| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88251910 by branib @ 2020-07-20 14:17 | 1 | 2021-02-12 18:06 | Allison P ♦1,140 | Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you! |
| 2 | 2021-02-15 09:55 | branib | Hi Allison P,Thanks for checking our edits. Apologies for the miss. I have modified the access to customers. change set : 99297792Regards, Branib | |
| 73791530 by branib @ 2019-08-27 11:06 | 1 | 2020-10-12 19:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello - the imagery you used here to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718857656 was very offset. You can see the problem if you look at OS_OpenData_StreetView |
| 2 | 2020-10-14 06:51 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your feedback, but we are not able to grasp your concern here. I can find the roads we have created are inline with Bing imagery, which has minimum offset. We are using adjust imagery offset in id editor to add data whenever we see imagery is offset.Are you suggesting us to add or al... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-14 23:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | You can see the changes if you use achavi - you nudge the road north in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73791530 and I nudged it south again in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92370997 . It now matches OS OpenData StreetView (exactly) and Bing (nearly) but not Esri. Your alignm... | |
| 4 | 2020-10-20 11:49 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your valuable inputs, will consider this learning in my future edits.Thanks&Regards,Branib | |
| 87650896 by branib @ 2020-07-07 11:08 | 1 | 2020-07-07 11:17 | ToniE ♦1,237 | Hello branib,Are these roads really open to the public?I doubt, I've seen signs that access is limited to taxis and ... but not for all.By removing 'access=no', you opened these roads for all kind of traffic - 'psv=yes' is superfluous now, simply saying "anyon... |
| 2 | 2020-07-07 11:22 | ToniE ♦1,237 | On June 30th, I've seen here (and have photos) a sign which denies access to all kinds of vehicles. I unfortunately cannot see the "exceptions" below the sign - photo quality is poor. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-20 05:51 | branib | Hi ToniE,Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies for the delayed response. I have mistakenly modified the access tags. Thanks for the quick correction. I will make sure to perform my future edits very carefully with all the available resources. Once again, thanks for clearly explaining the i... | |
| 87957807 by branib @ 2020-07-14 06:43 | 1 | 2020-07-14 08:01 | Nakaner ♦3,153 | Hi,could you please give a proper reason for this change?Best regardsMichael --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87957807 |
| 2 | 2020-07-16 10:41 | branib | Hi Michael,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have modified the highway tag with starting segment as service and the remaining road to parking aisle as it is leading to the parking lot. Please correct me if I am wrong and it requires any further modifications. Always happy to learn from the ... | |
| 86941755 by branib @ 2020-06-21 17:42 | 1 | 2020-06-21 21:43 | gurglypipe ♦898 | Hi, are you sure about this change? This leaves the bridleway inaccessible from Hayclose Lane, which seems unlikely. Has it been rerouted? What’s your source? |
| 2 | 2020-06-22 12:16 | branib | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made this edit based on the driver feedback and available resources. It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improvise our edits. Please go ahead and make the necessary changes. I have made this edits with the available resources. please correct m... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-22 14:47 | gurglypipe ♦898 | Which available resources in particular? Can you point me to the roadside imagery you used? Or the feedback from the driver?I don’t know if you’re wrong for sure – I haven’t been down Hayclose Lane recently – but it seems pretty implausible for the bridleway to be i... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-24 08:09 | branib | Hi,Thanks for the response. we have received the feed back from our driver that the road is accessible by motor vehicles and cross verified the same with the available aerial imagery(map box,maxar,etc.). based on that,I have modified a part of the segment to service road. we have not made any chan... | |
| 5 | 2020-06-24 08:40 | gurglypipe ♦898 | I’ve fixed it in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87072791. I think the issue is that you did accidentally make some changes to the bridleway, marking it as access=private on the service road. I added access exceptions for pedestrians, horses and bikes. Thanks for your replies... | |
| 82292558 by branib @ 2020-03-17 08:36 | 1 | 2020-03-22 10:13 | SammysHP ♦132 | So ist das aber auch nicht ganz richtig, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere. Man kommt doch hier als Fußgänger durch! Außerdem ist die Straße noch ein Stück länger. Ist dort ein Poller? Oder nur ein schmaler Fußweg? |
| 2 | 2020-03-23 10:39 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the commu... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-23 10:41 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the commu... | |
| 70836754 by branib @ 2019-06-01 14:29 | 1 | 2019-09-04 16:54 | BCNorwich ♦4,885 | Hi, You've drawn Way: 693925786 over a footway Way: 44332298 without joining to it, is there a bridge or tunnel here? If not the two ways should be joined. |
| 2 | 2019-09-04 16:57 | BCNorwich ♦4,885 | You've also drawn Way: 693925785 over a footway Way: 44332298 without joining to it, is there a bridge or tunnel here? If not the two ways should be joined. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-04 16:58 | BCNorwich ♦4,885 | Way: 693925784 should also be joined to the footway. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-06 11:19 | branib | Hi BCNorwich,Thank you for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake made me. I have rectified the mistake (#74170073). I will be more careful going forward and would not commit such error. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.Rega... | |
| 71508749 by branib @ 2019-06-22 12:35 | 1 | 2019-07-16 13:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | I suspect that motor_vehicle=yes will need removing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53051099/history if there's no other evidence for it. |
| 2 | 2019-07-16 14:16 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72307918Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards, branib | |
| 3 | 2019-07-16 14:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Thanks - still couple more to do - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KM6 . | |
| 4 | 2019-07-17 11:42 | branib | Hi, Thanks for sharing the query. I have identified the similar changesets with the help of this query and reverted the changes as per the community's feedback.Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.Best Regardsbranib | |
| 5 | 2019-07-17 11:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Thanks for fixing these. | |
| 71679656 by branib @ 2019-06-27 16:44 | 1 | 2019-07-16 13:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | I suspect that motor_vehicle=yes will need removing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50316461 if there's no evidence for it. |
| 2 | 2019-07-16 14:25 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72307757Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards,branib | |
| 72096853 by branib @ 2019-07-10 14:02 | 1 | 2019-07-10 14:40 | tux67 ♦1,945 | Hi,on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703102590 there is a gate close to the tunnel preventing access.BRtux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72096853 |
| 2 | 2019-07-11 17:55 | branib | Hi tux67,Thanks for your comments. I didn't add this information as I was not sure if the elevation was a gate or just a barrier to restrict heavy vehicles to enter into this road. But as per your confirmation I am adding the gate information.Regards,branib | |
| 71678910 by branib @ 2019-06-27 16:23 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:23 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166516719/history is similar to the problem described in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71707773 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best Regards,... |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 16:07 | branib | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71937852Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards, branib | |
| 3 | 2019-07-05 17:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Thanks. If ir helps, you can see the ones that you were the last editor of by looking at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Kvn .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71707773 by branib @ 2019-06-28 13:16 | 1 | 2019-06-28 15:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What was the source of the access tag change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 13:10 | branib | Hi Andy,Thank you for your response. Since the service road is connecting to the track road and there are motor vehicles that are visible in Bing Satellite imagery, I added "motor_vehicle=yes" to this track roads. Reverting the "motor_vehicle=yes" tag as per feedback from com... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-01 08:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello branib,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 71714993 by branib @ 2019-06-28 16:47 | 1 | 2019-06-28 17:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,In https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2967 you were asked to reply to the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9641463 before continuing to map.Can you please do that? |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 14:18 | branib | Hi,Thanks for writing to me. As suggested, I have gone through the feedback provided by community and responded on those comments. Regards,branib | |
| 3 | 2019-06-29 16:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hi branib,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 70559204 by branib @ 2019-05-23 16:57 | 1 | 2019-05-23 22:08 | ndm ♦889 | Driveways - please check with Bing Streetside when adding. |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 14:16 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your feedback and correcting the edit by changing road classification.Regards,branib | |
| 71486465 by branib @ 2019-06-21 15:35 | 1 | 2019-06-21 19:48 | ndm ♦889 | Road probably doesn't go throught the building. |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 14:06 | branib | Hi,Thanks for your feedback and correcting the edit. I will consider the feedback for further edits.Regards,branib | |
| 70960879 by branib @ 2019-06-05 16:42 | 1 | 2019-06-05 17:45 | ndm ♦889 | ESRI clarity shows this is a parking aisle with spaces |
| 2 | 2019-06-29 14:01 | branib | Hi,Thank you for providing your feedback and correcting the road classification. Please let me know if there are any other suggestions.regards,branib |