Lee Carré
♦665		 Spiffy; enjoy.

I had assumed that this was armchair-mapping, since source != survey.

Thanks; we're rather lacking on the building-outline front (among many other features).
42021-08-24 12:25blackadder Always try to add a bit here and there when I visit. Will add what I can.
Cheers
Andy
65485728
by blackadder
@ 2018-12-14 21:12		12021-02-05 12:49SK53
♦864		 Hi Andy,

Just wondered if St Mary's Drive should be residential rather than unclassified. Presumably it was originally the service road driveway for the golf club before the houses were built, or were the houses built at the same time.

Jerry
22021-02-05 13:16blackadder Hey Jerry,
Used to be the road through the Abbey. Noth end these days is just a track and southern end the access to the hotel and golf course along with the upmarket houses they built more recently either side of the road. I agree its more residential than unclassified these days.
Cheers
Andy
44238649
by blackadder
@ 2016-12-07 15:55		12020-01-23 13:27Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,575		 What is the intended meaning of construction=cutting tag used for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458305617 ?
22020-01-23 13:46blackadder That section of the track is proposed to be in cutting
32020-01-24 08:51Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,575		 I think that cutting=yes is usually used for such things.

Maybe proposed:cutting=yes if someone likes namespaces.

(I encountered this because I was fixing railway=tram construction=tram type of tagging mistakes and this is railway=proposed construction=* way)
42020-01-24 09:31blackadder I'm easy on this. The tagging format probably dates back to 2012 when I did the import for Phase 1 and the translation from the government data to OSM tags wasn't as mature as it would be today. Anyway, feel free to adjust though note none of the HS2 route sections are in build currently t...
14248163
by blackadder
@ 2012-12-12 11:53		12019-12-30 16:49mueschel
♦6,562		 Hi,
I found various 'STAG_*' tags on this park - Are they still meaningful?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2634482

Jan
22019-12-30 22:16blackadder They could be changed to something more appropriate. They stem back to a time 12 or more years ago when I was looking to create a new version of the tagging schema which I didnt take further. Some of these tags may have some relevance but certainly they could be reviewed and updated or deleted as re...
77986148
by blackadder
@ 2019-12-05 10:34		12019-12-08 12:15BCNorwich
♦4,845		 Hi, re Way: 402053671 in this changeset, an area with long self intersection tails. I can't make out the area it was meant to cover. Could you have a look at it please.
Regards Bernard.
22019-12-08 20:43blackadder Hi Bernard, looks like I messed up the original landuse when converting and combing for the new construction area extent. Will fix in my next edit session.
Cheers
Andy
10447705
by blackadder
@ 2012-01-20 15:50		12019-11-21 11:42SK53
♦864		 Hi Andy,

Is 314 Boldmere Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145042764) really a social club just looks like an ordinary semi to me on Bing Streetside.

Jerry
22019-11-21 11:50blackadder No I'm sure thats wrong. I must have accidentally tagged the wrong building as the North Birmingham Bridge Club just down the road and mapped at the same time should have that tag and doesn't.

I'll fix when next editing.

Cheers
Andy
32019-11-21 12:46SK53
♦864		 Thanks, I'm just looking at social clubs because iD is changing the tagging (incorrectly) and it has highlighted inconsistency in tags. Mainly we're looking for working man's club style social clubs which are pseudo-pubs.
45860748
by blackadder
@ 2017-02-06 16:51		12019-05-03 10:36Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,575		 Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1765600 ? It seems that some notes about vacant object maybe should be removed.
22019-05-03 11:24blackadder Are you saying you don't like the use of the word (vacant) because its not the name of the place? I use it as a useful placeholder to keep an eye on changes when retail units are temporarily empty.
32019-05-05 14:04Mateusz Konieczny
♦7,575		 I replied on note on topic of note itself, but name=(vacant) is a bit problematic - it is not name of this building.

I would remove it during survey as incorrect but I am not going to remove here it remotely.
65470035
by blackadder
@ 2018-12-14 11:43		12018-12-16 12:56mueschel
♦6,562		 Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "vesting_declaration_date=20171114"? This isn't used in any other place.

Jan
22018-12-16 22:42blackadder Hi Jan,
Vesting Declaration is the same as compulsory purchase. These are land parcels that have been purchased for HS2 and will be cleared shortly (some already have been) in order to construct HS2 Phase 1
54462399
by blackadder
@ 2017-12-08 15:51		12018-10-11 01:06Warin61
♦2,663		 Hi,
On Way: 545490074 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
26740050
by blackadder
@ 2014-11-12 17:35		12018-10-10 04:02Warin61
♦2,663		 Hi,

For Way: 310213093 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
57985523
by blackadder
@ 2018-04-10 21:16		12018-10-10 04:02Warin61
♦2,663		 Hi,

For Way: 578649115 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
11993690
by blackadder
@ 2012-06-23 21:25		12017-12-03 21:48sperlingskauz
♦72		 Hi blackadder,

for your information: I changed your tagging man_made = bee_hive to man_made = beehive. The reason is that since this year there is a wiki page for beehives.

Regards,
sperlingskauz
50763194
by blackadder
@ 2017-08-01 19:47		12017-08-21 13:10Robert Whittaker
♦271		 Did you make a mistake with some of the postcodes in this changeset -- the following three houses have addr:postcode=JAJB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452146161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452146159
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452146152
22017-08-21 15:52blackadder Ha, nice catch. Clearly wasn't paying attention! Will fix next time I'm editing in that area.
Cheers
Andy
47005822
by blackadder
@ 2017-03-20 08:58		12017-04-14 17:41RobJN
♦77		 Good spot! We need a way of sharing our list of checked edits so that we don't duplicate effort :-)
43811825
by blackadder
@ 2016-11-19 23:14		12017-03-14 20:02Mike Baggaley
♦630		 Hi blackadder, I know it is a little while ago, but your edit of relation 4292131 (Wharton Retail Park) seems to have left it with an incomplete outline. I'm not sure whether the unclosed line is part of the retail park or not. Can you take a look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/429213...
22017-03-14 22:41blackadder Looks like my cleaning up was so clean after all! Thanks for spotting. Will fix when next editing in that area unless you get to it first?
32017-03-14 22:42blackadder s/was/wasn't
44238054
by blackadder
@ 2016-12-07 15:32		12016-12-09 22:04mueschel
♦6,562		 Hi,
do we really need tags like these in OSM?
chainage_end=27161.5996094
chainage_start=14396.2998047
shape_length=12765.2998022

Btw, the key name:proposed should be proposed:name.

Jan
41419458
by blackadder
@ 2016-08-12 21:48		12016-11-16 12:12Robert Whittaker
♦271		 The postcode of "SW9 8JT" on the houses along Hartford Road, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436951345 looks wrong. (SW is south-west London.)
22016-11-16 13:29blackadder Cheers Robert. Typo should be CW. I'm in the process of mapping out Davenham so will fix as I'm doing the addressing.

Cheers
Andy
2303745
by blackadder
@ 2009-08-29 17:43		12015-12-26 10:09utack
♦280		 The "Shelfield Child Devlopment Centre" on node 476685156 is missing any main tags
186264
by blackadder
@ 2007-01-02 22:53		12015-10-29 19:23GerdP
♦2,751		 please review node 24352994:
What is meant with highway=distance_post ? I assume it is traffic_sign=distance ?