| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87119779 by cvamsi @ 2020-06-25 06:45 | 1 | 2020-06-25 08:18 | DaxServer ♦115 | Hi. Can you please revert all of your "testing" edits? Thanks.To test mapping, you can go to this link http://preview.ideditor.com/master/ and then click on the red colored "live" button at the bottom. After clicking, it will switch to "dev" mode. You can start test... |
| 71276343 by cvamsi @ 2019-06-15 10:21 | 1 | 2019-07-05 15:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648729985 has the same issue previously pointed out at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71162844 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?Best Regards,\... |
| 71162844 by cvamsi @ 2019-06-12 02:48 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What's the evidence that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76235197/history should have a motor_vehicle=yes access tag?I'm familiar with the area, and it was not my impression that it was publically accessible, though of course anyone delivering to addresses down here would be ab... |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 11:11 | cvamsi | Hi,Thank you for providing feedback on the edit. The edit on "motor_vehicle=yes" attribute was made as vehicles were visible near the houses in the satellite imagery. As per community feedback on not to add "motor_vehicle=yes" tag until complete evidence is available, reverti... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 12:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 70915037 by cvamsi @ 2019-06-04 09:16 | 1 | 2019-06-04 12:06 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Please take into account existing data, edits such as this degrade the quality of OSM.If you are adding parking aisles please spend a little more time to at least adjust the adjust the existing car park to match.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 11:16 | cvamsi | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. We have aligned the parking lot area as per your suggestion. Please let us know if there is anything that can improve the edit.Regards,cvamsi. | |
| 71694579 by cvamsi @ 2019-06-28 05:54 | 1 | 2019-06-28 12:44 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | HiPlease ensure that you are using the latest imagery and mapillary. The gaps were closed some time ago.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 11:03 | cvamsi | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. Adding connector here is wrong as per the latest images. we have removed the connection as per your suggestion. Please let me know if there is anything that can improve the edit.Regards,cvamsi. | |
| 70793854 by cvamsi @ 2019-05-31 06:04 | 1 | 2019-06-14 23:11 | OftenResident ♦2 | Aerial photography is out of date. New houses were built here in 2018. |
| 2 | 2019-06-17 02:56 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi, Thanks for looking into the edit. We didn't have an updated imagery when the edit was made. Now we are adding the roads as per the latest aerial image. Thanks again for the review.We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.Regards,yaswap. | |
| 69329441 by cvamsi @ 2019-04-18 04:03 | 1 | 2019-05-23 18:17 | laurent-38 ♦172 | Hi, Thank you for your contribution. However, it would have been nice to move the buildings according to the aerial imagery too, in order to prevent erroneous intersection between ways and buildings…And you need to create a point at the crossing between service ways and footways. (see h... |
| 2 | 2019-05-24 06:58 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor might have turned off the building feature. That is why it got missed. Thanks again for reviewing it. We are updating the edits as per your suggestion. Please let us know if we need to add anything else so that it can improve the edit.Regar... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-25 16:03 | laurent-38 ♦172 | Thank you for the quick fix, it's fine. |