2 changesets created by coloredstone_import have been discussed with 0 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
37929784
by coloredstone_import
@ 2016-03-18 22:58
12016-03-19 06:28Gogul
♦4
Hi! Why do you delete the bare_rock? For example here: http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/index.html?changeset=37929784&zoom=16&lat=46.51152&lon=13.90266&layers=BTT bare_rock look fine?! Br
22016-03-19 20:12coloredstone
♦10
Deleted tags natural=moor and natural=bare_rock were created by RABA-KGZ import (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slovenia_Landcover_Import_-_RABA-KGZ).

Early imports also include both tags which were later abandoed (see discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2015-Novemb...
31644282
by coloredstone_import
@ 2015-06-01 18:40
12015-06-16 17:55woodpeck
♦2,417
There appears to be a problem with this import, as it imports obejcts that were explicitly not planned to be imported. See "imports" mailing list. Please do not continue the import until this is resolved.
22015-06-18 13:58coloredstone
♦10
The "Slovenia Landcover Import - RABA-KGZ" wiki page has actually not been updated according to the latest decision of the Slovenian group of OSM contributors which has prepared the import. The discussion was quite intensive on the amount of elements to be imported. At the end the decision...
32015-06-18 15:42woodpeck
♦2,417
The import has passed review on the global imports list. If changes have been made later, then the changed proposal needs to be discussed on the imports list, and then the import can be performed. You cannot document one thing and execute another.
42015-06-18 15:59imagico
♦70
Yes, when you want to import additional data please include this on the wiki and open this for further discussion on the imports ML. Those things indicated for import on the wiki seem mostly solid but those imported beyond that have various issues. Getting input from the international community wi...