| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88711540 by contrai1 @ 2020-07-30 06:01 | 1 | 2023-05-20 23:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | As unfortunately is normal with "#MapWithAI" road tracing, what you've traced here is massively offset from reality. Just compare it with OS OpenData Local and the available imagery and you can see the issue. I've nudged it closer to reality.Best Regards,Andy |
| 74167209 by contrai1 @ 2019-09-06 10:23 | 1 | 2021-05-24 11:29 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.From a simple look at aerial imagery it is very clear that most of these 'service roads' you have mapped are clearly footpaths and are therefore not routable by vehicles.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2021-05-25 15:21 | hemasvn ♦17 | Hi Phil,Thanks for looking into our edit. The editor is out of Organization (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Amazon#Previous_users). Hence, Replying on behalf of him. Looks like the editor hasn't considered the road width and misinterpreted the segment to be a... | |
| 89667902 by contrai1 @ 2020-08-20 06:01 | 1 | 2020-08-28 11:45 | q_un_go ♦97 | You can see in the area you have edited a new bypass road (with gps-tracks) which is not shown in the imahery you have used for your edits.The service road you have (re)drawn (before I had deleted it) has been completed renaturated after the opening of the new bypass road in July 2020.using the ... |
| 2 | 2020-08-28 11:48 | q_un_go ♦97 | https://ais.badische-zeitung.de/piece/0b/1c/c2/4b/186434123-h-720.jpghere you can see the dismantling of the old road, which you have drawn using the outdated imagery, | |
| 3 | 2020-08-31 11:52 | skyper ♦871 | @contrai1Would you, please, comment, on this issue. As a payed mapper it is your duty to watch your mailbox and respond to comments about your CS. | |
| 4 | 2020-09-01 12:49 | skyper ♦871 | I wrote a PM-Mail but contrai1 did not react on the first CS-Comment some month ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86433775.I wait one more day for a reaction.Would be happy an answer in German.skyper | |
| 5 | 2020-09-01 13:25 | Nakaner ♦3,153 | Hallo skyper,die Organised Editing Guideline sagt klipp und klar, dass Antworten von organisieten Mappern binnen zwei Arbeitstagen auf demselben Kanal zu erfolgen haben. Da die Frist überschritten ist, kannst du die DWG anrufen und um eine Sperre des Benutzerkontos oder der Organisation bit... | |
| 6 | 2020-09-01 14:41 | skyper ♦871 | Danke für die Infos. Da es nicht nur um eine Person geht, dort aber wenigstens ein wenig Reaktion gezeigt wurde, warte ich noch einen Tag.Bin da eher beim Sperren der Organisation, damit alle angestellten Personen die richtigen Anweisungen erhalten, welche, vor ab, im OSM-Wiki veröffen... | |
| 7 | 2020-09-01 18:41 | Nakaner ♦3,153 | Hallo skyper,die Frage, ob man ggf. Sprachkenntnis voraussetzen sollte, damit die Organisation note=*-Tags, Notes, Änderungssatzkommentare und lokale Presse lesen kann, ist diskutierenswert. Es ist IMHO wirklich eine Diskussion wert, ob wir das vielleicht doch nicht mal in Deutschland einf&... | |
| 8 | 2020-09-01 22:20 | skyper ♦871 | Hey Michael,Ja, werde mich mal im Forum einklinken.Habe bei meiner kleinen Studie entdeckt, dass weder die Seite der Firma, noch die CS, noch die einzelnen User-Seiten mit den Richtlinien übereinstimmen. Eine Zusammenfassung und Erklärung der genauen Änderungen finde ich auch ... | |
| 9 | 2020-09-03 19:20 | skyper ♦871 | Immer noch kein Kommetar. Weder vom Verursachenden noch von den Ebenen darüber.Alle Fragen müssen beantwortet werden, darum gleich die nächste:Warum braucht es so lange für eine offizielle Reaktion?Wo bleiben die Antworten?skyper | |
| 10 | 2020-09-04 03:59 | contrai1 | Apologies for the delay in response. This is a mistake from my end where my mail box had an issue in piping up these messages. I will make sure it will not happen again. We generally use the recent GPS traces (3 month old) to check the availability of roads, but since the road is blocked in July it ... | |
| 11 | 2020-09-04 09:49 | skyper ♦871 | Then, please, tell me why are you writting about ground source for every edit on the wiki?How did you find this "missing" toad?Which sources where used to find the "missing" road?Why did your reviewer not react on the first unanswered comment?skyper | |
| 12 | 2020-09-08 07:08 | contrai1 | Hi Skyper, As mentioned we use recent GPS traces to add the missing roads into OSM based on available OSM resources. Yes, I completely understand the importance of checking the history before making changes to validate the edit. I sincerely apologise for that miss from my end. Our review team perf... | |
| 90217130 by contrai1 @ 2020-09-01 03:09 | 1 | 2020-09-02 10:10 | skyper ♦871 | Ground source missing in CS.How about access restrictions?Angles seem to be drawn carelessly and parallel ways are not parallel.Reviewer? |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 04:07 | contrai1 | Thank you for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-04 11:02 | skyper ♦871 | Why did you not answer my question about access restrictions.No personal word about the carelessly drawn angles.Are you a human? Can you write in your own words?How long will it take?How am I informed about the progress?Please, ask your chef if it is not wise, to stop all mapping a... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-08 02:37 | contrai1 | thanks for the response. apologies for the misaligned geometry. please find the changeset(90553312) for suggested modifications. i have not modified any access tags as there are not enough resources to validate it. going forward, i will be more precise about my changeset comments. Our lead had init... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-08 02:43 | contrai1 | I have also changed the road angles in another changeset and hence I am posting the changeset separately. Please check the following changeset. Changeset: 90553387Thanks for your valuable inputs. | |
| 86433775 by contrai1 @ 2020-06-10 03:33 | 1 | 2020-06-10 14:21 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, in this edit you have created a duplication. You have created way 814425220 which is a duplication of the existing way 84163888, which carries the right of way.Rather than create duplications please update the existing ways.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2020-06-24 16:23 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | 15 days and you have not responded so I will be reverting this edit soon.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2020-09-04 04:14 | contrai1 | Apologies for the delay in response. This is a mistake from my end where my mail box had an issue in piping up these messages. I will make sure it will not happen again. Thanks for the valuable suggestions, going forward,, I will stick to updating the existing ways avoiding the duplication. always h... |