| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91039232 by deepikja @ 2020-09-17 10:17 | 1 | 2024-07-17 08:03 | Russ McD ♦223 | This is certainly not a Private access road. It shows as public in a number of places, plus I rode along most of it last weekend. Perhaps the tag was inadvertently carried over when editing.Anyway, I have changed the tags & left a note. |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:17 | deepikja | Hello, Thank you for reviewing my edit, making the required corrections and providing me the necessary feedback. Upon deep dive, as rightly mentioned by you I have extended the minor unclassified and missed out on modifying the existing access restrictions which were not true to ground reality. ... | |
| 131229055 by deepikja @ 2023-01-13 12:58 | 1 | 2023-01-16 11:51 | skyper ♦871 | Hello deepikja,there is no need to add `oneway=no` as it is the default. As I wrote in CS 129744574 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129744574) you need to be careful with relations and probably use a better editor but you seem to not listen and broke the relation again: https://www.openst... |
| 2 | 2023-01-20 15:51 | deepikja | Hi Skyper,Thank you for sharing the insights on the error created due to the changes made by me. I have updated my team about the right guidelines to follow while making edits w.r.t directions. To ensure that we identify and correct any errors that may have occurred in this task, as suggested by... | |
| 109442088 by deepikja @ 2021-08-10 06:34 | 1 | 2022-02-20 12:00 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo deepikja,wo gibt es Infos zu Deinen Sperrungenwie z.B. hier:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270666285/history?Fragende Grüße |
| 2 | 2022-02-23 10:52 | deepikja | Hi,Thank you for reaching out to us.I have made the edit based on the note added by the community member https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109134121 and confirmed the source of edit from the article https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/pfalz-ticker_artikel,-schock-f%C3%BCr-tausende-pendler-fahrla... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-27 09:37 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo deepikja, es wäre schön, wenn Du an den von Dir gesperrten Straßenabschnitten noch eine Note wue hier ergänzen würdest:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155860714/historyGrüße | |
| 4 | 2022-03-01 07:01 | deepikja | Hi,Thank you for your inputs.I have added the notehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3069047 based on your suggestion. Thankyou,Deepikja | |
| 110809831 by deepikja @ 2021-09-06 15:34 | 1 | 2021-09-07 19:21 | HalloThere! ♦2 | this is not a highway. It is going to be a road to a new school |
| 2 | 2021-09-08 17:31 | deepikja | Hi, Thanks for your comment. Existing roads are incomplete, I have checked our internal imageries (03/2021) and added construction tag to the road. Since you confirmed road exist, we have made it complete. Thanks for the feedback, happy to learn from you. Regards,Deepikja | |
| 107221455 by deepikja @ 2021-06-30 17:41 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:11 | 351293 ♦87 | Reverted with Changeset 107249326. Please read discussions on Changeset 106652698 and Note 2719245.Also, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:constructionThe road you tagged as closed permanently is only closed for a few days-weeks. Thanks to your edit, for example, OsmAnd won... |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 12:52 | deepikja | Hi,Thank you for sharing your inputs. I have made the edit based on the aerial imagery and the connecting segments having access=no. Apologies for the incorrect edit done from my end. Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,Deepikja | |
| 107237306 by deepikja @ 2021-07-01 04:42 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:32 | 351293 ♦87 | As the other changesets i also reverted this one.STOP changing ways, without paying attention to the notes added to them! |
| 105791602 by deepikja @ 2021-06-03 17:00 | 1 | 2021-06-04 08:08 | ironspock ♦39 | Hi deepikja,this part of motorway is in used since 1th of june 2021 as well as other parts of motorway A661 you have (re)set to "construction". |
| 2 | 2021-06-04 10:48 | deepikja | Hi,Thank you for correcting my edit and providing inputs. Going forward I will be careful while making any edit. Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,Deepikja | |
| 102132887 by deepikja @ 2021-04-01 14:26 | 1 | 2021-04-02 09:21 | abrensch ♦674 | Hi deepikja,I reverted your change, because it locked B255 eastbound (due to another glitch at the ther side of this bypass) Please be more carseful.Creating a major bug while correcting a minor glitch does not helpthe project.thanx, Arndt |
| 93539676 by deepikja @ 2020-11-04 11:32 | 1 | 2020-11-04 16:17 | TravGW ♦355 | cover=yes is a better fit than tunnel=building_passage. Building passage is used when going through a building and there are wall on both side. The "building" here is just a roof over the road. Therefore the road is 'covered'. |
| 2 | 2020-11-05 08:50 | deepikja | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies for the delayed responses. I have made modifications as suggested by you. Thankyou for your inputs always happy to learn from the community.RegardsDeepikja | |
| 89966935 by deepikja @ 2020-08-26 10:51 | 1 | 2020-08-28 11:26 | q_un_go ♦97 | The way you have (re)drawn doesn't exit anymore because of the new secondary highway in the east. |
| 2 | 2020-08-28 11:39 | q_un_go ♦97 | You may also note, that there are public gps tracks which cover the new bypass road east of the erased highway, the parallel track and the new roundabouts. All of them are not in the imagery you have used.It should be also clear, that a new bypass road very likely could make a parallel road obsole... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-31 11:54 | skyper ♦871 | @deepikjaWould you, please, comment, on this issue. As a payed mapper it is your duty to watch your mailbox and respond to comments about your CS. | |
| 4 | 2020-08-31 13:01 | deepikja | Hi, Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies for the delayed response. I have modified the road based on the available osm resources. apologies, if it is contradicting with the ground reality. please let me know the required modifications if any. it can be helpful if the community can impro... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-01 12:35 | skyper ♦871 | HiIn this cases, everything seems to be corrected, after your vandalism. But please recheck all your edits in south-west Germany. That is your job, not the one of the community.If you are not 100% sure do not edit but talk to the local community in prior of you edits.No, it is not the ta... | |
| 6 | 2020-09-01 16:09 | deepikja | Hi Thanks for your response. We have been using the latest imagery that is available in the osm to make the changes. I have cross verified my other edits in the region as well. I don't speak German, so I use translator to understand German comments. Please feel free to comment in German.Thank... | |
| 7 | 2020-09-01 22:35 | skyper ♦871 | HiUsing the latest available imagery source is not enough. You need to use more or better sources. I doubt that the imagery is the only source you use.Simply, looking at the OSM-History would have revealed that you are readding outdated data.By the way, where are the required CS tag as d... | |
| 8 | 2020-09-02 06:15 | deepikja | Hi,Thanks again for the inputs. Our team is already looking into this request and soon will be implemented. RegardsDeepikja | |
| 9 | 2020-09-02 10:05 | skyper ♦871 | HiWhat will be implemented? If you do not comply to the rules, stop mapping all of you, right, now. Implement the solution, test and demonstrate it and then you can restart working on OSM-data.You did not answer any question* sources ?* OSM-History?* How do you gonna change your mappin... | |
| 10 | 2020-09-04 12:46 | deepikja | Hi, Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.RegardsDeepikja | |
| 11 | 2020-09-04 13:31 | skyper ♦871 | Many questions were not answered.Some are directly toward you as an individual. | |
| 12 | 2020-09-08 05:35 | deepikja | Hi Skyper, We always edit based on available OSM resources and yes we do check History and validate the edit according to the OSM wiki editing guidelines. My genuine apologies for the miss from my end in this changeset. While editing, we make sure to add quality data into OSM. Hence,All the edits ... | |
| 90294133 by deepikja @ 2020-09-02 09:45 | 1 | 2020-09-02 10:29 | skyper ♦871 | Still no tags about your employer and the task your are doing on the changeset.How do you find the places you are editing on. Is there not at least one source missing?Please, first, solve all issues , instead of simply continuing your work. This counts for all of you not just you as a person... |
| 65991671 by deepikja @ 2019-01-03 14:52 | 1 | 2019-01-03 17:37 | n76 ♦60 | Curious on how you determined that the service road is oneway. That area is not accessible by the general public so it can't be done by survey. And the aerial imagery doesn't seem to indicate a whether it is oneway or bidirectional traffic. |
| 2 | 2019-01-04 11:18 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi n76,Thanks for looking into our edits and reaching out to us. This edit was made because there is a oneway road marking identified at the start of this road in Mapbox Satellite imagery. Based on that evidence we came to a conclusion that this road should be a oneway. Hope this answers your ... |