| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100190471 by chaubean @ 2021-03-01 09:25 | 1 | 2021-12-05 23:51 | segubi ♦115 | ... and changed the geometry of the street by accident... I'll correct it again. |
| 2 | 2021-12-06 14:49 | mundlk ♦19 | Hey Segubi, Thank you for reviewing our changeset. Apologies for modifying the road. Our editor might have modified it unknowingly. Please feel free to let us know the changes, we will correct the error made. Best Regards,mundlk..PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part... | |
| 97044150 by chaubean @ 2021-01-06 11:18 | 1 | 2021-05-26 14:10 | skyper ♦871 | Hey chaubeanWie Endet der Fahrweg wirklich? Wie sieht das mit Zugangsbestimmungen und ein paar mehr Merkmalen aus?Sind da nicht noch mehr Verbindungen auf dem Gelände?Bitte lese unter anderem mal folgende beide Diskussion durch:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72... |
| 2 | 2021-05-28 13:26 | chaubean | Thanks for the inputs and sharing the forum discussions with us. I have gone through the complete discussion and am totally inlined with the suggestions proposed. The only challenge I foresee is this information is not completely captured in the OSM editing wiki pages. In the past we had a couple of... | |
| 3 | 2021-05-31 12:06 | skyper ♦871 | Hi chaubeanDas Wiki sind auch nur Richtlinien. Viel hilfreicher und einfacher ist eine eigene Wikiseite für das verwendete Taggingschema, wie z.B.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MENTZ_GmbH#ProposalsIm Forum hast Du wohl u.a. `access=permissive` und `service=driveway` für die me... | |
| 4 | 2021-05-31 12:10 | skyper ♦871 | Warum sieht diese Antwort und die auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97040854 immer noch so quasi übereinstimmend aus? | |
| 5 | 2021-06-03 15:03 | chaubean | Hi Skyper, Thanks for your response. If we are clear with the information available, we do add access information. But if we are not sure of the inputs, we don't add access information. The editing philosophy we follow is to only add the information that is clearly visible. In this particul... | |
| 6 | 2021-06-04 12:09 | skyper ♦871 | Salli chaubean`permissive` geht doch schon daraus hervor, dass es sich hier eindeutig um Zufahrten auf privatem Grundstück handelt. Sollte doch aus den angegebenen Quellen ersichtlich sein, sowie jede Menge Detailinformation. Leider finde ich kein Wort zu `service=*` in Deiner Antwort und ich... | |
| 7 | 2021-06-08 07:29 | chaubean | Hi Skyper, I have not added service=* tag as there is no enough resource on the type of entity to provide the detailed tag. I have now added the tag based on your feedback (changeset: 106015570). Also, I See that Maps4BW is useful in identifying the major roads and the type of area with the buildi... | |
| 96048092 by chaubean @ 2020-12-18 07:04 | 1 | 2020-12-18 07:54 | tux67 ♦1,967 | Hi,the mapping here is not consistent with only a few meters marked as oneway.BRtux67 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96048092 |
| 2 | 2020-12-18 11:31 | chaubean | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies for the inconsistency. We do not have the complete evidence to add the directions. Please find the changeset 96066528 for the reversion. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in my future edits. Thanks for the valua... | |
| 95790189 by chaubean @ 2020-12-14 07:34 | 1 | 2020-12-14 07:59 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo chaubean,Du hast diese Zufahrthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853805645/historyvon service auf track heruntergestuft. Das ist definitiv falsch. Eine Zufahrt ist immer mindestens service.Allerdings ist die Zufahrt aus Südwest von Sigmaringendorf ebenfalls falsch als track eingest... |
| 2 | 2020-12-14 13:37 | chaubean | Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have misinterpreted the road classification and added a track road. Please find the changeset #95809040 for the reversion. I do not have enough resources to predict the road classification of the adjoining roads. Please go ahead and make the necessary... | |
| 92387942 by chaubean @ 2020-10-13 05:38 | 1 | 2020-10-13 05:54 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | replaced with better onehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92388617 |
| 2 | 2020-10-13 05:54 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92388617 | |
| 3 | 2020-10-14 02:40 | chaubean | Thanks for checking into our edits. It is good to see the community improvising our edits, I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in my future edits. always happy to learn from the community | |
| 83125578 by chaubean @ 2020-04-06 06:44 | 1 | 2020-07-11 17:44 | aquarix ♦115 | Hello chaubean,you have added a service rouad here but the access from the main road is not possible the way you created it. It's only possible via the new street that has been built at the east side of that industrial area.I've corrected this already. If you have no local knowledge,... |
| 2 | 2020-07-13 09:42 | chaubean | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the imagery and added the road. Thanks for the quick correction. I will make sure to cross verify all the imagery before adding the roads. Once again, thanks for the correction, always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 87125194 by chaubean @ 2020-06-25 08:14 | 1 | 2020-06-25 13:46 | TG-map4 ♦20 | Hello chaubean,you made a mistake. Two tags are missing, namely access=? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) and service=? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice)Not that important, but still relevant is to use service=? (in this case: service=driveway) to spec... |
| 2 | 2020-06-27 09:42 | TG-map4 ♦20 | Hello again,I see that you continue mapping, making the same mistakes again. Please first read my message, do the 2 things i want you to do and stop any further edits until this is done!Kind regards | |
| 3 | 2020-06-27 11:02 | chaubean | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies for the delayed response. I have created a service road and haven't modified the access/highway tags since we don’t have the enough resources to predict the type of building. So, i haven't added any customers/private tags as we are not s... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-27 14:12 | TG-map4 ♦20 | The question I ask myself is: Why do you have a source to map a way but then at the same time have no source to know whether its private or not?---When looking at aerial imagery I can clearly see that this is private property. There is the street, next to the street is the sidewalk. And then it ... | |
| 5 | 2020-06-29 04:56 | chaubean | Thanks for the response. Please find the changeset(87269919) for the suggested modifications. We always thrive to improve the osm data with our best efforts. It is helpful that the community is improvising our edits with the local knowledge. I have forwarded your inputs to our management. Once again... | |
| 78368825 by chaubean @ 2019-12-13 11:13 | 1 | 2019-12-15 22:32 | ndm ♦889 | You have connected the service road to an administrative boundary -- perhaps you could zoom in more next time -- or even better use a filter to avoid changing boundaries if you are only adding service roads.I'll try to fix it. |
| 2 | 2019-12-16 09:21 | chaubean | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into my edit and for making the necessary changes. It was an honest mistake. Will take the suggestion as learning and use for the further edits.Please let me know if any changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,chaubean. |