| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107973670 by borramou @ 2021-07-14 11:03 | 1 | 2021-07-15 15:20 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Hi,just curious - Where does the access=private come from? Is there signage or physical barriers which prohibit from entering?Flo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107973670 |
| 2 | 2021-07-19 07:14 | borramou | Hi flohoff, I have added the private access as the landuse and aerial view of the entity is a residential entity. Please feel free to improve in case of any updated information or let me know, I will make the changes. Regards,borramou | |
| 3 | 2021-07-19 12:32 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Hi,access=* something describes access restrictions either by phyiscal barriers e.g. a gate or some signage prohibiting entry. So unless one of the 2 exists i would abstain from tagging any superflous access restriction.Flo | |
| 107300415 by borramou @ 2021-07-02 09:07 | 1 | 2021-07-02 10:00 | SafetyIng ♦348 | Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag? |
| 2 | 2021-07-06 07:52 | borramou | Hi SafetyIng, Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset (107479174) with modifications. Regards,borramou | |
| 106689720 by borramou @ 2021-06-21 04:55 | 1 | 2021-06-21 20:02 | SafetyIng ♦348 | The way is more a driveway.... |
| 2 | 2021-06-23 04:19 | borramou | Hi SafetyIng, Thank you for the inputs. I have changed the highway tag to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106807578) with changes made. Regards,borramou | |
| 106532626 by borramou @ 2021-06-17 13:15 | 1 | 2021-06-17 16:31 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-06-21 06:11 | borramou | Hi PT-53, I have added Highway = service but not service= driveway as it was leading to several buildings and type of it is unknown. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion (changeset #: 106693045). Thanks for looking into my edit. Regards,borramou | |
| 105818298 by borramou @ 2021-06-04 06:58 | 1 | 2021-06-04 12:18 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo borramouJetzt hast Du einfach den Weg gekürzt. Bin mir auf Grund der Luftbilder aber ziemlich sicher, dass er hinter dem Vorderhaus noch entlang geht.Warum hast Du nicht auch noch `access=*` und `service=*` verwendet?Maps4BW scheint Ihr immer noch nicht als Hintergrund zu verwende... |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 05:55 | borramou | Hi Skyper, Apologies for the miss. I have modified the geometry based on aerial imagery but have not added access as I was unsure about the entity type. But, as rightly pointed out it seems to be a private space. Hence, I have added Service = driveway. However, driveway itself represents a priva... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 12:07 | skyper ♦871 | Salli borramouaccess=permissive ist in den meisten Fällen nicht falsch. Bei einfachen Stichstraßen ist es jetzt aber nicht so wichtig. Sobald aber eine weiter Verbindung besteht und sei es auch nur ein Trampelpfad, sollten schon die richtigen Zugangsbestimmungen eingetragen werden.G... | |
| 4 | 2021-06-09 06:28 | borramou | Hi Skyper, Thanks for the clarification. I'll keep this note posted to my supervisor on how to utilize the Maps4BW map in our edits. Thanks for making the changes on my behalf. Happy to have this productive conversation and learn more from you!Regards,borramou | |
| 5 | 2021-06-09 14:14 | skyper ♦871 | Hi borramouHabe mal die Gebäude und Wege, soweit es von der Couch aus möglich war, aktualisiert. Die Zufahrt habe ich auch verbessert.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106058358.Schön fände ich es, wenn diese Informationen auf Eurer Wiki-Seite dokumentiert werden un... | |
| 6 | 2021-06-11 04:16 | borramou | Hi Skyper,Thanks for improving the map around this area. I will for sure put forward this information to our Higher Authorities who can monitor these updates closely.Good Day! | |
| 99022756 by borramou @ 2021-02-10 07:39 | 1 | 2021-05-31 12:59 | skyper ♦871 | Hey borramouSorry, aber so verläuft der Weg nicht. Ist so auch auf dem Luftbild erkennbar. Vorsicht, die meisten Gebäude sind iM oft leicht versetzt, aber dass ist mit Maps4BW als Hintergrund ja erkenntlich.Zwecks zusätzlichen Tags, Quellen und mehr siehe u.a. auch https://opens... |
| 2 | 2021-06-04 07:01 | borramou | Hello Skyper, I have added the segment based on older Esri Clarity imagery which I believe is the mistake I have made. I have now changed the geometry of the segment as per the latest aerial view. Please find the changeset (105818298) and many thanks for the feedback. Regards,borramou | |
| 3 | 2021-06-04 12:43 | skyper ♦871 | Siehe Fortsetzung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105818298 | |
| 104109062 by borramou @ 2021-05-04 09:02 | 1 | 2021-05-05 05:26 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-05-05 09:07 | borramou | Hi, Thanks for checking my edit. I have added the road as per the available aerial imagery in OSM. As I was unable to identify the type of entity I have not added service = driveway tag. But, As it is residential area driveway seems to be more apt. I have modified the the tag as per your suggestio... | |
| 93401624 by borramou @ 2020-11-02 07:46 | 1 | 2020-11-02 11:34 | tux67 ♦1,945 | Hi borrymou - I do not see a private flag - neither at the gate nor at the way.And it should be private, as the new highway you added connects a main road via a private ground.BRtux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93401624 ... |
| 2 | 2020-11-04 04:08 | borramou | Hi tux67, thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, it is a honest mistake from our end. I have added the segment but missed adding access. I have made changes as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset for your reference 93511790. I will make sure to never repeat such mistakes. Always h... |