| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172518641 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-09-27 10:08 | 1 | 2025-09-27 19:43 | Hufkratzer ♦840 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433533337 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433533338 are no horseback riding centers, they are outdoor riding arenas, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EixOrrGnfVA&t=141s and should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (like https://www.... |
| 2 | 2025-09-28 22:19 | catgirlseraid | Hi,Thanks for your comment! I've retagged these areas now.Thank you,Phoebe | |
| 167522495 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-06-12 08:24 | 1 | 2025-06-13 07:27 | redd ♦436 | Hallo catgirlseraid,Auch wenn du dein Vorhaben vorher zur Diskussion gestellt hast, bin ich erst jetzt darauf gestossen. Der Tag generator:output:electricity=yes kann für generator:type=solar_photovoltaic_panel implizit angenommen werden. Dieser Punkt wurde auch in der Diskussion bereits ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 08:06 | catgirlseraid | Hi, This was discussed in the forum post, and my reply about why I thought this method would be more acceptable received a thumbs up from the person who wrote the feedback, which I took to mean they agreed with me. I will stop doing these edits in Germany while I await further community response... | |
| 3 | 2025-08-22 08:49 | catgirlseraid | Hi,I have receved no further feedback across any other worldwide changesets related to this project. It will be resumed. Please direct any further feedback to the fourm page,https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-partially-automated-edit-of-solar-panel-tags-worldwide/130200Thanks, Phoebe | |
| 168117610 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-06-26 02:23 | 1 | 2025-06-27 12:25 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | hey, i think your JOSM settings might be misconfigured, looks like you've added source=esri to >100,000 nodes in the past few days: see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/26Q0 and https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=New%20Zealand where I noticed the spikeI believe it'... |
| 2 | 2025-06-27 15:26 | catgirlseraid | Im not sure whats going on here either, I'll try look into it more. The spikes are all legitimate edits, I have been importing a lot of LINZ buildings recently, and have creates a pretty fast workflow for verifiying them. What seems to have happened is that mapwithai josm plugin has added sourc... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-28 04:12 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | yeah no stress, but maybe chat with some folks who use JOSM, I've seen this type of problem before, but I don't use JOSM so I can't tell ya which setting is wrongi removed that tag from https://osm.org/changeset/168211778 & subsequent changestes | |
| 4 | 2025-06-28 08:00 | catgirlseraid | thanks for removing the additional tags! | |
| 5 | 2025-06-28 08:05 | catgirlseraid | For further context for anyone else looking into this, this seems to be caused by the mapwithai JOSM plugin rather than JOSM itself. The source tags were added at upload so I never got a chance to see them. It's also been very intermittent, only happening to some changesets. I've been havi... | |
| 164672894 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-04-08 10:39 | 1 | 2025-06-16 13:27 | Saint_Vincent ♦5 | "Hello catgirlseraidI have fixed validation error between building way 373165436way 373165421.Please inspect your task carefully before closing.Happy Mapping!" |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 14:44 | catgirlseraid | Thanks! Sorry im not sure what happened there :( | |
| 167556530 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-06-13 02:49 | 1 | 2025-06-13 02:51 | catgirlseraid | Wrong changeset description sorry, should be "Add missing tags to solar panels, remap when needed. See forum post https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-partially-automated-edit-of-solar-panel-tags-worldwide/130200 and wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/catgirlseraid&q... |
| 167333352 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-06-08 02:50 | 1 | 2025-06-09 07:35 | aharvey ♦1,869 | pretty much every beach along the coastline has opportunities for surfing, unless it's it has a specific local name you'd like to map should we really be adding sport=surfing off each beach?furthermore, the "water" here is already mapped via the coastline, so we shouldn'... |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 08:08 | catgirlseraid | I'm unsure about the sport=surfing without a name too. This was a node converted to an area as part of a area=yes on nodes cleanup, it wasn't creating any new information. This is the ID of the original node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12036802068 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-09 08:10 | catgirlseraid | The water tagging seems to be part of a preset i was using sorry, natural=water removed from both this area and the nearby one i also fixed in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167383324 . Thanks for noticing and pointing it out <3 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-09 10:25 | aharvey ♦1,869 | Thanks, fair enough. | |
| 5 | 2025-06-09 10:29 | catgirlseraid | I have no problems if you want to remove them, maybe best to reach out to the original mapper first though? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-09 12:12 | aharvey ♦1,869 | I'll leave them. I looked through the original contribution and it seems they were mostly from Strava surfing heatmaps, which is mostly just mapping the popular surfing spots. It just seemed odd seeing them mapped but the more I think about it the more I think it's reasonable. | |
| 166974580 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-30 14:14 | 1 | 2025-05-30 14:18 | catgirlseraid | sources for this changeset since i forgot to add them sorry, Esri World Imagery, Esri World Imagery Clarity, Bing Imagery, NYS Orthos Online, Wikimedia images, 1960's US Department of Engineers map, Mapillary |
| 166556945 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-21 08:46 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:05 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | Hello again.You tagged entranced to this fort(currently under repair) as natural=scrub. This doesn't seem correct..🤔 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166556945 |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 16:25 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | This is the feature that you tagged as scrub: https://www.hmdb.org/PhotoFullSize.asp?PhotoID=572505 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166556945 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-27 19:48 | catgirlseraid | Hi,The photo you sent appears to be from 2007, and using latest aerial imagery that area seems to be covered in scrub now under the scaffolding, which i chose not to tag as its a temporary feature. If you have more modern images of the entrance, preferably without the scaffolding in the way, whi... | |
| 166561284 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-21 10:18 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:18 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | Hello.I do not believe the features you tagged are faussebraye.You can see some clearer photos at https://www.nps.gov/gois/learn/historyculture/fortjay.htm and https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Fort_Jay_Governors_Island_and_Lower_Manhattan_skyline.jpgIf anything could be cons... |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | This seems to be more of Counterguard or counterscarp as shown on this photo https://npplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Fort-Jay-Diagram.jpg --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166561284 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-27 19:45 | catgirlseraid | Hi,Please retag the defensive works if you know more about the subject, I tried my best i could with the information the OSM wiki page proided. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defensive_worksThanks, Phoebe | |
| 166554429 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-21 07:42 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:01 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | Hello.You really should not be hand-drawing outlines of trees' canopies and deleting tree nodes.That's called https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and that's inappropriate.Tree canopies change as trees grow, with seasons as they lose and gain leaves and a... |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 19:42 | catgirlseraid | Hi,I deleted tree nodes where their location was incorrect such as the middle of a pathway, grass field or in an area with more than one tree represented by a single node where i could not tell where the base of the rest of the trees are. I did my best i could with the available resources, but O... | |
| 166557023 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-21 08:47 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:10 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | Hello.Please note that this edit is incorrect.These are retaining walls of a moat around this fort. These features do not raise above the ground level.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dretaining_wallhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcity_wallThis edit should... |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 16:11 | MxxCon ♦3,363 | I see you already corrected this in the following edit. 👍😅 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166557023 | |
| 166280310 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-14 23:22 | 1 | 2025-05-25 09:17 | Koen8 ♦1 | Hi, can I ask why you reverted this change? Some of these lands are clearly covered with solar panels, but you reverted them to landuse=farmland. |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 10:11 | catgirlseraid | Hi,I changed these back to farmland as they appeared to be crop netting used to cover crops such as grapes from birds and excessive sun. I also wasn't able to see any electrical infistructure nearby such as transformers that normally come with a solar farm. Here's a link to what the nett... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 10:13 | catgirlseraid | only https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79845380/ should have been included in this changeset sorry. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 12:50 | Koen8 ♦1 | Thanks for the explanation, I see what you mean. I will try to take a look in the field, probably somewhere in the coming week and make a change if required. | |
| 166476621 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-19 13:21 | 1 | 2025-05-20 13:55 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | hey, these should probably be highway=track + access=private, otherwise GPS software will start telling people to drive thru these private farmssome more details here: http://osm.wiki/Tag:highway=track |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 11:49 | catgirlseraid | Added access=private to the service roads but kept them as service as i belive it suits them better as they also provide access to businesses and houses, as well as farmland.Thanks for pointing out the lack of access tags <3https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166609127 | |
| 166369541 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-16 21:12 | 1 | 2025-05-17 02:19 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Heyy, streetside parking should be mapped slightly differently. Individual parking spaces are as parking space, and then there should be an area covering each section of them as a streetside parking. Have a look at what I corrected them to :3 |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 09:43 | catgirlseraid | thanks <3 | |
| 164273396 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-03-30 05:10 | 1 | 2025-05-14 08:10 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | There is a bug in the editor you used because this changeset added the wikidata tag for NCMA to the outer line of the multipolygon instead of the relation. |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 09:50 | catgirlseraid | ooh thanks for noticing <3 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 12:20 | catgirlseraid | fixed by Sunset_Sakura in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166241029 | |
| 166194934 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-13 10:30 | 1 | 2025-05-13 10:36 | catgirlseraid | i forgot about the way in south korea sorryyyy |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 10:38 | Kovoschiz ♦2,642 | You haven't added back `electricity=solar` , meaning this is a loss of info eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131212886/history | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 10:41 | Kovoschiz ♦2,642 | Wrong fixing for validator which included `building=` and other areas (including `=clinic` ) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152309258 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-13 10:47 | catgirlseraid | please see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166195665 where electricity=solar was added as was implied via previously incorrectly used tags | |
| 165827950 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-05-05 05:45 | 1 | 2025-05-07 10:05 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Most examples of detailed indoor mapping I looked at included barrier=wall, so I did so here. I checked the wiki, it seems you're right that it's implied - indoor=room has walls, indoor=area does not. So I agree with your decision to remove the tags :) |
| 2 | 2025-05-07 12:37 | catgirlseraid | I thought barrier=wall was correct too, but someone in the OSM World Discord who is familar with indoor mapping pointed out they shouldn't be there as its implied. Don't worry, i wasn't aware either until their comment<3 | |
| 164071633 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-03-25 11:11 | 1 | 2025-04-09 18:49 | HellMap ♦751 | Hi,Thanks for mapping these one a piece.I did however restore the panels you deleted in the South end, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320335408/history - these do in fact exist and are newer than the aerial imagery, which is a few years old. |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 08:07 | catgirlseraid | Thanks for readding them<3. Sorry for deleting those, i figured they might have been misplaced as i couldn't see them on imagery and it seemed strange to have a few random seperate panels. | |
| 163522186 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-03-12 10:57 | 1 | 2025-03-29 03:11 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Two Maproulette tasks have arisen from this with the cycleway areas on Atawhai Shared Path. Should those two areas be deleted? I doubt mapping them is valuable.ref:https://maproulette.org/challenge/50523/task/278853998https://maproulette.org/challenge/50523/task/278853825 |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 05:05 | catgirlseraid | ooh yes they can be removed, so sorry for leaving them there, i was seeing what tags were needed for them to render and forgot to remove them sorry <3 removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164273321thanks for telling me | |
| 3 | 2025-03-30 05:43 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | all good! :3 | |
| 162730971 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-02-20 09:02 | 1 | 2025-02-20 20:00 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | How long does it take you to micromap so many carparks? Or do you have a JOSM preset/plugin that makes it easier? |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 04:26 | catgirlseraid | it depends a lot on what angle the car parks are, but using josm plugins and a lot of josm features does speed it up. | |
| 162722266 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-02-20 01:52 | 1 | 2025-02-20 07:55 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Your micromapping is beautiful, but comes at the wrong time: they've just been taking the park down. Apparently they're finding a new place for a pop-up park, but anyway this one is not accessible anymore. See: https://shape.nelson.govt.nz/riverside-youth-pop-park |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 08:11 | catgirlseraid | noo :( | |
| 162494007 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-02-14 08:40 | 1 | 2025-02-16 08:57 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Hi, I'm cool with tagging Bank Lane as a pedestrian street, but why should that be different from the other arcades/walkways, especially Nelson Central Arcade?Also wondering why the layer=0 tag was removed from the businesses - it's a 3 to 4 story building so useful to explicitly state t... |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 11:56 | catgirlseraid | thanks for reaching out, i tagged bank lane as a pedestrian street as it has addresses associated with it, as for the layer=0 tag, layers aren't mean to represent a physical location such as underground or stories in a building, in this case level https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level i... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-16 22:51 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | True I sometimes get layer and level mixed up :) | |
| 161633866 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-01-22 11:24 | 1 | 2025-01-23 08:12 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | Hi, I checked 20 of the deleted ways and they all seem to exist.... Some of them have also been refined by other mappers since the original import. If the creekbed appears dry, that might be because the aerial imagery was caputered in summer, and it would be more appropriate to add intermittent=... |
| 2 | 2025-01-23 08:59 | catgirlseraid | how do you see deleted ways on a map so im able to check for myself? | |
| 3 | 2025-01-23 09:52 | catgirlseraid | as far as i know i only deleted ways that were so far off they weren't worth realigning or retagging since the scope of these changesets is to clean up the import not map drains, although many drains have also had their positions altered if i could see clear evidence as to what drain they belon... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-23 10:14 | catgirlseraid | i dont mind if you choose to revert the deleted objects in this changeset as im not sure i want to continue with the verification of this import, but keep in mind there are multiple changesets and any ways that have been moved should stay moved as their positions have been corrected from the import ... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-23 19:15 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | re. your first question: your changeset is too big to use any of the standard tools, unfortunately the only method I know is manually clicking on the ways listed below this chatbox | |
| 6 | 2025-01-23 19:22 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | re. second and third comments: "weren't worth realigning" is a tricky topic, I also find the validator warnings annoying, but deleting them causes further issues, for example disconnected segments of waterways. https://waterwaymap.org is normally a nice way to visualize this. I q... | |
| 7 | 2025-01-23 22:55 | catgirlseraid | i can go through the area in the first changeset i did and see if i can find any ways to readd if you would like. thanks for replying <3 sorry if i seemed a bit rude at first, it wasnt my intention to cause any vandalism. | |
| 8 | 2025-01-24 09:57 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | no worries, I can check it with an automated script next week, which will be a lot more efficient | |
| 9 | 2025-01-25 13:24 | catgirlseraid | if you're readding deleted ways without manually checking them would you be able to add LINZ:reviewed=no to them please, its what i've been using to keep track of what has been checked, deleting the tag after checking. Thanks, and sorry about the deletions, in hindside i was a bit ambisous... | |
| 161367415 by catgirlseraid @ 2025-01-15 05:51 | 1 | 2025-01-16 05:54 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | You updated Pole Artistry Studio, but that was last updated 9 years ago and the website says it's in Nelson City. I saw it there a few months ago and mapped it there, so probably delete it from Richmond |
| 2 | 2025-01-16 07:00 | catgirlseraid | poi removed, thanks <3 | |
| 154508395 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-07-28 07:31 | 1 | 2024-07-31 08:41 | ❤️🔥 ♦420 | hey, I reviewed a few of your recent edits, everything looks great, nice workif you want to save a huge amount of time when mapping parking spaces, have a look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/9020 There's also a JOSM plugin linked on that page which does the same thing |
| 2 | 2024-07-31 11:40 | catgirlseraid | I've recently started using josm to micromap, i've been trying to switch to it as it seems to be a more powerful editor. I'll start using this plugin when i map more repetitive features such as car parks in the future, ty for the tip. Sorry about the track multipolygon, i wasn't ... | |
| 153617262 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-07-06 10:06 | 1 | 2024-07-06 10:58 | Sunset_Sakura ♦14 | Thanks, I'm trying to map all the sidewalks in Nelson, following the OpenSidewalks schema. Did you survey to update these or not? Because I know some of my notes are for crossings I couldn't see from aerial imagery and I'll be going out sometime in the next couple days to survey the r... |
| 2 | 2024-07-07 10:38 | catgirlseraid | Isurveyed locally then uploaded the changes once i got home, weirdly enough i was already planning to do something similar with mapping all the sidewalks in Nelson, I had already done a small trial section when micromapping nmit. Thanks for the resourses to make sure i'm using the correct tags,... | |
| 153132837 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-06-24 23:01 | 1 | 2024-06-25 06:42 | mcliquid ♦1,941 | Hi and thank you for your contribution!Please note for the future: changesets should be local.To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)• keep changes within the sa... |
| 153136337 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-06-25 03:21 | 1 | 2024-06-25 06:42 | mcliquid ♦1,941 | Hi and thank you for your contribution!Please note for the future: changesets should be local.To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)• keep changes within the sa... |
| 153139203 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-06-25 05:19 | 1 | 2024-06-25 06:42 | mcliquid ♦1,941 | Hi and thank you for your contribution!Please note for the future: changesets should be local.To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)• keep changes within the sa... |
| 153017906 by catgirlseraid @ 2024-06-22 07:13 | 1 | 2024-06-22 07:16 | NeisBot ♦3,233 | Hi catgirlseraid, welcome to OSM!Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not ma... |
| 2 | 2024-06-22 07:23 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,645 | Thank you for your mapped beach.Looks good!#HappyMapping |