10 Changesets created by charmaine_dalisay have been discussed with 5 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
146602568
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2024-01-23 17:50
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay To the person who originally created this way, I am so sorry I did not mean to delete some of the tags you had. I'll do my best to put them back in. Sorry again!
146197080
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2024-01-12 22:03
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoRedEyedVireo
♦21
Hi,

I think you might want to expand the power plant grounds to include the building on the right.

I think the left building has the actual generators and the right one does some kind of processing of the fuel. Or a least that's where all the big dump trucks are being unloaded every time ...
2 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make that change!
3 ~ 2 years agoRedEyedVireo
♦21
Excellent! Thank you.

RedEyedVireo
146189687
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2024-01-12 17:26
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoBaloo Uriza
♦2,397
This should probably be "building=industrial" instead of "landuse=industral" since it's already inside a university, which counts as its own land use.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1461...
144840468
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2023-12-06 18:56
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoezekielf
♦90
Hello. Why did you change this building to an oil power plant? I'm quite sure it's never been one in the nearly 20 years I've lived in the area. Is there some news I'm unaware of?
2 ~ 2 years agoezekielf
♦90
Oh, I see. This must be the gas turbine Burlington Electric uses "as a peaking unit and for emergencies". It generated 0.1% of Burlington's electricity in 2022
https://www.burlingtonelectric.com/our-energy/
https://www.burlingtonelectric.com/our-energy-portfolio/

I've pa...
142840617
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2023-10-19 23:20
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agogurglypipe
♦1,024
Why delete the power plant building? Was that an intentional change, or an accident?
2 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay Oh no Im so sorry that was an accident!
3 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay I can put it back for you if you would like.
4 ~ 2 years agogurglypipe
♦1,024
Thanks for the fast reply! I’ve partially reverted your changes, so the building is restored (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142841180).
142207745
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2023-10-05 21:25
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoMxxCon
♦3,524
Is it considered "landuse=" if it's on the roof?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142207745
2 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay @MxxCon, that's a good point, i'll look into it. what do you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142207745
3 ~ 2 years agoMxxCon
♦3,524
I think it shouldn't be landuse= tag. Each object as appropriate and perhaps with "location=roof"
142208030
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2023-10-05 21:38
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoMxxCon
♦3,524
Hello.
What does this relation indicate?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208030
2 ~ 2 years agocharmaine_dalisay It indicates they are part of the same plant and have the same owner
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208030
3 ~ 2 years agoMxxCon
♦3,524
Same owner can be indicated using operator= tag on both features. That makes it easier to edit in the future. Relations are awkward and clunky to deal with if connected features need to be modified. For simple situations like this I think there's no need to complicate things with relations.
139892345
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2023-08-14 23:29
~ 2 years ago
1 ~ 2 years agoosmapper7
♦10
这个电厂已经被拆除了,现今仅剩下烟囱和部分建筑留作文创用途。
OSM是按现今实际地貌来描绘的,如果要绘画历史地图,请前往 https://www.openhistoricalmap.org
125284177
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2022-08-23 18:20
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agokepivar
♦45
If the well pads have 90 ° angles you shall straighten them by pressing "Q".
124359999
by charmaine_dalisay
@ 2022-08-01 18:35
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agoHerman Lee
♦348
您好,请使用中文作为name名称,谢谢。